Find statistics online which is consistent with your policy issue.

/in /by

Public Policy 110 – Creating and Writing about tables.

Using chapter 5 in Pennock, draft a table pertinent to your public policy issue.

My policy area: Social welfare and healthcare policy

My Public Policy Issue: the cost of Medicare

Find statistics online which is consistent with your policy issue. Either draw a table by hand on a piece of paper or use Microsoft word to draft a table and upload the table. Any valuable resources from outside can be used.

Describe the role of your assigned department and overall discipline (fire) in the response.

/in /by

1. Make list of at least four SMART incident objectives for your assigned response discipline. These should represent the significant actions that need to be taken by your response discipline to deal with the first six-hours of the incident.
Remember – Objectives should SMART –
Specific
Measurable
Action-Oriented
Realistic
Time-Sensitive
Example Objective: Evacuate all residents in the area of North of 2nd street between First and Second Avenue by 1400 hours.
2. Based on the scenario, describe the role of your assigned department and overall discipline (fire) in the response. Based on the description of resources in the Central City materials, is this something your Department has the resources to handle on its own?
Consult the National Response Framework – Terrorism Incident Annex…what agencies will you and your Department need to work with directly and indirectly at the local, State, federal levels? Cite specific details from the appropriate documents.
Attached are all the simulation resources. I am posting them in multiple places to make sure that everyone can find them.
Linked are:
1. The Simulation Guide – start here
2. The Scenario – gives you the response problem to work on as a group
3. Response Roles – a file for each role, you only need to look at the role you end up with.
Fire Role

Identify, discuss, and describe a specific contemporary political problem in one or more of the subject areas studied.

/in /by

Must include a title page containing your name, POLS 2301, Written Assignment (with an essay title), semester, and the date of submission. The title page is not included as a numbered page and your essay should meet the page number requirement exclusive of the title page.
3 to 5-page essay containing an introductory paragraph containing a brief description of 3 subject areas studied and a statement about a contemporary political problem or issue related to the course, to be discussed in greater detail later in the paper.
Discussion of the 3 subject areas identified in the introduction. Citations and specific academic information from the course must be provided both in the body and in the bibliography.

Identify, discuss, and describe a specific contemporary political problem in one or more of the subject areas studied. Construct and communicate a solution to the problem you identified. Make sure to develop and express your solution in the form of an argument that is supported by well-documented and properly cited facts and data.
Should be typed and double spaced with 12-point font and one-inch margins, top, bottom, and side. MLA citation style.
Scholarly resources are required for this paper, you need 3-5 sources beyond your textbooks. Your sources should support the points in your paper.

Examine and analyse the changing character of diplomacy, its development, practices, procedures and skills, and discuss its role foreign policy making and international relations more broadly;

/in /by

Position Paper – UN Security Council (RUSSIA)

Russia’s position on the assimilated negotiation on the following topic: ‘Peace and Stability in Fragile States’

research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2020

research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2020

https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/meetings/2020

https://library.un.org/

  1. Introduce and critically evaluate competing foreign policy approaches and diplomatic theories and infer implications for diplomatic practice;
  2. Examine and analyse the changing character of diplomacy, its development, practices, procedures and skills, and discuss its role foreign policy making and international relations more broadly;
  1. Critically assess the effectiveness and sustainability of national and multilateral diplomatic strategies, instruments and tools;
  2. Explore ideas, theories and approaches drawn from international relations, foreign policy analysis, diplomatic theory, political psychology, sociology and media studies to help generate an improved understanding of foreign policy making, foreign policy change and diplomatic practice.
  3. Provide opportunities for students to develop and apply a range of personal and transferable skills including: analytical, problem solving, negotiation, independent study and research, collaborative work and written communication skills.
  • Distinguish and critically evaluate competing diplomatic theories and infer the implications of these for diplomatic practice;
  • Interrogate the changing role of diplomacy in foreign policy making and international relations;
  • Critically assess the effectiveness and sustainability of national diplomatic strategies, instruments and tools;
  • Synthesise and apply ideas, theories and approaches drawn from international relations, foreign policy analysis, diplomatic theory, political psychology, sociology and media studies in critical to generate an improved understanding of diplomatic practice.
  • Appreciate the impact of state type on foreign policy making and diplomacy.
  • Demonstrate evidence of a range of personal and transferable skills including: analytical, problem solving, negotiation, independent study and research, collaborative work and written communication skills.
  • The accuracy of the representation of the simulation event
  • The understanding of diplomacy and the negotiation process
  • The ability to use theoretical concepts and theories to evaluate own negotiating strategies and those of one other participating state.
  • The writing and presentation skills

Discuss the Role of ‘Consent’ in Human Trafficking

/in /by

A policy brief consists of four sections:
1) Executive Summary ( ~ 100 words)
a. A brief summary of the document. What it looks at, what it argues, and (most importantly) what it recommends. You should write this last.
2) Problem Analysis/Issue (500 words)
a. A description of the issue your policy brief looks at. It should be specific and well-defined, but also connected to a larger theme in international relations/global politics.
b. Justification for why this issue must be addressed is important here. How does it relate to ethics? What ethical obligation(s) does the audience hold?

