“Our constitution is called a democracy because power is in the hands not of the minority but of the whole people” (Pericles) What was the attraction of such a constitution and how well did it live up to its promise?
In this final, you will take the cumulative knowledge from the semester to answer the core question of presidency: What determines presidential success or failure? Create an informed definition of success and failure. In crafting your answer to this part, assess the following dimensions of presidential governance
Next, does presidential success necessarily mean betterment of the polity, and similarly, is prosperity in society necessary for presidential success? Having established the contours of success and failure, conclude your paper by assessing the prospects for presidential success moving forward, and whether our politics need to de-emphasize or rely even more on the chief executive
Read pp. 393-409 in Turkish foreign policy book edited by Baskın Oran (a copy is provided). What does “relative autonomy” mean in Turkish foreign policy according to the text? What are the arguments presented in support of this characterization of TFP in the 1960s-1970s? What strikes your attention about the text? (Word limit: 700).
In Part I this week, choose a case from your state that involves civil rights or civil liberties that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. If your state does not have a case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court, choose a civil rights case from another state for which the United States Supreme Court issued a decision.
Here is a brief description of civil rights and civil liberties: Civil rights refers to equal social opportunities under the law. It gives you these freedoms such as the right to vote, the right to public education, or a fair trial, among other things, regardless of your wealth or race. Civil liberties mean freedom of religion, equal treatment and due process under the law, and the right to privacy.
You should be able to go online and look up your state and famous cases decided by the Supreme Court. For example, Brown v Board of Education (1951) started in Topeka, Kansas, and ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States. Another example would be Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada (2020) that started in Nevada and ended up in the United States Supreme Court. A good source of information about cases decided by the United States Supreme Court is www.scotusblog.com. Other sources can be researched online using search terms for “civil rights cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Be sure to use a case actually decided by the United States Supreme Court, and not a case decided by your state’s supreme court or a different court. A case that is still pending before the United States Supreme Court should not be used. If you are unsure, please contact your Professor BEFORE you pick your case and submit the assignment as this is a significant part of your overall grade.
Research your court case and write an outline of the case that you will be using to prepare a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. If you are unsure, then verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment.
This week’s assignment should include (a) summary of the case; (b) a case outline; and a summary.
Summary of the Case
In one or two paragraphs, provide a general overview of the case that serves as a snapshot of what the case is about and how it ended up in your state high court. A summary is using your words to write a brief history of the case. Do not give your opinion or your interpretation but stick to the facts only.
Case Outline
Your court case outline should include:
Conclusion:
What was the resulting impact of the ruling? How did the citizens of your state benefit from it? Was this a good decision?
“De-growth offers a viable alternative to development”. Critically assess this statement.
The Canadian Senate has long been considered an institutional pariah, viewed as an undemocratic, outmoded warehouse for patronage appointments and mired in spending and workload scandals. Should the Senate be reformed? If so, what type of reforms should be implemented? What are the main challenges to reform?
POLS’ 101: Introduction to Political Science
Details
For this discussion, you will need to synthesize the materials on politics and models of power in this module.
Step 1- Under the ”Models of Power” subsection in the reading ”Do we need a government?” from the Primer on Politics, the theories of majoritarianism, pluralism and elitism are explained. Please read this section over.
Step 2-For this current events discussion, you must: find a news article or editorial that is no older than 1-2 weeks from a reputable news source, and if you aren’t sure what counts as a reputable news source is, please follow the link (Links to an external site.), t for a non-exhaustive list. If you have a different source that is not on the list, you are welcome to check with me to confirm that it meets enough standards to be counted as a reputable news source.
Step 3-Provide an APA citation for your news article from a reputable news source (please find an article no more than 2 weeks old). If you are unfamiliar with APA citation format, please see this TCC Library Guide. APA stands for ”American Psychological Association’ and it is the preferred format for social sciences like political science, psychology, etc. We don’t tend to use MLA like other disciplines do.
Step 4- Write up a short and unbiased summary of the article/current event (this will probably be about a paragraph long) so we know the basic facts
Step 5- Provide a minimum one paragraph explanation/analysis of how the current event relates to the majoritarian, pluralist and elitist models of power and/or explain how these models apply to this current event. For example, you may consider the following questions or others related to the different models of power: Do you see evidence of elitism? Pluralism? Majoritarianism? Why? Etc.
What are the challenges to regional security and cooperation in the ASEAN region? Can ASEAN surmount these challenges in the next decade?
Section I – Identify the Policy Problem
This section describes the symptoms, magnitude, and consequences of the policy problem you are analyzing, and identifies one or more plausible goals for government intervention (i.e. goals for a policy or program).
Your analysis should convince a thoughtful, analytic reader of the existence and importance of the policy problem, and inform the reader about alternative goals for public intervention. You should not approach this as an advocate (watch out for exaggerated claims, etc.) and you should not begin by identifying the lack of a policy or program as the problem.
Your analysis in this section should address the following questions:
Section II – What are the Potential Solutions?
This section describes and evaluates the policy alternatives designed to help meet the policy goals. You are expected to identify alternatives and to identify and logically support criteria by which these alternatives can be compared. The alternatives can draw on both existing policies and programs, or propose new ones.
This section should address the following questions:
Section III – What Action do you recommend?
Now that you know the problem, the goals, the alternatives, and advantages of each, your job in this section is to think critically about the implementation realities.
You will want to consider the political interests and how they are organized, along with the ability to enact policy alternatives. It is important to remember that new policies create new politics. Based on your analysis, make a recommendation for action or, if there is no single “best” solution, compare the relative benefits of the top two alternatives.
Questions to be addressed in this section include:
Who do you think has been the greatest President in American history? What characteristics do you admire about the President you chose? Think about his policies and effectiveness while in office. Give dates for when he was in office and for major policies that you discuss.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.