Do Locke’s views on money imply an endorsement of unrestricted capital accumulation?

/in /by

Choose one of the topics below, and write a 6-8 page, typed, double spaced essay. Regardless of which topic you choose, please ensure your introductory paragraph contains both a clearly identifiable thesis statement which directly addresses the essay topic, and which specifically and succinctly summarizes your position on your chosen topic. Also, your introductory paragraph should contain an orienting ‘road-map’ for your forthcoming discussion, one which identifies each of the key components of the body of your essay, and outlines the order in which the reader should expect them to occur.

These individual components should, in turn, be logically related to the thesis you have identified, in the sense that together they can be seen to offer rational support for the truth of the claim articulated in your thesis statement. Your concluding paragraph, finally, should contain a brief summary of the essay in which your conclusion and road map are succinctly reiterated. It should contain nothing else (i.e., no new information). You do not need to answer every single question contained in the topic. Instead, use the questions as a guide to help you select, articulate, and defend a thesis statement.

Explicate and assess Locke’s theory of money, as developed in his Second Treatise of Government. What is money, according to Locke, and how does it allow human beings to transcend the spoilage and sufficiency conditions on property acquisition? Do Locke’s views on money imply an endorsement of unrestricted capital accumulation? Why or why not? Is Locke correct to characterize gold as ‘fiat money’? Why or why not? Is Bitcoin money? Why or why not? What would Locke say?

What would it feel like to live in a society like East Germany’s?

/in /by

What would it feel like to live in a society like East Germany’s? How would it compare with living in a surveillance society as depicted in The Age of AI? 250+ words

How do the theological truths about God impact the aspects of Christian education: teacher, student, methods, materials, etc.?

/in /by

The final major (signature!) assignment of the course is a philosophy of Christian education (12 pages minimum, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font), which is a statement of your beliefs about the central issues in Christian education. This philosophy (and the ideas underpinning it) should guide you in the decisions that you make as a teacher.

Your philosophy should express your biblical and theological perspective on the nature of reality (Metaphysics), the nature of knowledge (Epistemology) and the nature of value (Axiology) as applied to central issues in Christian Education (these terms are defined and discussed in Anthony/Benson, chapter 13). Also, remember that your philosophy must be executed in a particular context, so, include brief, but concrete examples or illustrations from your teaching context.

In order to help you formulate your philosophy, do some analytical and reflective thinking before you begin to write. The list below contains some questions to guide your thinking. Your philosophy of Christian education is not simply a list of answers to those questions, but they will be useful in getting the cognitive gears turning.

Use the information you have from your personal experience, what you’ve seen practiced in formal education settings, what you’ve learned from class readings and assignments, what you’ve discovered from researching your institutional report, and what you learned from your classmates/colleagues to consider how your philosophy would address these areas:

What is the goal of Christian education?
What methodologies are appropriate?
How have the philosophies we have studied this semester affected your view of Christian education?
Would evaluations and assessments be included in your philosophy? Why and what kind? If not, why not?
What role might discipline and grace play in your philosophy of education?
What would the curriculum look like? What topics would you include?
How do the theological truths about God impact the aspects of Christian education: teacher, student, methods, materials, etc.?
What is your view of Christian education in an online context?

Choose a recent news events or pop culture trends related to societal change to analyze.

/in /by

Browse the blog to get a sense of how TROT posts are written. They usually start with a summary of a current event, then provide cultural ideas relevant to the matter at the hand and includes citations for each source. journal articles no more than five years old

Choose a recent news events or pop culture trends related to societal change to analyze. And choose a topic to investigate, such as the impact of societal construction, institutions, or networks etc.
Evaluate. Read the methods sections of any journal articles, or reviews of books. Ask yourself, “What would a philosopher have to say about this that the rest of the media may be missing?” Do you find the conclusion(s) convincing, based on the evidence provided? Is the method/approach of high quality? Which pieces provide the best takeaways for a general reader?
Write a TROT essay for the topic in the style of the website. Remember the main components: a short summary of the news, including links to media coverage

Why did the US transform from a rural to an urban country between 1865 and 1932

/in /by

Should follow a general 5 paragraph essay format. Has to have example and 3 primary sources that are cited correctly. Must also include an extra citation page

Analyze Michael Sandel’s argument in The Case against Perfection and make and argue a claim about it.

/in /by

This essay is to CHALLENGE Michael Sandel’s argument made in “The Case Against Perfection. Please follow my instructions and please do not offer me any bidding if you have not read the book or do not have the book on hand.
NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ALLOWED
MUST BE USING SANDEL’S BOOK “THE CASE AGAINST PERFECTION” ONLY

The task.

For this essay, you are to analyze Michael Sandel’s argument in The Case against Perfection and make and argue a claim about it.

In order for it to be an argument and not just a collection of observations or descriptions, your essay must first present a question or a problem about the text.

