Critically analyse this statement. Does this reflect the current state of the law on incompletely constituted transfers? Should it?
Trusts Law
Assignment detail:
Answer both parts which are equally weighted.
1. “An intention (even a fervent desire) to give, no matter how clearly expressed and repeated, is not enough; the donor must also do everything ‘necessary to be done’ as stated in Milroy y Lord and applied by the Court of Appeal in Re Rose” P. Luxton ‘In search of perfection: the Re Rose Rule rationale’ [2012] Cony 70, 74-5
Critically analyse this statement. Does this reflect the current state of the law on incompletely constituted transfers? Should it?