Discussion 1
From your assigned readings and outside research on the topic, consider the difference between a “manager” and a “leader.” What do you feel are the three biggest differences? What is the benefit and disadvantage of a manager, and what is the benefit and disadvantage of a leader?
Module 3 | Part 3
A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
The role of a nurse practitioner
As a health care provider, an NP will face many ethical dilemmas. Review this report about 21st-century nursing ethics. Although this report uses an MD-based survey, it still provides a recent example of the top ethical dilemmas in clinical practice. Determine an ethical stance on one of these dilemmas, and defend your viewpoint. In addition, provide the pros and cons of your stance.
Your content should have 500–700 words with at least 2 scholarly references.
Education on lifestyle changes to lower obesity
A. Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient(s) and the organization it affects.
1. Identify the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem:
• patient/population/problem (P)
• intervention (I)
• comparison (C)
• outcome (O)
2. Develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question based on the clinical practice problem discussed in part A and the PICO components identified in part A1.
Note: Refer to “Appendix B: Question Development Tool” for information on the creation of an EBP question.
B. Select a research-based article that answers your EBP question from part A2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.
1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the research article.
2. Describe the research methodology.
3. Identify the level of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model.
Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.
Note: Refer to “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to level a research-based article.
4. Summarize how the researcher analyzed the data in the article.
5. Summarize the ethical consideration(s) of the research-based article. If none are present, explain why.
6. Identify the quality rating of the research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.
Note: Refer to “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to establish the quality rating.
7. Analyze the results or conclusions of the research-based article and explain how the article helps answer your EBP question.
C. Select a non-research article from a peer-reviewed journal that helps to answer your EBP question from part A2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.
1. Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the non-research article.
2. Describe the type of evidence (e.g., case study, quality improvement project, clinical practice guideline).
3. Identify the level of evidence using the JHNEBP model.
Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.
Note: Refer to “Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” for information on how to level the non-research-based article.
4. Identify the quality rating of the non-research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.
5. Discuss how the author’s recommendation(s) in the article helps to answer your EBP question.
D. Recommend a practice change that addresses your EBP question using both the research and non-research articles you selected for Part B and Part C.
1. Explain how you would involve three key stakeholders in supporting the practice change recommendation.
2. Discuss one specific barrier you may encounter when implementing the practice change recommendation.
3. Identify one strategy that could be used to overcome the barrier discussed in part D2.
4. Identify one outcome (the O component in PICO) from your EBP question to measure the recommended practice change.
E. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
Academic and professional goals
Your essay should discuss your academic and professional goals and should be 2-3 pages (double spaced) in length. Your essay should answer questions such as: How will enrolling in the B.S./M.S. Dual Degree Program at NYU Meyers help you achieve these goals? Why is your specific master’s degree program of choice a good fit for you?
Use of alcohol and drug on parents
Topic to do is How parents alcohol and drug use affects children in adolescent years.
As part of the course students must write a term-paper on a condition, situation, scenario specific
to a stage in the life-span (ex. Crises, aging, “failure to launch”, marriage/divorce, empty nest,
sandwich generation, etc.) The term paper must be typed with 1” margins, double spacing and a
12 point Times Roman font. The paper should also include a reference list. A minimum of five
references must be utilized. The American Psychological Association format must also be utilized
for the paper. The paper should be between four and six pages in length (not including cover page,
abstract, references, exhibits, etc.).
Portfolio
Title Page (APA format)
Table of contents
1 Page Personal Philosophy: Write a brief page on your philosophy of advanced practice nursing in primary care.
2 PAGES NP Role definition: Write a brief paper that includes your definition and characterization of the NP role in the current U.S. healthcare environment.
Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Executive Final Presentation Paper for Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) Implementation and Evaluation
Implementation Context (20 points):
Describe the problem, the setting, and the context.
Identify impacted end user(s).
Breakdown the workflow of the impacted end user(s) without the technology and predict workflow with the technology.
Identify key stakeholders who need to ‘buy-in’ to solution’s implementation and the importance of their buy-in.
Assess competing solutions for the proposed CDSS which expands upon their existing gaps or inevitable competition for the proposed CDSS.
Implementation Approach (20 points):
Identify key champions who garner change for a successful clinical implementation.
Identify risks upon implementation and subsequent methods to mitigate identified risks relating to any existing impediments (change management, behavior management, cultural notions, etc.).
Describe data sources needed and extracted from source systems, and the complexity of obtaining such data elements.
Implementation Plan (20 points):
Create a roll-out plan for health care organization to include target areas such as specific service lines, levels of care, etc.
Develop an education plan required to train clinical (or other) end users.
Discuss how you will ensure connectivity and integration to databases encompassing data sources needed for the solution’s success.
Predict environmental and cultural factors which may inhibit the success of the solution.
Outline methods to mitigate risk with the product’s implementation such as change management, behavior management, cultural notions, data obtainment, data timeliness, etc. (specifically to speak to your identified clinical or project champion).
Evaluate existing policies/processes which need to change in order to accommodate the implementation of the CDSS.
Implementation Goals & Evaluation (20 points):
Compose the goals/outcomes which prove the success (or lack thereof) of the solution’s implementation.
Describe the framework or theory to be utilized as the conceptual underpinning of the project and to assist in the evaluation of the project.
Design the methodology of obtaining feedback in order to measure the success of the solution’s implementation.
Discuss the milestones that must be achieved before further-roll out of the CDSS occurs across the organization.
Organization, Writing Style, Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, and Formatting (20 points):
Presentation and style of the paper are consistent with scholarly work and reflect use of APA format (7th ed.).
Be sure to include the requirements outlined in the scoring rubric.
The paper is limited to 10 – 12 pages (excluding the title page and references; abstract not required) and must reflect APA 6th edition standards for formatting (e.g., title page, 2-level headings, references, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, usage) and writing consistent with Standard American English.
Parental perception of support in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
– [ ] Start with background- background to the study. A focus question. Why you have the focus question. Put question at the end.
– [ ] Methodology- inclusion and exclusion. Best available evidence. Why you think they are the best to answer the questions. Best articles to answer the question. Best available evidence. Summary of the articles selected.
– [ ] Give reader sense of what the article is about. Explained the process. Tell what they are. Summary table of the articles. Table goes in appendix (appendix is not marked).
– [ ] Findings- review the articles. Thematic analysis, themes. Topic 1. Subjects for discussion. Themes that emerge from thematic analysis. Conclusion. Topic 3. What patients think. Topic 2. What healthcare professionals think.
Audit trail.- all steps taken of how u got somewhere. How and why u selected the articles. Explai why the articles are okay.
– [ ] Inclusion and exclusion criteria- what time period. Min 6 articles. Best available evidence. Identify themes from articles.
– [ ] Explain in the seearchibv how u got keywords= Boolean operators. Explain why you chose the data bases. Ovid-search
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.