Explain what it means for a law enforcement officer to be a “guardian” of the public.

Use the U.S. Department of Justice website to find and research four police departments and their relationships with their communities.
Write a 1,250-1,500-word comparative analysis of those four departments and their interactions with their communities. Include the following:

• Discuss both the negative and positive relationships that these departments have had with their communities.
• From a Christian worldview, how could some policies have reflected better ethical decision making that would have enhanced the relationship between the police and their communities?
• How do ethical issues that are faced within the community directly affect the relationship with the police?
• Discuss the best practices and behaviors for enhancing community-police relations. Describe which police departments (of the four) would benefit the most from specific best practices.
• Consider Christian perspectives in applying ethical reasoning to decisions and choices in a legal setting.
• Explain what it means for a law enforcement officer to be a “guardian” of the public.

Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites/legal case sites or those provided in Topic Materials.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Reflect carefully on possible alternatives and/or reasons why a different argument or set of conclusions might be put forward

This reflective piece of writing is an opinion piece; so there will need to own thoughts but a use of books to back up opinions.

Very short piece, only 500 words (not incl. footnotes)

A firm and clear contention and support that contention with appropriate and relevant examples.

Provide a clear argument in response to the statement, and develop that argument in a logical and coherent way.

Identify and utilise appropriate examples in support of your main argument

Reflect carefully on possible alternatives and/or reasons why a different argument or set of conclusions might be put forward

BOOKS THAT CAN BE USED AS EVIDENCE AND HELPING DEVELOP THE POINT ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Claus, P. and Marriott, J. (eds), History: An Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice (London, 2nd edition, 2017).

Green, A. and Troup, K. (eds), The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in Twentieth-century History and Theory (Manchester, 1999).

Lambert, P. and Schofield, P. (eds), Making History: An Introduction to the History and Practices of a Discipline (London, 2004).

Tosh, J., The Pursuit of History (London, 5th ed., 2010).

Briefly describe how your actions were limited by the U.S. Constitution.

The President and Crisis Management
Today is your presidential Inauguration Day. You were elected as president last November by a slim margin in both the popular vote and the electoral vote. You attended a worship service this morning with your family and about a dozen high-ranking members of the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Then, you and the current president took a ride in a convertible car to the U.S. Capitol, where you were sworn in as the new president of theCrisis Management. It is now official; you are the president!

As you and your family are enjoying the parade, your new chief of staff and one of the key military advisors who is a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff whispers to you that there has been a major cyberattack on key federal financial institutions across the United States that compromised the personal financial data and passwords of hundreds of thousands of citizens.

Even though you have held office for just a few hours, you know it is critical to act swiftly and decisively so that the perpetrators of the crime, the American citizens, and political leaders (those who support you and those who do not) see you as a competent and strong leader. What are your first three actions?

In your paper, you will describe these three actions in detail. Organization is important in this paper. Make certain to include the following information in your paper, and organize major sections using headings.

Briefly describe the cyberattack and its implications for the nation.

This section should be located early in the paper (i.e., in the first or second paragraph).

Do you know who the perpetrators are?

What was the goal of the crime?

How much damage was caused?

What is your first action?

Why is this action your first? Why is it so important?

What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?

What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?

What is your second action?

Why is this action your second? Why is it so important?

What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?

What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?

What is your third action?

Why is this action your third? Why is it so important?

What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?

What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?

Provide a conclusion.

What are your next steps?
Briefly describe how your actions were limited by the U.S. Constitution. For example, you may feel constrained by the other two branches—powers denied to you by the U.S. Constitution or law (e.g., declaring war or appointing to key positions in your administration loyal and trusted friends without going through the formal appointment process or the civil services system).

Your paper must be 2–4 pages in length, not counting the title page and references page. Make certain to double-space, apply 1-inch margins, and use 12-point font. Utilize headings to separate major sections of your plan (e.g., First Action, Section Action). Cite all sources in-text and on the references page using APA Style.

Your paper must be submitted to SafeAssign using the SafeAssign Originality Checker, which is software that helps identify plagiarism. The SafeAssign Originality Checker can be found within the CSU Student Portal (under your list of courses). You can submit your paper within the checker more than once. Once you receive your SafeAssign results, you can correct any areas of your paper that have too closely matched the sources you used. Your paper should not have a score higher than 40%.

