Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis. Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary disorders

Week 4 Pharmacotherapeutic: gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders

DC is a 46-year-old female who presents with a 24-hour history of RUQ pain. She states the pain started about 1 hour after a large dinner she had with her family. She has had nausea and on instance of vomiting before presentation.

  • PMH: HTN, Type II DM, Gout , DVT – Caused by oral BCPs
  • Vital signs: Bp- 136/82, pulse- 82bpm, temp- 98.8, ht- 5ft 8” , wt- 202 lbs
  • Allergies; latex, codeine, Amoxicillin
  • Current Medications: Notable Labs:
  • Lisinopril 10 mg daily WBC: 13,000/mm3
  • HCTZ 25 mg daily Total bilirubin: 0.8 mg/dL
  • Allopurinol 100 mg daily Direct bilirubin: 0.6 mg/dL
  • Multivitamin daily Alk Phos: 100 U/L, AST: 45 U/L, ALT: 30 U/L
  • PE: Eyes: EOMI
  • HENT: Normal
  • GI: bNondistended, minimal tenderness, Skin: bWarm and dry, Neuro: Alert and Oriented
  • Psych bAppropriate mood

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

 

Write a 4 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing.

The use of technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing

Write a 4 page annotated bibliography where you identify peer-reviewed publications that promote the use of a selected technology to enhance quality and safety standards in nursing.

 

Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms.

Complex Case Study Presentation

Select a child/adolescent or adult patient from your clinical experience that presents with a significant concern. Create a focused SOAP note for this patient using the template in the Resources. Include the complete SOAP note as a Word document and PDF/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your Preceptor. You must submit your SOAP Note using SafeAssign.

3). Then, based on your SOAP note of this patient, develop a video case study presentation. Take time to practice what you will say beforehand and ensure that you have the appropriate lighting and equipment to record the presentation.

4). Your presentation should include objectives for your audience, at least 3 possible discussion questions/prompts for your classmates to respond to, and at least 5 scholarly resources to support your diagnostic reasoning and treatment plan.

5). Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.

6). Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.

7). Pose three questions or discussion prompts, based on your presentation, that your colleagues can respond to after viewing your video.

8). Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?

9). Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?

10). Assessment: Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria and is supported by the patient’s symptoms.

11). Plan: What was your plan for psychotherapy (include one health promotion activity and patient education)? What was your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Discuss an identified social determinate of health impacting this patient’s mental health status and provide your recommendation for a referral to assist this patient in meeting this identified need (students will need to conduct research on this topic both in the literature and for community resources).

12). Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow-up, discuchoss what your next intervention would be.

 

Identify the performance that you have selected. Describe the staging, lighting, costumes, and characters of the performance. How do these match or revise the written version of the play?

Play Analysis

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 8

Play from the Internet, YouTube, DVD, iTunes, Amazon, Netflix, etc.

1 primary source (written version of selected play)

Instructions
Plays are meant to be performed, rather than read. The purpose of dramatic arts often extends far beyond the words written on a page; staging, lighting, costumes intonation, expression, and audience experience are all part of the experience of a theatrical production. To develop your understanding of the cultural role of the dramatic arts, you will view a production of a play this week and write a reflection to explain your viewing experience. Choose a play that you would like to view and find a version online, YouTube, DVD or iTunes, Amazon, Netflix, etc. You can also choose to see a play live if you prefer.

Play Suggestions:
A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Romeo and Juliet

As You Like It

Taming of the Shrew

The Tempest

Much Ado About Nothing

The Comedy of Errors

Macbeth

King Lear

If you have another idea, please ask your instructor to approve it. Then, select and address one of the following options:

Option 1: Write an analysis of the play that you viewed. Include at least one quote from the play in your essay. In your essay, address the following:

Identify the performance that you have selected.
Describe the staging, lighting, costumes, and characters of the performance. How do these match or revise the written version of the play? You do not need to read the entire play, but you should skim the text.

What type of mood and tone does the performance create? How?

What parts of the play are easier to understand through performance? What are some details that stood out through performance?

What are your feelings about this performance? What did you take away from viewing it?

 

Option 2: Find an adaptation or transformation of a play. Choose an adaptation with some significant differences from the original, such as transposed plots and characters into a variety of different settings and historical contexts. Here are some examples:
A Midsummer Night’s Dream – A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1999) or A Midsummer Night’s DREAM (2018)

Romeo and Juliet – Romeo + Juliet (1996) or West Side Story (1961) or Romeo Must Die (2000)

As You Like It – As You Like It (2006)

Taming of the Shrew – 10 Things I Hate About You (1999) or Kiss Me, Kate (1948)

Much Ado About Nothing – Much Ado About Nothing (2012)

The Comedy of Errors – The Bomb-itty of Errors (2012)

King Lear – A Thousand Acres (1997)

Othello – O (2001)

Hamlet – The Lion King (2019 or 1994) or Hamlet (2000)

Twelfth Night – She’s the Man (2006)

If you have another idea, please ask your instructor to approve it.
Watch the original version and the adapted version. In your essay, address the following:

How is the adaptation the same as the original? Discuss plot, characters, theme, conflict, language, etc.

How does the adaptation differ from the original? Discuss setting, time period, characters, plot, language, etc.
Does the original story translate well in the adaptation? Why or why not? Did the adaptation work in a different setting, time period, etc. Why or why not?

Why do you think Shakespeare’s plays are adapted so often?

What is a personal power base and what is (or has been) your plan for building one? Have you had any experience with having to rebuild it because of a position change or change in practice location?

Week 5: Collaboration Café: Personal Power and Empowerment

This week’s collaboration focuses on two power concepts, personal power base and empowerment, and how they are related. Regardless of the type of formal power a nurse may have, whether a novice or expert in the role as leader, each must develop a personal power base. Part of becoming a transformative leader is learning to empower others and is related to having a personal power base.

  • What is a personal power base and what is (or has been) your plan for building one?
  • Have you had any experience with having to rebuild it because of a position change or change in practice location?
  • What was that experience like?
  • Empowering others is reciprocal in nature. What does this mean?
  • What is the relationship between having a strong personal power base and the ability to empower others?

 

When palliative care began for Emma? When did it change to end-of-life care? What are the six qualities of palliative care and how this team met each of those qualities?

Case Study Questions

Family Assignment

This week’s family assignment is The Garcia Family.

Living and Dying a Good Death, Saying Hello and Good-Bye

You are a nursing student in your final clinical placement. I am your preceptor, a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) on the palliative care team in a children’s hospital. You asked for this placement as a final year nursing student because you have come across a number of situations during your student experiences where you wished you knew how to talk and be with a patient and his or her family when the patient was dying. You realize that all nurses, from novice to expert and in all areas of nursing practice, need to develop skills in the area of death and dying. Please acquaint yourself with the Garcia family genogram in Figure 10-4. Consider what it would be like if you were the student working with this family.

Figure 10-4. Garcia family genogram.

We have received a new consult to meet with Emma and her parents, Eduardo and Karina Garcia. We learn that Emma is 7 days old and is a beautiful little baby with a perfect little face, big dark eyes, and lots of dark hair. Emma is on a ventilator because she has severe congenital muscular dystrophy and is unable to breathe on her own. Babies with severe disease, like Emma, have a very limited life expectancy, typically only a few weeks. Her severe muscle weakness means she is not able to breathe on her own for any length of time. We have been asked to meet with Emma and her family because they have decided, in consultation with their health care team, to withdraw ventilator support. As part of the palliative care team, we have been invited to assist Eduardo and Karina in deciding how, when, and where the withdrawal might occur.

Before meeting with this family for the first time, we realize how important it is to prepare ourselves. We know that we need to pause for a moment and consider how we might begin this conversation with Eduardo and Karina. We also want to ensure that we have in place whatever we might need to facilitate this first meeting.

We make arrangements to meet with Eduardo and Karina in a quiet, private room where we will not be interrupted. Pagers are turned off and other staff are covering for us so that we will have time to sit with the parents and really listen to what they have to say. Given that there will be several challenging things to discuss, we invite the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) social worker, who already has a relationship with the family, to join us for this meeting.

Before meeting the family we spend some time talking about different ways to begin the conversation with the parents. There are as many ways to start this conversation as there are clinicians. This is the beginning of what we hope will be a therapeutic relationship during one of the most difficult times a family can experience. Eduardo and Karina need to know who we are. It is often hard for parents to keep track of health care professionals—who we are, what we do, and how we can be helpful. This is especially true in highly emotionally charged situations, so typically we start with brief introductions. Sometimes, rather than starting the conversation by saying why we are here, it is helpful to gain an understanding of why the parents think we are meeting and then continue from there.

We start the meeting by each introducing ourselves. Then one of us says, “Tell us your understanding of why we are meeting today.” To facilitate our connection with this family, we also ask Eduardo and Karina to tell us about Emma—not her medical condition but what they have noticed about her or experienced in their relationship with her as parents. In answer to our query, one of the things Karina tells us is that she thinks Emma has Eduardo’s eyes. Eduardo has noticed that she follows Karina with her eyes, and he says, “She really knows her mom.”

We learn after talking with both sets of grandparents (mostly by telephone because Eduardo’s family is in Mexico where he and Karina met and Karina’s parents live across the country), the health care team, and their priest, that Karina and Eduardo have indeed decided that the most loving thing they can do as parents is to withdraw Emma’s ventilator and allow natural death. We encourage them to discuss their concerns, fears, and hopes for the time they have now with Emma. There is much silence and tears as the parents try to put into words all the thoughts swirling in their heads. They tell us that their focus is on having Emma experience as much of normal newborn life as she can. Also, they want to touch her and care for her. They want her to spend time with her 4-year-old sister, Sara, and 6-year-old brother, Markus; to be in her car seat; to have both her mom and dad bathe her, cuddle her, and change her diaper; to be baptized; and most of all to see the sun. We learn that it was the middle of the night when Emma was born, then immediately transferred from her small community to our tertiary urban hospital 3 hours away, so she had seen the moon but not the sun. Eduardo is a forestry worker and the family loves to be outdoors. They cannot believe that one of their children will never spend any time outdoors. Neither Karina nor Eduardo had been able to hold Emma before she was whisked away. Karina has held her in the NICU, but Eduardo has been reluctant because of all the tubes. He is feeling sad that her pervasive muscle weakness means she cannot grab onto his finger the way Sara and Markus did as babies, and he is searching to find another way to connect with Emma. Both parents express worry about how to help Sara and Markus understand what is happening in a way that does not frighten them. Although both Karina and Eduardo are committed to their decision, they are afraid that Emma may suffer when the ventilator is withdrawn. They are worried about watching her struggle for breath. The parents ask us for a week to have these experiences with Emma; they also want time for additional family members to visit and to plan for withdrawal of the ventilator.

Following our meeting with Eduardo and Karina, we meet with the involved NICU staff members, who are quite concerned with the proposal that we wait a week to discontinue the ventilator. This is not the way it usually happens, and they worry that the family will only become more attached to Emma, finding it harder and harder to let her go, or that something will change in Emma’s health status that may lead to an earlier death than what the parents expect. We provide further explanation and facilitate a meeting between the parents and the NICU staff. At the meeting, NICU staff members are able to express their concerns, and the family is able to respond, as well as talk about their wishes. Hearing each other’s fears and hopes is helpful, and there is now agreement and support for the parents’ request. Eduardo and Karina understand that it is possible something could happen unexpectedly with Emma and, although everything possible will be done to ensure that she is comfortable, the staff would not provide CPR if her heart stopped.

Emma and her parents move into one of the private family rooms in the NICU. Karina’s parents, Elaine and Gordon, who came to care for Sara and Markus in the family home, bring them to stay in a nearby hotel. This proximity enables them to visit often and to get to know the newest member of their family. Prior to their first visit, we spend time talking with Eduardo and Karina about how to prepare the siblings for seeing Emma, as well as explaining similarities and differences in how Sara and Markus may understand what is happening. Another member of the team, a child life therapist, spends time with Sara and Markus individually and together to assess and support their understanding and coping with Emma’s illness. Eduardo and Karina join some of the discussions and have some of their own time with the child life therapist. They learn how young children come to understand serious illness and death and that Sara and Markus will likely have questions about Emma for many years. They are happy about the picture books and other resources on how to support their children over time.

During the week, even in the midst of the technology that is still needed to keep Emma breathing, Eduardo, Karina, Elaine, Gordon, Sara, and Markus do all the things that families with newborns usually do. The family has the opportunity to say hello and good-bye to their new family member all at the same time. Eduardo holds Emma for the first time, and they take many, many pictures and videos. They give Emma her first haircut, and each saves a tiny lock of hair tied with a ribbon. Sara and Markus each create a memory box with drawings, the locks of hair, Emma’s handprints and footprints, and copies of the photos. They also help the child life therapist make molds of Emma’s hands and feet and of their own. Eduardo’s parents arrive from Mexico, and several close family members and friends come to meet Emma and witness her baptism in the hospital chapel. The list of hopes and dreams for this time is ticked off. Eduardo and Karina also use this time to contact a funeral home in their home community and make arrangements with their priest for her wake and funeral.

One day we take Emma, her parents, her siblings, and her grandparents outside to the hospital’s play garden, where it is beautifully clear and sunny with a gentle breeze blowing. Hospital security has closed the garden to other families and staff so it is intimate and peaceful. Emma is able to feel the sun on her face for the first time. The child life therapist is there to support Sara and Markus. They both seem to enjoy this family outing: running over to see Emma, giving her a kiss, and then heading off to explore the sandbox and the swings before coming back again for a hug from their parents. Eduardo and Karina ask if we think that Sara and Markus really don’t understand the situation and that is why they keep running off to play. The child life therapist reassures them that this is a typical way for children to cope and essentially they are just taking in what they can handle at their own pace. The child life therapist continues to follow the children’s lead in supporting whatever they want to do and wherever they want to be in the garden. A nurse from the NICU stays close to Emma to assist her in breathing while her parents and grandparents are holding her. Everyone relaxes and shares stories about Karina’s pregnancy, the labor and delivery, and the things they have learned about Emma the past few days. We take more family pictures and videos to send to the rest of the extended family that night. To our surprise, the parents feel so comfortable in the garden that they ask if we can discontinue the ventilator in the garden. We set about making this request happen.

Eduardo, Karina, and Elaine meet with us, the neonatologist, the NICU CNS, and the NICU social worker; we explain how we will keep Emma comfortable when the ventilator is withdrawn. The family is reassured to learn that there are medications that will ensure that Emma does not struggle for breath and that we will not allow her to suffer. Eduardo asks what it will be like when we take the ventilator away. We are able to help them understand that we do not know how long Emma will be able to breathe without assistance, but it could be minutes to hours; her breathing will slow, become irregular, and then stop. Her color will change and she will feel cool. Eduardo and Karina decide that they would like to be by themselves with Emma when she dies. Sara and Markus will stay at the hotel with their grandparents and then may come back to see Emma before she is taken to the funeral home.

