What is the a priori/a posteriori distinction?
o What is the analytic/synthetic distinction?
o How does Kant reimagine (or repurpose) these distinctions?
o What role do synthetic a priori judgments play in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason?
What does Nietzsche mean by the will to power? Does it mark a departure from the philosophies of utilitarianism and deontology? Explain.
If you were to ask Aristotle “what is the meaning of life?” he would say it is eudaimonia. (1) What does Aristotle mean by eudaimonia? (2) Would Susan Wolf say that eudaimonia is “a life of active engagement in projects of worth”? (Wolf pdf, p. 570) Explain.
Why should we think that the ethics of care is a feminist ethics? Explain by reference to the feminist ethics articles we read this term.
What is cultural relativism? Evaluate two of Gensler’s arguments against cultural relativism. Are his arguments good or bad? In your view is cultural relativism a good metaethical theory? Explain.
After hearing about Lewis’s thoughts about time travel, does the time travel in the story seem consistent to you? Is it genuine time travel (as Lewis thinks of it)?
Briefly summarized the episode. Choose an ethical theory and discuss the point of view of each character below.
Perspective of:
1. Mr. Langley, Parkinson’s victim, research donor, father
2. Dr. Mandell, Stephanie’s doctor, Parkinson’s researcher
3. Stephanie Rawley, coma patient, pregnant
4. Mr. & Mrs. Rawley, parents of coma patient
5. David Anderson (fiancé) OR unborn baby
Must questions about personal identity always have an answer.
Come up with two persuasive reasons on why to think that his argument for this fails. Discuss the reasons in detail, and why they count as a reason to think that the argument fails.
1) Introduce the Utilitarian position, what is the good on this view?
2) Describe a moral scenario and demonstrate how the Utilitarian will determine what the moral action is. Don’t use examples from the assigned materials; come up with your own.
3) Provide REASONS, not opinions, about whether the Utilitarian position provides a satisfactory account of morality. Should we only consider the greatest good for the greatest number exclusively? Are there scenarios where the Describe a moral scenario and demonstrate how the Utilitarian will determine what the moral action is. will recommend actions that conflict with our common sense morality?
In a one- to two-page paper, consider the people and experiences that have shaped how you see yourself, how you see life, and, most importantly, how they have shaped your biases.
List and then describe a minimum of three things you believe to be true, such as the existence of God, right vs. wrong, morality, and what it means to be a “good” person.
Explain, in detail, how you acquired these beliefs (including the other people or experiences that have influenced you most), why these beliefs are important and how these beliefs will influence how you engage with people and policies in your future career. Do not simply say something like, “I believe in doing the right thing because it is the right thing.” You must really dig deep into your psyche and analyze your own perspective of the world; make your brain hurt!
Most importantly, discuss at least two cognitive biases discussed in Chapter 1 that you might be most subject to and why. Integrate these into your three beliefs and analyze the ways in which they shape you.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.