Briefly describe the cyber attack and its implications for the nation. Do you know who the perpetrators are? What was the goal of the crime? How much damage was caused? What is your first action? Why is this action your first? Why is it so important?

The President and Crisis Management

 

Today is your presidential Inauguration Day. You were elected as president last November by a slim margin in both the popular vote and the electoral vote. You attended a worship service this morning with your family and about a dozen high-ranking members of the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Then, you and the current president took a ride in a convertible car to the U.S. Capitol, where you were sworn in as the new president of the United States. It is now official; you are the president!

As you and your family are enjoying the parade, your new chief of staff and one of the key military advisors who is a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff whispers to you that there has been a major cyber attack on key federal financial institutions across the United States that compromised the personal financial data and passwords of hundreds of thousands of citizens.

Even though you have held office for just a few hours, you know it is critical to act swiftly and decisively so that the perpetrators of the crime, the American citizens, and political leaders (those who support you and those who do not) see you as a competent and strong leader.

What are your first three actions?

In your paper, you will describe these three actions in detail. Organization is important in this paper. Make certain to include the following information in your paper, and organize major sections using headings.

 Briefly describe the cyber attack and its implications for the nation.

o This section should be located early in the paper (i.e., in the first or second paragraph).

o Do you know who the perpetrators are?

o What was the goal of the crime?

o How much damage was caused?

 What is your first action?

o Why is this action your first? Why is it so important?

o What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?

o What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?

 What is your second action?

o Why is this action your second? Why is it so important?

o What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?

o What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?

 What is your third action?

o Why is this action your third? Why is it so important?

o What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?

o What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?

 Provide a conclusion.

o What are your next steps?

o Briefly describe how your actions were limited by the U.S. Constitution. For example, you may feel constrained by the other two branches—powers denied to you by the U.S. Constitution or law (e.g., declaring war or appointing to key positions in your administration loyal and trusted friends without going through the formal appointment process or the civil services system).

The paper must be 2–4 pages in length, not counting the title page and references page. Make certain to double-space, apply 1-inch margins, and use 12-point font. Utilize headings to separate major sections of your plan (e.g., First Action, Section Action). Cite all sources in-text and on the references page using APA Style.

In addition to your textbook readings and the unit lesson for this unit, the following resources may be helpful as you complete the assignment. As aforementioned, make certain to cite all sources—in-text and on the references page—

Compare and contrast the research questions in your 5 articles. Compare and contrast the hypotheses being tested across the 5 articles. Compare and contrast the data being examined across the articles.

Immigration Literature Review

The article summaries were about summarizing each article individually. A literature review organizes and analyzes multiple sources COMARATIVELY.

Compare and contrast the research questions in your 5 articles.
Compare and contrast the hypotheses being tested across the 5 articles.
Compare and contrast the data being examined across the articles.
Describe the statistical methods used for analysis across the articles.
Compare and contrast the findings across the articles.
Compare and contrast what the articles say should be done in future studies.

Do you agree with the way machiavelli has written about the state, or do you think there are other theories that have a better idea of what the state is, or how the state should be structured?

Critically Examine the relevance of Machiavelli to understanding the nature of the modern state.

Your essay should begin with a clear definition of what the state is. Another way of thinking about this question is: how useful are the ideas of Machiavelli in helping us to understand the modern state? Do you agree with the way machiavelli has written about the state, or do you think there are other theories that have a better idea of what the state is, or how the state should be structured? You can use other theorists to add to your critique of your chosen theorist.

Apply concepts of state-centric networks, federalism by abdication, inter-jurisdictional cooperation, collaboration, IGR accountability, and multilevel governance alternatives in developing recommendations for the case studies.

Reflection Papaer

1. Identify the main concepts, terms, and approaches of federal primacy, issue centric networks, inter-jurisdictional cooperation, collaboration, IGR accountability, and management roles as a foundation of study and how they are utilized to analyze four case studies involving the management of local and community water systems, the safe drinking water act and the case of Flynt Michigan, and Puerto Rico,s community aqueduct systems after Maria.

2. Apply concepts of state-centric networks, federalism by abdication, inter-jurisdictional cooperation, collaboration, IGR accountability, and multilevel governance alternatives in developing recommendations for the case studies.

What do you think are the greatest strengths and weaknesses of each methodology? Are there aspects of socio-political reality that one methodology can answer that the other cannot? Are there certain research questions better suited to one or the other?

Qualitative versus quantitative methodology

Answer the following prompt in an essay of 2-3 double-spaced pages. Essays may be longer if you like, but a comprehensive answer should be a minimum of 2-3 pages. You should refer to course readings, videos, and/or lectures to illustrate your points. No additional sources are necessary, but you are free to use additional work if you would like. Include all works referenced or quoted in a works cited page. The exam is due in Dropbox by Saturday, 11/13, at 11:59pm (Tuesday class) and Sunday, 11/14 at 11:59pm (Thursday class). No late essays will be accepted. Will be submitted to Turnitin.com

An enduring debate exists within the social sciences between proponents of qualitative versus quantitative research methods. Each camp believes its methodology is inherently better at understanding the social and political world. What do you think are the greatest strengths and weaknesses of each methodology? Are there aspects of socio-political reality that one methodology can answer that the other cannot? Are there certain research questions better suited to one or the other? Do you believe one is always preferable?

Identify the primary problems that each man believes face African-Americans. Then explain how each man proposes that white and/or black Americans should address these problems. Finally, carefully consider the positive and negative aspects of each approach.

MLK vs. Malcolm X

Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both addressed the position of African-Americans in America. Despite the similarity of their concerns, significant differences exist in their approaches to advancing the interests of African-Americans. Identify the primary problems that each man believes face African-Americans. Then explain how each man proposes that white and/or black Americans should address these problems. Finally, carefully consider the positive and negative aspects of each approach. Drawing from this consideration, identify which approach that you favor and explain why. (Make sure that you acknowledge both the advantages and drawbacks inherent in your favored approach.)

To what extent are modern concepts of counter-insurgency derived from practices of imperial and colonial rule?

Practices of imperial and colonial rule

To what extent are modern concepts of counter-insurgency derived from practices of imperial and colonial rule?

What are some functions that are essential to an EOC in your area based on specific threats or challenges your community might face?

An EOC

What are some functions that are essential to an EOC in your area based on specific threats or challenges your community might face? For example, if you live in a coastal area, your EOC may need to be prepared for hurricanes and mandatory evacuations or if you live in areas prone to wildfires, you might have different essential functions. My challenge for my community is nuclear plants like SRS. Savannah River Site.

Describe the techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks. Evaluate the Enhanced Risk Management Models used by NIS. Provide an overview of the practicality of these models, will they work, or are there gaps in the protection of networks?

Techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks.

Formulate a discussion forum in APA 7 format using the required reading and any other reliable resources with a minimum of 250 words.

Describe the techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks.
Evaluate the Enhanced Risk Management Models used by NIS.
Provide an overview of the practicality of these models, will they work, or are there gaps in the protection of networks?

What were the key events in its development? Which side was responsible? Given the political, military, and ideological situations at the time, was the Cold War unavoidable?

Discussion Board #10: The Cold War

In a minimum of 250 words answer the questions below.

Questions:

International affairs in the postwar era were dominated by the Cold War.

1) What were the key events in its development?

2) Which side was responsible?

3) Given the political, military, and ideological situations at the time, was the Cold War unavoidable? Support your conclusions.