Critically examine whether a legal defence should ever be available to mercy killing.
Critically examine whether a legal defence should ever be available to mercy killing.
Critically examine whether a legal defence should ever be available to mercy killing.
Explain how employers can overcome the particular challenges regarding cybermonitoring and cybersecurity.
Construct a research paper that examines the components of harassment
under Title VII. Your paper should focus on what constitutes disparate treatment and disparate impact. Specifically, include
the following components in your research paper:
Provide examples of cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that relate to a violation of Title VII, and describe the
treatment and act aspects identified by the court.
Describe how the outcomes of these cases affect emergency services organizations.
In light of the outcomes of these cases, discuss potential liability and how emergency services organizations may avoid
that liability by changing employment practices.
Your completed paper should be at least three pages, not including your title and reference pages.
1.Explain concisely the difference between Parliamentary Supremacy (also known as Parliamentary Sovereignty) and Parliamentary Privilege. Do these aspects of the UK’s Constitutional arrangements help or hinder good law-making?
2.“Administrative law is concerned with both the facilitation and the control of executive power.” Explain and illustrate, with practical examples, how Administrative Law (in the broad sense of the term) strikes a balance between these dual aims.
The overall word limit for the alternative assessment is 1,500 words. There is no 10% leeway on the maximum word count and you must declare your word count at the end.
Please list in a bibliography at the end of the essay the main sources (books and other materials) consulted in writing your essay. Any quotations should be accompanied by a full reference with page numbers. In all Law modules, footnotes for referencing purposes will not count towards the word limit.
1. Natalie runs a business selling second-hand laptop computers. She knows that her friend Noura – a student who has just started her studies at the university – is interested in buying a laptop. Natalie writes a letter to Noura telling her that she can have a laptop with a one- year warranty for £200. Noura replies by email that she is interested but will have to think about it. Natalie replies that she will consider the laptop sold to Noura unless she hears otherwise.
Noura does not say anything and Natalie does not follow up. A year passes after Natalie’s last email. In the meantime, a shortage of laptops in the market causes the average price of second-hand laptops to double. Noura sends a letter to Natalie saying: ‘I accept your offer to buy the laptop for £200’. After the letter is posted, but before it is received, Natalie sells all of her stock to Bryan.
Advise Natalie and Noura as to the legal issues that may arise.
Ahmad is an accountant. Martha, who owns and runs a travel agency is one of Ahmad’s clients. Martha pays Ahmad a fee of £1,000/month for his services, according to a contract they signed a few months ago. As a result of the COVID19 pandemic, many of Ahmad’s clients face financial difficulties, and some no longer need his services. Martha’s business is struggling, and she is thinking of ending the contract with Ahmad because she can no longer afford it. Worried about the loss of clients which he may not be able to gain back after the pandemic is over, Ahmad promises to reduce his fee to £500/month, even though he will spend the same number of hours doing Martha’s accounts. As a result, Martha keeps the contract with Ahmad. After a vaccine is discovered, Martha’s sales go back to their pre-pandemic levels. Yet, she rejected Ahmad’s notice to go back to the £1,000/month rate, saying that he has promised to accept £500. Two months after the notice, Ahmad decides that it is enough, and he wants to bring a claim against Martha demanding the payment of his full fees since the pandemic started.
Advise Ahmad as to the legal issues that may arise.
Prepare a tabbed or paginated bundle of documents (i.e. copies of any legislation and authorities that you will refer to) for ground 2, and also a skeleton argument for the moot
“While the courts have long protect personal confidences, in England (in contrast to some other states), there is no general ‘right of privacy’ as such”
R.Jacob, D, Alexander and M. Fisher, Guidebook to Intellectual property, (sixth edition, Hart publishing)
Critically evaluate whether the doctrine of confidence adequately protects individuals.
Examine relevant academic literature and policy reports and identify a particular aspect of organised crime that is of relevance to the country. It could be the most problematic or the most under-researched aspect (e.g. child sexual exploitation in Cambodia or heroin trafficking in Afghanistan).
‘The deviant is one to whom that label has successfully been applied…’ (Becker, 1963). Discuss this claim in relation to labelling theory.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.