Reflection
What makes you who you are? Explain Parfit’s discussion about psychological continuity and Jaworska’s discussion of Alzheimer’s patients. These raise troubling issues. Yet we think we’re the same person today as we were years ago. Why?
Understand and Evaluate Arguments for and Against the Existence of God
Unit 5 AS: Understand and Evaluate Arguments for and Against the Existence of God
This assignment tests the student’s ability to articulate and evaluate arguments for and against the existence of God.
Write a 1000-word, double-spaced paper (approximately 4-5 pages) explaining the major arguments for the existence of God.
Explain which argument you find the most convincing and why. Then explain the problem of evil proposed by J.L. Mackie. Do you find the problem convincing? Explain in detail your answer.
Question assignment Categorical Desire/Maternal Thinking
You have two questions to answer. You are required to properly cite (you must include page numbers even if you are paraphrasing a specific claim. Word count for each answer must be 500 words. (1-2 lines for intro and outro NO MORE) USE ONLY READINGS PROVIDED
**DO NOT waste word count on introductions or conclusions as if you were writing an essay. They are not needed. You will be penalized if you use up your word count on intros and conclusions instead of on content. Get to the content quickly.**
Questions:
1.Describe Williams’s notion of a categorical desire. Then explain the two conditions that must be met for immortality to be desirable. Discuss, in detail, two of the scenarios for immortality and explain why Williams thinks they fail to satisfy the two conditions. Finally, evaluate one of the two scenarios and explain why you think Williams is right/wrong in discussing the scenario chosen.
2.Explain the three aims of maternal thinking, according to Ruddick. Include discussion on how the aims can come into conflict. Then detail how Ruddick believes maternal thinking is betrayed by larger society. Do you agree with Ruddick’s account of maternal thinking’s clash with society? Explain why or why not.
After landing on another world, you meet an alien creature native to that world. If it turns out that this creature is a person, that would affect the moral constraints on your interactions with it. In light of this, the U.S. Space Force’s Philosophical Squad—of which you are a member—has been tasked with determining whether the alien is a person. How would you do so? Justify your proposal
(a) describe which properties you take to be essential to personhood, and
(b) explain how your proposal will identify the presence or absence of those properties in the creature. (Your response should draw on some of the readings from Weeks 1 and 2 of our course.)
Style & Length: 500-600 words. Use a normal font (like Times), not a monstrous font (like Comic Sans). Grading will be done anonymously, so do not put your name on your final submission.
Suggestions: Keep your prose relatively simple. Use paragraphs to help structure your response. In general, think about what you have liked or disliked about the style of the different readings, then apply that to your own writing. This paper is short, but it is a significant part of your grade—spend time proofreading and revising it!
Choose one of the central themes of Tommie Shelby’s book and evaluate how well you think he handles the issue.
Identity and Justice
Imagine that you have been given a piece of sovereign land upon which to build a just society. In a 3-4-page paper, discuss the following:
Identify and explain your definition of justice.
Identify and discuss the social philosophy/philosophies that are similar to your own vision of justice. For example, you might draw upon Rawls’ idea that justice is fairness and original position and discuss how reflecting upon the original position influenced the structure of your new society. Alternatively, you might explain intersectionality and discuss how your society will ensure that discrimination on the basis of identities like race, class, gender, and sexuality will not occur.
Identify and discuss a contrasting theory.
Support your account of the theories with citations to the textbook and online lectures in correct APA format.
Write a letter to one of your elected officials in which you identify an unjust circumstance in your community and advise your representative as to how it might be remedied. Include the following in your letter:
Identify and explain the injustice in your community.
Discuss your proposed solution.
Explain at least one social philosophy from Chapter 9 in the textbook that supports your solution.
The 18th-century French writer known as Voltaire has been quoted as having said, “No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking.”
When faced with a problem, what do you do to solve it?
This assignment asks you to apply a six-step problem-solving process to a specific problem scenario.
Instructions
You will write a paper that presents a synthesis of your ideas about solving the problem using this systematic approach.
Review the six-step problem-solving process outlined in the webtext.
Read the article, The Problem-Solving Process.
Write a 4–5 page paper in which you:
Define the problem in the scenario that you chose in the Week 7 assignment, Problem-Solving: Part 1.
Analyze the problem in the scenario.
Generate options for solving the problem in the scenario.
Evaluate the options for solving the problem.
Decide on the best option for solving the problem.
Explain how you will implement the chosen solution and reflect on whether this option was the most effective.
The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
Address the main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Use the Strayer Library to find at least five academic resources.
Use four sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
Argue a position on a significant issue pertaining to your chosen topic for your research manuscript. Your claim should be clearly stated with adequate support. Consider other perspectives when making your position and clearly show why you believe your position is more logical, sensible, useful, or appealing than the opposition’s viewpoint.
Use print sources, electronic sources, and – if possible – an interview with an informed individual to support your claims.
On a page separate from your paper, identify the audience to whom you are addressing your argument and explain why members will benefit from understanding your position.
Within the paper, or in an accompanying note, explain why the issue is important to you so that your classmates and instructor can be aware of the nature of your expertise and any possible biases.
At one interview session, you are asked to discuss a time when you were faced with an ethical dilemma, whether personally or professionally. And if you can’t think of a personal ethical dilemma, you’ve been asked if you can you imagine one that might arise in the particular industry that you have chosen.
Briefly describe the circumstances of the ethical dilemma you faced, or that you envision, and explain the dilemma. What is the ethical issue in question? Are there multiple ethical issues at play? Is there a legal issue implicated as well, as far as you know? (Make sure to understand the difference between an ethical issue and an ethical dilemma, as noted in our materials.)
How did you handle the ethical dilemma and why? Do you wish you had handled it differently and if so, what would you have done differently? If you are envisioning a hypothetical dilemma, how would you handle that hypothetical dilemma and why?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.