Describe how broad or narrow your definition and understanding of the term “diversity” was, prior to reviewing the resource materials. Compare the concepts of cultural competency and cultural humility.

/in /by

Discussion

Describe how broad or narrow your definition and understanding of the term “diversity” was, prior to reviewing the resource materials. Then, compare the concepts of cultural competency and cultural humility. Finally, referencing these materials, explain why cultural humility is important for professionals in your chosen discipline. Provide an example to illustrate the importance.

Explains what type of participants the researchers want in their experiment and describes the characteristics such as age, gender, and status as well as how the participants were selected.

/in /by

Read this paragraph and write a summary. (What you like about it, what you know about it, or if you agree, etc.)

The research paper report’s primary purpose is to communicate with the readers and should always be written in a scientific writing style (Myers & Hansen, 2011). The research report is there for general information to the reader and should not involve your personal opinion or experiences so that the researcher will not sound biased toward the experiment (Myers & Hansen, 2011). Many steps should be followed to complete an accurate research paper. those steps are first the title page which gives the reader an idea of what the report is going to be about. also gives the reader the independent and dependent variables. second is the abstract page which summarizes the report in a past tense approach, explaining the method, experiment, and procedures given in the research (Myers & Hansen, 2011). next comes the introduction and in this part, the researcher must introduce their hypothesis, independent and dependent variables, and how they plan to execute the experiment. afterward comes the method part. in the method part, this is where the researcher explains to the reader how they want to do the research such as what materials they going to use and what type of method design such as within-subject design or between-subject design. Participants come next and in this part, the researcher explains what type of participants the researchers want in their experiment and describes the characteristics such as age, gender, and status as well as how the participants were selected. The next measure is how the researcher will collect the data such as in interviews or through observations. after is manipulations, in this step the researcher explains the contents of each treatment including the controlled treatment that they will be used to manipulate. sometimes they can also write in the exact instructions they give to their participants (Myers & Hansen, 2011). The design comes after and in this part, the researcher explains what type of design they will be using and give a detailed definition of the design to better help the reader understand. Next is the results and in this section, the researcher explains all of their findings from the experiment. Discussion is second to last and in this part, the researcher evaluates the whole experiment and explains the result that was found. lastly is the references and this is where the researcher cites all the sources that they used to help build their research paper. I think that all section of a research paper is necessary because it helps the reader understand the researcher’s hypothesis or theory on the experiment.

Describe limitations of previous research in this area. This may include poor methodology, unsatisfactory results, or a lack research in the area.

/in /by

Cognitive psychology

Introduction: The first few (1-3) sentences serve as an introduction that clearly tells the reader the purpose of your paper. First, include some very general, very brief, information about the topic area. You could refer to other sources if you like (e.g., book chapters, other review articles)

Then, in the same paragraph, state that you are going to summarize two experiments on a certain topic. Inform the reader that the paper will describe the purpose of the research, and review previous results and the limitations of that research. Then, the paper will summarize two experiments, describe the methodological problems in that research, and explore future research. Let the reader know what is coming.
Cite the two references in the text here. Do not review specific characteristics of the articles here.
Purpose, Previous results and limitations can be presented in one paragraph.
Purpose: In one or two sentences, state the related purpose or theme of these two experiments. Do not discuss the specific purpose of each individual article. If your experiments are similar, then their purposes should be similar.

Previous Results -Describe results from previous research in this area. Focus on research that is specific to the kind of research that these papers conducted.

Limitations – Describe limitations of previous research in this area. This may include poor methodology, unsatisfactory results, or a lack research in the area.

Experiment Summary: Present a summary of how each experiment was conducted and what each the experiment proved or demonstrated. Often it works best to go in chronological order.

Discuss some of the more salient points about how to assess someone with an addiction. Are there strategies you want to make sure you use and/or are there strategies you want to avoid?

/in /by

FIND 2 ASSESSMENTS ON LINE

Find 2 assessments and discuss the strengths and weaknesses, population best suited for these assessments and any other information that may be beneficial to a clinician looking to use the assessment.

Discuss some of the more salient points about how to assess someone with an addiction. Are there strategies you want to make sure you use and/or are there strategies you want to avoid?

Using the Top-Down Theories describe the personality traits, attitudes, and cognitions that you would want to use that would best promote well-being for each of the above domains.

/in /by

Bottom-Up Theories

Applying the Bottom-Up Theories to the following domains of your life, describe your situational goals you have for each domain that would promote life satisfaction and well-being.

