Provide a research paper about the media representation of Women in politics. They are seen to be portrayed in many tones and there is basically two ends. Women are either too Mellow or too aggressive. The paper should look at different articles from mainstream news channels and analyze how women are portrayed.
Watch Frontline’s documentary “On the President’s Orders”. Why is Duterte waging war on his own people? What does it say about the nature of conflict in the Philippines? What does it say about dictatorship and democracy, authoritarianism and other topics (civil liberties/civil rights) and leadership covered in chapters 1,4,5, 6, 8 and 12 (or any others)?What kind of leader is Duterte? What surprised you about this story?
Make sure to relate your post to the readings.
To receive a good score you should:
Make sure to post your response first.
Include citations from the textbook/chapters, time stamps and respond to two classmates.
Follow the discussion guidelines listed in Canvas.
Follow discussion guidelines which include the following:
Provide references (at least 3 citations from readings/notes) in your post (Chapter 1, 16, 17 and lecture notes)
Provide timestamps (to back up your examples; e.g., 30:15);
Make sure to proofread your post;
Provide citations at the bottom (MLA, APA, Chicago–whatever you are comfortable using);
Posts should be a minimum of 500 word
What is Japan’s new geoeconomic strategy?
Why is Japan an underappreciated power?
Why is Japan a harbinger state?
Discuss these issues, and make and support your argument with logical explanation and empirical evidence, by referring to the readings and the video. Be sure to offer concrete examples and illustrations to support your claims wherever possible. When referring to the reading, you must cite page numbers
Why is a free press essential to democracy? If there was no free press, how would people get information? Can we maintain a democracy when most Americans pay little attention to political events?
Chapter 8:
Chapter 9:
Debate on Parliamentary impetus in favour of the fight against disinformation and hateful and discriminatory content in cyberspace.
Question. Read Douglas Irwin, Free Trade Under Fire, fifth edition (introduction & chapters 1– 4) and other required readings and answer the questions that Irwin tries to answer in his book: What’s so good about trade, why do governments restrict trade, and why is trade policy so controversial? What is Irwin’s answers and arguments? Assess his arguments and make your arguments answering these questions. Be sure to offer concrete examples and illustrations to support your arguments wherever possible, referring to course materials such as the readings, and the film assigned. In other words, you must make and support your argument with logical explanation and empirical evidence referring to Free Trade Under Fire and other course materials including the required readings other than the book.
There are many ways you can answer this question, but no matter how you answer it, your discussion at least needs to include the following points:
1. What is comparative advantage? Why do countries trade what they trade? Discuss by referring to Irwin, chapter 2.
2. Contrary to the economists’ conclusion that free trade is good for all countries all the time, Krasner argues that states will not embrace free trade all of the time and that the international trading system will be open only under particular conditions. What is the reason for this discrepancy? Which argument (economists vs. Krasner) do you find more convincing, and why? Discuss the hegemonic stability theory by referring to Krasner.
3. After reading Milner’s and Krasner’s articles: To what extent is the openness of the world trading system best explained by international vs. domestic factors? What are the main pieces of evidence to support each argument? Are these arguments contradictory and can they be used to complement one another? Find supporting evidence from the historical discussions by Schonhardt-Bailey and Bailey/Goldstein/Weingast.
4. Rogowski and Davis both join Milner for arguing that states will not embrace free trade all of the time due to each state’s domestic politics. Explain the domestic political economy of trade protectionism, referring to Rogowski’s and Davis’s articles. Also, explain the difference between Milner’s and Rogowski’s arguments by referring to the Ricardo-Viner model (Milner) and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem (Rogowski). Refer to Irwin, chapters 3–4 as needed.
5. According to McDonald, how does capitalism brings peace? According to the normative arguments introduced by Hirschman, how does capitalism bring peace?
-While discussing the above points, you should clearly link your discussions to your overall argument on whether and how capitalism brings peace.
You have to discuss at least FIVE of the following terms and their significances in the study of international political economy:
Commercial liberalism (capitalist peace) Comparative advantage
Corn Laws
Democratic peace
Hegemonic stability theory
Issue linkage
Prisoners’ Dilemma
Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act (RTAA) Ricardo-Viner model
Stolper-Samuelson theorem
Underline these terms every time when they appear on your essay.
In writing this essay, you should remember that a good essay has several features:
a) Make sure that your essay has:
• a logical structure, including introduction, body, and conclusion,
• a summary statement of your argument, which should appear in the introductory paragraph, and
• clear, direct sentences and coherent paragraphs.
b) Your essay should make a clear, coherent argument. While you have to discuss several issues and events, your treatment of each issue and event should support the overall argument. Your argument should be clearly stated in the first paragraph.
c) When you have to summarize the argument that an author has made in the reading, we do not want a blow-by-blow (e.g., “first he says this, then he says that…”) or extensive direct quotations from the author. Rather, we want you to put the author’s main argument in your own words.
d) You should support your claims by evidence. An effective analysis will juxtapose your claims with passages from relevant readings and lectures.
Is democracy preferable to other political systems? Why? Provide examples. You have to make an Essay with 3 pages
Linkage Institutions (10 points)
Answer: (10 points)
Answer: (10 points)
Answer: (5 points)
Answer:
| Your Score | ___ of 35 |
Read the assigned pages (pp. 1–76) of Patrick J. McDonald, The Invisible Hand of Peace: Capitalism, The War Machine, and International Relations Theory, and answer the question that the author tries to answer in this book: What is the “invisible hand of peace” and how—and under what conditions—does capitalism bring peace? What is McDonald’s answer and argument?
Assess his argument and make your argument answering this question. Be sure to offer concrete examples and illustrations to support your claims wherever possible by referring to the reading. When referring to the reading, you must cite page numbers. In other words, you must make and support your argument with logical explanation and empirical evidence referring to The Invisible Hand of Peace and other course materials.
Winter 2023
Midterm Essays
Answer both questions in short essay form (2-4 paragraphs), based on the lectures and readings. (You do not have a choice.)
Use 12-point font, double spacing, and 1” margins.
Give notes for all quotations.
Write the essays in a word processor, save in a PDF file, and submit it on Canvas at Assignments/Midterm Essays.
Due Sunday, February 5, 2023, 11:59 PM
Write essays with an introduction, an argument and a conclusion.
Do not simply answer the questions, create an argument within your answers.
No bullet points.
In your answers, be very specific; use examples and quotes from the readings.
Draw on the lectures and discussions.
Develop your own ideas and avoid generalizations.
Each essay is worth 50 points.
1. Summarize and compare the definitions of public space in Richard Sennett’s The Fall of Public Man and Neil Smith and Setha Low’s Introduction to The Politics of Public Space. What types of spaces do they consider “public space”? According to Sennett, how did public space change with the rise of capitalism? According to Low and Smith, how has public space changed under neoliberalism?
2. Describe how Paris was transformed during the nineteenth century. What were the most important public spaces in the city after Haussmann’s public works projects? Discuss the social and political consequences of Haussmann’s renovations of the city. How was nineteenth-century Paris divided by class? What spaces did working-class women and middle-class women occupy?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.