– Discuss and analyze that movement, and deconstruct the arguments for and against.
– You will need to present your understanding of what “defund the police” means, what the arguments are within that movement, and then using RESEARCH, argue for or against some of those arguments.
‘The mediator does not make a judgement about the quality of the settlement. Success in mediation is a settlement that the parties can live with. The outcome of mediation is not about just settlement, it is just about settlement.’
Hazel Genn. 2008. Judging Civil Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.117
Describe your understanding of the ‘law based’ critiques of mediation set out by Genn and others, and explain the extent to which you agree with them
Explain the concept of an overriding interest and describe the three main categories within Land Registration Act 2002, Schedule3. Explain whether you think that overriding interests should these be abolished on the basis that they contravene the ‘mirror principle’ of land registration.
Explain the Impact of Financial Fair Play Rules on European football clubs under competition law.
Explain the Effectiveness of Legislation and the importance of Gender Neutral Legislation in a Patriachal system.
Rewrite part of a judgment on migration, law and policy
Written piece of work in the form of part of a judgment which seeks to provide an alternate perspective of a prominent decision in the area of migration law and policy (word limit: 2,500 words).
Choose ONE of the following cases for your coursework:
OR
EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 64
The following criteria will be used in evaluating this assessment:
Subject knowledge and understanding. The ability to:
Identify the appropriate subject area and legislation.
Grasp the key legal issues relevant to the case chosen.
Be aware of supporting case law and documents.
Appreciate what is relevant material and what is not.
Explain the facts, point(s) of law, reasoning and decision for the outcome.
Analysis and evaluation. The ability to:
Work out what is important in deciding the outcome of a case, and what is unimportant.
Apply your knowledge to the facts of the case chosen.
Bring together, explain and apply relevant information and materials from a variety of sources.
Provide strong legal reasoning for your decision/outcome.
Provide evaluation of the decision/outcome.
Communication and Literacy. The ability to:
Use language, tone and terminology appropriate to the assignment, thereby demonstrating understanding of the difference in style and tone between an essay and a judgment.
Present information or argument clearly, concisely and comprehensively.
Apply the law clearly, concisely and comprehensively.
Understand and use legal terminology correctly.
Use correct grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Observe the word count.
Research and Organisation. The ability to:
Adopt a logical and structured approach to:
(a) the information gathering process, and
(b) the use of information compiled as a result of this process.
Identify relevant primary sources and other supporting documentation relevant to the topic and chosen case.
Apply these sources and authorities appropriately to the topic area.
Underpin reasoning by reference to appropriate authorities.
Formative feedback and support will be provided through the coursework prearation lecture, and during coursework preparation wokrshops in January, and drop-in sessions in early March.
Further information about this assessment is available on the Blackboard site for this module and includes:
Is this an accurate reflection of the current state of law? Should it be?
What role did academic scholars play in the development international investment law?
•What was the significance of the Calvo Doctrine?
•What is the meaning of gun-board diplomacy?
•What is the Hull Formula?
•ITO and GATT: separated at birth. Explain. •What are FNC treaties?
•Explain the significance of the new York convention 1958
•Explain the significance of the ICSID Convention
•Explain the significance and limitation of Bilateral Investment Treaties.
•Ad hoc arbitration
Critically examine the adequacy of the existing legal framework applicable to the agency and protection of marginalised groups
and persons in the event of disasters.
Critically examine the Islamic legal issues related to cryptocurrencies.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.