Describe and analyze the five elements of a contract that must exist for this agreement to be enforceable. Explain why this contract is governed by common law or the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

Elements of a Contract

Suppose that the Fabulous Hotel hires you as head chef under a two-year employment contract. After two years, another hotel wants to hire you. However, in the original employment contract you signed with the Fabulous Hotel, the following paragraph appears:

“The below-signed agrees not to work as a chef for another hotel in the same metropolitan area for a period of two years after leaving our employ.”

Describe and analyze the five elements of a contract that must exist for this agreement to be enforceable.

Explain why this contract is governed by common law or the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

Examine at least two circumstances in which this non-compete agreement would be unenforceable.

Submit a four- to five-page paper (not including title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide and must cite three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook

Summarize the ethical issue(s) and put it/them in context. Examine the company’s mission statement in light of the ethical issues. Make four suggestions for creating a more ethical organizational culture in this organization.

Ethical Culture

Choose one of the following companies and locate at least two different articles having to do with ethical problems regarding that company.

  • Apple
  • Boeing
  • Enron
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Nissan
  • Starbucks
  • Tesla
  • Uber
  • Volkswagen
  • Wells Fargo

Then compose a 500- to 750-word paper (2 to 3 pages) in which you:

Summarize the ethical issue(s) and put it/them in context.

Examine the company’s mission statement in light of the ethical issues.

Make four suggestions for creating a more ethical organizational culture in this organization.

Support your positions with critical analysis. Format all references in proper APA format.

Be sure your paper is well organized and well written, with proper grammar and punctuation.

Write a letter explaining why the reinstatement application is needed and how the you plan to maintain F-1.

Reinstatement Letter

Write a letter explaining why the reinstatement application is needed and how the you plan to maintain F-1.

What values, and whose interests, should International Economic Law promote? Why?

Economic International Law

– The question is ‘What values, and whose interests, should International Economic Law promote? Why?’.

– The word limit is 4000 words including all footnotes. Bibliography is excluded from the word count. The word limit cannot exceed or fall below 10% of the word limit i.e. the word count cannot exceed 4400 or fall below 3600 words.

– The theme font is Arial with the size of 12 throughout the whole essay and bibliography. As for the footnote, it should used with the same font with the size of 10.

– The essay should demonstrate:

1. Knowledge and understanding of the origins, evolution and impact of international economic law and legal institutions; including economic, social,

political and cultural dimensions.

2. Knowledge and detailed understanding of the principles of international economic law by reference to appropriate primary and secondary sources.

3. An ability to analyze the legal structure and implications of specific international economic legal instruments such as investment agreements.

4. An ability to assess international economic law from multiple perspectives; in particular of individuals and organizations; in the public, private, and third

sectors; in relatively poor and relatively rich economic contexts; in times of calm and of crisis; and on local, national, regional and global levels.

-The writer must:

• Draw on specific examples both from the module and from your own independent research.

• Draw on sources both from the module and from your own independent research.

• Work towards the LW632 learning outcomes (see Module Guide) and the KLS assessment criteria (see Moodle).

– All main info of the module as well as the assessment will be covered in the files attached.

– However, the files do not include all of additional readings of the module that may be relevant to the project. The writer may contact me personally either through the chat or my email for the sources of particular topic of the module. Providing all of them at once may be too confusing for the writer.

What constitutes consent is the second element. And you need to be able to express and write what is a valid consent ? Or how does invalid consent look like? And the third part of the question is being able to tell how consent can be given in an online environment? What can constitute as a valid consent or an indication of valid consent in an online environment?

Information Commissioner’s Office

Question has actually consists of three questions, So it asks three different things from you.

1- Which is the elements of consent. ( Which the Information Commissioner’s Office says anyway.) So the what Information Commissioner’s Office says, is just kind of an opening remark, go to the question critically discussed the importance of consent, you need to this is the first part of the question, but it doesn’t have you don’t have to start with it. But this is a part one of the three parts. But you need to be careful here. Because the importance of consent, or let’s say, to be able to express why consent is important might not be easy. I am asking a very important philosophical debate in the literature in this part of question. Why the literature think consent is important. that’s the first thing.

2- What constitutes consent is the second element. And you need to be able to express and write what is a valid consent ? Or how does invalid consent look like?

3-And the third part of the question is being able to tell how consent can be given in an online environment? What can constitute as a valid consent or an indication of valid consent in an online environment? And equally, what types of activities cannot be? How consent can be given in an online environment? (You need to read and do more research to answer this part please. The first part could be more involved with the scholarly debates rather than the act. Because it’s the about the importance of consent. probably when you look at the GDPR. It doesn’t say why consent is important. It might give you an idea, you might well give reference to the GDPR while describing why consent is important, but you can’t find kind of a sentence, why consent is important in act it is not possible, but you will find fruitful discussion in the literature in the debate. When I say referencing to EU law, I am not only talking about the GDPR. But also some European data protection boards are working part directives, opinions,

So just approach the question and approach the references holistically. There might be many elements, the GDPR itself, the opinions of the working party directors, or European Data Protection Board opinions on consent and other things. And there are actually two consent opinions in a way. And also literature, there are many, many things.

