Could an arbitral award rendered by A1 systems be recognised or enforced?

/in /by

Could an arbitral award rendered by A1 systems be recognised or enforced?

Discuss the limitation on ownership rights that you chose, demonstrating your understanding of the limitation.

/in /by

1. Choose one limitation on (Unites States) Real Estate ownership rights to research more in depth. These could include:

Zoning ordinance
Condo association bylaws
Easement
Police power
Eminent domain
Taxation

2. Discuss the limitation on ownership rights that you chose, demonstrating your understanding of the limitation.

3. Then, find an article online that discusses a real-world example of an owner’s property rights being restricted by the restriction that you chose, and discuss what happened while incorporating the principles of the reservation of rights you chose. The article should show a practical application of the limitation on ownership rights that you gave an overview.

Short papers should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to the APA citation method. Page-length requirements: 2 pages

Explain your reasoning using the definitions and principles of contract provided in Lessons, required readings and any other research you do.

/in /by

YOU BE THE JUDGE.

DECIDE WHO GETS THE CAR. PREPARE YOUR DISCUSSION ESSAY USING THE ABOVE FACTS, DISCUSSING THE FOLLOWING:

What are issues you see here?
Applying the principles of contract law, who gets the car, if anyone, and for how much? Explain your reasoning using the definitions and principles of contract provided in Lessons, required readings and any other research you do.
What is the situation if Ted (or Dave…. or ? …..whoever) accepts Townerbucks’ offer and the car doesn’t start? Does “As Is” still apply?

Address what Dworkin says, or would say, in reply to the defenders of Hart who say that Hart’s theory can absorb his criticisms.

/in /by

It is certainly relevant to describe Hart’s theory.
On the subject of structure, you need to:
i) Describe Hart’s theory
ii) Describe Dworkin’s theory
iii) Address the question of the extent to which Dworkin’s theory really undermines Hart’s (this is relevant to the part of the question that asks whether Dworkin’s theory provides ‘a genuine alternative to positivism’). Many defenders of Hart claim that Hart’s theory can, so to speak, absorb Dworkin’s criticisms without being undermined. (What this really comes down to is that defenders of Hart say that principles can be incorporated in a system of primary and secondary rules with a rule of recognition. Dworkin, however, claims that principles can’t be so incorporated.)

iv) Address what Dworkin says, or would say, in reply to the defenders of Hart who say that Hart’s theory can absorb his criticisms. This is where the arguments of the Model of Rules II become relevant.

In performing these tasks you may find especially helpful – in addition to Hart’s and Dworkin’s own writings – the essay by Shapiro called ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: a Short Guide for the Perplexed’. This gives a useful overview of the debate.The most impressive thing you could do, in a way, would be to disagree with some aspect of Shapiro’s account of the debate.

Critically analyse the following statement:The rights afforded to minority shareholders under the Companies Act are very limited, and often shareholders use other ways to protect their interests.

/in /by

Critically analyse the following statement:The rights afforded to minority shareholders under the Companies Act are very limited, and often shareholders use other ways to protect their interests. But more minority shareholder protection is not necessarily a better solution. Company law must balance between different interests so that not a “maximum”, but an “optimum” level of shareholder protection can be found.

Provide an ethical argument for one or two possible solutions you feel would be possible to resolve the issues around this problem surrounding social media

/in /by

Rubric: Your topic will be Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (and any law or precedent you feel relevant/associated with section 230). First, you will present a brief explanation of this law and its intended purposes and scope when written. Second, you will present the unintended consequences that have manifested from this law in recent years (primarily focusing on the ambiguity social media platforms have regarding censorship/”deplatforming” practices i.e. their liabilities/obligations as platforms or publishers and how they have chosen to act). *A possible example being the recent removal of President Trump from Twitter which then gave the Ugandan and other autocratic governments reason to ban social media proceeding important domestic events* You will then present a possible solution to this problem based on legal president. If no such precedent exists at this time, you will state so as part of the problem. Finally provide an ethical argument for one or two possible solutions you feel would be possible to resolve the issues around this problem surrounding social media to ensure a fair and safe environment conducive or a stable society.

*Note: The nature of this debate has sparked controversy over if is a First Amendment issue in public debate. Briefly speak on the validity (or lack there of) of these claims.
*You will need at least 3 credible sources for your explanation and reasoning however, more are encouraged

Analyze the political and legal strategies used against segregation.

/in /by

Analyze the political and legal strategies used against segregation. Include a discussion of conditions under segregation in the early twentieth century and the ruling Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) as well as the Supreme Court decisions and reasoning that led to Brown v. Board of Education (1954). How were tactics such as grandfather clauses, white primaries, literacy tests, poll taxes, and racial gerrymandering used to deny voting rights to minority groups, despite the Fourteenth Amendment? What measures abolished these types of laws?

Your essay should be at least 500 words in length (2 pages, double-spaced), using 12-point font, and in proper APA format. You should use a minimum of two sources, one of which may be the textbook. Include a references list of your sources at the end of your essay.

