Is it true that the “bottom line” of a business is profit and profit alone? In business, are there other, less tangible goals that are intrinsic to—and just as important as—making money?

Morality and ethics

Use the following 2 starting points to develop your essay on morality and ethics:
The article by Jay Feldman: Sunday Dialogue: How Corporations Behave
Alfred North Whitehead’s controversial statement, “What is morality in any given time and place? It is what the majority then and there happen to like and immorality is what they dislike” (as cited in BrainyQuote, 2021).
Think about those two perspectives, and then select 1 of the focal questions in Part 1 of the assignment. Your response to the selected focal question will guide you to formulate a thesis statement.
Discuss the article and Whitehead’s statement in the introduction, body, and conclusion of the essay.
Locate and utilize at least 2 credible sources to support the arguments presented in your paper. Make sure you cite them appropriately within your paper, and list them in APA format on your Reference page.
Ensure that your paper is 4–5 pages in length, not counting the Title page and Reference page. In accordance with APA formatting requirements, your paper should include a Title and Reference page, should be double-spaced, and should include a running head and page numbers.

Part 1: Formulating the Philosophical Thesis Statement
Select only 1 of the following focal questions to answer to help formulate your thesis statement:

Businesses can have ethical standards, but businesses are not moral agents. Do you agree or disagree?
Is it true that the “bottom line” of a business is profit and profit alone?
In business, are there other, less tangible goals that are intrinsic to—and just as important as—making money?
In a business environment, why should people be moral as individuals?
Why should a corporation or organization be moral?
Could you apply the first formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative to a business environment?

Part 2: Developing the Essay
Identify your thesis statement (argument claim) within the introduction of your paper.
Conduct research using library resources. Please use the article presented above (Sunday Dialogue: How Corporations Behave) as well as 2 additional sources.
Outline your essay, considering deontological ethics, teleological ethics, moral objectivism, and ethical relativism in your argument.
Provide at least 3 valid reasons to support your argument. Remember to think critically here—there likely are reasons that may not be evident at first.

Also, be sure to include the following in your essay:
Use of explanations of philosophical concepts—such as utilitarianism, categorical imperatives, process philosophy, moral relativism, moral absolutism, ethical relativism, moral objectivism, deontological ethics, or teleological ethics—to structure your essay and provide evidence to support your claims.
Remember, you can use these concepts to argue for or against a particular statement (e.g., from a deontological perspective, something might be “right,” whereas that same thing may be “wrong” from a utilitarian perspective).

Your argument and reasons (claims) should be defended by philosophical concepts supported by evidence, which is based on your research.

Part 3: Conclusion

Consider morality and ethics from the perspective of Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy and Immanuel Kant’s universal categorical imperative. After conducting your research and writing your essay, could you conclude that businesses can have ethical standards, despite the fact that businesses are not moral agents? Explain why or why not. Sum up your argument based on the evidence presented in the paper

Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the nature of form and matter. How does Aristotle reconcile Platonic dualism in his view of the unification of essences within material reality?

Nature of Reality

Using the text and online resources in this module, evaluate any video, and respond to one of the following focused questions in at least 500 words. (Be sure to cite online sources by author or title and date as well as Web address/URL.) In your original responses, be sure to cite primary source quotations in the words of the philosophers in addition to secondary source information about their ideas. you only respond to either 1 or 2 not both

Examples:

Primary source: Descartes reached the conclusion, “cogito ergo sum” (Descartes).
Secondary source: Descartes methodological doubt led to the certainty of the mind or thinking subject. (Morgan)

Focused Questions:
Only choice one

1.Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the nature of form and matter. How does Aristotle reconcile Platonic dualism in his view of the unification of essences within material reality? (Use primary source quotations from both philosophers.)

2.Explain Descartes method in his Meditations on First Philosophy. How does does his doubt lead to the certainty of “cogito ergo sum.” How did this realization lead to the mind-body problem in modern philosophy? (Use primary source quotations in your response in addition to secondary sources.)

In your original responses, be sure to cite primary source quotations in the words of the philosophers in addition to secondary source information about their ideas.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-metaphysics/#1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Descartes
https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csIW4W_DYX4www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgZlScrWhuE

Concentrate on the analysis and critique of a specific argument based on a specific reasoning.

Argument

Concentrate on the analysis and critique of a specific argument based on a specific reasoning.