3) Critique of Current Policy (500 words)
a. This is where you criticise current policy and frame it as unethical / immoral.
b. You need to effectively demonstrate the shortcomings of current policy in this section and criticise it in accordance with your ethical principles.

4) Policy Recommendations (900 words)
a. This is the most important section because it is where you develop and apply your own ethical policy

b. Using the criticisms outlined in the previous section, your task is to devise a policy that addresses these shortcomings
c. You should be integrating your moral principles, making (justified) statements as to who is morally obligated to do something about the issue, and supporting your own policy by showing why it is ethical
d. Applying concepts from moral foundations is a good way to gain marks here and to demonstrate your knowledge/understanding

Describe an event in international relations (Japan during 1939 – 1945, Pearl Harbor Invasion) and then use one theory to interpret what happened .

/in /by

The goal of the paper is to describe an event in international relations (Japan during 1939 – 1945, Pearl Harbor Invasion) and then use one theory to interpret what happened . Your paper will be divided into two parts (please separate part 1 and part 2).

Remember that the main task is to describe thoroughly what Japan did year by year in World War II. So, you’ll need at least one milestone per each year of Japanese involvement, with very clear actions. For the rhetoric portions, you need to use direct speeches and statements by actual Japanese officials, and then examine their speeches for themes.

As many “correct” sources as needed, some provided in my document – see instructions for source requirements.

Explain the principal schools of thought (e.g. realism, institutionalism, liberalism, constructivism), and discuss their respective influence in policy-making circles, including the concepts of sovereignty, multilateralism, and interdependency;

/in /by

• Explain the principal schools of thought (e.g. realism, institutionalism, liberalism, constructivism), and discuss their respective influence in policy-making circles, including the concepts of sovereignty, multilateralism, and interdependency;
• Examine the these schools of thought, as appropriate, including inter alia, related world events where the specific theory proves unable to explain outcomes, and assess implications for a possible future world order.

What are the major roadblocks for the president in his relationship with Congress, regardless of whether there is divided government or not?

/in /by

a) What are the major roadblocks for the president in his relationship with Congress, regardless of whether there is divided government or not?

b) What are some options for presidents who face serious efforts by the House and/or Senate to stop his legislative efforts?

Discuss an international problem that also affects Canada

/in /by

Discuss an international problem that also affects Canada (international studies subject)

Briefly discuss two important consequences of the emergence of industrial capitalism. You must discuss how and why what you identify as a consequence is an important consequence.

/in /by

Please write 2-3 BRIEF paragraphs for each question.

-Briefly discuss two important consequences of the emergence of industrial capitalism. You must discuss how and why what you identify as a consequence is an important consequence. Don’t just identify them.

-Cassie writes, “Labor Unions formed in late nineteenth century America gained so much power over corporations that corporations had to pay union members high wages and accede to other union demands. The balance of power was heavily tilted toward labor unions.” Do you agree with Cassie? Why or why not?

-Many historians consider Reconstruction a failure. Do you agree? Why or why not?

-Briefly discuss the connection between Andrew Carnegie and other industrialists and social Darwinism. How did they use it to justify things like monopolies and the inequality in wealth?

-Choose one of the narratives–“How the West was Lost” or “How the West was Won”– and discuss two things about change in the American West from 1870 to 1900 to support your narrative. (for this question I have attached a PDF, documents from section, 17-5, Helen Hunt Jackson, A Century of Dishonor, 17-6, Congressional Report on Indian Affairs, 17-7, Tragedy at Wounded Knee.

-Briefly discuss the New South vision and who promoted it

-Bennie writes, “as shown by Williams v. Mississippi, federal courts in the late 19th century did all they could to fulfill the promises of the goals of Radical Republicans during the Reconstruction Era. Do you agree with this? Why or why not?

-Compare cartoons 1 and 2 with 3 and 4. Does Thomas Nast’s perspective on Reconstruction change? Is his support for doing more to help former slaves in the South consistent? Is his support for Reconstructing the South consistent? If so, what is he reflecting?