So you should be able to answer all the three parts correctly by referencing the EU law. But the depth or the context in which you give reference might be diverse.

Briefly identify the key differences between formal and substantive versions of the rule of law. Provide an outline or plan of how you think the question should be addressed if presenting it in an essay.

Rule of Law

This assessment is made up of two parts / components and you MUST COMPLETE BOTH

The basis of the assessment:

During a ‘Black Lives Matter’ protest in Bristol in 2020, four individuals were charged with criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 for toppling the statue of Edward Colston and throwing it into the Bristol harbour. At the trial, the four’s defence lawyer argued that the statue was so indecent and potentially abusive that it constituted a crime by its very presence. Colston was linked to the slave trade. On the 5th January 2022, a jury acquitted the four of criminal damage. Yet there was no denying that they had taken the action of toppling the statue and throwing it into the harbour.

Bearing the above in mind, address the following question under the TWO PARTS BELOW:

How might one assess this outcome from the perspective of the rule of law? Use at least two definitions of the rule of law that we have looked at in the module in answering the question.

In order to do this, you need to do the following:

 

Part 1 (up to 500 words):

  • Briefly identify the key differences between formal and substantive versions of the rule of law.
  • Provide an outline or plan of how you think the question should be addressed if presenting it in an essay.

Note that Part 1 is also the task set you as a formative assessment and you are permitted to use what you did for your formative assessment, using our feedback to revise and improve it, and submit that revised work as Part 1 for this assessment by simply cutting and pasting it into what you submit.

To help you, look at the judge’s direction to the jury in R v Milo Ponsford, Sage Willoughby, Rhian Graham & Jake Skuse at https://legalhackette.com/2022/01/09/r-v-milo-ponsford-sage-willoughby-rhian-graham-jake-skuse/

This is a kind of mind mapping/planning exercise aimed at trying to get you to focus on what is necessary in order to address the task rather than ending up waffling. To this this you need to think such things as the nature of the task and how it fits within what you have learnt/are learning.

Part 2 (up to 1500 words): Address the question in essay form, applying appropriate legal academic writing skills such as providing an introduction, main body and conclusion, supporting your answer with law or legal commentary, ensuring there is no plagiarism and providing proper referencing using the OSCOLA referencing style. Make use of what you have done in Part 1 (and given feedback on as your formative assessment) to help you ensure your essay is relevant, well planned, well-structured and, above all, answers the question.

Explain and critically analyse the right to health, considering in particular the implications of this right for access to vaccination against Covid-19 in low-income countries and taking into account the issues raised by this quotation.

Universal Affordable Vaccination against Coronavirus Disease

UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, “Statement on Universal Affordable Vaccination against Coronavirus Disease COVID-19, International Cooperation and Intellectual Property” (2021) 10 International Human Rights Law Review 180, para 1

Explain and critically analyse the right to health, considering in particular the implications of this right for access to vaccination against Covid-19 in low-income countries and taking into account the issues raised by this quotation.

How did the material on a Homeland Security issue affect you? Did your learning about the material on a Homeland Security issue change your mind about something?

Reflection Paper 6

The goal of this paper for you to write your opinion on a Homeland Security issue that we did not previously cover in this course without using first or second person. This paper is your opinion, and as such, it is your job to express your thoughts in a manner that is comprehensible and clear for any and all readers.

How did the material on a Homeland Security issue affect you?
Did your learning about the material on a Homeland Security issue change your mind about something? If so, how.
Has the material on a Homeland Security issue left you with any questions? If so, what are they.
Were there any unaddressed critical issues not covered by the material on a Homeland Security issue?
How will the material on a Homeland Security issue impact your future in Homeland Security?

What is your ethical obligation? Should you pay $1.99 to download an episode of Big Bang Theory from iTunes or take it for free from an illegal site? What is your Life Principle?

Pick ONE of the following questions to answer for your initial discussion post.

1) Virtually any television show, movie, or song can be downloaded for free on the internet. Most of this material is copyrighted and was very expensive to produce. Most of it is also available for a fee through such legitimate sites as iTunes. What is your ethical obligation? Should you pay $1.99 to download an episode of Big Bang Theory from iTunes or take it for free from an illegal site? What is your Life Principle?

 

2) Music stars Beyoncé and Jay-Z named their newborn daughter Blue Ivy and then rushed to trademark the name, because they planned to use it in commerce. Their application was partially denied because a wedding planner in Massachusetts was already using “Blue Ivy” as the name of her business. Is this the correct outcome? Should people have priority in protecting personal names? Should a small business have priority over what would surely have been a much larger, more profitable use of this name?

How did the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues affect you? Did your learning about the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues change your mind about something?

Reflection Paper 5

The goal of this paper for you to write your opinion on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues without using first or second person. In this paper, you get the opportunity to write your point of view on the material reviewed during the week.

How did the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues affect you?
Did your learning about the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues change your mind about something? If so, how.
Has the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues left you with any questions? If so, what are they.
Were there any unaddressed critical issues not covered by the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues?
How will the material on Homeland Security Legal and Ethical Issues impact your future in Homeland Security?