Describe classical and operant conditioning and then critically evaluate the evidence on how they relate to mental health.
Motivation & You (Reflection #3)
Use this as the main topic of your paper. Start with the sentence, “In 10 years, I see myself …”
Write about your future social life, your network, and the connections you’d like to make. Then add the sentence “In order to achieve this vision, I know I have to achieve the following short-term goals…”
Include some thoughts about why you are in college. What kind of career would you LIKE to have? Are the things you are currently doing leading to this career? How would you achieve your short- and long-term goals? What obstacles might you face as you pursue your goals, and how would you overcome these obstacles? What are some daily and/or weekly activities you would have to engage in to achieve these goals?
Stress, Health, Sleep & You (Reflection #1) and Personality, Mental Health, and You (Reflection #4)
What emotions do you believe would help you achieve your goals? How would you try to maximize what you have learned about appraisal, positive emotions, and coping with negative emotions, to achieve your goals?
How do you appraise and manage your stress, as you move towards your goals?
What are some cultural and family practices that you have found to be helpful in managing your stress?
How does lack of sleep impact your health and how might that impact the move towards your goals?
As you have learned, stress negatively impacts many areas of a person’s life, including mental health. How might you manage your stress as a way of warding off any mental distress that you might experience?
What leisure activities can you engage in (other than mindlessly scrolling through social media apps) that would improve your mood and increase your energy as you move towards your goals?
How would you feel if you failed to achieve your goals, and how might you cope with failure?
Personality, Mental Health, and You (Reflection #4)
First briefly compare and contrast the “nature” and “nurture” explanations for behavior. Then write about how what you have inherited from your parents impact your goals and plans?
Do you believe you have what it takes (genes and environmental resources) to achieve your goals?
With regard to what you’d like to do/be in the future, are they related to what any of your family members have done?
In what ways might your genetic inheritance and the environment (including family, friends, culture, education, and finances) help or hurt you moving towards your goals?
Learning, Memory, Development & You (Reflection #2)
Reflect on your development and attachment style. How do these impact your personal goals?
Write about the home and family life you plan to have. How might your attachment style help or hurt you in realizing this vision for family? Do you have a difficult relationship with your parents and/or siblings? If so, what can YOU do to change these relationships?
How might what you have learned about reinforcement, punishment, and other learning principles, and memory enhancement, impact your goals, plans, and priorities?
What habits would you like to see yourself develop, in order to achieve your goals? Write about what positive and negative reinforcers you can build in to your schedule to keep you motivated to do all the work required of you at college. Write about how you can improve your memory based on what you’ve learned about how to improve memory.
As the group leader, one of your roles is to go over the rules of the group, and to do so you must develop most of the group rules with the entire group. What two rules will you have for a group of adolescents? Also, explain issues around boundaries, for example, is it acceptable for group members to contact each other via social media outside of the group? Identify at least three boundary issues that may come forth when providing group therapy to adolescents.
1) Many people choose Clinical Psychology because they are interested in helping people. Beyond wanting to help people, describe your reasons for choosing to do graduate work in Clinical Psychology. And what is your dream job after graduation? (up to 250 words)
2) Autobiography (up to 500 words)
3) Describe an experience of making a mistake or feeling ineffective, and what it taught you about yourself. (up to 250 words)
4) Describe how COVID-19 has impacted your professional and/or academic experience and your application. (up to 250 words)
Choose a research topic from this course that is of interest to you.
Give a brief description of how and why this topic was chosen.
Employ concepts or research findings from the textbook/lectures and at least two other references.
Discuss past and current research relevant to the topic.
Describe in detail any changes pertaining to the topic that have occurred over time.
Include any theories relevant to the topic.
Present future implication for research on the topic.
Expand upon concepts from the course relevant to the topic.
Provide relevant support from textbook/lectures and other resources.
OVERVIEW
The purpose of this Narrated PowerPoint Assignment is to practice oral communication. In this Narrated PowerPoint Assignment, Select one of Johnson’s (2010) five views of how psychology and Christianity relate, and describe how it could be beneficial in your area of research interest. Briefly describe the viewpoint you have chosen, and then describe how it would apply to your research area and why you believe it would be a beneficial approach to pursuing truth in that area. Remember that you are persuading the audience to believe this viewpoint would be good for your research area and, therefore, you will want to ensure you build a logical, strong argument for using the chosen viewpoint in your research area.
INSTRUCTIONS
Include the following slides in your Narrated PowerPoint Assignment:
• Introductory slide that tells the audience the purpose of the presentation.
• Viewpoint slide(s) that explain the view you have chosen and how it explains the relationship between psychology and Christianity.
• Research area slide that describes your area of research interest.
• Slide(s) describing why you believe the chosen viewpoint would be a beneficial way to approach knowledge and truth in your topical area.
