In 250 words max, explain Illich’s concept of “social iatrogenesis,” as contrasted with clinical iatrogenesis.

/in /by

Answer using own words and personal thoughts. Give supportive text from reading-Medical Nemesis. (Citing when must.) Support your own views when replying.

Single space, One page, No student/subject/ title/or surname.

In 250 words max, explain Illich’s concept of “social iatrogenesis,” as contrasted with clinical iatrogenesis. What is it (give a definition), and what are some of its features (where does it show up in real life?)

Should Sex Education Be Taught in School?

/in /by

Should Sex Education Be Taught in School?

Explain How to train a dog

/in /by

Explain How to train a dog

Describe the Categorical Imperative, making clear what Kant means by a maxim, and how he thinks our maxims can be made compatible with the categorical imperative.

/in /by

Answer one of the following two questions. The assignment should be approximately 1-2 pages long. It should be typed, double spaced, with a 12 point font and with at least a 1 inch margin. There is no need to give these a formal paper structure with an introduction and conclusion, etc.; go straight into the topic. Criticisms and examples may be derived from any source, but please fully cite sources from outside of the class materials. If you choose to do this assignment as your first short paper, it is due Mar 19th on Moodle before class begins.

1. Kant’s Categorical Imperative is a general moral principle: Kant claims that in order to be morally good, our maxims must be compatible with it. a) Describe the Categorical Imperative, making clear what Kant means by a maxim, and how he thinks our maxims can be made compatible with the categorical imperative. Use an example of a moral choice that illustrates how this can be done. b) Does using Kant’s categorical imperative always give us the right answer to which actions are acceptable, forbidden, required or supererogatory? Describe a case where it appears to give the wrong answer.

Write a 500-600 word explanation of the following passage from Kant’s GMM

/in , /by

Write a 500-600 word explanation of the following passage from Kant’s GMM [all other parameters and rubrics are the same as for the first writing assignment]:

“Thus a good will seems to constitute the indispensable condition of being even worthy of happiness.” (Groundwork, First Section)

Discuss accepted policies and practices in dealing with this deviance and how attitudes have changed over time.

/in , /by

Identify the aspects of this particular deviance and discuss its overall impact on US society and culture.

Discuss accepted policies and practices in dealing with this deviance and how attitudes have changed (if they have) over time. Last, project how you see this deviance being treated with the next 10-20 year period. Is the behavior becoming normalized?

The grade is determined by how well you support your arguments utilizing the materials discussed in this course and research and reference material you locate on your own for this assignment.

Document your facts utilizing standard APA style.

Why is it important to examine the stimulations effects of race, class and gender when studying deviant behavior and crime.

/in , /by

Why is it important to examine the stimulations effects of race, class and gender when studying deviant behavior and crime. paper need references no less the 750 words intro and conclusion must be in word.

According to Iris Marion Young in “Throwing Like a Girl,” what do women’s ways of positioning and moving their bodies reveal about “the structures of feminine existence”?

/in /by

According to Iris Marion Young in “Throwing Like a Girl,” what do women’s ways of positioning
and moving their bodies reveal about “the structures of feminine existence”? p. 30/4

Avoid using secondary sources

Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved.

/in /by

Evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.

Recall an instance in which you have taken a strategy, finding, or lesson learned from one care context and applied it in another.

  • What challenges did this type of knowledge transfer present?
  • Did applying this knowledge in a different setting lead to improvements in the safety and quality of care? How?
  • Did applying this knowledge in a different setting raise any particular ethical issues affecting the provision of care?

Preparation

In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece (see below). Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

  • Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans.
  • Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.
Report Content
  • Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved.
    • Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups.
    • Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups.
    • Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls.
  • Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
    • Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls.
    • Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing.
    • Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted
  • Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes.
    • Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative.
    • Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s:
      • Individual health needs.
      • Economic and environmental realities.
      • Culture and family.
    • Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take.
  • Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient.
    • Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case.
    • Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family.
  • Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care.
    • Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes.
    • Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
    • Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.