Prepare no more than a 3-page summary not counting the cover page and reference page of the method and search strategy to answer the background question that is Cancer Patients and increased risk of Post-Operative Venous Thromboembolisms (VTEs).

Prepare no more than a 3-page summary not counting the cover page and reference page of the method and search strategy to answer the background question that is Cancer Patients and increased risk of Post-Operative Venous Thromboembolisms (VTEs).

In addition to savings on personnel costs, what benefits does this arrangement have?

CASE STUDY #3
Read and study the case on Health Maintenance Organization (B) – Case 5.2, p. 144 of the textbook. DO NOT answer the questions at the end of the case on p. 144. Answer the following 3 questions:
1. Draw an initial flowchart for this process using an example on slide 15 of the lecture materials. Identify the process bottleneck, cycle time and flow capacity. Can this initial process flow have a capacity of 50 patients per hour? Explain your answer.
2. Identify and draw an improved layout (process flow) that will allow to have the capacity of 50 patients per hour. Use two pharmacists and two technicians for this layout. Explain what you improve, identify bottleneck, cycle time, and flow capacity per hour. (Hint: use the example on slide 16 of the lecture materials).
3. In addition to savings on personnel costs, what benefits does this arrangement have?

Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.

RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines
NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice.
(POs 4 and 8)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
this assignment.
Total points possible: 200 points
Preparing the assignment
1. Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
2. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
3. The paper will include the following:
a. Clinical Question (30 points/15%)
1. Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this
is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
3. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?
***Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of
this paper is different. You can use your paper 1 for items 1 & 2 above, including any faculty suggestions for
improvement provided as feedback.
b. Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) – (60 points/30%)
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
1. References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
2. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
3. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
4. Study Design
5. Sample Size and Selection
6. Data Collection Methods
7. Major Findings (Evidence)
c. Description of Findings (60 points/30%)
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
1. Compare and contrast variables within each study.
2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method
study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?
3. Participant demographics and information.
4. Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
5. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence
is needed to answer your question?
6. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
d. Conclusion (20 points/10%)
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
1. Evidence to address your clinical problem.
2. Make a connection back to all the included sections.
2
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice
RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines
NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_Guidelines_Sept20_v2 2
3. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.
e. Format (30 points/15%)
1. Correct grammar and spelling
2. Include a title and reference page
3. Use of headings for each section:
o Problem
o Synthesis of the Literature
− Variables
− Methods
− Participants
− Instruments
− Implications for Future Work
4. Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines
6. Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook
7. 3-4 pages in length, excluding appendices, title and reference pages
For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library

Identify a disease or disorder that disrupts the cardiovascular system.

Using credible sources, identify a disease or disorder that disrupts the cardiovascular system. Be sure to discuss what the disease or disorder is, how it impacts the cardiovascular system, and ultimately how it impacts daily life for a person with this disease or disorder.  Be sure to cite your sources following guidelines. Credible sources include the use of the peer reviewed articles.

Design a Stress Management Implementation Plan for this patient.

Questions and answers to be solve

CASE STUDY / PATIENT HISTORY:

A young woman sought psychological services after her cardiologist referred her for stress management and treatment of “heart attack” symptoms. This 36-year-old woman had the world by the tail. Marketing director for a local high-tech firm, she was in line for promotion to vice president. She drove a new sports car, traveled extensively, and was socially active.

Although on the surface everything seemed fine, she felt that, “the wheels on my tricycle are about to fall off. I’m a mess.” Over the past several months she had attacks of shortness of breath, heart palpitations, chest pains, dizziness, and tingling sensations in her fingers and toes. Filled with a sense of impending doom, she would become anxious to the point of panic. Every day she awoke with a dreaded feeling that an attack might strike without reason or warning.

On two occasions, she rushed to a nearby hospital emergency room fearing she was having a heart attack. The first episode followed an argument with her boyfriend about the future of their relationship. After studying her electrocardiogram, the emergency room doctor told her she was “just hyperventilating” and showed her how to breathe into a paper bag to handle the situation in the future. She felt foolish and went home embarrassed, angry and confused. She remained convinced that she had almost had a heart attack.

Her next severe attack occurred after a fight at work with her boss over a new marketing campaign. This time she insisted that she be hospitalized overnight for extensive diagnostic tests and that her internist be consulted. The results were the same–no heart attack. Her internist prescribed a tranquilizer to calm her down.

