Describe the population you wish to study. Provide two kinds of sampling procedures and explain the procedures. Justify your sampling technique in terms of its ability to get a useful and valid sample.

Sampling procedure assignment

Prompt- You have been asked to conduct a quantitative study on school violence incidents in Texas.

1. Describe the population you wish to study.
2. Provide two kinds of sampling procedures and explain the procedures.
3. Justify your sampling technique in terms of its ability to get a useful and valid sample.
4. Discuss the limitations of each sampling procedure, if any.
5. Describe how you will protect human subjects in your study, ensure anonymity, and gain consent from participants.

Describe the overlap between business law and criminal law. Be sure to use examples, and discuss at least three (3) different domains where these two areas of law overlap.

Writing Assignment I

Written Assignment: Describe the overlap between business law and criminal law. Be sure to use examples, and discuss at least three (3) different domains where these two areas of law overlap.

Your answer should be 5-7 paragraphs long. Your response should include an explanation of the differences between the legal proceedings, the important players in each, and the subject matter in each.

Your answer should be in your own words. While you may use outside resources, you should not plagiarize and should cite all of your sources.

Choose a high profile police violence incident that received extensive media coverage. What are the ethical dilemmas related to the case and the potential ethical issues relating to the aftermath of the incident?

Police violence

Choose a high profile police violence incident that received extensive media coverage. What are the ethical dilemmas related to the case and the potential ethical issues relating to the aftermath of the incident? i.e., overarching implications upon the field of criminal justice, implications related to the public’s perception of criminal justice professionals, etc.

Summarize the facts of the case. List only the essential facts that you need to understand the holding and reasoning of the case. List what happened in the “lower court(s).” What is/are the question(s) facing the court? How did the court answer the issue question(s)?

TRUMP v. VANCE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT

How to Brief a Case

Case Title and Citation:  The title of the case lists the primary parties showing who is opposing whom. The citation tells how to locate the report of the case in the appropriate case reporter.

Facts: Summarize the facts of the case. List only the essential facts that you need to understand the holding and reasoning of the case.

Procedure: List what happened in the “lower court(s).” Do not go into too much detail. Just list what the lower court did or what the appellate court did if you are reading a higher court or Supreme Court case.  If it is a case of first impression in the lowest court of the federal system, then you may not have any procedure as this is the first time a court is hearing the case.  State court opinions are always appellate opinions and so there will be the trial results at the very least. Remember that some “history” or procedure of the case may be in other proceedings that are not before a court of law (agencies, for example).

Issue(s): What is/are the question(s) facing the court? Form the issue questions in a way that they can be answered by yes or no.  (Professor Demers prefers that this question begin with the inquiry word “whether”.)

Holding: How did the court answer the issue question(s)? Include directions from the court-affirmed, reversed and remanded, etc.

Reasoning: This is the most important section of your case brief. Here you want to detail the reasoning of the majority in reaching its decision. You can actually be quite explicit in this section while keeping in mind this is to be a short form version of the important points of the decision.  Do not simply choose a couple of good sentences from the opinion.  This should be your own work as you break down the court’s steps in reaching its decision.  Be certain to spell out what the law was before this case was decided and how the law has changed or remained consistent after this decision.

FOR PURPOSES OF LOGIC AND THE LAW:  THIS SECTION SHOULD BE A BREAKDOWN IN BULLET POINTS OF EACH OF THE COMPONENT IDEAS IN THE COURT’S REASONING IN COMING TO ITS CONCLUSION.

Concurring/dissenting opinions: The judges or justices in agreement might have more to add in a concurring opinion.  In a dissenting opinion, the opposing judges usually have remarks that state why they disagree with the holding.

FOR PURPOSES OF LOGIC AND THE LAW:  YOUR ANALYSIS SHOULD INCLUDE BULLET POINTS OF THE COMPONENT IDEAS IN EACH OF THE CONCURRING/DISSENTING OPINIONS.

