Discuss the differences between a public and a private limited company when it comes to selling shares. Explain what rights are attached to the ownership of shares when becoming a shareholder. Elaborate on the procedure that must be followed for distribution of dividends

/in /by

Business Law

Answer the following questions in detail. Give definitions of the key terms with in-text references in Harvard style.

Ques 1) In relation to company law:
a) Discuss the differences between a public and a private limited company when it comes to
selling shares (10 marks)
b) Explain what rights are attached to the ownership of shares when becoming a shareholder
(10 marks)
c) Elaborate on the procedure that must be followed for distribution of dividends (5 marks)

 

Ques 2) With respect to Employment Law and termination of employment:
a) Discuss how a contract of employment may be terminated. (15 marks)
b) Explain the difference between wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal. (10 marks)

What it does? Who is the sponsor? What’s the purpose of the bill? What are the bill’s main points? How does the bill work to solve the issue?

/in /by

Bill summary

For brief summary of a bill: 1. What it does? 2. Who is the sponsor? 3. What’s the purpose of the bill? 4. What are the bill’s main points? 5. How does the bill work to solve the issue?

How is the purpose realised through current regulation and application of the law? What, or what needs, justifies a victim’s involvement in the criminal proceedings? And what does participation mean, both for the individual and for the outcome of the process?

/in /by

Victims as Plaintiff in criminal procedural law

Background

It is the third year in a row that I submit an application and project description to the department. This year, too, the project is characterized by a victim perspective based on weight-imological research. Over the past year, however, the main focus has shifted from the overall and broader umbrella term[1] of victims [2] to the subcategory, and the procedural figure,  plaintiff[3]. The primary procedural focus of the project is based, in short, on the following. It is relevant to investigate and update the state of knowledge around the concept of plaintiffs. The latest investigation is nearly 50 years old and focused primarily on plaintiff status in prosecutions and trials. A broader study has so far not been carried out in the doctrine of jurisprudence to any great extent. At the same time, the victim perspective has been given an increasing importance in the criminal policy discussion, in the field of behavioural science as well as in both national and international law.  However, comments have also been made on the costs incurred by the rights of the plaintiff in the proceedings, which has also led to legislative changes in this area. The project is not only socially relevant, but also original in that part a broader and more in-depth approach is intended to be taken regarding the purpose, effectiveness and real meaning and function of the plaintiff institute for victims.

Overview

The research project is based on the treatment of the procedural path to victim status. Central to the project is therefore the definition of the plaintiff by the Code of Procedure (RB), which can be found in Chapter 20. Section 8, 4 pcs. The overall aim is to analyse the effectiveness of the plaintiff figure and its raison d’être. In order to do this, it is necessary to examine at least the following issues.

 

  1. What is the purpose of the plaintiff figure?
  2. Has the purpose of regulation changed over time and in line with the development of the right of plaintiffs and the concept of victims of crime?
  • How is the purpose realised through current regulation and application of the law?
  1. What are the other norms regarding victims of crime in criminal, compensation and social legislation, but also in European law?
  2. What, or what needs, justifies a victim’s involvement in the criminal proceedings? And what does participation mean, both for the individual and for the outcome of the process?

[1] Prior to previous years’ application, professors Anna Kaldal, Claes Lernestedt and Mårten Schultz have been told and committed to acting as supervisors and making comments. Ahead of this year’s application, Anna Kaldal has commented on the application.

[2] “Victims of crime” is a difficult-to-define umbrella concept, the material content of which is largely determined, defined, by legal regulation (and application). Contributing to the construction of the ‘victim’ is, in particular, criminal, procedural and compensation regulation. There are also elements, for example, in social and preventive legislation.

[3] 2020 project description submitted as an annex to the application.

Investigate the legal implications and practicalities for the UK becoming an EU member state again or to reach a status like EEA standards or a close relation like in the Benelux agreement.

/in /by

legal implications and practicalities for the UK becoming an EU member.

The UK and the EU member states face significant issues as no refined trade agreements had been set up before the UK left the European Union. In fact, it is now important to know if trade agreements with important EU member state trade partners can be done despite the legal implications. Additionally, it should be explored which legal implications and practicalities for the UK becoming an EU member state again really are.

