Discuss strategies for overcoming barriers in implementing evidence-based practice with references sufficient to support strategies.

/in /by

For students in the Simulated Case Study:
Case Study: Weekly discuss implementing your proposed evidence-based practice change project during the COVID-19 pandemic:
Discuss best practices for implementing evidence-based practice/ guidelines with references sufficient to support best practice.
· Discuss strategies for overcoming barriers in implementing evidence-based practice with references sufficient to support strategies.
· Provide the PICOT question for your DNP Project each week.
Week 7 in NR707 – Discuss:
Discuss your ongoing implementation progress and in meeting with staff and observation – how are addressing challenges regarding your formative evaluation and providing feedback?
· What feedback are you providing to participants that are a result of your observational formative evaluation?
· How is this feedback being provided?
· Is additional education needed at this point? If so, how would you provide this education?
· To date – what have you learned about your project and the implementation process? Are you learning what you expected or is your experience different than anticipated? Describe what you are learning.
Reference should not be older than 5 years old

Explain your reasons for wanting to enter the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Nursing.

/in /by

Explain your reasons for wanting to enter the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Nursing. Please, explain why you have chosen nursing as a career?

.Discuss what Transgenerational trauma is in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

/in /by

1Assessment task 3:Analysis and discussionDue 5pm Wednesday 2ndSeptember 2020Weight: 50%Word limit: 1500 words (+/-10%)The purpose of this assessment is to explore the impact of“Transgenerational Trauma”in relation to “Black Lives Matter”andthe ‘Closing the Gap’(CTG) policy on Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander People’s health outcomes.To complete this task, students are toanalyse the impact of Transgenerational trauma on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and discuss their findings in relation to “Black Lives Matter” and the CTG policy. To ensure all criteria for this assessment are met, please address the points below:1.Discusswhat Transgenerational trauma is in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. To demonstrate your understanding, write a brief explanation of what “Transgenerational trauma” is in the context ofthe contemporary topic of “Black Lives Matter” (Approximately 300 wordsvalue 15%)2.Analysethe impact of transgenerational trauma on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and howthe impactis addressed within the CTG policy. Your discussion shouldincludethe potential long-termconsequences ofthe CTG policyon thehealth and social determinantsof Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People. Your discussion here should refer to specifics within the CTG policy and supported with other relevant literature and statistics.–approximately (Approximately 600wordsvalue 40%)3.Discussthe benefitsof an Aboriginal client being registered with CTG and how this may have an impact on them accessing healthcare.(Approximately 300 wordsvalue 15%)4.Discussas an RN, how you would implement ONE strategyto improve health outcomes for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander person experiencing Transgenerational trauma.(Approximately 300wordsvalue 15%)Application of appropriate terminology throughout the analysis and discussion is weighted at 15% of the result for this assessment. Criteria:Marking Criteria Comprehensive marking criteria for each assessment are available under Assessments in UTSOnline.

2ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES1.The discussion should be supported by relevant literature (peer reviewed) and health statistics.2.Your assessment should be written in full sentences and paragraphs. Paragraphs should use topic and summarising sentences.NO headings.3.You are NOTto use Wikipediato support the discussion. Assessments that do not just rely on the statistics presented in the Literature will attract higher marks. 4.It is expected that presentation of the assessment and referencing will be in accordance with the Faculty guidelines. 5.The References is to be attached on a separate page at the end of the assessment and is not included in the word count. 6.All late assessment submission to be submitted through the same assessment portal. Any students experiencing issues with assessment submission are to email CIHW@uts.edu.au. 7.All documents must be in Microsoft wordonly, NO PDF format–for the reason being there may be a discrepancy in your similarity report.8.There is an expectation that the concept of cultural respect in regard tothe discussion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples is maintained throughout the assignment. E.g. using Capital letters for when referring to Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander People’s and the use of appropriate terminology as explained in the Core lecture.

Identify and articulate leadership styles to support your management of power as the nurse executive at Saint Louis Medical Center.

