Critically outline the role of leadership in change Management and identify one leadership style that may be appropriate for change within organisations.

Essay. HRM 7012.

First paragraph- Define and evaluate change management. (500 words).

Second paragraph- Critically outline the role of leadership in change Management and identify one leadership style that may be appropriate for change within organisations (Transformative leadership style ) 500 words.

Third paragraph– Critically analyse the role of HR in managing Change including the role of the change agent. (500 words).

Last paragraph– Assess the role Covid19 has had on change, leadership and HR. Highlight some of the key challenges and any recommendations. ( 500 words).

 

Create a 5-minute presentation for a committee kickoff meeting in which you describe your leadership role, team composition, and how to foster collaboration.

E-mail From Lynette

Overview:
In this assessment, you will create a 5-minute presentation for a committee kickoff meeting in which you describe your leadership role, team composition, and how to foster collaboration.

Scenario
Imagine that Lynette follows up with you in an e-mail shortly after reading your views on leadership and collaboration.

Briefly outline the project goals and highlight 2–3 of the initial priorities to be addressed by the group.
Explain the composition of your ideal team and why you chose them. (Note that you will not know the exact personnel yet, but assume we will recruit the people with the desired qualities and characteristics that you outline in the presentation.) Provide brief description of the type of professionals you believe can help define the problem and ultimately make recommendations on how to address it. You will want the group to be diverse and with each member being able to provide a unique perspective.
Explain your role and describe how the committee will work together and achieve effective interprofessional collaboration.
Describe how the group will communicate. Include how and when they will meet.
Describe how ideas will be shared and decisions made.
Describe roles, group function, and structure.

How did the advertisement come to be, why didn’t someone notice its questionable content and message, did Unilever effectively repair its reputation, and what communications lessons were learned?

Communication Theory

In retrospect, the reaction of the public to a 2017 Dove Soap advertisement and Unilever’s apology as told in Humphries-Kil’s (2019) case are both expected and shocking. First, provide a detailed overview of the case. Then, using a communications theory lens, dissect the case. How did the advertisement come to be, why didn’t someone notice its questionable content and message, did Unilever effectively repair its reputation, and what communications lessons were learned?

Reference
Humphries-Kil, M. (2019). Unilever and leadership: Gender, race, and classification in corporate globalisation (Links to an external site.). SAGE Business Cases. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526469311

Define decision making & give the importance of applying decision making. Give an introduction to Jamaican grill and explain how are they applying decision-making in their business. Explain the organizational theory of theory x and theory Y and which and how is it apply to Jamaican grill.

Decision making/Jamaican Grill

Define decision making & give the importance of applying decision making. Give an introduction to Jamaican grill and explain how are they applying decision-making in their business. In addition, explain the organizational theory of theory x and theory Y and which and how is it apply to Jamaican grill. Give some recommendations on how to make Jamaican grills a much better restaurant when applying more decision-making.

How have your background and life experiences, including cultural, geographical, financial, educational, citizenship status, or other opportunities or challenges, motivated your decision to pursue a graduate degree at the University of Michigan?

Life experiences,

How have your background and life experiences, including cultural, geographical, financial, educational, citizenship status, or other opportunities or challenges, motivated your decision to pursue a graduate degree at the University of Michigan?

Define what is decision making, & describe the importance of the decision making. Define a theory of organization that applies to Hyatt regency Guam.

Decision making

Define what is decision making, & describe the importance of the decision making. In addition, define a theory of organization that applies to Hyatt regency Guam. Describe how the theory of organizational and decision-making applies to Hyatt Regency Guam. Lastly include some recommendations on how to make Hyatt Regency Guam a better hotel.

Each week the textbook covers a different aspect of HDS and as you are reading seek out and make note of what they are saying about each of the ‘Big 6’ components and the impact they have individually and collectively on an organization, and more specifically your organizations.

Health Care Delivery Systems (HDS)

The final exam for this course is going to be the creation of a cumulative document that relates what you learned throughout the semester in relation to the components of the ‘Big 6’. The rationale for this approach is to assist you in identifying and better understanding how the 6 components of the ‘Big 6’ individually and collectively impact every aspect of an organization, and in this case your organizations. The purpose for providing the details of the final exam and the instructions this first week is so that as you work on your reading assignments each week that you can be looking in each chapter for information about each of the 6 components for your final paper. The ‘Big 6’ document is embedded below for easy access and I highly recommend that you print it out and keep it handy as you complete your reading assignments each week and perhaps start identifying thoughts for the final paper as you go.

