What are some of the ways that faith-based organizations are seeking to make a difference … and what motivates them to do so? What are some of the structural changes that these NGOs are fighting for, and why? What leads faith-based organizations to be involved in addressing hunger issues?

PHIL 1304Introduction to World Religions

This paper is an “application” paper, of sorts. You will be presented with a topic, and you will explain how different religions think about this topic and how it should be addressed. You are welcome to do research in order to help figure out how the religions you choose to apply are approaching the issue. Below you will find information about exactly what you should be explaining in each paragraph of your submission. This paper should be prepared in Microsoft Word according to MLA formatting guidelines; a template has been provided for you. If you choose not to utilize the template, information on MLA formatting is posted in the course. You will be graded on the content of your paper, of course, but a portion of the grade will be assigned based on correctly naming the file that you submit, submitting the paper correctly, formatting the paper correctly, and the mechanics of writing. A grading rubric has been posted with the assignment, to show you how your grade will be determined. When you are preparing your paper, you will assign a file name when you save it on your computer. The file name needs to be correctso that when you upload your paper, it will be distinguishable from the papers submitted by the other students.

This paper should consist of five paragraphs (which are outlined below). Remember that each paragraph should contain at least 2 substantive sentences and is expected to be 58 sentences in length. Additionally, note that I am asking specific questions, indicating exactly what you should be explaining in each of your five paragraphs. Make sure that you answer the questions that have been asked. This is a philosophy course, and philosophy is most interested in the answer to the question, “Why?” As you are writing, be careful not to simply report. The goal here is for you to explain the meaning involved. Why are things done in a particular way? What is the real difference between things? “Why” is far more important than “What” in a philosophy course. You need to demonstrate an understanding of the conceptsnot just that you were able to find them. For that same reason, you are encouraged to limit your quotations. It is fine to quote from the reading (or from other sources, if you choose to use them). But a quotation tells me what someone said. It does not explain why they said it, or what they meant by it. If you quote, make sure you explain the meaning behind what was quoted. Again, “Why” is more important than “What.” I’m the “Why Guy.”

Here is the issue: world hunger. Hunger affects about a billion people around the world; that is 1 out of every 7 people. In the United States, about 40 million people struggle with food insecurity. Faithbased organizations have been leaders in addressing the needs of the hungry across the globe, as well as in advocating for structural changes that would end hunger.

1) In the first paragraph, you should clearly explain the ways that hunger affects human and societal development. The basic question here is, Why should we care whether others go hungry? What are the effects of world hunger on the population as a whole?

2) In the second paragraph, you should clearly explain ways in which nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are addressing this issue. What are some of the ways that faithbased
organizations are seeking to make a difference … and what motivates them to do so? What are some of the structural changes that these NGOs are fighting for, and why? What leads faithbased organizations to be involved in addressing hunger issues?

3) In the third paragraph, choose a religion (one of those we have studied in this course). Explain how this particular religion would address world hunger. Do the teachings of the religion you have chosen lead its followers to try to be involved? Or does the religion you chose see hunger as a “fact of life” that needs to be accepted? Be specific about how the teachings of the religion you chose would address this issue.

4) In the third paragraph, you will do the same thingwith a second religion. Choose another religion that we have studied this semester and assess how that religion views the issue of world hunger. Ideally, this will be a religion that has a different perspective; either (a) it sees the issue in a completely different way, or (b) it has very different reasons for the perspective that it has adopted. (Making sure there is a clear difference will make the last paragraph easier.)