/in /by

Management of Power
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) identify and articulate leadership styles to support your management of power as the nurse executive at Saint Louis Medical Center (SLMC) (CO 1, 2), (b) compare and contrast organizational structures that may influence the management of power of your role (CO 3), and (c) provide empirical, scholarly evidence to support your assignment in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO 4).
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5
Total Points Possible: 200
REQUIREMENTS:
1. This paper will be graded on quality of paper information, use of citations, use of standard grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.
2. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in .docx.
3. Submit to the appropriate assignment area by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday of the week due. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A discussion topic.
4. The length of the paper is to be no greater than three pages, excluding title page and reference page.
5. APA format using the sixth edition manual is required in this assignment, including a title page and reference page. Use APA level 1 headings for the organizational structure of this assignment. Remember that the introduction does not carry a heading that labels it as a level heading in APA format. The first part of your paper is assumed to be the introduction. See the APA manual sixth edition for details. Use the suggested format and headings to organize your assignment.
a. Include introduction and discuss power (do not label as a heading in APA format)
b. Leadership styles
c. Organizational structures
d. Evidence
e. Conclusion

PREPARING THE PAPER
Note: Use the resources on the assignment page related to SLMC to assist in completion of this assignment, as required.
1. Clearly introduce your assignment and discuss power in the introduction paragraph. Include a sentence that states the purpose of your paper.
2. Clearly identify and articulate leadership styles (at least two) to support your management of power in your role as the nurse executive at SLMC. State how power would be wielded in each and which you prefer; including your rationale.
3. Clearly compare and contrast the effect of organizational structures (at least two structures) that may influence how you manage power at SLMC. State how power would be wielded in each and which you prefer; including your rationale.
4. Include of a minimum of three sources of scholarly, empirical evidence. See resources on the assignment page related to SLMC if you need to review the information.
5. Provide concluding statements that should summarize your overall assignment content.
6. The paper should be no longer than three pages maximum, excluding title and reference pages.
7. Title and reference pages must be in APA format using the sixth edition manual.
8. Use 12 point, Times New Roman font and one-inch margins on all sides of the paper.

Category Points % Description
Introduction 30 15% Introduction clearly introduces your assignment and discusses power; including a statement of the purpose of your paper.
Leadership Styles 40 20% Identification of leadership styles to support your management of power as a nurse executive is clearly articulated. State how power would be wielded in each and which you prefer; including your rationale.
Organizational Structures 45 22.5% The effect of organizational structures that may influence management of power are clearly compared and contrasted. State how power would be wielded in each and which you prefer; including your rationale.
Evidence 30 15% There is a minimum of three scholarly, empirical evidence sources.
Conclusion 30 15% Concluding statements summarizing content are present.
Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. 10 5% Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. 10 5% Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly.
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. 5 2.5% Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed.
Total 200 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

/in /by

Create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment. (COVID 19- employee not cooperating and medication errors).

USE THE TEMPLATE TO WRITE THIS PAPER (ATTACHED BELOW).

Demonstration of Proficiency

  • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
    • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
  • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
    • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
    • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
  • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Communicate the interdisciplinary plan with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Professional Context

This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.

Scenario

Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.

Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.

Instructions

For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.

The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.

Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria .

  • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
  • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
  • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
  • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
  • Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
  • Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting:Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

 

Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

/in /by

A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals.

1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods)
2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part A.

4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices.

B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A.

1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods)
2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part B.

4. Identify one strength and one limitation of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices.

C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Name at least one technology that could improve the implementation process and the outcomes of your capstone project change proposal.

/in /by

Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects, through either support or integration or both. Name at least one technology that could improve the implementation process and the outcomes of your capstone project change proposal. Do you plan to use this technology? If not, what are the barriers that prevent its use?
Capstone change proposal- improve peri-operative nurse to nurse handoff

Cite the article and provide a brief overview of how the results or findings were obtained.

/in /by

For this written assignment, select one recent (within the past two years) evidence-based article from a peer reviewed nursing journal that describes a “best practice” in an area of nursing you are interested in. For example, if you would like to be a pediatric nurse, select an article that discusses a best practice in pediatric care.

Cite the article and provide a brief overview of how the results or findings were obtained. Then describe the “best practice.” Conclude your discussion by explaining whether you thought the research findings supported the conclusions and the best practice.

This assignment must be no more than 3 pages long. It should include all of the required elements. Use APA Editorial format and attach a copy of the article.

 

Identify a piece of legislation you feel passionately about.

/in /by

Throughout this course, you have learned about the importance of political advocacy: how legislation can impact healthcare delivery, quality of care, patient outcomes, and various healthcare professional’s roles and practice.

you will research current legislation related to public health

  • Advocate for policies that improve the health of the public and the profession of nursing and health care administration.

Instructions

Throughout this course, you have learned about the importance of political advocacy: how legislation can impact healthcare delivery, quality of care, patient outcomes, and various healthcare professional’s roles and practice.

you will research current legislation related to public health. Identify a piece of legislation you feel passionately about.

Prepare a professional paper, summarizing the legislation itself, your position, call for action, etc. Cite relevant sources, which may include industry leader’s perspectives, or scholarly research.