Which of those three types of intelligence do you think you are best at? Briefly explain why you feel that is your strongest type of intelligence.

/in /by

Sternberg’s three types of intelligence

Read about Sternberg’s three types of intelligence: analytic, practical and creative. Give an example from your own life of a time when you used analytic intelligence. Give an example from your own life where you used practical intelligence. And give an example of a time when you used creative intelligence.

Which of those three types of intelligence do you think you are best at? Briefly explain why you feel that is your strongest type of intelligence.

Write an essay on how young children learn and thrive when their childhood is shaped by positive, secure relationships with knowledgeable adults, who are able to support their child’s learning and development.

/in /by

Qualitative

Write an essay on how young children learn and thrive when their childhood is shaped by positive, secure relationships with knowledgeable adults, who are able to support their child’s learning and development.

Choose one of the two studies you want to write-up as a full 1500-word practical report. Write a 200-word abstract for the second study.

/in /by

Research into Human Behavior

STUDY ONE ANCHORING STUDY TWO PROCESSING FLUENCY

Part 1: You can choose one of the two studies you want to write-up as a full 1500-word practical report.

Part 2: You will write a 200-word abstract for the second study (the one that you have not done the full report on).

You will require SPSS software for this report and add GRAPHS/ CHARTS and DATA according

 

Examine your figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describe your chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung. Evaluate the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provide your impression of your chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI.

/in /by

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on LGBT rights and women rights.

Examine your figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describe your chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung.
Evaluate the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provide your impression of your chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI.
Analyze how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to your chosen figure or character.
Assess the MBTI and its use to provide results on your chosen figure or character and describe the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to your chosen person.
Summarize and present your opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question. Provide research to support your claims.

Explain three potential problems with the literature that you have found (and why they are problematic). Keep in mind that the conclusion of a paper (i.e. supporting or undermining your approach) is not the focus here. Rather, what in the design, execution or interpretation of the studies might be problematic for accepting the findings? Explain why this is the case. Small sample sizes (while possibly problematic) are not interesting from a methodological or theoretical viewpoint and should not be used as one of the discussed problems.

/in /by

ACP1718 Series 2 Assignment –

Application (group, <300 words):
This text should be written together with your presentation group. Briefly describe what your approach was (e.g. the use of daily exercise in improving memory performance in middle school children) and why. Briefly describe what evidence should be required from the literature to support your approach for memory enhancement (e.g. finding a link between exercise and hormones supporting memory formation, or link between obesity and memory decline etc.). Keep in mind that the approach should always be a type of intervention / training.

Evidence (group, <300 words):
Explain, based on the conclusions of your selected 3-4 papers, whether the literature currently supports your proposed approach for memory enhancement and why / why not. For this part you do not yet have to take into account potential problems with the studies.

Literature list (group, 3-4 papers):
Find empirical research articles, specifically intervention/training studies (not reviews or meta- analyses) that help to provide evidence (for or against) the above suggested application. The articles should not be a part of the required reading material for this course. List the articles here in APA reference list format. Realize that often there will be no one paper that exactly matches your intended approach/application (let alone four), therefore also look for papers that provide circumstantial or convergent evidence. For example, if a working memory training in children is not present in the literature, perhaps it is present for adults, of perhaps a training focused on different cognitive skills is present for children. While these do not provide the exact evidence you are looking for, they can be very relevant nonetheless. For each of the papers, as group fill in a reading form (see following pages).

Reading forms
Fill in the reading forms below for the 3-4 papers that you have selected (note that the first one is filled in as an example.

Instruction for Presentation (you do not need to write anything here)
During the group presentation you will 1) Briefly explain your intended approach and application2)

Explain three potential problems with the literature that you have found (and why they are problematic). Keep in mind that the conclusion of a paper (i.e. supporting or undermining your approach) is not the focus here. Rather, what in the design, execution or interpretation of the studies might be problematic for accepting the findings? Explain why this is the case. Small sample sizes (while possibly problematic) are not interesting from a methodological or theoretical viewpoint and should not be used as one of the discussed problems.

What are the responsibilities for reporting child abuse in your state? How might this be different according to the role of the individual educator, lawyer, clergy, physician, caseworker, etc?

/in /by

Create a worshop on child abuse

For this task, imagine that you have been asked to present a workshop on child abuse prevention and recognition to child service professionals in your area. Your workshop will focus on and include the following areas:

Definitions and types of child abuse and neglect
Impact of child abuse on various aspects of human development.

