Explain on Bolam rules and patient prudent test (definition), shifting from medical paternalism towards patient autonomy increase litigation.

/in /by

Need to have Introduction, Background, Fact, Legal Development, Legal Issue and Conclusion. Based on the guidance given.

In the introduction part, I need to state clearly whether I agree or not with the judgement and explain the brief reason.

Need to include Bolam test, Bolitho, Montgomery, reasonable medical body opinion, patient prudent test, informed consent, the increment of litigation, defensive medicine, therapeutic exception, etc. It does help, to discuss HRA ACt 1998, EHCR, Mental Capacity Act 2005 and GMC Guideline on COnsent 2008.

3500 words, including footnotes.

Please do write simple and clear.

This case commentary need to discuss all the legal development and journal of medical law review prior to Montgomery case.

You also need to explain on Bolam rules and patient prudent test (definition), shifting from medical paternalism towards patient autonomy increase litigation.

Structure
Part of legal issue is actually comment about the case. It is appreciated if there will be subheading to discuss each topic, for example :

1. Which one is the best? Bolam test or patient prudent test?
The judgement in Montgomery…..

2. Legally informed consent
The judgement in Montgomery case…
However,…

3. Therapeutic exception

Describe and explain important aspects of the Law of England and Wales relating to contracts, terms and commercial law;

/in /by

Describe and explain important aspects of the Law of England and Wales relating to contracts, terms and commercial law;
Apply the relevant law to factual scenarios;
Research at an appropriate level for a level 6 law student into this area of law using a variety of primary and secondary sources both paper and electronic;
Write both time-limited and word-limited assignments at an appropriate level for a level 6 law student;
Reflect on your learning in class and on feedback from assignments.

Critically compare any rescue procedure in the UK with the rescue procedure of your chosen jurisdiction, making recommendations to improve either or both systems

/in /by

Critically compare any rescue procedure in the UK with the rescue procedure of your chosen jurisdiction, making recommendations to improve either or both systems

The question ask for critical compare in these paper of my essay is my way in the writing correct and answer part of question ? Also, can you please check the information in the Voting and Moratorium sections because it is a new law on me I want to be sure my writing is correct. The main law in this essay are Insolvency Act 1986 and Insolvency rules 2016

Explain which of the three theories best account for this criminal’s persistent offending.

/in /by

In 500-750 words, analyze life course offenders using developmental theories of crime by doing the following:

Find an example of a person who is or was a life course offender (someone with a very long criminal history, serial killers, etc.).

1.Determine if the criminal’s persistent offending can be explained using life course, latent trait, and trajectory theories.
2.If any of those three theories do not account for the criminal’s persistent offending, explain why.
3.Explain which of the three theories best account for this criminal’s persistent offending.
Use the GCU Library to locate three to five relevant, scholarly sources in support of your content, no older than 5 years.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Explain how the Internet has changed Contract Law.

/in /by

Explain how the Internet has changed Contract Law.

Describe in detail the descriptive and inferential statistics in this study. 

/in /by

READ: Hughes et al. (2011).  Posttraumatic Stress among Students after the Shootings at Virginia Tech Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Vol. 3, No. 4, 403–411

  RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 

  1. What is the Problem that is being identified by this study?
  2. What are the Research Questions AND Hypotheses in this study?
  3. Is this a Quantitative or Qualitative Study? Why do you think this design was selected. Provide what the rationale would be if you were the researcher.
  4. Is this Design cross sectional (one shot deal) or over time (longitudinal)? Why do you think this design was selected. Provide what the rationale would be if you were the researcher.
  5. Identify each of the variables?
  6. Identify the independent variable (explanatory)?
  7. Identify the dependent variable (outcome)?
  8. Identify what would be considered a “modifying” variable (that which might serve to change the relationship between the independent and the dependent variables? – IF APPLICABLE)
  9. Identify the measurement instruments that are being used to measure each of the main variables?
  10. Identify the levels of measurement for each variable?
  11. Identify the reliability score for each measurement that is a multi-item measure.
  12. Identify the appropriate tests that are being used to test each hypothesis and describe why they were selected by the researcher to use.
  13. What level of significance is being used for each? (Be sure to identify each test and each level of significance).
  14. Describe in detail the descriptive and inferential statistics in this study.
  15. What are the basic findings of this research study and what is the researcher’s interpretation of the findings?

 

Identify the measurement instruments that are being used to measure each of the main variables?

/in /by

READ: Menard & Arter (2013). Police Officer Alcohol Use and Trauma Symptoms: Associations

With Critical Incidents, Coping, and Social Stressors. International Journal of Stress Management ©

2013 American Psychological Association Vol. 20, No. 1, 37–56

RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

  1. What is the Problem that is being identified by this study?
  2. What are the Research Questions AND Hypotheses in this study?
  3. Is this a Quantitative or Qualitative Study?
  4. Is this Design cross sectional (one shot deal) or over time (longitudinal)?
  5. Identify each of the variables?.
  6. Identify the independent variable (explanatory)?
  7. Identify the dependent variable (outcome)?
  8. Identify what would be considered a “modifying” variable (that which might serve to change the

relationship between the independent and the dependent variables? – IF APPLICABLE)

  1. Identify the measurement instruments that are being used to measure each of the main variables?
  2. Identify the levels of measurement for each variable?
  3. Identify the reliability score for each measurement that is a multi item measure.
  4. Identify the appropriate tests that are being used to test each hypothesis and describe why they

were selected by the researcher to use.

  1. What level of significance is being used for each? (Be sure to identify each test and each level of significance).
  2. Describe in detail the descriptive and inferential statistics in this study.
  3. What are the basic findings of this research study and what is the researcher’s interpretation of the

findings?

  Explain the doctrines and principles of the law in England and Wales and the institutions and personnel that administer the law.

/in /by

Explain the doctrines and principles of the law in England and Wales and the institutions and personnel that administer the law.

Understand a variety of areas of the law in their social, political, economic and European contexts.

Act with independence and intellectual curiosity making use of questions and feedback to reflect and develop knowledge.

Analyse complex real or hypothetical legal problems and produce a reasoned conclusion.

Use both Standard English and legal terminology with care and accuracy.

Communicate verbally and in writing to a variety of audiences.

On successful completion of this module, students should be able, at threshold level, to:

  • Demonstrate a wide-ranging ability to critically evaluate core concepts of data protection law by developing research, theoretical and practical understanding, so as to arrive at appropriate conclusions.

Demonstrate an awareness of practice-related issues and challenges pertinent to data protection law and policy.

        Demonstrate an awareness and understanding of current/emerging legal and policy issues/challenges observable in the data protection field.

Work independently, and be able to reach reasoned conclusions from complex theoretical or problem-based data protection law-related scenarios, and provide advice and recommendations.

Demonstrate a comprehensive ability to form an argument through the research and synthesis of academic data protection law materials.

Communicate effectively about data protection law related ideas and concepts in a way that is comprehensible to others with knowledge of the subject.

How valid is the analogy that judges are like umpires in the case of Yemshaw v London Borough of Hounslow

/in /by

How valid is the analogy that judges are like umpires in the case of Yemshaw v London Borough of Hounslow [2011]

 

Critically analyse the evolution of the definition of domestic violence in relation to housing legislation in the UK.

/in /by

Critically analyse the evolution of the definition of domestic violence in relation to housing legislation in the UK.