5) In your final paragraph, you will explain the differences between the approaches that you have identified in the previous paragraphs. What are the fundamental differences in these two religions that lead them to view the issue of world hunger as they do? And which of them seems to be the way that we ought to think about this issue? Which of the two religions that you chose seems to have the better approach? Explain why we should prefer one perspective to the other. Remember that the goal is to explainnot to merely report. Don’t just tell me what you read about; explain what it meant. The goal is to explain the ideas, in your own words, as you would explain it to someone who knows nothing about how NGOs are addressing the issue of world hunger. Ideally, you would not quote from the article; demonstrate your understanding by explaining in your own words. If you do feel that you need to quote, a brief quote or two is acceptable, as long as the quote is placed in quotation marks and a page number is correctly cited. If you have any questions about this assignment, please do not hesitate to ask.

Select one of any of the articles we have covered this semester (for instance Aristotle, Kant, Bentham, Mill, Nietzsche etc) and describe what you take the principal argument[s] to be.

Fin discussion

Select one of any of the articles we have covered this semester (for instance Aristotle, Kant, Bentham, Mill, Nietzsche etc) and describe what you take the principal argument[s] to be. Your answers should be at a minimum one paragraph in length or as long as you like up to a total of two pages. This generally means that you should write more and go into more details if you want a better grade. You may quote the text if you wish with in text citations and works cited. All outside sources should be quoted if you are using any secondary sources.

Briefly state specifically how this source provides evidence that strongly supports your conclusion. If the information is “popular” or if it is from a blog, from a marketing site, or is persuasive in nature explain why you are using the source and why you cannot use a more substantive or scholarly source.

Week 5 Source Evaluation Worksheet

First read the notes that begin on p. 3 of this handout and the table that follows. Then, complete the analysis for each of your sources.

Part 1: Annotation

Using APA format, identify the source and write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article.  A sample annotation can be found in the directions for this assignment.

Annotation 1

Annotation 2

(Continue for as many annotations as you have developed)

Example: Annotation 1

Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and t he erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.

 

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living

 

Part 2: Source Evaluation

Use the following criteria to evaluate each source:

 

  1. How current is this the source you are using? (If not current – explain why information is still applicable)

Source 1

Source 2

(Continue for as many sources as you have developed)

 

Example 2a

2a. While this source is not current, it has formed the basis for numerous follow-up studies and it frequently cited in the literature; it has both historical value and also serves as a base-point for tracking changing attitudes.

 

  1. How authoritative, credible, reliable? (For example: recognized expert; peer-reviewed journal; trusted site such as .edu, .gov, .mil; experienced and knowledgeable in the field; information consistent across several sources, etc.)

Source 1

Source 2

(Continue for as many sources as you have developed)

 

Example 2b

2b. This is a scholarly source; the source is credible, reliable and authoritative.  The authors were experts in their fields, published their study in a peer-reviewed journal, and the study has held up under rigorous scrutiny by other experts in the field.

 

  1. Briefly state specifically how this source provides evidence that strongly supports your conclusion. For example, “the article discusses significant evidence that this diet provides all essential nutrients and supports my view that the diet is healthy” “this study shows that this diet is deficient in vitamin D and supports my point that this diet is not healthy”  “this survey revealed that obesity is on a rapid rise among all demographic groups and supports my view that obesity is epidemic”

 

Source 1

Source 2

(Continue for as many sources as you have developed)

Example 2c

2c. This source strongly supports my thesis that the current pattern of young adults remaining with family because they cannot afford independent living due to student loan obligations is having a negative effect on young adults developing self-sufficiency and individualism.

 

  1. If the information is “popular” or if it is from a blog, from a marketing site, or is persuasive in nature (i.e., an editorial or opinion piece, or a publication of a special interest group such as a trade organization, union, etc.) explain why you are using the source and why you cannot use a more substantive or scholarly source.

Source 1

Source 2

(Continue for as many sources as you have developed)

 

Example 2d

2d. This source is popular; it is used to show how public opinion was influenced by advertising.

