Evaluate the claim that “brain drain” is not a hindrance to advancement in Middle Eastern developing countries

/in /by

Write a 3,000 word essay based on the question:

(Evaluate the claim that “brain drain” is not a hindrance to advancement in Middle Eastern developing countries.)

Instructions:

-Please provide me with an outline and bibliography of the essay as well.

-Check the file with essay guidelines to be able to produce the best essay possible.

-IMP. Please be very cautious when writing the essay, this will go through turitin!

-Create arguments and counter-arguments throughout the essay.

-Please show examples to support your arguments and counterarguments.

-Provide positive and negative sides of brain drain in the middle east.

– VERY IMP. Use critical thinking throughout the WHOLE essay.

-Use as MANY sources as possible!

We have to critically analyse the neorealist assertion that the world system is anarchical and how it leads the Pakistani state to seek out alliances with terrorists.

/in /by

We have to critically analyse the neorealist assertion that the world system is anarchical and how it leads the Pakistani state to seek out alliances with terrorists. Critical skills and clarity are the most important parts of this paper.

What is the History , laws and regulations of the whole process and what are the issues of bringing the child back home to the parents.

/in /by

Surrogacy in India, looking at laws and regulation and describing the situation, how do clients from the U.S or Europe find a surrogate in India? what are the requirements? What is the History , laws and regulations of the whole process and what are the issues of bringing the child back home to the parents. Talk about how surrogacy law in India have changed through the years. possibly include Surrogacy in California and compare it to India.

Explain why you are approaching the question in that way. Are you looking at it through a particular standpoint?

/in /by

a) locate your work within key debates in the academic literature
b) evaluate evidence
c) use evidence to develop an argument in answer to the question
d) write clearly and precisely
e) use academic referencing
1. Answer the question. This is the most important thing. Think about what the question is asking you to do. Ask yourself, ‘why is this question being asked’? Most questions refer, one way or another, to debates within the academic literature. To answer the question, you have to decide what your argument is; and what information (evidence) is most important to include so as to answer it.
2. Develop your argument. Tell the reader in the introduction what your argument is going to be; and how you are going to answer the question. There’s no template how to do this; it’s up to you to decide what you need to say and not say so as to answer the question.
3. What is an argument? Sometimes, you might find you want to argue one ‘side’ – that’s fine. Alternatively, you could decide that you think the answer is something of both ‘sides’. That’s also fine. But try to show how the factors fit together: give weight, balance, and emphasis to each factor you want to include. That can make a clear argument.
4. You can also make an argument by showing why you are answering the question like that. You can show you are aware that you could be answering the question in a different way; but you are choosing to do it like this. Explain why you are approaching the question in that way. Are you looking at it through a particular standpoint? Is there a piece of evidence that you think is particularly convincing?
5. Make sure you refer to academic literature. You have to show where your argument comes from; and how it relates to scholarship that you have read.
6. Reference academic literature correctly. Include a bibliography which lists the resources you have used.
7. Refer to evidence. Try to be specific and try to say things that are true. i.e. not ‘thousands of deaths’, but ’40,000 deaths’. Not ‘the Cold War terrorized the world for centuries’. It didn’t.
8. Try to write clearly and say what you mean. It’s not easy to do that. Give yourself time.
9. It normally helps if you can finish a draft of the essay before the deadline – a day or so
before if you can. It’s a good habit to get into if you can do it. That way, you can read it through and make changes if you need to. Sometimes, writing is not the end point, but it is the part of the process of developing your understanding of the subject. Only on ‘finishing’ a piece of writing do we see what we wanted to say all along.
10. Don’t worry. It’s only an essay. The first year is the time you have to try things out and see what works for you. Everyone is different and everyone works in different ways. Through essay writing, hopefully you can also develop your interest and understanding of the subject matter: and perhaps that is the most important thing.

Define out clearly, at the level of a systemic concept, you dependent (outcome) and independent (causal) variables for each hypothesis.

/in /by

For this assignment, take your refined research question, model, and hypotheses and do the following:
1. Define out clearly, at the level of a systemic concept, you dependent (outcome) and independent (causal) variables for each hypothesis.
2. Define your unit of analysis as precisely as possible. Make sure to show how the unit of analysis matches your question and model.
3. Design and discuss a possible experimental or quasi-experimental research design for your hypothesis(es). Classify it according to the ones discussed in the readings.
4. What are the threats to you design? Discuss additional ways you could address these.

For this assignment follow the above instructions along with the below highlighted lines and add five more pages to the current one (update the current research paper by adding more 5 pages with following the giving instructions)

.

Is organisational reform key to avoiding ‘intelligence failure’?

/in /by

Literature Review Question: Is organisational reform key to avoiding ‘intelligence failure’?

Structure plan:
-Introduction (100 words)
-Body (800 Words)
-Conclusion (100 words)

This is the structure i recommend using if you have any further points you want to discuss in the body paragraph then let me know. All source must be academic only. Please make sure that the essay itself is 1000 words. Anything exceeding 1000 words should only be the academic sources.