A well-structured essay will also take time and space to summarize the text being analyzed. This means not only that you are pointing out the main ideas, but that you are presenting as well the various good reasons that the author has for having these ideas (for if they’re not good ideas, why do we need an argument to debunk them? Why bother?). That is, before we can trust your analysis of an argument or a text, you have first to show that you thoroughly understand its ideas, the ideas behind the ideas, etc.

The bulk of your essay, however, will be devoted to analyzing the argument presented by Sandel. You need, for example, to show how the kinds of examples, evidence, and logic he uses lead you to make your argument. Thus, if your argument has something to do with, for example, false causal connections between different elements of Sandel’s claims, your analysis of the evidence has to show that this is truly the case. If your argument has to do with erroneous assumptions (about the way human nature works, the way society functions, or whatever), your analysis of the evidence has to show that this is the case. If your argument has to do with showing that there are deeper consequences than Sandel acknowledges, you have to show how his ideas do indeed lead to these consequences. And so on.

The goal.

What should emerge from your essay? That is, after having read your essay, how should your reader have been moved from what he or she thought before having read your essay?

You should have presented an argument that makes a point about the text that is not obvious – for if what you are arguing were obvious, why do you need to argue it? You should have, that is to say, made an argument that feels like an argument, and not just a restatement of the (obvious) facts of the text itself. Instead, your argument should have done some intellectual work in making what was perhaps initially unclear about the text or its claims clearer, or the intellectual work of showing how something superficial about the text’s claims needed to be deepened or made more complex or sophisticated. Or, again, your argument might have shown us how something ignored or made tangential is actually central or significant to the issues at hand. In any of these cases, your goal as writer of this essay – as is your goal generally as a scholar and thinker – is to have “helped” your reader come to a better understanding of not only the text, but also the issues with which the text is dealing. In other words, you should have taught us a new way to see or understand Sandel’s argument.

Do Newton’s discussions of the rotating bucket experiment and of the globes thought experiment establish the existence of absolute space?

/in /by

Do Newton’s discussions of the rotating bucket experiment and of the globes thought experiment establish the existence of absolute space?

Explain what changes you can bring in your life to achieve the Epicurean tranquility in your life.

/in /by

• Epicurus’ philosophy aims to produce tranquility and happiness (pleasure). What he means by pleasure is not being in pain, even emotional pain. This involves being grateful and not being greedy. Explain what changes you can bring in your life to achieve the Epicurean tranquility in your life.
• What is the self, according to Augustine. Read the lecture notes to answer this question.
• Understand the importance of Epicurus and Augustine to the development of philosophy.
• Understand Augustine’s philosophies about memory (self), time, and free will.
• Understand how Epicurus and Augustine’s ideas relate to each other, especially in terms of their ideas about salvation and how they answer the question of “What is a good life?”
• Interpret the readings and form opinions about them.
• State and defend a view using philosophical arguments.
• Think critically about how these philosophical concepts apply to your own views and life.

What is the definition of ‘wilderness’ in the Wilderness Act of 1964, and what sort of difficulties arise from this definition?

/in /by

What is the definition of ‘wilderness’ in the Wilderness Act of 1964, and what sort of difficulties arise from this definition? (a) Are these difficulties insurmountable? Should the definition be revised, abandoned, or left as it is? (b) What sort of argument would you expect to hear from someone who disagrees with you about this issue? (c) How would you respond? [for this question, see especially Michael Nelson, J. Baird Callicott, Reed Noss]

What is the difference between descriptive and normative knowledge?

/in /by

SECTION 1: Short Answer (8 marks total; 2 marks each)

Using approximately 4-5 sentences each, answer FOUR of the following five questions. Be sure to explain your answers.

NOTE: If you choose to answer all five questions, I will only grade your first four.

  1. What is the difference between descriptive and normative knowledge? Explain why it might be important to keep these two types of knowledge distinct.
  2. What is the precise relationship between consequentialism and utilitarianism? Likewise, what is the relationship between deontology and Kantianism? Explain thoroughly.
  3. What two major ideas (or ‘theses’) do all legal positivists accept as true? Explain what each of these ideas are.
  4. What do natural law theorists mean when they say ‘an unjust law is no law’? How is this different from a legal positivist view? Explain.
  5. What is social contract theory? What are social contract theorists trying to explain, and how do they generally go about doing so? (Note: you don’t need to delve into the specifics of each unique version of social contract theory. Instead, focus on what all social contract theories generally have in common.)

SECTION 2: Long Answer (7 marks total)

In approximately 3-4 paragraphs, answer ONE of the following questions. Be sure to EXPLAIN your answers fully, using complete and coherent sentences and paragraphs.

NOTE: If you choose to answer more than one question, I will choose to only grade the first.

Option A:         Explain the concept of sovereignty. What is the significance of saying someone or something is sovereign? In your answer, be sure to also explain the role this concept plays in the classical legal positivist view of the nature of law.

Option B:         What is natural law? What is its significance in philosophical debates concerning the nature of law? In your answer, be sure to explain the relationship between natural law and positive law, as well as explain how natural law theorists and legal positivists each view natural law.