Choose from one of the following:

Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling

Fyodor Dostoevsky, Notes from the Underground

Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science

Martin Heidegger, Being and Time

If all jobs had roughly equal salaries, you could attend college for free to qualify for these jobs, and everyone had good health insurance, would people work hard and be happier or would there be more laziness and crime than we have now?

Critical Dialogue

Original Opinion Paper question:
If all jobs had roughly equal salaries, you could attend college for free to qualify for these jobs, and everyone had good health insurance, would people work hard and be happier or would there be more laziness and crime than we have now?

Anaylse specific texts by Aristotle or other philosophers and their concepts on the human body.

The philosophy of body

Anaylse specific texts by Aristotle or other philosophers and their concepts on the human body.

Analyses specific texts by Aristotle or other philosophers and their concepts on the human body.

The philosophy of body

Analyses specific texts by Aristotle or other philosophers and their concepts on the human body.

Anaylse specific texts by Aristotle or other philosophers and their concepts on the human body.

The philosophy of body

Need to anaylse specific texts by Aristotle or other philosophers and their concepts on the human body.

Discuss Plato and touch on Aristotle. Mention Plato’s Allegory of the Chariot. Discuss Alexander the Great. Discuss the ideas of Thomas Aquinas, St Augustine and Irenaeus

A Short History of Dualism in Western Civilisation

Intro- Brief introduction of Descartes view of dualism (400-500 words).

Greek beliefs about dualism- Discuss Plato and touch on Aristotle. Mention Plato’s Allegory of the Chariot (1000 words).

Roman/Hellenistic Period- Discuss Alexander the Great. (500 words).

Christian/Medieval Period- Discuss the ideas of Thomas Aquinas, St Augustine + Irenaeus (800 words).

Conclusion Summary- (200 words).

Use the attachments for guidance.

In your view, what are the most insightful points that McRaven makes? Why do you view these points as especially insightful? Is there anything you would add to the remarks that McRaven makes in relation to these points?

McRaven’s Advice on Living a Good Life and Making the World Better

This discussion assignment relates to Admiral McRaven’s Commencement Speech delivered at the University of Texas. In his speech, McRaven gives ten pieces of advice based on lessons he learned during Navy SEAL training. His hope is that his advice will help us both lead more fulfilling lives and change the world for the better. If you would like to review the speech and/or transcript, here is a link:

https://news.utexas.edu/2014/05/16/mcraven-urges-graduates-to-find-courage-to-change-the-world/

Instructions:

Begin the assignment by reflecting on the speech. What do you think about McRaven’s advice? Though few of us have had Navy SEAL training, McRaven intends to offer us insights from which we can benefit, whether or not we have served in the military. Did you find any part of the speech to be especially striking? What aspects of the speech made the strongest impression?

Part I: Now, having reflected, write a post in which you comment on the speech. Let’s call this post your “original post.” In your original post, address one or more of the following questions:

In your view, what are the most insightful points that McRaven makes? Why do you view these points as especially insightful?

Is there anything you would add to the remarks that McRaven makes in relation to these points?

Do you regard any parts of McRaven’s speech as puzzling, dubious, or false? If so, which parts do you find problematic, and why?

McRaven makes many comments related to the virtue of resilience. In your view, what are some key characteristics that resilient people tend to possess?

Suppose that you were to make integrity and resilience central goals within your own life (indeed, perhaps they are already central aims for you!). What would be the most significant steps you would take in developing such character traits?

Look at how Alexey Brodovitch made images come alive, and then find one image online, or one of your own, and compare it with Brodovitch’s work and write a 300 word reflection on your process of discovery concerning the importance of composition and pre-visualisation.

Thinking Photography: Composition ideas and thoughts

The idea of composition is based on the organisation of information in a tangible way that makes sense and allows the viewer to ‘read’ the image clearly.

Is this absolutely necessary- can we challenge preconceptions and our viewers when they look at our work?

Look at how Alexey Brodovitch made images come alive, and then find one image online, or one of your own, and compare it with Brodovitch’s work and write a 300 word reflection on your process of discovery concerning the importance of composition and pre-visualisation.

Comment on at least two other peers observations in the forum.

Utilize Attached Urls Below:
1)http://www.iconofgraphics.com/Alexey-Brodovitch/

2)https://www.dpreview.com/articles/7654892998/landscape-composition-part-1-masses-and-lines