Convinced now that her own doctor was wrong, she sought the advice of a cardiologist, who conducted another battery of tests, again with no physical findings. The doctor concluded that stress was the primary cause of the panic attacks and “heart attack” symptoms.

Using the information from this case study, you will design a Stress Management Implementation Plan for this patient. Draw on the information you received in this class to help you complete the following plan. Format your Management Plan using the template provided in a separate file.

Define community nursing as it relates to nurse practitioner practice.

Define community nursing as it relates to nurse practitioner practice. Describe the nurse practioner’s role in screening and promoting health for people in the community. Support your answer with evidence-based research.

Citations: At least two high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Give the importance of ethics and integrity in the nursing profession.

A 15-page research paper in APA format with a minimum of 10 peer reviewed
references. The topic of the paper is: “The importance of ethics and integrity in the nursing profession.”

Explain five key historical influences on nursing and nursing education today.

Write a short article about the history and future trends of the nurse educator role. The article will run in a newsletter for nurses and nurse educators, and should be approximately 2 pages long.
In your article, be sure to do the following:
Explain five key historical influences on nursing and nursing education today. Be sure to address why these influences are important and how they have had an impact.
Analyze three trends you believe will impact nursing and nursing education in the future. Explain how those trends relate to what you understand about nursing history.
Support your assertions with credible sources. You can use the Resources in this assessment and conduct additional research in the Capella library.

Identify characteristics of professional behavior including emotional intelligence, communication, and conflict resolution.

: Identify characteristics of professional behavior including emotional intelligence, communication, and conflict resolution.

: Demonstrate information literacy and the ability to utilize resources

Propose an intervention plan that references relevant processes to improve quality and safety, and reduce costs in the context of a chosen health problem.

Instructions

Use a provided template to develop a 3-5 page proposal for an intervention and implementation plan related to the health problem you defined in the first assessment.

For this assessment, you will be designing and planning the implementation for the intervention to improve the health problem you defined in the first assessment. You will also examine implications of interprofessional collaboration, technology, and organizational and governmental policies for your intervention and implementation plans.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care. ◦Propose an intervention plan that references relevant processes to improve quality and safety, and reduce costs in the context of a chosen health problem.
  • Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes. ◦Analyze technology within a chosen health care practice context to support a proposed plan.
  • Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care. ◦Explain the ways in which existing governmental or organizational policies could impact the proposed plan.
  • Competency 6: Collaborate interprofessionally to improve patient and population outcomes. ◦Explain strategies for communicating and collaborating with patients and interprofessional teams to improve health outcomes.
  • Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice. ◦Communicate professionally in writing that is clear and logically organized, with correct grammar, spelling, and use of APA style.

Preparation

Your intervention and implementation plan should be carried out in an interprofessional context, aligned to your topic, and based on the work you did in the first assessment. You should find collaborators as soon as possible so you can solicit their feedback about intervention and implementation plans to inform your approach.

Instructions

Having identified a health problem relevant to your current or future nursing practice and reviewed the literature to support nursing standards, decision making, and improvement strategies, you should now plan an intervention to address the chosen health problem based on the research you conducted.

Construct a plausible plan that leverages the best practices and research collected to date as well as additional research into similar projects that you find in the literature. Be sure to frame your plan within the context of the health care setting in which you are completing your practicum hours. Incorporate relevant site-specific processes and policies into your implementation plan.

Use the Plan Proposal Template [DOC] to complete this assessment.

As you develop your plan, be sure to address the following:

  • Remote collaboration and communication with patients and colleagues to improve health outcomes. The patients and colleagues can be friends and family.
  • Governmental or organizational policies that could affect the plan.
  • Quality and safety improvement strategies.
  • Technology at the site that could be leveraged.

Scoring Guide Criteria

Your submission will be assessed based on the following criteria:

  • Propose an intervention plan that references relevant processes to improve quality and safety, and reduce costs in the context of a chosen health problem.
  • Analyze technology within a chosen health care practice context to support a proposed plan.
  • Explain the ways in which existing governmental or organizational policies could impact the proposed plan.
  • Explain strategies for communicating and collaborating with patients and interprofessional teams to improve health outcomes.
  • Communicate professionally in writing that is clear and logically organized, with correct grammar, spelling, and use of APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 3 to 5 pages. You do not need to include a title page. Be sure to complete the reference page at the end of the template.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.