Archive for category: Other

MSc PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MSc IT PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MSc OIL AND GAS ENGINEERING

Risk Management in Projects

The assignment is 100% of your Module Assessment.

You must adhere strictly to the word specified for each question.

Marks will be awarded based on the following criteria:

• Your understanding of the main themes of the lectures. All questions has unequal marks and mapping of learning outcomes score marks as well.
• All fonts should be Arial Style, 1.5 sentence spacing, Justify, Main Heading 16, Sub-Heading 14, Body-12 font size. Please adhere to report requirement.
• Evidence that you have read additional material and refer (using references) to the contributions from relevant authors in the field.
• Clear structure and presentation of the computer-generated outputs and their analysis i.e. professional technical report layout should be adopted.
• Report should be in .doc or .docx and only one .xls should be submitted. The .pdf file are not accepted. E-submission, NO E-mail submission is accepted
• Report should have each question outcome and Learning outcomes mapping sheet. DO NOT COPY the QUESTION.
• Citation and references (SCEDT Harvard Style) are very critical for all parts of the Assignment (if required).
• All answers, drawing (including decision tree, Bayes rule formula) should be word processed.
• You are expected to submit the excel sheet. You are required to export all the results to word document. No screenshots and no marks for not exporting the results.
• If you need 7-day or long extension, you can apply for short-extension form available on https://www.tees.ac.uk/sections/stud/handbook/extenuating_circumstances.cfm
• Word limits is 4000 and should be +/- 10%, words in tables, figures, citations, references are NOT counted towards work limit.

 

Question 1 – 20 marks

The Pulsometer Pump Company makes concrete pumping equipment for the European market and is at present operating at near production capacity. The sales and marketing director of the company anticipates that the market for concert pumps will increase by 15% during the next twelve months. The board must decide how to react to this change in demand. There are three strategies that are being considered

S1 Install new equipment to improve productivity with a new system of working

S2 Institute overtime and weekend working

S3 Continue to work at capacity and let rivals or new firms satisfy the increased demand.

A decision matrix can be constructed to show information (all columns show profits, in £000s).

	Market Factors
Strategy	15%	Stable	-10%
S1	240	130	0
S2	210	150	70
S3	170	150	70

 

Use the Pay-off Matrix to make decision and inform what decisions should the board take? The company board satisfied with pay-off procedure however they are not confident with your decision. The sales and marketing director of the company now decided that “we need the probabilities associated with the change in market demands”. The probabilities are

 

Market Outcomes	Probability (in %)
15% Rise	0.6
Stable	0.3
10% fall	0.1

 

 

Calculate the Expected Monetary Value Analysis (EMV) for each strategy and use decision tree to show the best option. The board are impressed with decision method which has informed their decision making. They have assigned you to further investigation on the decision due to variability of returns and further measure of the degree of risk. You need support to do further investigation so that you can examine the sensitivity of decisions. A firm of consultants offer to survey the market for concrete pumps. This survey will lead to a revision of prior probabilities estimate of the likely market outcome. The survey will cost the company £5,000. The consultancy predictions records are shown below

 

 

		Consultant`s Prediction (in %)
Actual Market Outcome	Prior Probabilities	Rise	Stable	Fall
Raise	0.6	0.7	0.2	0.1
Stable	0.3	0.2	0.6	0.2
Fall	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.7

Hint: The sum of getting a `Raise report` is given by the sum of the probabilities of getting a `Raise report` under each outcome multiplied respectively by the probability of getting that outcome.

Use the Bayes Theorem to revise the consultant`s prediction. Should you choose to pay for this additional information? Produce a revised Decision tree for the board to make a decision. You should discuss on your decision on to use or not to use the consultant firm and each strategy.