Did he (Calvin) have the mental capacity to enter into the contract when he agreed to let Billy sell the penny? What would he (Calvin) have to prove to show a court that he did not have the necessary mental capacity when he authorized Billy to sell the penny?

/in /by

Unit 4 Case Study

Calvin had been an avid coin collector for many years, and the most valuable coin in his collection was an uncirculated, mint condition, 1943 Lincoln penny made of copper (most pennies made during World War II were made of zinc because copper was needed in the war effort). That penny had a value of between $60,000 and $95,000.
In August of 2017, Calvin had a serious stroke that left him unable to speak or walk, but his doctor assured his family that Calvin would recover over time with intensive therapy.
Calvin was a widower and did not have any children, but he had several nephews who visited him from time to time as he recovered. None of the nephews had any real interest in Calvin’s coin collection. One of Calvin’s nephews, Billy, who visited Calvin more often than the other nephews, sometimes listened to Calvin talk (talking was a part of Calvin’s therapy) about his mounting medical bills and his coin collection, but Billy never showed much interest in the medical bills or the coin collection.
In October, as Calvin’s recovery progressed slowly, Billy visited Calvin and told Calvin that he had been reading about coin collecting, and he realized that Calvin’s collection, especially the 1943 Lincoln copper penny, was valuable, and Billy suggested that Calvin should consider selling the 1943 Lincoln copper penny and use the proceeds to pay his medical bills. Calvin resisted the idea at first, but Billy continued to urge Calvin to sell the penny so that he would not have to worry about the medical bills. Finally, when Billy told Calvin that he would arrange the sale of the penny for a commission of just 5% of the sale price of the penny, Calvin began to think that selling the coin might be a good idea. He was still a little confused about how the sale would work and what Billy would do to make sure that the penny would be sold for the best price. Calvin told Billy that he thought that the penny was worth almost $100,000, but Billy assured Calvin that the market had changed recently, and that the penny was now worth $40,000 to $45,000. Eventually, Calvin allowed Billy to sell the penny for the best price he could get and to take a 5% commission for arranging the sale of the penny. Billy then sold the penny to a friend for $40,000, took his 5% commission, and paid the remainder of the sale price to Calvin.
A few months later, as Calvin continued to recover, he read a story in a coin collecting magazine about how an uncirculated, mint condition, 1943 Lincoln penny made of copper had just sold at auction for more than $100,000, and Calvin began to wonder if Billy had taken advantage of him. Calvin consulted a lawyer and asked the two questions below.
Did he (Calvin) have the mental capacity to enter into the contract when he agreed to let Billy sell the penny? What would he (Calvin) have to prove to show a court that he did not have the necessary mental capacity when he authorized Billy to sell the penny?
Did Billy exert undue influence over Calvin to cause Calvin to enter into the contract that allowed Billy to sell the penny?
What do you think? Does Calvin have a case to set aside the contract with Billy on either of these theories?
Your case study should be at least two pages in length and include at least two outside sources. Be sure to use APA formatting for all citations and references.

What it does? Who is the sponsor? What’s the purpose of the bill? What are the bill’s main points? How does the bill work to solve the issue?

/in /by

Bill summary

For brief summary of a bill: 1. What it does? 2. Who is the sponsor? 3. What’s the purpose of the bill? 4. What are the bill’s main points? 5. How does the bill work to solve the issue?

Explain 2 similarities and 2 differences between the Hindu and Confucian Legal Traditions.

/in /by

Hindu and Confucian Legal traditions.

Explain 2 similarities and 2 differences between the Hindu and Confucian Legal Traditions. 400 words with at least 1 scholarly citation from 1 scholarly source in addition to the textbook/course material in Bluebook format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly source cited in Bluebook format. When appropriate, acceptable sources include the textbook and the Bible. However, each discussion thread must include a citation to a source in addition to/other than the textbook and the Bible.

Discuss the possible defenses that could be reasonably asserted by the doctor to each claim, and why that defense might apply.