Compare your understanding of the state court structure in your home state after reading/reviewing the above learning materials

/in /by

Your participation in the discussion forum, including:
A clear, specific, and detailed response to the initial question(s) below
Step 1: Read/Review the following instructional materials:

Review Webpage:

Read (attached): “Federal Habeas Corpus: A Brief Legal Overview”: Congressional Research Service Report for The Library of Congress (2006), pages 1-10 required

View Video:

View Video: Court Shorts:

Review Webpage:

Find the Specific Structure of NEW JERSEY State Courts by reviewing the Website:

Browse NEW JERSEY State Court Website (50 States covered):

Step 2: Create an original post answering the following questions:
1. Compare your understanding of the federal and state court structure after reading/reviewing the above learning materials. Which materials did you find most helpful and why?
2. What is your impression, now having reviewed the materials, of the merit (if any) in having federal judges appointed rather than elected?
3. What do you believe is the merit (if any) in having the election of state court judges?
4. Compare your understanding of the state court structure in your home state after reading/reviewing the above learning materials. Are there specific courts for family/domestic relations cases? Probate (Estate) cases? Juvenile cases?
5. Any other thoughts/takeaways from the materials that you reviewed?

Discuss this statement and critically evaluate whether any reforms are needed, with reference to at least two sources of the Constitution.

/in /by

“Recent events in British politics have stretched the capacity of our constitutional norms to their limits.” (M Russell, ‘Boris Johnson has shown why Britain’s constitution must be reformed’ (The Guardian 6 Sep 19) accessed 16 November 2020)

Discuss this statement and critically evaluate whether any reforms are needed, with reference to at least two sources of the Constitution.

DISCUSS THE STATEMENT IN THE QUESTION:
“Recent events in British politics have stretched the capacity of our constitutional norms to their limits.”
(so basically, argue for and against the British Constitution as it is NOW)
AS ONE PARAGRAPH
AND THEN CRITICALLY EVALUATE WHETHER REFORMS ARE NEEDED BASED ON THE STATEMENT. FOR AND AGAINST REFORMS BEING NEEDED.
WHY THEY ARE AND ARE NOT NEEDED IN REGARD TO RECENT EVENTS (e.g. Brexit, Covid-19, etc.) AND THE STATEMENT IN THE QUESTION – WITH REFERENCE TO AT LEAST TWO SOURCES OF UK CONSTITUTION (THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS)
SO, THE TWO SOURCES OF UK CONSTITUTION WILL BE THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS. TALK FOR AND AGAINST THE DIFFERENT REFORMS THAT COULD BE APPLIED TO THEM.

Bibliography:
Your bibliography should be divided into primary and secondary sources.
These should then be further sub-divided into cases and legislation, books, journal articles, official reports etc. PLEASE USE LEGISLATION, BOOKS, JOURNAL ARTICLES, CASE LAW. More so than websites.

Please follow the file ‘CAAL prep updated 2’ as a guide on how to structure this essay. This is important

Advise the parties of the admissibility of the evidence and any relevant procedures.

/in /by

The essay is not a typical essay it is problem question so therefore requires the IRAC rule. Identify the issue, then the legal rule be it case law or statute, then conclude.

the answer needs to be 2000 words

question:

Answer the question below
Duncan is charged with inflicting grievous bodily harm on Vernon and he pleads not guilty. The vicious attack occurred on December 14th at approximately 1.30am as Vernon was returning home following an evening spent drinking with his friends in the local bars. As he walked through Wyvern Park on his way home Vernon says he heard footsteps behind him and then all of a sudden someone punched him to the face, ribs and stomach, and immediately fled. It all happened in a matter of seconds recounts Vernon, but he says he was able to grab his attacker briefly and believes that he heard something fall to the floor in the tussle; something that made a hard, metallic sound. The police found a key on the path near to where the attack took place, which was subsequently proven to be a key to Duncan’s house.

At the scene Vernon gave the police a visual description of his attacker, whom he described as being approx. 6-foot-tall, with thinning dark brown or black hair and short facial hair/stubble beard. As part of the investigation, two weeks later Vernon was asked to try to make a visual identification from police photographs. After being shown a set of 6 police photographs, Vernon immediately picked out Duncan. The police arranged a video procedure for Vernon 10 days later and again he picked out Duncan. Duncan (5 foot 2 inches) complains that he was the only person that had black hair, the others all having light brown or blonde hair, and he was one of only two people that had facial hair at all.
At the police station, Duncan said that he did not need a solicitor. He denied the attack, saying that he was home alone. Subsequently, during lengthy police questioning, Duncan was refused food and water as the station kitchen was undergoing refurbishment. On being taken back in for questioning following a 15-minute break, the police forgot to record the interview. When the recording was recommenced Duncan confessed to the attack on Vernon. Now Duncan claims that he confessed only after the police threatened to arrest his 15-year-old niece, Sally, on fabricated drugs charges.
Duncan suffers from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and is concerned about being able to follow the trial proceedings and answering questions in court. Consequently, at trial he does not want to testify.
Advise the parties of the admissibility of the evidence and any relevant procedures.