Notes: Evaluating Sources

  1. In 2b, rate your journal and periodical sources (whether you are looking at hard copy or on-line) as scholarly, substantive or popular. The Table “Distinguishing between Scholarly and Non-scholarly Periodicals” will work for evaluating either print or on-line journals, newspapers, and periodicals.
  2. Beware of bias in any specific article. Determine if the source is authoritative, credible, reliable, current and unbiased.  (If not current, then information can be rated “valid, regardless of age,” — i.e., a 1999 web-based article on the American Civil War is not “current,” but can be “valid regardless of age.”)  All sources should be authoritative, credible, reliable, current and unbiased.  If bias is found, state if bias may or may not affect the credibility and reliability of the information you will use and how you will compensate for possible bias.
  3. For websites, generally speaking, .gov and .mil sites are acceptable sources in academic papers. Most .edu websites will be acceptable, but analyze under the criteria in 2 above.
  4. If the website is a .com, .org or .biz website, you must further evaluate for authority, reliability and credibility. Never use a .com, .org or .biz site without evaluating across these criteria. Be especially careful about blogs – generally speaking, don’t use them. Many newspaper and magazines also publish to websites; evaluate those just as you would a journal or periodical.
    1. Authoritative
      • Who are the author(s)?
      • Are they recognized experts in their field? – check the <About> column or google the author’s name?
      • What is the level of education of the author? Experience?  Knowledge of the subject?
      • Is the information at a level appropriate to an upper-level academic paper?
    2. Credible
      • How does the information compare to other, similar information? Always look for more than one source – verify that all points of view are represented
    3. Reliable
      • Is it timely?
      • Does it come from a trusted source?

 

Distinguishing Between Scholarly and Non-Scholarly Publications

 

  SCHOLARLY SUBSTANTIVE POPULAR
Examples American Journal of Nursing

JAMA

New England Journal of Medicine

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

National Geographic

 Psychology Today

NY Times

The Atlantic

Time

Vanity Fair

Huffington Post

USA Today

Purpose & Use •      Knowledge dissemination

•      Reports of original research

•      in-depth topic analysis

•      Statistical information

•      For profit

•      Current events and news

•      Introduces a subject

•      Interviews

•      Analysis and opinion

•      For profit

•      Current events and news

•      Overview of topic

•      Entertainment

•      Sell products

Audience •      Reader knows the field (e.g., specialists) •      General audience •      General audience
Authors •      Researchers

•      Academics

•      Scholars

•      Journalists

•      Freelance writers

•      Specialists or scholars

•      Freelance writers

•      Staff writers

•      Journalists

Content & Language •      Description of research methods with conclusions

•      Objective

•      Assumes knowledge of language and specialist jargon

•      Article may have a specific structure

•      Usually peer-reviewed

•      Explanation of a subject

•      Interpretation of a research article

•      May or may not be objective

•      Use of non-technical vocabulary

•      Shorter articles than in scholarly  publications

•      May be biased toward a particular point of view

•      Less depth

•      Everyday language

•      Often written like a story

Publishers •      Professional organizations

•      University or scholarly presses

•      Research institutions

•      Commercial entities

•      Trade and professional organizations

•      Commercial entities

•      Trade organizations

Sources •      Includes bibliography and/or notes

•      Includes extensive citation of sources

•      Includes author credentials

•      Sometimes includes sources

•      May / may not include author credentials

•      Rarely includes citations of sources

•      Rarely includes author credentials

Graphics •      Includes graphs, charts, and tables

•      Advertising is very rare

•      Illustrated, often with photographs

•      Advertising is present

•      Heavily illustrated

•      Lots of advertising

 

 

How does evolution take place according to Sankhya philosophy ? Is evolution really possible if Purusa and Prakrti are separate ?

The Sankhya Philosophy

How does evolution take place according to Sankhya philosophy ? Is evolution really possible if Purusa and Prakrti are separate ? give reasons in support of your answer

Students will be expected to undertake an in depth, critical analysis of the major philosophical themes with a special emphasis on how the work responds to the most fundamental philosophical questions.

