Compare and contrast the Classical period with the Middle Ages and the Modern (Nietzsche and Camus).

/in /by

What is it to be Human? The paper will be double-spaced, one-inch margins, 12-pt font, black typeface, doc, docx, or RTF

Use APA or MLA formatting (Click here for OWL@Purdue (Links to an external site.))

The paper must have a minimum of 4-6 in-text citations taken from the primary texts. You are making your own arguments here, not using somebody else’s.

Compare and contrast the Classical period with the Middle Ages and the Modern (Nietzsche and Camus).

What are some of the differences between the Reformist Environmentalist position and the Deep Ecology postion?

/in /by

1. What does Devall mean by the “Dominant Paradigm” and what position does the Reformist Environmentalist take versus the Deep Ecologist? (about 150 words)

2. What are some of the differences between the Reformist Environmentalist position and the Deep Ecology postion? (150 words)

Compare and contrast paper of two or more religious perspectives conforming to MLA standards.

/in /by

Compare and contrast paper of two or more religious perspectives conforming to MLA standards. This is an academic research paper and should include citations and a works cited page.

Discuss on the Influence of Environmental Aesthetics on Human Psychology from the Perspective of Philosophy.

/in /by

Discuss on the Influence of Environmental Aesthetics on Human Psychology from the Perspective of Philosophy.

Is Blade Runner (1982) an existential film, as existentialism is described in Jean-Paul Sartre’s “Existentialism is a Humanism” or Albert Camus’ “The Myth of Sisyphus”?

/in /by

Is Blade Runner (1982) an existential film, as existentialism is described in Jean-Paul Sartre’s “Existentialism is a Humanism” or Albert Camus’ “The Myth of Sisyphus”?

Consider the following claim: “the view’s that arise in Plato’s Phaedo are the views of a complete and utter lunatic.” Do you agree or disagree or both?

/in /by

Consider the following claim: “the view’s that arise in Plato’s Phaedo are the views of a complete and utter lunatic.” Do you agree or disagree or both?

How does evolution explain the diversity of life, while God explains that existence of life in the first place? Do you think Darwin would have agreed with the Big Bang Theory as the primary cause of the universe, or do you think he still would have argued for a creator God – why or why not?

/in /by

In On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin argues that God functions as the primary cause of the universe, while evolution functions as the secondary cause of the universe. What does Darwin mean by this distinction? How does evolution explain the diversity of life, while God explains that existence of life in the first place? Do you think Darwin would have agreed with the Big Bang Theory as the primary cause of the universe, or do you think he still would have argued for a creator God – why or why not?

Identify the consequences for morality implied by the position you support.

/in /by

Based on the competing theories covered in this Learning Module, formulate an argument in defense of the position that you find most convincing (Determinism, Compatibilism, or Metaphysical Libertarianism). To put the question more simply: do you have free will? When you do something, are you freely choosing to perform that action? Whatever position you take, be sure to support your position with evidence from the readings. Posts that do not rely on the readings for support will lose points. Lastly, identify the consequences for morality implied by the position you support.

Write the essay with examples from the L’Argent film.

/in /by

Write the essay with examples from the L’Argent film.

Explain Rousseau’s arguments for this claim: what does Rousseau mean by the term ‘state of nature’? How does he claim to know about the state of nature?

/in /by

In the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality Rousseau argues that in the original state of nature human life is a life of equality, freedom, peace, and happiness. Explain Rousseau’s arguments for this claim: what does Rousseau mean by the term ‘state of nature’? How does he claim to know about the state of nature? According to Rousseau, why is there no inequality, dependence, war, and misery in that state? Briefly discuss to what extent you find Rousseau’s arguments convincing. (You may limit this discussion to one of the claims made by Rousseau, e.g. the claim that the state of nature is peaceful.)