Domains:

1. Financial
2. Romantic relationships
3. Friendship and socializing
4. Occupation
5. Leisure time
6. Personally engaging interests
7. Lifestyle after retirement
8. Unexpected tragedies or suffering
9. Other

Step 2: Using the Top-Down Theories describe the personality traits, attitudes, and cognitions that you would want to use that would best promote well-being for each of the above domains.

Describe examples that further illustrate relevant social psychological concepts. Relate the content in your classmate’s post to that of your own or another’s initial contribution or reply. Provide supplementary sources or reference course material that adds additional insight.

/in /by

Military psychology

Discover relevant theoretical perspectives.
Discuss basic research applicable to solving real world problems in this domain.
Explain a minimum of three specific, relevant social psychological concepts.
Predict cultural considerations that may impact the application of this insight to diverse contexts.
Formulate original ideas for application of insight from social thinking, social influence, or social relations to a career proceeding from your selected branch of applied psychology.
Your initial post should include an explanation and analysis of applied social psychology (500-word minimum). Structure your post using complete Body Paragraphs (Links to an external site.), and consider using headings to organize the various required components of the prompt. (See APA Style Elements (Links to an external site.) for guidelines regarding the use of headings in your writing.) Your initial post should reference, at minimum, three scholarly sources in addition to any applicable course resources. Additional Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) are encouraged.

Guided Response: Note the goal of the discussion forum is to provide a learning opportunity via meaningful and interactive discourse. Therefore, robust and continued commentary is essential. Responses must explicitly address concepts covered in Weeks 1 through 5, citing information from the required resources or other relevant resources in APA Style. Give examples to illustrate and explain content. In addition, responses must demonstrate critical insight. Respond to at least two of your classmates by Day 7. In addition, respond to classmates (and the instructor, if applicable) who replied to your initial post.

The following general suggestions may be useful as you craft your replies:

Describe examples that further illustrate relevant social psychological concepts.
Relate the content in your classmate’s post to that of your own or another’s initial contribution or reply.
Provide supplementary sources or reference course material that adds additional insight.
Ask clarifying or thought-provoking questions.

Is your personality more like one of your parents than the other? If you have a sibling, is his or her personality like yours? In your family, how did these similarities and differences develop? What do you think caused them?

/in /by

Personality

Is your personality more like one of your parents than the other? If you have a sibling, is his or her personality like yours? In your family, how did these similarities and differences develop? What do you think caused them? Provide specific examples of what might be due to nature and what might be due to nurture influences.

Write an essay on “How capitalism affects the mental health of people in the United States. “

/in /by

Mental health of people in the United States

Write an essay on “How capitalism affects the mental health of people in the United States. “

Describe how broad or narrow your definition and understanding of the term “diversity” was, prior to reviewing the resource materials. Compare the concepts of cultural competency and cultural humility.

/in /by

Discussion

Describe how broad or narrow your definition and understanding of the term “diversity” was, prior to reviewing the resource materials. Then, compare the concepts of cultural competency and cultural humility. Finally, referencing these materials, explain why cultural humility is important for professionals in your chosen discipline. Provide an example to illustrate the importance.

Write no more than 750 words, detailing: • Very Brief case description: What happened? relevant facts about the case, i.e. chronology of events as relevant to the forensic technology under scrutiny.

/in /by

Forensic technologies

For this assessment, i select three (N=3) forensic technologies

  • 1.DNA,
  • 2.Fingerprints (and other impressions)
  • 3.Bodily Fluids

And research a relevant case study of a criminal investigation that makes explicit use of them (a total of 3 case studies, one for each of the chosen technology).

Once you have chosen the relevant technologies and cases, you should write no more than 750 words per case (+ or – 10%), 2,250 max overall, detailing:

• Very Brief case description: What happened? relevant facts about the case, i.e. chronology of events as relevant to the forensic technology under scrutiny

• Historical and jurisdictional context: Where and when? i.e. where the case took place and any relevant legislation, cultural practices as related to historical, geographical and social context.

• Limitations and critique: any controversies about the case, particularly focusing on the forensic technology in question as well as the sources of information used. You will need to draw on academic literature in order to understand and expose limitations.

• Sources of information used: Who says? (bare minimum of four sources per case, including minimum of one academic journal article). The sources need to be referenced in a bibliographic fashion. You need to use in-text citations throughout your case analysis. You must reference in Harvard style.

The most important thing about your portfolio is that you follow the guidelines and outline structure. Each of your three case studies needs to include:

  • • a brief description of the case
  • • a discussion of context
  • • a discussion of limitations and critiques
  • • a bibliography/list of references (5 reference each)