THE BIG 6

⦁ Before beginning your final paper view this short online article entitled: “Collective Impact: A Collaborative Approach to Creating Change” it will provide you with some ideas on how to write your collective impact statement for the ‘Big Six’.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriscancialosi/2015/09/15/collective-impact-a-collaborative-approach-to-creating-change/#9dbd44f740be

Final Exam Requirements
⦁ Each week the textbook covers a different aspect of HDS and as you are reading seek out and make note of what they are saying about each of the ‘Big 6’ components and the impact they have individually and collectively on an organization, and more specifically your organizations.

⦁ There are 8 sections for the final paper (see Table of Contents below) and the minimum length requirements for each section are listed there.

Style:
⦁ 12 point font – use standard fonts
⦁ Double spaced – 1” margins = 250 words per page
⦁ Academic writing
⦁ Proofread
⦁ Page numbers beginning with the ‘Introduction’ and include in Table of Contents

Title Page:
⦁ Course name
⦁ Title of your paper
⦁ Name
⦁ Date

Table of Contents: Include page numbers
⦁ Introduction – Minimum Requirement – 2 full pages
⦁ People
⦁ Money
⦁ Change Minimum Requirement – 2 full pages for each topic
⦁ Technology
⦁ Time
⦁ Communication
⦁ Collective Impact Statement – Minimum Requirement – 2 full pages for this topic

Your paper should be a minimum of 4,000 words which is 8 topics X 2 pages each @ 250 words per page = 4,000 words.

Citations:
⦁ All resources used for your paper must be properly cited in APA format including your textbook. If you need some assistance with that check out http://www.apastyle.org/

Describe, in (500) no more than 750 words, the five project life-cycles defined by Schmidt (predictive, iterative, incremental, agile, and hybrid) and justify which life-cycle should be used to complete the Kitchen Heaven Project.

Project Life-Cycles

Reread the Kitchen Heaven Project Case Study in Heldman et al. pages 84-87, 139-141, and 283-285 and read pages 190-193. (See attached MGT-440 Week 2 Project Reading)

Part 1: Action Steps Column (A) (See attached Spreadsheet)

Create a list of action steps or activities and enter them in the Inputs (the blue portion) of the Logical Framework template. Be sure to include the associated Outcome each activity (see template). For each action step/activity add at least one assumption made related to the completion of the action step/activity.

Only define the action steps required to achieve each outcome. Resources, budget and due dates will be completed in Topic 7.

Each action step/activity should contain one and only one deliverable (i.e., one document, one action completed, one delivery made)

Each outcome will consist of a minimum of five action steps/activities.
Each action step/activity will have at least one assumption.

Part 2: Project Life-Cycles

Describe, in (500) no more than 750 words, the five project life-cycles defined by Schmidt (predictive, iterative, incremental, agile, and hybrid) and justify which life-cycle should be used to complete the Kitchen Heaven Project. (See attached Strategic Project Management read Chapter 8 pages 125-137)

Minimum of three outside resources. Sources must be authoritative and not from a Wikipedia-type source.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Describe your theory for a management leadership style. Think about your management and leadership style. Describe your style and detail the strengths and weaknesses of it.

Management leadership style

Describe your theory for a management leadership style. Think about your management and leadership style. Describe your style and detail the strengths and weaknesses of it. Include areas such as how you would manage employees in a business environment/professional setting.

Critically evaluate the similarities and differences between coaching and mentoring, as well as two other learning interventions within an organizational context.

Difference between coaching and mentoring

Written Reflection
Following the practical exercise, all students will be required to complete a 2,500-word individual report and reflection,
Your reflection should critically evaluate the following:

1. The similarities and differences between coaching and mentoring, as well as two other learning interventions within an organizational context. You should consider the tangible and intangible benefits of coaching and mentoring to organizations (Return on Investment).

2. The line manager as a coach/mentor, including an assessment of the necessary skills and behaviors.

3. The role of coaching and mentoring in building resilience and dealing with change.

4. Your own performance in the peer coaching exercise, with reference to relevant reflective cycles and the coaching model used. You should present an honest and transparent reflection, highlighting your strengths and weaknesses. You should also include a personal development plan. Note: Whilst Tasks 1-3 should be in third person, the personal reflection (Task 4) can be written in first person, if preferred.

GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS
NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five generic assessment criteria overleaf.

1. Engagement with Literature Skills Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the task(s) set; you should make use of scholarly reviews and primary sources, where appropriate (for example, refereed research articles and/or original materials appropriate to the discipline). You should provide evidence that you have accessed a wide range of sources, which may be academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal