How would the use of the Roy Adaptation Model assist the nurse in planning the continuation of care for Sgt. Johns? Describe the influence of Roy’s Theory in guiding the nurse’s actions in promoting Sgt. Johns adjusted self-concept.

Roy and Neuman

Assignment description to discuss the following…

Sgt. Eddie Johns leaned back against the chair in the outpatient orthopedic clinic. His head was killing him! He wasn’t sure which was worse, the “morning after” headache or not being able to sleep at night. At least when he had a few beers under his belt so he could catch a few hours of sleep. It had been like this since he was air evacuated back stateside from Afghanistan after the roadside bomb went off. He was thankful that he had only broken his leg in a couple of places and gotten a bad bump on the head. They called that traumatic brain injury but he didn’t know what that was and really didn’t believe them anyway. He was still thinking just fine. His friend Joe wasn’t so lucky! How was Joe going to learn to walk on those artificial legs? He was still in the hospital in Washington, DC. That was pretty far from his home. Eddie wished he could visit Joe. They had been in the same platoon for 9 months. But, Eddie was glad that he had been able to come back to his own home town for outpatient treatment. It took an hour to get here but at least he could see his girl almost every day. Sure he had moved back in with his mom but it was easier to have someone to help him get around and cook for him. It was a bummer that he couldn’t work right now. He guessed it didn’t matter much since he really didn’t have a job to go back to. He had been replaced at the plant. They said they would find something for him to do once he could get around more easily. Eddie sure hoped the doc would take the pins out of his leg today and give him a clearance to work.

• How would the use of the Roy Adaptation Model assist the nurse in planning the continuation of care for Sgt. Johns?

• Describe the influence of Roy’s Theory in guiding the nurse’s actions in promoting Sgt. Johns adjusted self-concept.

• From the perspective of the Roy Adaptation Model, why is it important for the nurse to listen to Sgt. Johns’ “story” in his own words and not just base her interactions on information from the chart, fellow colleagues, or his family?

• Based on Neuman System’s Model, identify at least 4 stressors from the case study. Create a plan of care based on Neuman Systems Model for Sgt. Johns.

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

• Write a 1000 -1500 word APA paper addressing each of the following points. answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise way.

• Structure: Include an objective page, content pages, reference page in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference pages do not count towards the minimum page count for this assignment.

• References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of one (1) outside scholarly sources and the textbook are required for this assignment.

Make a PowerPoint that is brief and covers the main concept/s of the subject/s. The PowerPoint should be no longer than 1-2 slides per subject you are given.

Maternal Newborn- Magnesium sulfate and terbutaline Powerpoint Presentation

You will make a PowerPoint that is brief and covers the main concept/s of the subject/s. The PowerPoint should be no longer than 1-2 slides per subject you are given. You will present the PowerPoint during class time.

Critically analyse their skills in leadership and discuss their role within the multi-disciplinary team. Discuss and how they work within the team and facilitate the learning of colleagues.

Working in Teams

The module assessment is a 3,000-word written critique in which the student will critically analyse their skills in leadership and discuss their role within the multi-disciplinary team.

The critique will require the student to discuss their leadership skills and how they work within the team and facilitate the learning of colleagues.

Identify a health condition or health issue and state a title for your summative assignment. Describe background and explain rationale of health condition / health issue including definitions. Discuss the epidemiology of your health condition, including risk factors,who is at risk, how it presents, prevalence or incidence in specific area; population group.

The prevalence and the consequences of childhood obesity in the UK

Assignment Criteria and guideline

1, Identify a health condition or health issue and state a title for your summative assignment. The prevalence and the consequences of childhood obesity in the UK

2, Introduce your assignment, signposting the purposes and contents of your assignment (250-300 words) 2 to 4 references

3, Describe background and explain rationale of health condition / health issue including definitions; (200-250 words) 2 to 4 references.

4, Discuss the epidemiology of your health condition, including risk factors,who is at risk, how it presents, prevalence or incidence in specific area; population group (200-250 words) 2 to 3 references.

5, Explain an assessment of the health condition, including assessment tools (if applicable); or literature evidence (200-250 words) 2 to 3 references.

6, Introduce and describe a health promotion model(s) and which approaches you would apply (200-300 words) 3-4 references.

7, Describe 2 to 3 health promotion goals that you would like to achieve, ensuring SMART objectives (200-300 words) 2 to 3 references.

8, Critically discuss interventions for your health promotion goals, including roles of the individual, relations, groups, communities, multi and inter disciplinary teams, organisations, departments, etc.

9, Remember to give interventions for each health promotion goal you would like to achieve. (700-800 words) 5 to 7 references.

10, Critically discuss the evaluation of your health promotion care planning, especially your interventions, including effectiveness, what works or not work, alternatives, justification, and recommendations. (500-600 words) 4 to 6 references.

11, Conclusion Reinforce the key elements of your assignment do not any anything new here. (200-300 words) 2 references

What do these findings mean? What are the implications of the findings to clinical practice? How do the research findings compare to clinical practice and/or policy and guidelines? Are they aligned with clinical practice? Is clinical practice aligned with up-to-date policy and guidelines? What is the impact of current clinical practice in the care of patients/service users? What strategies or recommendations have been made to improve current clinical practice?

Smoking amongst young adults.

Contemporary nursing report (3000 words)
Artefact 1 requires you to identify and explore a contemporary problem in public health, review the literature relevant to the problem and provide recommendations for clinical practice or organization development. You are expected to write at the required level 6 standard, which includes supporting your ideas with academic references, and offering a critical analysis and synthesis of the evidence base relevant to your contemporary problem.
The report should fully discuss the contemporary nursing problem that you have identified and articulate the root causes contributing to the problem. You should present your methodology for searching the academic literature in a systematic way, the results of the papers that have been retrieved and a discussion of how the findings have informed your recommendations for clinical practice and organizational development.
Although you can decide on the layout and structure of your project report, I recommend that you follow the structure below. This structure allows you to meet the marking criteria and ensures clarity. You can choose a different structure as long as you meet the requirements of the marking rubric. You are expected to make good use of tables, diagrams, charts, text boxes and images in the main text of your report. These are not included in the word count of the assignment but will be marked. You should also make use of subheadings to provide clarity to your work. You are not expected to include appendices, unless you wish to include information which is not your own work to add context or clarity to your report. The total word count for this assignment is 3000 words.
The following is a suggested structure for your report. There are suggested word counts for each section in brackets.

Title
The title of your report should accurately reflect your contemporary nursing problem. Examples of suitable titles: ‘The health impact of obesity in the United Kingdom’ or ‘Weight loss conversations between overweight patients and nurses.’

Abstract (250-300 words)
Provide a brief summary of the contents of the report. It’s worth writing this last, when you know the key points of your assignment. Remember the abstract is designed to provide a brief snapshot of your report. It should be no more than 300 words.
Key Sections:
• Background
• Methods
• Findings
• Conclusion and Recommendations

Smoking amongst young adults.
Introduction (600 words)
Why is this a problem? How big is the problem? What is the impact of the problem?
You should start by introducing the contemporary problem you are interested in studying and explain why this is a concern. In addition to this, you should link the contemporary nursing problem to previous placements or clinical observations. For example, you have observed an increased number of patients with obesity in clinical practice or you have provided care to patients with alcohol/substance misuse, and you decide to investigate this further. You may want to understand the root causes of this, you may want to understand the factors that led to alcohol misuse (social determinants of health, for example) or you may want to understand the overall health, social and economic impact of alcohol/substance misuse in the United Kingdom.
You should clearly articulate why the contemporary problem is an issue, whilst supporting your ideas with academic references. You may want to reference clinical or professional guidelines, policies or standard operating procedures (SOPs) that you feel care is not aligned with.
You should end your introduction with an overall aim for your literature review.

Literature review (1700 words)
It is important to undertake a literature review to understand the evidence for care in the context of the contemporary problem you have selected. The literature review should explore the problem in detail and offer potential solutions/recommendations to the problem. For example, if you would like to understand the health impact of alcohol misuse in teenagers, you could also explore the recommendations suggested by the literature on how to minimize/limit its impact. It may be that public health campaigns need to target a specific population group and increase the use of social media to reach teenagers. Guidance on how to carry out a literature review can be sought from myself.
In the literature review, you can include original research, systematic reviews, and non-research publications in your literature review.
Search methodology: what did you do to find the papers you will review?
This section should clearly document your approach to finding the relevant literature in a way that someone else could take your strategy and retrieve the same papers. You may need to do several searches in order to fully understand the context of the problem.
You should clearly present the key terms, Boolean operators, wildcards and truncation used; define the inclusion and exclusion criteria (methodology, publication year, translations, international studies etc.) and provide a justification for these, with the support of academic references, where appropriate.
You should clearly explain and justify the search strategy, including the databases that you used to search the literature (for example, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, etc.). If you decided to include grey literature, you should also describe a search strategy.
You should record the number of results you gained at each stage of your search and should present these figures using a PRISMA flow diagram such as this (Moher, Liberati,

Tetzlaff & Altman, 2009).
Findings: what did you find?
In this section, you will describe the papers you have found in your search and their findings. The optimum number of papers for this review is 5-8 papers. You may wish to consider presenting a summary of studies table within the main text of your report. In addition to this table, you should offer a synthesis of the papers you have read, by bringing together the key themes generated from the different papers (often called thematic analysis). This approach will allow you to capture and summarise relevant information to your contemporary problem.
In this section, you should only present the findings from the papers included in the review. You will be able to discuss the findings and use more literature in the next section –

Discussion.
Discussion: What do the findings mean?
In this chapter, you should think critically about the research findings of the literature review (chapter described above). Please consider the following questions as a way to guide and prompt your discussion: What do these findings mean? What are the implications of the findings to clinical practice? How do the research findings compare to clinical practice and/or policy and guidelines? Are they aligned with clinical practice? Is clinical practice aligned with up-to-date policy and guidelines? What is the impact of current clinical practice in the care of patients/service users? What strategies or recommendations have been made to improve current clinical practice?
You do not need to answer all of these questions, but you need to demonstrate that you have critically thought about your research findings.

In addition, it is expected that you consider the strengths and limitations of the included papers, and the limitations of your literature search. I suggest that you dedicate around 2 paragraphs to each part – one paragraph to the limitations of the papers and another paragraph to the limitations of the search strategy. You should also provide the limitations for individual papers in a separate table or in the summary of studies table.

You could use a critical appraisal tool to support you, e.g. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP; 2019). If you are using a CASP checklist, you should ensure that you select the most appropriate one for each paper.

Conclusion and recommendations (400 words)
The conclusion sets out what inferences you draw from the information. Ensure the main premises or issues are summarised in a meaningful way. For example, you may say that “The literature review suggested that obesity remains an area of concern in the UK, with deprivation and the surrounding environment being the most common cause…” In addition, you should also consider whether you have met all objectives.

Lastly, you should provide clear recommendations for clinical practice or organisational development, and ensure these are realistic and specific. These recommendations should be linked to research evidence, relevant to your contemporary nursing problem and be based on public health approaches and theory.

How did you /your family feel while completing the advanced directive? What was difficult? What was easy?

Reflective essay on dying, “Five Wishes”

Reflect on your thoughts and emotions during the experience and express these in a brief 4-5 pag) essay.

Write a summary of this experience discussing your wishes.
Focus on the process of the discussion, your/significant others’ thoughts and feelings about the conversation. You do not have to share specific decisions.

How did you /your family feel while completing the advanced directive?
What was difficult? What was easy?
Include your decisions, if you wish, and some of the thought behind your choices.

You do not need to submit your advance directive itself. That is personal and none of my business. Just submit the essay.

Does maintaining nurse patient ratios, limiting overtime, and providing staff with mental health support, reduce burnout and improve the quality of care?

Prevention of burning among nurses

PICOT Question:
Does maintaining nurse patient ratios, limiting overtime, and providing staff with mental health support, reduce burnout and improve the quality of care?

Describe a policy initiative implemented by nurse leaders from a national professional nursing association, the processes used by the organization in formulating and implementing a policy agenda and the current outcomes of the initiative.

Strategizing and Creating Change

Describe a policy initiative implemented by nurse leaders from a national professional nursing association, the processes used by the organization in formulating and implementing a policy agenda and the current outcomes of the initiative.

 

What are the current practices?, Role of district/ community nurses in public health promotion? What is not happening and why? What are the barriers?

The involvement of district/community nurses in identifying potential risks for venous ulcers and preventing these.

What are the current practices?, Role of district/ community nurses in public health promotion? What is not happening and why? What are the barriers?

Current situation. All these questions must be addressed in the essay and must meet level 7 standard with Harward style references with page numbers. References must be between -25-30 at least.

Identify a suitable change theory and provide a rationale for its selection, why this one? Discuss the chosen change theory model and explore the strengths and limitations of the theory. Embed your service improvement plan into the different stages of the change theory.

Early recognition of Delirium

1) Adhere to the word count distribution among sections:

– Background: should be 500 words / you have 582 words
– Literature review: should be not more than 2000 words/ you have 2645 words
– Change management: should be not more than 2000 words / you have 2378 words

Keep the paper within the word-count of 4500 words +/- 10% leeway. Right now, it is exceeded with more than 1000 words.

2) Address all comments from the file “Draft_add.docx”.

3) Literature Review:

– The rationale for the search strategy should be presented in the beginning of this section, and it should not be a separate section.
– CASP critiquing tool – this section should contain only a rationale for using a critiquing tool/framework the CASP Critiquing Tool. You need to include an example of one of the research papers being reviewed with the CASP Critiquing Tool as your appendix 2.
– Since the study given for the example of CASP tool application is supposed to be one of the studies under review, it is strange that this study is not actually reviewed in the literature review itself:

Brooke, J. and Manneh, C., 2018. Caring for a patient with delirium in an acute hospital: The lived experience of cardiology, elderly care, renal, and respiratory nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, [e-journal] 24(4), e12643.

– Issues /focusses raised by the literature: each article analysis should include the following parameters:

• Discussion on the research methods used by the key pieces of research found during the search
• Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods
• Sample Size
• Data collection methods – interviews/focus groups/questionnaires
• Use at least 5 (the UK) research papers on your topic to complete this section, which I have provided.
• Explore the findings of the papers and build a discussion showing the issues within the topic area
• Link in other pieces of literature and evidence – policies, websites, books, guidelines, articles.

4) Change Management:

“Change Management” subsection is not necessary.

The section should be fully restructured to cover the following:

• Identify a suitable change theory and provide a rationale for its selection, why this one?
• Discuss the chosen change theory model and explore the strengths and limitations of the theory
• Embed your service improvement plan into the different stages of the change theory
• Recognise and explore the challenges with implementing change – utilise other literature and evidence to deepen this discussion
• Identify potential ways to overcome challenges and barriers to change: Leadership – choose for example , transformational leaderships styles; Communication; Multi-disciplinary team working.
• Consider the resources needed to implement the change is it just leadership, communication, and multi-disciplinary working?
• This section must consider the service user – how are they involved in the change? How will they benefit?
• Consider how you will know that the change has taken place and is embedded
• Recommendation