Who commits child abuse and why? (Include any known gender or socioeconomic factors.)
What are the responsibilities for reporting child abuse in your state?

How might this be different according to the role of the individual educator, lawyer, clergy, physician, caseworker, etc? Suggestions for prevention or early detection

Interactive vignette: Include at least one brief, one-two paragraph vignette surrounding the issue of child abuse. Prepare 2-3 questions you would ask in the workshop, asking the individuals to analyze the event (hint: did abuse take place, if so, what type, who has to report, etc.).

Describe and explain the  factors influencing the vocational choice and potential impact on mental health

/in /by

Vocational choice in Luxembourg :

Describe and explain the  factors influencing the vocational choice and potential impact on mental health

Apply research and theories in the practice of individual, systemic, and relational therapy for grief, loss, and trauma. Develop a case presentation that addresses the grief and loss in the case study.

/in /by

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Apply research and theories in the practice of individual, systemic, and relational therapy for grief, loss, and trauma.
Develop a case presentation that addresses the grief and loss in the case study.

Competency 2: Apply knowledge of practice with diverse, international, multicultural, marginalized, and (or) under-served communities.
Apply cultural and ethical considerations when identifying systemic interventions for a family

Competency 3: Apply knowledge of emerging and evolving contemporary challenges, problems, and/or recent developments in grief, loss, and trauma for diverse groups and communities.
Identify the impacts of grief and loss on children and family systems.

Competency 4: Apply a relational and systemic perspective for client engagement, assessment, and intervention.
Identify which type of grief and loss client(s) are experiencing in reference to the cycles of grief.

Competency 5: Apply American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT) Code of Ethics and legal responsibilities and communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the marriage and family therapy profession..
Discuss the impacts of diversity, cultural, and ethical issues related to presenting challenges.

Competency 6: Communicate effectively through the appropriate application of grammar, punctuation, spelling, writing mechanics, and professional tone, while adhering to APA formatting and style.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Were the criteria used to select articles for inclusion predetermined, clearly stated, and appropriate? Was the methodological quality of each study assessed using predetermined criteria appropriate to the type of study?

/in /by

Systematic review and meta-analysis

CRITIQUE Associations between minority stress, depression, and suicidal ideation and attempts in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals: Systematic review and meta-analysis

When critiquing your meta-analysis, Answer the following questions:

What question did the systematic review address?

The main question should be clear and focused. It should describe the population, intervention/exposure, and outcomes of interest.

Is it likely that all relevant studies (published and unpublished) were identified?

Look for a comprehensive search for studies in relevant bibliographic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE); a search of reference lists from relevant studies; contact with experts; search for unpublished studies. The search should not be limited to English language only. The search strategy should include both controlled vocabulary terms (e.g. MeSH) and text words.

Were the criteria used to select articles for inclusion predetermined, clearly stated, and appropriate?

The inclusion or exclusion of studies should be a clearly defined a priori. The eligibility criteria should specify the patients, interventions or exposures, outcomes of interest, and study designs.

Were the included studies sufficiently valid?

Was the methodological quality of each study assessed using predetermined criteria appropriate to the type of study (e.g. randomization, allocation concealment, and follow-up for randomized controlled trials)

Were studies selected and data extracted by 2 or more individuals?

There should be at least 2 independent selectors/extractors and a tie-breaking procedure for disagreements.

Were the results similar from study to study?

Ideally, the results of the included studies should be similar (homogeneous). If heterogeneity exists, the authors may estimate whether the differences are significant (chi-square test). Possible reasons for the heterogeneity should be explored.

Conflict of interest

Sources of support and other potential conflicts should be acknowledged and addressed.

Clinical Importance

8a. What were the results of the review?

(Are the results of all included studies clearly displayed? Are the results similar from study to study?
Is there a clinical bottom line?
If the study results were combined, was it appropriate to do so?)

8b. How precise are the results?

(What is the confidence interval? p-value?)

8c. Did the interpretation of the review’s results accurately reflect the results?

Examine your figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describe your chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung. Evaluate the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provide your impression of your chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI.

/in /by

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on LGBT rights and women rights.

Examine your figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describe your chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung.
Evaluate the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provide your impression of your chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI.
Analyze how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to your chosen figure or character.
Assess the MBTI and its use to provide results on your chosen figure or character and describe the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to your chosen person.
Summarize and present your opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question. Provide research to support your claims.