Part 1-Outcomes – 1 mark	Page Number
Introduction to problem
Pay-off matrices, decision and discussion
EMV, Decision Tree and Discussion
Bayes Theorem, step-by-step calculation, post probabilities table and discussion
Each strategy probability and Decision tree
Final Decision

(Maximum 500 words)

 

Question 2 – 15 marks

In Week 5(using the Decision-Making Examples manual), you developed a simple spreadsheet modelling for Acron, a large drug company. You answered several questions on company production of drugs and their effect on the financial investments(NPV). Now, use the fully developed spreadsheet (after completing the manual) and perform below changes on the model,

1. Modify Acron`s model so that development lasts for an extra year. Specifically, assume that development costs of $7.2million and $2.1million are incurred at the beginnings of years 1 and 2, and then the sales in the current model occur one year later, that is, from year 2 until year 21. Again, calculate the NPV discounted back to the beginning of year 1, and perform the same sensitivity analyses. Comment on the effects of this change in timing.
2. Modify Acron`s model so that sales increase, then stay steady, and finally decrease. Specifically, assume that the gross margin is $1.2million in year 1, then increases by 10% annually through year 6, then stays constant through year 10, and finally decreases by 5% annually through year 20. Perform a sensitivity analysis with a two-way data table to see how NPV varies with the length of the increase period (currently 6 years) and the length of the constant period(currently 4 years). Comment on whether Acron should pursue the drug, given your results.
3. Create a one-way data table in the Acron model to see how the NPV varies with discount rate, which is allowed to vary from 8% to 18% in increments of 0.5%. Explain intuitively why the results go in the direction they go- that is, the NPV decreases as the discount rate increases. Should Acron Pursue the drug for all of these discount rates?

 

Part 2-Outcomes- 1 mark	Page Number
Answers for 3 questions on the manual
Changes to spreadsheet with costs, NPV, Sensitivity Analyses and Discussion
Changes to spreadsheet with cost, two-way data table, NPV, sensitivity analysis and discussion
Changes to spreadsheet with cost, one-way data, discount factor changes with increments, discussion on changes
Should Acron pursue the drug?

(Maximum 500 words)

 

Question 3 – 20 marks

Suppose you own an expensive car and purchase auto insurance. This insurance has a $1000 deductible, so that if you have an accident and the damage is less than $1000, you pay for it out of your pocket. However, if the damage is greater than $1000, you pay the first $1000 and the insurance pays the rest. In the current year there is probability 0.025 that you will have an accident. If you have an accident, the damage amount is normally distributed with mean $3000 and standard deviation $750.

1. Use Excel to simulate the amount you have to pay for damages to your car. This should be a one-line simulation, so run 5000 iterations by copying it down. Then find the average amount you pay, the standard deviation of the amounts you pay, and a 95% confidence interval for the average amount you pay. (Note that many of the amounts you pay will be 0 because you have no accidents).
2. Continue, the simulation by creating a two-way data table, where the row input is the deductible amount, varied from $500 to $2000 in multiples of $500. Now find the average amount you pay, the standard deviation of the amounts you pay, and a 95% confidence internal for the average amount you pay for each deductible amount.
3. Do you think it is reasonable to assume that damage amounts are normally distributed? What would you criticize about this assumption? What might you suggest instead?

 

Part 3-Outcomes – 1 mark	Page Number
Simple Excel model with description
Discussion on the mean, standard deviation of normal distribution
One-line simulation, iterations, solutions and discussion
Two-way data table, solutions and discussion
Discussion on the outcomes

 

(Maximum 500 words)

 

Question 4- 15 marks

Refer to the Table 1 and do the following:

1. Calculate the Expected activity time,
2. Develop the Network diagram using the Expected activity time and use PERT Analysis to know the mean and Sd of the project.
3. Based on these estimates and the resultant expected project duration of 44 weeks. The executive committee wants to know what is the probability of completing the project before a scheduled time of 46 weeks?
4. What is the probability that the project lasts more than 46 weeks?
5. What would be the completion time under which for the project has 85% probability of completing?
6. How do you measure project risk exposure? Explain and propose ways to reduce the project risk exposure.