Literature Review:

– Assesses strengths and weaknesses
– Identify gaps & clashes in the research and use this to justify the argument
– Keep the literature review organised by THEME or SCHOOL of Thought
– ALWAYS CENTRE THE LITERATURE REVIEW AROUND THE QUESTION

Literature Review Rules:
– All reference must have page numbers
– 6 or more academic sources
– Be consistent with referencing (only use Harvard)
– Do not only summarise thoughts of the other authors, but critique & contrast them!
– Remember to always reference throughout the essay.
1) Two Faces of Intelligence Failure: September 11 and Iraq’s Missing WMD
Richard K. Betts
2) Good literature and bad history: The 9/11 commission’s tale of strategic intelligence
Paul R. Pillar
3) Spying Blind : The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins Of 9/11
Amy B. Zegart and Amy B. B. Zegart
4) A weak pillar for American national security: The CIA’s dismal performance against WMD threats
Richard L. Russell
5) Red Team: How the Neoconservatives Helped Cause the Iraq Intelligence Failure
Patrick Conway
6) The Kent-Kendall Debate of 1949, CSI Studies
Jack Davis

Please let me know if you have any problem with them. If you would like you can add two more academic sources that you might think is good for this relevant literature review question.

 

Explain his/her policy interests. Look at their social media and “interrogate” the photos  – what is he/she doing? What kind of a persona is this Michigan State Senator trying to project to you?

/in /by

You are going to research who represents you in Washington,, DC and in Lansing Michigan. We talk about representation based on geography – which means  the address that you live at.

After researching these members, you will do some research on a topic that interests you. For example, I am interested in mental health issues and how this intersects with diversity and inclusion issues for minority groups. Find at least three different sources which are credible (use my reliable media link (not social media).  Link

 (Links to an external site.)

Find important background information on the problem you are researching, what has been done so far, and what needs to happen in the future.

  1. Upload the answers to the questions at the end of this assignment.
  2. Compose a letter to one of the five individuals that you have already researched and inform her/him about the topic that concerns you. Explain to the individual how this issue also matters to the people that live in your state (if US Senator)/or your community (if US Representative or Michigan state senator or Michigan state representative. Draw on your knowledge of  his/her policy interests or background to connect with him/her. Make sure to thank them for considering your views.

Use appropriate formatting (see the Citizen’s Guide to State Government pdf below and pay attention to pages 5-7 to ensure you address each person correctly, know what you are writing about, are reasonably brief, and be constructive. Make sure there are no spelling or grammar mistakes.

CitizensGuide to State Government.pdf

  1. List the sources that you used to research the public policy issue that concerns you.

Use the links to do some research and analysis:

www.senate.gov

 (Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

Pull down the menu on “Find your senator” to the state of Michigan and research both Michigan US Senators.

Senator XXX

Summarize (DO NOT LIST)  her policy interests.  Look at her social media and “interrogate” the photos  – where is she and what is doing? What kind of a persona is this US Senator trying to project to you?

Senator YYY

Summarize (DO NOT LIST)  his policy interests.  Look at his social media and “interrogate” the photos  – where is he and what is he doing? What kind of a persona is this US Senator trying to project to you?

www.house.gov

 (Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

Enter YOUR own address so you will find the US Representative that represents the street you live on. Not the Representative you wish you have, but the person who is responsible for representing your street in the US House.

Who represents you in the U. S. House of Representatives? What is your district number?

Explain his/her policy interests.  Look at their social media and “interrogate” the photos  – what is he/she doing? What kind of a persona is this Representative trying to project to you?

Now, we will find out who represents you in the Michigan Legislature in Lansing, Michigan. When you research who represents you in the Michigan Legislature in Lansing, you will be researching both the Michigan House of Representatives and the Michigan Senate. There are 100 districts in the Michigan House, and 38 districts in the Michigan Senate. As a result, you have four layers of representation: 1. US Senate, 2. US House, 3. Michigan House, 4. MIchigan Senate (and we are not including your city or  council/county commissioners).

First we will focus on the Michigan House of Representatives in Lansing, Michigan.

www.house.mi.gov

 (Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

Enter your address and find out who represents your street  in the Michigan House of Representatives? What is your district number in the Michigan House?

Explain his/her policy interests.  Look at their social media and “interrogate” the photos. What kind of a persona is this Michigan  State Representative trying to project to you?

www.senate.mi.gov

 (Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

Now we will find out who represents you in the Michigan Senate? What is your district number in the Michigan Senate.

Explain his/her policy interests. Look at their social media and “interrogate” the photos  – what is he/she doing? What kind of a persona is this Michigan State Senator trying to project to you?

Describe the philosopher-king and the tyrant as complete opposites, the former being the best sort of human being while the latter exemplifies the worst of humanity.

/in /by

INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUEST

1. Do not consult secondary sources. You must only leverage your understanding of Plato’s Republic only. I have attached a copy of the book for easy reference.

2. You should support your argument with relevant quotations and through the use of paraphrase. Whatever position you take in your essay, you must explain why you think as you do.

3. Your explanation must point to those passages in the text that support your conclusion.

4. Please develop your ideas and explain them thoroughly do not only provide a single sentence in support of any given stance. Please provide ample evidence from the text in order to support your position.

5. All quotations and references to specific passages must be cited in APA Format. Citations may appear in the form of standard foot- or endnotes or in the body of your paper using the author-date system.

6. You must append a bibliography giving the complete reference.

ESSAY QUESTION – At the conclusion of the Republic, Plato has Socrates describe the philosopher-king and the tyrant as complete opposites, the former being the best sort of human being while the latter exemplifies the worst of humanity. Still, they have in common that both are absolute rulers. Their power over their subjects is unlimited. What, then, distinguishes the philosopher-king and the tyrant as rulers? On your reading of the dialogue, does Plato make a compelling case for regarding the philosopher-king, in his political role, as the opposite of the tyrant?