https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFeoS41xe7w video link
In 1965, James Baldwin debated William F. Buckley over the following question: “Is the American Dream at the expense of the American Negro?” There is a one-hour debate need to watch and then make three observations. one about the debate in general, one about one of Baldwin’s points, and one about one of Buckley’s points.
CHAPTER 6 – ARRESTS AND USE OF FORCE
Book – Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice, 10th Edition
Rolando V. del Carmen; Craig Hemmens (2017)
Please summarize entire chapter six of our course text in your own words. Be sure to organize your summary well to make it reader-friendly. APA Style
You must have a subtitle “Evaluation of Chapter six” where you evaluate the work you are summarizing. This is where you state your views/opinions on the work/chapter. Among other things, you can comment on all or some of the following:
• Do you like the area/topic or issue covered in the chapter (or work)?
• Why?
• How about the language used in the work – easy or difficult to understand?
• Findings – surprise? – agree with findings if any?
• Lengthy article …. brief article or just right/average?
• Usefulness of the chapter especially issues covered
• Conclusions
• Is the article practically useful – utility and usefulness of the article
• Type of data used in the article and your views about the data
• Simple or complex statistical analysis?
• Policy implications of the finding or suggestions based on the finding – any thoughts?
• Other comments … etc
The minimum deliverable length is 1000 words.
For each you will find an article containing material that is relevant to microeconomics, clearly link your article to material from the textbook, then compose a thread discussing the topic. The article you choose along with the textbook must be referenced in current APA format. Acceptable research sources for your articles include periodicals, journals, newspapers, and magazines. Sources such as Wikipedia, About.com, book reviews, and blogs are prohibited. You must demonstrate a fundamental understanding of the economic theory and outside research for the topic at hand. <br>Each thread must be at least 1-2 pages. For each thread, you must find a relevant article. Use the following guidelines when composing your thread:<br>• In the opening paragraph, provide a summary of the article.<br>• In the second paragraph, explain an economic idea contained in the story. Specifically, refer to material from the textbook, including the page number, and note how the economic idea plays a prominent role in the story.<br>• In the third paragraph, explain what you think about the events in the story. You do not have to agree with what is going on, but you do need to provide your reaction to it. This is your chance to express yourself: what are your opinions? Be sure to defend yourself.<br>• Finally, what do you think is a Christian response to this situation? Provide details to support your view. <br>• Be sure to title your thread according to your topic.<br><br>Book to use: Principles of Microeconomics, Christian Economics Second Edition
Choose 2 works of art to compare and contrast from the book, Art: A Brief History 5th edition by Stokstad, Marilyn.
Write anWrite an informative essay (5 paragraphs) that details your vision for yourself and your goals for this school year, the next five years, and the next ten years. (5 paragraphs) that details your vision for yourself and your goals for this school year, the next five years, and the next ten years.
Read Crime and Punishment, by Fyodor Dostoevsky, marking each instance of liminal space, e.g., thresholds, doorways, that is, places or objects that are physically or metaphorically between 2 things.
Write out your analysis and interpretations of the novel’s various and abundant liminal spaces
1000-1250 words
MLA format (1 inch margins, double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. type, correct class information, and page numbers, etc.)
Instructions:
Write an organized literacy narrative examining your own literacy history, habits, and processes. The purpose of this inquiry is to get to know yourself better as a reader and writer. Start your literacy narrative by considering your history as a reader and writer. Try to get at what your memories and feelings about writing/reading are and how you actually write/read now. Do not make bland generalizations such as “I really love to write,” “I hate reading,” etc. Instead, go into detail about how you learned to write/read. Mine your memory, thinking carefully about where you’ve been and where you are as a reader and writer.
Keep in mind that you should be looking for an overall “so what?”—a main theme, a central “finding,” an overall conclusion that your consideration leads you to draw. It might be an insight about why you read and write as you do today based on your past experiences. It might be an argument about what works or what doesn’t work in literacy education, on the basis of your experience. It might be a resolution to do something differently, or to keep doing something that’s been working. It might be a description of an ongoing conflict or tension you experience when you read and write—or the story of how you resolved such a conflict earlier in your literacy history.
(Don’t be afraid to voice your own opinions about writing, just make sure you back up your opinions and tell us why you feel the way you do J). Good luck!
Tips:
The audience is your instructor and classmates. Your audience will expect correct usage of grammar and style conventions, appropriate language and tone, well-organized thoughts, and detailed explanations.
Avoid trying to cover too many events or scenes. Illustrate one or two key events that influenced you. Keep the discussion focused on your precise purpose.
As this is a narrative, use details, descriptions, and dialogue to flesh out scenes so the reader can see what influenced you and why.
Make sure your essay has a clear goal or thesis. Show your reader who you are as a writer today and how you got to be the writer you are today.
Questions and prompts for brainstorming: (your paper does not have to explore all of these; this list can help you think of possible topics.)
How did you learn to read and write?
What kinds of writing/reading have you done in the past?
How much have you enjoyed writing /reading? Think of specific events.
What are some vivid memories you have of reading/writing or activities involving them?
What is your earliest memory of reading/writing?
What sense did you get, as you were learning to read and write, of the value of reading/writing, and where did that sense come from?
What frustrated or pleased you about reading and/or writing in school?
What types of reading and writing do you do most commonly? (could be digital media)
What is your favorite kind of reading or writing?
What are your current attitudes or feelings about reading or writing? Where do these attitudes come from?
Who are some people in your life who have influenced your views on reading/writing?
What technologies impact you as a writer?
Research paper with bibliography on the case of Danroy Henry Jr. in New York in October 2010. Explain both sides of the issue, i.e., the justification for the use & the argument against it. Were there any parallel examples to this event in the past? Describe the legal issues. Did the case result in a prosecution against the officer(s)? If so, what was the basis of the prosecutor’s decision & what were the results? Was the use of force consistent with the department’s policy? If not, what did the Department do? Was there a public outcry to the event? If so, describe it. Did this event lead to any change in police policy or the law? Did this event affect the public’s trust in the police and criminal justice system? Close your report with your opinion re: the outcome. Was it fair? Why/why not?
Write a critical review of the book “The Things We Do for Love” written by kristin hannah.
Make sure you clearly pass judgement in the introductory paragraph and then make sure you write an explicitly clear sentence at the beginning of each body paragraph that strongly supports and illustrates your thesis statement.
Keep the tone authoritative, keep the sentences crisp and clear, eliminate all passive voice, add transitions that join ideas and create the feeling of movement forward in the essay (avoid using just “first, second, third”, etc. at the beginning of each paragraph.
Minimum Length: 500 words
Given two articles presenting opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a workable solution or “middle ground.”
1. Summary of Positions
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1?
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 2?
2. Thesis/Claim
❒ Does your claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles?
❒ Does your claim present a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a “middle ground” between the two sides?
3. Analysis
❒ Have you backed up your claim using facts from both sides of the argument?
❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.