Utilizing the clips below, discuss the differences between Sweeney Todd as a play vs. as a film. Do you consider a video recording of the play “a film or movie” or is it just a recording of a live performance?

Comparing Sweeney Todd the film vs the movie

1. an introduction (with a thesis statement)
2. a body (with examples from the clips to support your argument), and
3. a conclusion (where you summarize and prove your point)

Utilizing the clips below, discuss the differences between Sweeney Todd as a play vs. as a film. Do you consider a video recording of the play “a film or movie” or is it just a recording of a live performance?

What’s the difference between a “film/movie” and the recording of the stage play? Keep in mind how different these two sequences are based on who the action is staged for–ie. the audience in the room vs. the camera (the audience watching in a cinema)

Stage vs. Film, Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=oakRSpLXqtk

Stage vs. Film, Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=zygTvmzIBp4

What are your thoughts/analysis on the movie as it relates to the law? How could the parties in the movie have prevented the problem created in the movie?

The Movie is “The Wolf of Wallstreet.”

PROJECT COMPONENTS – Review Carefully and Apply to your Papers

A. WRITTEN PRESENTATION
4-6 PAGES TYPED; ARIAL OR TIMES ROMAN; 12 POINT; JUSTIFIED MARGINS; DOUBLE SPACED or 1 1/2 SPACED; 1 INCH MARGINS TOP, BOTTOM, LEFT, RIGHT

B. COMMENTARY ON THE MOVIE(OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE MOVIE AS IT RELATES TO THE TOPIC OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY)
A. What are your thoughts/analysis on the movie as it relates to the law?
B. Public policy concerns?
C. How could the parties in the movie have prevented the problem created in the movie?
D. Can a business be in compliance with the law yet be unethical?
E. Future recommendations? How will what you learned help you in your future employment?

What was John Q’s situation and how did it happen? How was the family treated by hospital administration? What did you think about the discussion in the emergency room?

John Q Movie Reflection Paper

You are to watch the movie of John Q.
While watching these are a few things to think about:
Issues facing the public as a whole in regards to insurance
What was John Q’s situation and how did it happen?
How was the family treated by hospital administration?
What did you think about the discussion in the emergency room?
Were there any legal issues brought up? If so, what were they?
Were there any ethical decisions made? If so, what were they?

Analyze the stylistic and technical aspects of the film – what worked for you, what didn’t work, and why?

Write a 500 word paper on any Feature film of your choosing made between 1970 and the present day.

DO NOT WRITE ABOUT ANY FILMS DISCUSSED IN THE LEARNING MODULES.

Submit your papers to the drop box in either the MS WORD file or a PDF file ONLY.

Give some background and context for the film you are analyzing; when was it made, who was the Director, what awards did it win, and any other information that helps provide context.

Give a summary of the plot in at most 3 or 4 paragraphs, but do NOT make this 90% of your paper, please.

Analyze the stylistic and technical aspects of the film – what worked for you, what didn’t work, and why? Things to consider include the script, the directing, the acting, the editing, the music and sound effects, the special effects, etc.

Be as specific as possible, and cite information from specific scenes in the film to back up your opinions. This paper is due July 26; no late papers accepted. Please be sure to both use and cite at least two sources; you lose 5 points if you do not do this.

What did you make of the Washington Post article?

It is opinion question after watching the film Bombshell. There is no specific format because no outsources can be used.  No Introduction or conclusions are required. Just answer the question in one full paragraph after reading the related article to answer this question. Because it is opinion based question, do not need summary for article and movie please write thoughts and reflections.

QUESTION: What did you make of the Washington Post article? This one asks if the movie can be called a feminist film if the characters don’t want to be feminists. The Washington Post article, like many criticisms of the film, challenges the way that the filmmakers reconcile their goal (telling a story about sexual harassment and the need for cultural change) with their choice to center their story on women who fought against cultural change in many ways. What is your opinion?