In addition to your textbook readings and the unit lesson for this unit, the following resources may be helpful as you complete the assignment. As aforementioned, make certain to cite all sources—in-text and on the references page—that you use to support your work.

Does Inequality Matter?’, Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs

A summary of the key points raised by each reading.
Introduce the main theme of the articles
– A summary of the key schools of thoughts raised by each reading
– Compare and Contrast each of their main claims
– Evaluate and analyse the arguments
– Conclude and summarise my main key points.
1. Dollar, David and Aart Kraay (2002), ‘Spreading the Wealth’, Foreign Affairs, 81 (1), 120-133.
2. Kiely, Ray (2007), ‘Poverty Reduction Through Liberalisation? Neoliberalism and the Myth of Global Convergence’, Review of International Studies, 33 (3), 415-434.
3. Wade, Robert Hunter (2005), ‘Does Inequality Matter?’, Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs, 48 (5), 12-38.

What are the main differences between ‘classical’ liberal and neoliberal approaches in the field of IR?

What are the main differences between ‘classical’ liberal and neoliberal approaches in the field of IR?

Structure plan:
-Introduction (200 words)
-Body
-Conclusion (200 words)

This is the structure i recommend using if you have any further points you want to discuss in the body paragraph then let me know. All source must be academic only. Please make sure that the essay itself is 2000 words. Anything exceeding 2000 words should only be the academic sources. Remember to always reference throughout the essay.
1) Title: International relations theory : a new introduction (Author: Jørgensen, Knud Erik, author).
2) Liberalism and international relations theory in Center for International Affairs, Harvard University

 

How are the impacts of the coronavirus epidemic socially and spatially differentiated?

Description

an essay that discusses the links between coronavirus and core themes we have been studying this term. To give you guidance your essay should answer the following questions:

How has the coronavirus epidemic been facilitated through infrastructurally-mediated social and environmental changes of the Anthropocene?

How are the impacts of the coronavirus epidemic socially and spatially differentiated? In other words, who, if anyone, is disproportionately impacted and why?

How do these differential impacts reflect the uneven power relations that determine the distribution of risks, harms and benefits in the Anthropocene?

Was the information provided by your option helpful in identifying misinformation related to the 2020 US Election? Why or why not?

This is a more complex one to complete! But the fun part, is that you have 2 choices as to what you do. Please make sure you read everything completely so you can make an informed decision that fits your interests.

Please visit this page on First Draft News’ website called “Prepare for US election misinformation” (https://firstdraftnews.org/long-form-article/prepare-for-us-election-misinformation/)

There’s A LOT on this page. You don’t have to do it all for this assignment. Please look through the page and choose one of the following 2 options:

Sign up for the (free) text message course on disinformation. (NOTE: This course lasts 2 weeks, so you’d need to choose this option early on so you can answer the questions about it before the assignment is due. No extensions will be given for this assignment if you didn’t sign up early enough.)
First Draft News had a 3-day event on reporting on the election and misinformation called Infotheque 2020. Go to that page (LINK HERE (https://firstdraftnews.org/long-form-article/infotheque/)) and view all the videos and text before answering the questions.

Once you have completed your choice above, answer the following questions:

1 Which of the options above did you choose?
2 The two options were quite different. What do you consider the strength of the option you chose and why?
3 Was the information provided by your option helpful in identifying misinformation related to the 2020 US Election? Why or why not?
4 Choose what you consider to be the most useful skill or concept you learned. Why did you choose this skill/concept? What is its significance?
5 Is there anything you learned that surprised you? Explain what it was, and why it surprised you.
6 Is there anything you were hoping to learn relating to misinformation in the election that you did not learn? Why do you think it wasn’t covered (make an educated guess)?

How can policy action and enforcement at both the state and local levels have an influence on the ultimate impact on the health and wellbeing of undocumented immigrants?

please write a summary of important points
1) How can policy action and enforcement at both the state and local levels have an influence on the ultimate impact on the health and wellbeing of undocumented immigrants?
please see the attachment for additional info