Discourse analysis on the impact of ‘Saudization’ on higher education in a Saudi Arabian context

/in /by

Discourse analysis on the impact of ‘Saudization’ on higher education in a Saudi Arabian context

Why do some host governments respond in relatively generous ways to refugees, while other governments act more restrictively?

/in /by

Why do some host governments respond in relatively generous ways to refugees, while other governments act more restrictively?

Identify a tension or contradiction in EBS’s structural theory of racism and the constructivist ontology

/in /by

Make an argument that analyzes the compatibility or conflict between Eduardo Bonilla Silva’s (EBS) “racialized social systems” approach to identity conflict and the constructivist approach to identity conflict as articulated by Kanchan Chandra (“Cumulative Findings in the Study of Ethnic Politics”), and/or Mara Loveman (“Is ‘Race’ Essential?”), and/or Rogers Brubaker (Ethnicity without Groups). Use evidence from EBS and at least one other constructivist (Chandra/Loveman/Brubaker) to defend your claim. 3-4 pages double-spaced. 90 points

Your essay should include:
A clear thesis statement articulating the relationship between EBS’s theory and the constructivist theory of at least one other constructivist (Chandra/Loveman/Brubaker)
Direct evidence (i.e. quotations) from sources from our course. Evidence must be interpreted in light of the essay’s thesis statement.
Clear and accurate definitions for related key terms (e.g. ontology, constructivism, “idealist view of racism”, “racialized social systems”, “social closure”, “ethnicity as cognition”, etc. — the terms in this list are neither required nor exhaustive of possible key terms).
Proper in-text and bibliographic citation.
A clear, descriptive title.

There are many possible directions for you to take this essay. I have included some of the possibilities below. Feel free to borrow them directly, modify them based on your interest, or go your own way!

Option 1: Identify a tension or contradiction in EBS’s structural theory of racism and the constructivist ontology — as articulated by Chandra, Loveman and or Brubaker. Illustrate the moments of tension with explicit evidence from the texts and explain the significance of this tension for our understanding of identity conflict.

Option 2: Critique EBS’s structural theory of racism using the constructivist ontology — as articulated by Chandra, Loveman and or Brubaker. Illustrate your critique with explicit evidence from the texts and refine EBS’s argument based on your critique. Note: You could also do the opposite. You could critique Chandra/Brubaker/Loveman using EBS’s structural theory.

Option 3: Walk through a case of identity conflict and identify the moments of agreement and tension between how EBS would explain this identity conflict and how Loveman/Brubaker/Chandra would explain this conflict. Argue the strengths and weaknesses of analyzing the case of identity conflict through each approach.

Option 4: Explain why the apparent tensions that Loveman identifies between Bonilla-Silva’s theory of structural racism and constructivism are not tensions at all. Illustrate your argument against Loveman’s critiques using evidence from both texts.

Analyze the National Emergency Management Agency of the United states and give recommendations on how to improve it.

/in /by

Analyze the National Emergency Management Agency of the United states and give recommendations on how to improve it.
table of contents should be added to the paper. tital page and refrence page are seperate from the number of pages of work
title page and refrence page doesfktnt need to be numbered

Is indigenous sovereignty a solution to the issues plaguing Canada’s indigenous communities?

/in /by

Compare and contrast Trudeau and Lévesque’s approach to dealing with French in Canada. Which do you find more persuasive?

What are some of the reasons that might account for the under representationof women in Canada?

Is indigenous sovereignty a solution to the issues plaguing Canada’s indigenous communities? In your opinion, is the solution one of self government, or self governance?

Is multiculturalism a disruptive or integrative force in Canadian society?

/in /by

21.Is multiculturalism a disruptive or integrative force in Canadian society? If you were asked to reform the policy, what changes would you recommend? If you suggest it should not be reformed, explain why?

2.Discuss the National Energy Program and the controversy that surrounded it.

3.Do you think decentralization of the federal system is an answer to conflicting regional demands in Canada?

4.What are the most salient sources of the enduring constitutional impasse in Canada?Whichapproach do you favour in addressing the question of Quebec’s place in the federation?

How do you explain the persistence of the social safety net in Canada, given the lack of political power of the poor and working class?

/in /by

How do you explain the persistence of the social safety net in Canada, given the lack of political power of the poor and working class?

How did the Cold War affect Canadian foreign policy?

How is political culture examined in Canadian political science? Is it a useful theoretical framework forexplaining political outcomes?

Explain whether the questions still need answering or if they have been addressed by government since the article was published.

/in /by

After reading the article “‘Big Questions About Intergovernmental Relations and Management: Who Will Address Them?” by Kincaid and Stenberg, choose two of the questions from the article that intrigued you the most. Then in 750-1,000 words, do the following:

Explain whether the questions still need answering or if they have been addressed by government since the article was published.
If they have been answered, explain why and how. If they have not been answered, explain what government can do to start finding answers to them.
Describe the importance of the questions as they relate specifically to state and local governments.
Use three to five scholarly resourcfktes to support your explanations.

Evaluate the change and discuss what contributed to its success or lack of success

/in /by

That is my tutor`s recommenations and feedback.
Your plan is too broad. Your plan seems to be to analyse the implementation of the NPM in Africa. This is a contextual issue. You need to focus on a case of organisational change (that is a change within or to a public sector organisation). As we considered in Week 3 – the NPM is a contextual factor .Your argument should then relate to the reason for change outcomes (focusing on how the change was managed and how the implementation of change was shaped by contextual factors) – your recommendations will then focus on how to successfully manage change within public sector organisations – take a look at the guidance on the VLE.

Your analysis should:

Focus on a case of organisational change within a public sector context
Analyse the context, content, and process of the change.
Evaluate the change and discuss what contributed to its success or lack of success
Discuss what lessons can be learnt from this case study for achieving effective change within a public sector context.
Draw on the literature, theories and frameworks covered in the module, as appropriate and relevant to your case

Describe the importance of the questions as they relate specifically to state and local governments.

/in /by

After reading the article “‘Big Questions About Intergovernmental Relations and Management: Who Will Address Them?” by Kincaid and Stenberg, choose two of the questions from the article that intrigued you the most. Then in 750-1,000 words, do the following:

Explain whether the questions still need answering or if they have been addressed by government since the article was published.
If they have been answered, explain why and how. If they have not been answered, explain what government can do to start finding answers to them.
Describe the importance of the questions as they relate specifically to state and local governments.
Use three to five scholarly resourcfktes to support your explanations.