Explain, in your own words, one of Thompson’s arguments for the permissibility or impermissibility of abortion. Is the argument convincing to you? why or why not?

Thompson discussion

Explain, in your own words, one of Thompson’s arguments for the permissibility or impermissibility of abortion. Is the argument convincing to you? why or why not?

Describe what he means by these terms. Do you have any objections to his theory?

Nietzche discussion

Nietzsche’s fundamental insight or assertion seems to be that in order to understand morality we must look at history and human culture. For him morality is not natural in the sense of already being there but is created by humans and evolves. His example is the evolution of what he calls master and slave morality. Describe what he means by these terms. Do you have any objections to his theory?

Write a research paper structured as a logical argument with at least two premises, a refutation of a counter argument, and a clearly defined conclusion. Identify and use the resources to write a research paper made available in this course and by Lone Star college.

Logical argument

Write a research paper structured as a logical argument with at least two premises, a refutation of a counter argument, and a clearly defined conclusion.
Identify and use the resources to write a research paper made available in this course and by Lone Star college.
Search and select Academic Sources according to the following criteria:

No articles from .com; .net; .org; etc.
Only .edu can be considered Academic sources BUT ONLY IF the article provides you with the required information for a proper citation.
MUST be written using Chicago-Turabian Format and citation style.

Do wealthy and freer nations have a duty to admit citizens from poorer and more oppressed countries if doing so would improve their quality of life? Why or why not? Which moral factors should a country consider when deciding who can and can’t immigrate to its lands?

The Ethics of Immigration

Do wealthy and freer nations have a duty to admit citizens from poorer and more oppressed countries if doing so would improve their quality of life? Why or why not?

Which moral factors should a country consider when deciding who can and can’t immigrate to its lands?

In your view, are the criteria of justification, truth, and conviction necessary and sufficient conditions for having knowledge? In other words, can we claim to know something if we meet Ayer’s criteria? Do we need to meet all of them in order to have knowledge? Even if we have a justified true belief, are there any criteria missing, as Gettier seems to have thought?

Introduction to Philosophy Summer 2022

The total length of the essay should be approximately 1,000 words.
See “How to Write a Philosophy Paper” below for guidelines on how to write your essay.
You are expected to refer to relevant parts of our course materials and to cite references appropriately, even if your only source is, for
example, one article. No other secondary literature should be needed to craft an “A” paper. In fact, using other sources usually detracts from the quality of an essay like this one.

1. Knowledge & Knowing
In the Mediations, Descartes was concerned to find knowledge that was true, certain, and well-justified. Three centuries later, A. J. Ayer wrote that to know something is have a justified true belief about it. Gettier objected to Ayer’s characterization of knowledge by offering a counterexample.

In your view, are the criteria of justification, truth, and conviction necessary and sufficient conditions for having knowledge? In other words, can we claim to know something if we meet Ayer’s criteria? Do we need to meet all of them in order to have knowledge? Even if we have a justified true belief, are there any criteria missing, as Gettier seems to have thought?

Answer this question succinctly as possible. Your answer should

  • (1) explain what Ayer means by justification, truth, and conviction (belief),
  • (2) the details and reasons for Gettier’s objection, and
  • (3) your assessment of the debate.

Be sure to offer reasons for and against your view, providing your own examples as needed to clarify your meaning.

With these concepts in mind, discuss what the Christian response to Platonism, as found, for example and most notably, in the thought of Augustine.

The Passion of the Western Mind by Richard Tarnas

Richard Tarnas asserts that Greek philosophy was, “in the view of many early Christian theologians, a divinely prearranged matrix for the rational explication of the Christian faith” (The Passion of the Western Mind, pp. 100-101). Notwithstanding, “faith was the primary means, and reason a distant second, for comprehending the deeper meaning of things” (ibid., p. 112).

With these concepts in mind, discuss what the Christian response to Platonism, as found, for example and most notably, in the thought of Augustine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Western_Mind