Both parents seem to be coping fairly well with the situation, with Eduardo taking on the role of the strong one and Karina appearing more fragile. On the day of Emma’s death, however, we are surprised at the reversal of roles, as Eduardo looks disheveled and distressed whereas Karina has done her hair and makeup; she’s wearing a special outfit and seems in control. We had hoped for sun, but somehow the weather seems more in keeping with the mood. You comment to her parents that Emma has seen the moon and the sun, and now she is experiencing a true West Coast day—foggy and gloomy. Emma is given some medications so that she will not experience any pain or distress and is settled with her parents in a secluded corner of the garden. The priest performs last rites. The nurse removes all the tape and then the endotracheal tube while Emma remains peaceful in her parents’ arms. We give the family private space to be together but, along with other members of the team (the priest, the NICU social worker, and the NICU nurse with additional medications ready in case Emma experiences any distress), are available in the play garden if needed.

The play garden is on a busy street, and we are concerned that the level of traffic noise might be disturbing to the family. Our concerns increase when the siren starts at the nearby fire hall and the fire truck roars past; Emma’s dad simply walks over to the fence and lifts her up to see her first fire truck. Emma and her parents walk the paths of the garden. Although there is still bustle and noise around them, it is clear that Emma and her family are in their own little world. Although they had opportunities to do normal family things over the past week, this is the first time Emma and her parents experience each other without the interference of machines, tubes, wires, or other people.

Emma lives for another 2 hours. After she dies, her parents continue to hold her for another hour. Both sets of grandparents return with Sara and Markus to say good-bye to Emma. Although the children were both told what Emma would look and feel like after she died, Markus in particular has many questions about whether she is hungry, why she is cold, and if she is just sleeping. Karina responds gently to all of their questions to help them understand what has happened. When the family is ready, Sara and Markus spend some time with the child life therapist while a senior nurse, Patrick, partners with you to help Karina and Eduardo prepare Emma’s body. Patrick asks the parents if they have any special rituals they would like to do, and he explains about what needs to be done to meet the hospital rules. Everyone works together and though it is sad there is also a peacefulness as Karina and Eduardo talk about how happy they are to have done things the way they wanted to. They thank you and Patrick and say how grateful they are that the staff made it possible for Emma to die in peace in such a beautiful setting; Karina and Eduardo say that they will never forget what the staff did. With one last kiss on Emma’s forehead, they leave for home with the rest of their family.

Patrick assists you in completing all the charting and necessary paperwork related to Emma’s death. Because Eduardo and Karina decided against having an autopsy, Emma does not need to go to the hospital morgue. Patrick calls the funeral home and accompanies you as you carry Emma’s body in a special softly colored and patterned bag to meet the funeral home director at the staff entrance to the hospital. You return to the unit and spend some time talking with Patrick and me. We make sure that you have a way home and a friend available to spend the evening with you. I also contact your clinical coordinator to let her know about the day’s events to make sure that you have some ongoing support from the faculty. A few days later I invite you to attend a special debriefing session with NICU staff.

Because the funeral takes place 3 hours away, you are unable to attend. I suggest that you send a note to the family and offer to review it if needed (see Box 10-8 in text).

One Month Later

That was not the end of our relationship with this family. We make a home visit a month after Emma’s death, where we learn about the funeral. Karina and Eduardo remark that they were very happy when two of their favorite NICU nurses came to Emma’s funeral. They tell us about how moved they were when they received notes from you and some of the other nurses, as well as a card from NICU staff. They tell us that it helps them to know she touched the hearts of those who looked after her. We discuss how Karina and Eduardo are managing as a couple and as parents. Eduardo is back at work; Sara and Markus are back at preschool and school. Both sets of grandparents have gone home. At this point we draw an ecomap (Fig. 10-5) of the family’s community connections, discuss their experiences of grief, and work together to map out avenues of support available locally. We let Karina and Eduardo know that they will receive a letter with an appointment to see a geneticist in about 6 months. Because there was a genetic component to Emma’s diagnosis, they may want to explore genetic testing and understand any possible risks for future pregnancies. A follow-up visit with the NICU neonatologist, CNS, and social worker will be coordinated to occur on the same day to respond to any questions the parents may have about Emma’s illness and death, as well as to see how the family is coping. We invite Karina and Eduardo to bring Sara and Markus then to meet with the child life therapist.