/in /by

4-3 case study

This assignment gives you an opportunity to consider the facts of a case potentially involving claims of negligence. You will have the opportunity to analyze the possible claims, as well as the potential defenses to any claim presented by the plaintiff. The facts of the case are described below.

Following an automobile accident, a 46-year-old man was brought to the hospital emergency department by an ambulance. The patient seemed to be alert, was able to answer questions, and claimed to be suffering from a great deal of pain. The physician administered 15 milligrams of morphine intravenously. The patient needed blood but refused a transfusion. After being observed in the emergency department for several hours, the patient was placed on a medical-surgical unit for observation. The following morning, he was unresponsive, and he was eventually pronounced dead. It was later discovered that he had a long history of drug and alcohol abuse. The night of the accident, he had injected heroin and drank several shots of tequila and multiple cans of beer. He had not disclosed any of this to the doctors or nurses treating him. Several years later, his estate sued the physician, claiming medical malpractice.

Analyze the possible outcomes of the lawsuit under one of the following scenarios:

If death was the result of overdose
If death was the result of failure to administer blood
If death was the result of subdural hematoma
In your short paper, analyze the potential success of a claim for negligence under one of the three possible scenarios. Include a detailed discussion of each element of the negligence claim and why that element is met or not met. Discuss the possible defenses that could be reasonably asserted by the doctor to each claim, and why that defense might apply. Lastly, include a paragraph describing which, if any, claim you believe might be the most successful against the doctor and why.

Do people have expectation of privacy in a public setting? Is a university dorm room a public or private setting? Explain your view.

/in /by

Discussion

This is a discussion post, no need to be a formal APA paper.

Read the news summary below. A link to a more detailed overview follows if you feel you need additional information.

A Rutgers University freshman, named Tyler Clementi, committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington Bridge after his roommate, Dharun Ravi, secretly broadcast (via a spycam) Clementi kissing a date he had brought back to the dorm. Ravi was convicted of bias intimidation and violation of privacy in New Jersey; Ravi received a 30-day jail sentence and three years of probation.

Broadcasting video images can be considered “speech” as we understand it today. Commentators characterized the broadcast of live video as hate speech as it conveyed homophobic ridicule of Clementi.

Link to article:

As your main post, address the following scenario-based questions:

Should behavior, such as Ravi’s, be punished, whether by the University or the state government?

How would define free speech? Is Ravi’s behavior ethically defensible as an exercise of free speech?

Do people have expectation of privacy in a public setting? Is a university dorm room a public or private setting? Explain your view.

Provide case Law from florida, as many as possible . Compare, contrast and distinguish. Answer should be solely based on the Law.

/in /by

Provide case Law from florida, as many as possible . Compare, contrast and distinguish. Answer should be solely based on the Law. The focus is emergency theory.

Use these headings and answer
1. Heading
2. Question Presented
3. Brief Answer
4. Fact Statement
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion (when appropriate)

The function of the Heading is to identify the requesting attorney, the writer, the date, the client, and the particular legal matter.
The Question Presented identifies the question(s) you have been asked to analyze. It allows your reader to confirm that you have understood the question(s). It also might remind a busy reader of the question(s) he or she asked you to analyze.
The Brief Answer provides your answer quickly and up front. The reader then can decide how much attention to invest in the explanation that follows.
This section sets out the facts on which your answer is based. You probably obtained the facts from your reader (the requesting attorney) in the first place, but your memo must repeat them. Your reader will want to be sure you have not misunderstood any important facts. Also, your reader, who has been busy working on other cases, might need a review of the facts, and other attorneys working on this case or future cases might need access to your analysis. Finally, reading your fact statement in conjunction with your legal analysis could cause your reader to realize that she has neglected to give you a critical fact.
As the writer, you have an interest in reciting the facts as well. Your legal analysis will be based on the facts as you understand them. If the facts were to change, the result might change. If you memorialize the facts you have been given — the facts on which your answer is based — you ensure that your work will be evaluated with reference to those facts. No future reader will think you had access to other, different facts and therefore expect you to have reached a different answer.
The Discussion section explains to your reader the analysis that led to your answer .

Conclusion