(Maximum 500 words)

 

Table 1: All O, ML,P are in Weeks.

Activity	Description		Optimistic Duration	Most Likely Duration	Pessimistic Duration	Immediate Predecessor
A	Set up the project acquisition team		1	2	3
B	Write down the software requirements		1	2	3	A
C	Develop a contractor evaluation grid that will be used to evaluate proposals		0.5	1	1.5	B
D	Identify and select potential contractors		0.5	1	1.5	A
E	Develop and send out a request for proposal to potential contractors		3	4	5	B,D
F	Audit candidate contractors, select one contractor, negotiate and sign an agreement		1	2	3	C,E
G	Prepare the definition of functional specifications		3	5	7	F
H	Develop a software testing plan		1	2	3	G
I	Software customization phase I		10	12	14	G
J	Purchase and install the hardware		1	2	3	G
K	Test the first release		0.5	1	1.5	H,I,J
L	Develop a training plan for key users		0.5	1	1.5	K
M	Software customization phase II		4	6	8	K
N	Test the second release		0.5	1	1.5	M
O	Train Key users		1	2	3	L,N
P	Software customization phase II		1.5	3	4.5	N
Q	Test the final release		1	2	3	P
R	Software deployment and project sign-off		2	4	6	Q

 

Part 4-Outcomes -1 mark	Page Number
Simple Excel model with description
Project Duration, mean of the project, Sd of the Project,
Probability of before and more than 46 weeks
The project has 85% probability of completing
Project risk exposure discussion

 

 

Question 5-20 marks

Read the attached paper (especially paper 2) carefully and develop the following:

1. Project network of the example given in the paper using spread sheet. You can show it in table format or network diagram view.
2. Incorporate the methodologies of risk factors discussed in the paper, in your project model (using spreadsheet). Explain the procedure of developing the project model and discuss on the risk methodologies used in the paper.
3. Compare the results of your model with results in the paper and provide comments.
4. If distribution of the weather risk factor is modelled using uniform distribution, discuss and critically comment on the new results as compared to Point 3.
5. Conduct sensitivity analysis to identify the influence of different risks on project durations and critical review the outcome.

 

*Use Triangle Distribution for Event Distribution on the paper 2.

 

(Maximum 2000 words)

 

Part 5-Outcomes – 1 mark	Page Number
Excel model with description, Network Diagram with all values
Simulation model with all the tables and probabilities, descriptions provided with @RISK inputs and outputs
Result comparison discussion with paper, results representation and analysis
Change in distribution, Uniform distribution and effect on project duration and distribution properties discussion
Sensitivity analysis with discussion

 

 

Learning Outcomes Mapping Sheet – 5 marks

ID	Learning Outcomes	Pages
L1	Demonstrate a comprehensive and critical understanding of risk, risk mitigation, probability theory, PERT, MCS and IT application in risk analysis .
L2	Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding   within risk mitigation and understanding of how techniques are used to interpret the risk factors in projects.
L3	Integrate and synthesise diverse knowledge, evidence, concepts theory and practice to resolve the risk in projects
L4	Make logical and arguable conclusions on the basis of incomplete and/or contested data in the Simulation, MCS and Sensitivity analysis in  projects or management
L5	Demonstrate technical skills on probability theory, distributions, and data analysis and propose collective suggestion at a professional or equivalent level.
L6	Can act autonomously in identifying, adopting and implementing techniques, balance, write and   evaluate outcomes in risk relating to project management at a professional or equivalent level.
L7	Operate ethically in a complex and unpredictable and specialised situation with a critical understanding of the issues governing good practice in the field.
L8	Also communicate complex academic and professional issues clearly to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
L9	Demonstrate competency in the numeracy and IT skills in ways that are appropriate to the professional context of project management
L10	Collaborate effectively with others in ways appropriate to the professional context and the demands of   project management.