 

What are the regulations for health, safety and security in the workplace? Describe the responsibilities for employer and employees. Give examples of health, safety and security risks that could exist in different locations and the action to take to minimise or mitigate risks. Identify the risks to you which are associated with lone working and working at heights.

Health, safety and security

 

 

Unit 1: Conduct inspection and assessment in an effective and professional manner

Outcome 1: Understand how to maintain the health, safety and security requirements as they apply to residential surveying

 

  Question Learner please type in black adding the date and your initials before each entry

Assessor please type in red adding and date and your initials before each entry

Criteria Met
1.1.1

 

 

 

What are the regulations for health, safety and security in the workplace? Describe the responsibilities for employer and employees.

 

   
1.1.2 Give examples of health, safety and security risks that could exist in different locations and the action to take to minimise or mitigate risks.

 

   
1.1.3 Identify the risks to you which are associated with lone working and working at heights.

 

 

   
1.1.4 Explain why it is important to remain alert to the presence of risks in the workplace.

 

 

 

   
1.1.5 Explain the importance of personal conduct in maintaining the health, safety and security of yourself or others.

 

   
1.1.6 Explain the importance of reading instructions for the safe use of equipment, materials and products.

 

   
1.1.7 Who should be informed of any conflicts between different health, safety and security requirement and who would you notify.

 

   
1.1.8 Give examples and describe the procedures for different types of emergency and how to implement them.

 

   
1.1.9 Give examples for improving health, safety and security at work that could be made and who should be given them.

 

   
1.1.10 When inspecting, Identify the actions that may be taken to protect customers’ property and information.

 

   

 

Choose a high profile police violence incident that received extensive media coverage. What are the ethical dilemmas related to the case and the potential ethical issues relating to the aftermath of the incident?

Police violence

Choose a high profile police violence incident that received extensive media coverage. What are the ethical dilemmas related to the case and the potential ethical issues relating to the aftermath of the incident? i.e., overarching implications upon the field of criminal justice, implications related to the public’s perception of criminal justice professionals, etc.

Discuss what he talks about in thebook. Explain how he gives accurate and inaccurate descriptions of what goes in thelaw office based on your experience

BOOK REVIEW1

Read and review The Empowered Paralegal: Working with the Elder Client, by Robert E. Mongue

Discuss what he talks about in thebook. Explain how he gives accurate and inaccurate descriptions of what goes in thelaw office based on your experience(s))

2)Length—minimum of ten pages, double spaced

3)Form—ALWD Citation Manual or The Bluebook (no footnotes, endnotes orbibliography)

4)Sources—minimum of six additional source

Academic style
Other (add to details)

Discuss what he talks about in thebook. Explain how he gives accurate and inaccurate descriptions of what goes in thelaw office based on your experience(s)

Read and review The Empowered Paralegal

Working with the Elder Client by Robert E. Mongue

1)Discuss what he talks about in thebook. Explain how he gives accurate and inaccurate descriptions of what goes in thelaw office based on your experience(s)

2)Length—minimum of ten pages, double spaced

3)Form—ALWD Citation Manual or The Bluebook (no footnotes, endnotes orbibliography)

4)Sources—minimum of six additional source

Demonstrate that the problem you identify exists and that it matters; describe a specific solution to the problem that is fair and feasible; and, justify your solution with evidence from scholarly sources.

Legalizing Marijuana

This is a research-based proposal essay. To succeed, you must demonstrate that the problem you identify exists and that it matters; describe a specific solution to the problem that is fair and feasible; and, justify your solution with evidence from scholarly sources. Yes, all sources must be academic. All sources should be cited parenthetically in the text where they appear and in a list of works cited at the end of the essay.

Reflect on how technology has changed record keeping practices for emergency services agencies. Do you think the changes have made it easier or harder for emergency services agencies? What additional liability do you think this places on agencies?

Record keeping practices

Reflect on how technology has changed record keeping practices for emergency services agencies. Do you think the changes have made it easier or harder for emergency services agencies? What additional liability do you think this places on agencies?