Figure 10-5. Garcia family ecomap.

We also let them know that the NICU has a formal program where, with the parents’ permission, staff nurses are supported to contact families at regular intervals in the first year after the death and then send a plant on the 1-year anniversary. Karina and Eduardo express their appreciation for such a program and say they can only imagine how hard it will be on the anniversary of Emma’s death; to know that the NICU staff who looked after her will be thinking of them gives them great comfort.

 

Based on this week’s family assignment case study answer the following case study discussion questions:

When palliative care began for Emma? When did it change to end-of-life care?

What are the six qualities of palliative care and how this team met each of those qualities?

How did the NICU staff and care team helped the Garcia family through Emma’s dying and death. Is there anything else that could have been done to assist this famicholy with their grieving process?

 

What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated? What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?

WEEK 3 GROUP THERAPY

The Assignment
In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:

What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
What did you notice that the therapist did well?
Explain something that you would have handled differently.
What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?

Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What was your differential diagnosis? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority.

Assessing and Diagnosing Patient With Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and OCD

To prepare:

(1) Consider the insight this week’s resources provided about assessing and diagnosing anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and trauma- and stressor-related disorders.
(2) Use the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template, to complete this Assignment. Also, review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar to see an example of a completed evaluation document.
(3) Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
(4) Consider what Interview Questions you would need to ask this patient.
(5) Identify at least three Possible Differential diagnoses for this Patient.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS ARE:

(A) Complete and Submit the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, Including your Differential diagnosis and critical- thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
(2) Incorporate the following into your responses in the template.

(A) SUBJECTIVE: What details did the patient provide regarding their CHIEF COMPLAINT and symptomology to derive Your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their Symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?

(B) OBJECTIVE: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?

(C) ASSESSMENT: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What was your differential diagnosis? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR CRITERIA rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

(D) REFLECTION: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over?

(E) Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations( demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment), health promotion, and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors ( such as age, ethnic group, etc), Protected health information (PHI), and other risk factors ( e.g, socioeconomic, cultural background, etc). (F)

Answer ALL parts of the assignment questions with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge using APA format with no grammar or spelling errors. (G) Please provide at least four references.

Construct a 10-15 minute PowerPoint presentation on a disorder within your assigned system. Create the scenario based on how the alteration typically presents.

Identification, Treatment, and Management of STEMI

APA, not counting title and reference slides. Use 3 scholarly sources within 5 years, the text can be one of the sources. I can edit/add any needed info from the text if needed. The text citation is here, if you are able to access it, please feel free to use as a reference; McCance, K. L., & Huether, S. E. (2022). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). Mosby. (I have attached some pictures of the text regarding the MI section of reading, if it helps).
Please do not worry about the narration, I will take care of that.

ASSIGNMENT:
Construct a 10-15 minute (narrated) PowerPoint presentation on a disorder within your assigned system (see below). To complete the assignment, you will create the scenario based on how the alteration typically presents.

Reflect on a person you know who faced end-of-life and how religion or spirituality influenced their experience, their decisions, etc… Or reflect on how religion or spirituality influenced your experience at end-of-life. Write about the encounter.

Personal Reactions/Experiences to a Death

Make all research related to Nursing in Ontario.

Topic #3: A Person at End-of-Life and How Religion or Spirituality Influenced Their Experience or Your Experience (self-reflect)

Reflect on a person you know who faced end-of-life and how religion or spirituality influenced their experience, their decisions, etc… Or reflect on how religion or spirituality influenced your experience at end-of-life. Write about the encounter. Include a description of the experience. Some dynamics to consider: your relationship with the person, being there for the person, the person’s well-being and suffering, your compassion and empathy. Some questions to consider: Did you gain any insights about yourself? How might this experience change you going forward? Comment on how you were personally affected by this situation. (Adapted from Wald, Borkan, Taylor, Anthony, & Reis, 2012).