• Concluding slide that provides a summary and conclusion to your presentation.
• References slide(s).
The Narrated PowerPoint Assignment must be clear and include information on the slides to help the audience follow the argument made in your narration. Also, transitions between slides must be made in a way that helps guide the audience along the argument you are making for your viewpoint. As you are preparing this Narrated PowerPoint Assignment, imagine you have been asked to give a talk on how the chosen viewpoint could help advance knowledge in your research area. Then, develop a logical, clear argument describing the viewpoint, your research area, and why the viewpoint you have chosen would be beneficial to advancing knowledge in your area.
For this assignment, choose a historically important figure or a character from a movie, novel, or TV show, then address the following in your paper:
Examine your figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describe your chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung.
Evaluate the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provide your impression of your chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI.
Analyze how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to your chosen figure or character.
Assess the MBTI and its use to provide results on your chosen figure or character and describe the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to your chosen person.
Summarize and present your opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question. Provide research to support your claims.
The Personality Analysis
Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA
Using the same topic you selected for Part I of your proposal, discuss all components denoted below. Use each numbered item as a required subheading in your paper.
1. Data Collection Procedures (Describe the step-by-step process you would use to collect your data) (1 page minimum).
2. Data Analysis (Select two types of statistics you would use to analyze gathered data; not stats formula details, but which stats you would use) (1 page minimum).
3. Contribution to the Field (explain the benefits to individuals, groups and society as a whole of the study results. Example: Using the first hypothetical social psychology study from Part I, if we find that public awareness ads are associated with improved changes in attitudes toward the severely mentally ill, might we use such study results as a means of advocating for Federal funding for expanding advertising efforts; or if study results show no to little association between ads and public attitude changes, might we better serve the severely mentally ill by pursuing other means of reducing stigma? (1 page minimum).
4. Research Limitations (1/2 page minimum). Discuss limitations that you foresee in Part I and Part II of your Research Study Proposal. It may be helpful to review your Instructor feedback for Part I of this assignment.
5. Discussion (1/2 page minimum). Discuss and reflect on your conclusions of the research process and this assignment in its entirety.
Identifying Data
On November 1st, 2021, Shar B a twenty-one-year-old African American woman who is presently attending college, works as a Walmart cashier. She is a single heterosexual woman who speaks English. Dr Fran Davis-Weathers, her psychologist, conducted a clinical examination, diagnostic assistance and helped in developing an appropriate treatment plan for her.
Referral Questions
There was a discussion with Miss B. about the scope of the evaluation’s secrecy, access to documents, and its purpose. Self-referral from a client who wants to learn more about her frequent panic episodes and whether or not they may be alleviated. The assessment aimed to determine the following questions:
1. What are the causes of her anxiety, was the symptomology consistent?
2. Were the anxiety triggers controllable or was there a remedy?
Learning Outcomes
The student should be able to:
• carry out a literature search to find relevant research
• critically evaluate research design and findings
• evaluate research within the context of wider psychological knowledge.
Guidelines for Critical Review
Students will write a critical review of a recent psychology journal article (within the last 2 years) or an appropriate unpublished ‘preprint’. This review should place particular emphasis on design and analysis used, and students should also consider the theoretical ideas discussed. The article selected should be one that could be greatly improved, or where an alternative explanation/argument is possible. The review should be submitted by 10am Friday 3rd December 2021.
Notes for guidance on writing the journal review:
New research articles are ‘peer reviewed’ – with researchers providing comments to journal editors highlighting strengths and weaknesses of the presented work and how it could be improved. In this piece of coursework, you take the role of this reviewer, and critically evaluate your chosen article, making suggestions for amendments. Look at each section of your chosen article and critically evaluate what is presented. You should also present suggestions for changes, or alternative explanations and experiments that could test them. Examples of this kind of peer review will be given at the seminar associated with this course on 7th October 2021.
Note – your review should not be written in essay format, as this is not the way reviews are presented. Put your comments into sections, using subheadings, such as:
General comments:
Give an overall critique of the paper. What claims do the authors make? How do these claims relate to methods they have used? Do you agree with their conclusion?
Introduction:
Critically evaluate the background to the study. Is this information clearly presented? Are the aims of this study clear? Are the hypotheses clear, and are they appropriate for the study?
Method:
Look at the design used and consider whether this is an appropriate method for the research questions. Are there any issues with the methods they have chosen? Would alternative measures provide clearer answers to the research questions? Are the variables used valid and/or reliable measures relevant to the hypothesis tested? Are the details of the study clear?
Results:
Discuss the type of analysis used, and how the results are presented. You could suggest possible alternative analyses and discuss what this would have shown. Is anything missing? Should additional analyses have been carried out?
Discussion:
Evaluate the explanations given for the results. Consider whether alternative explanations could be given for these findings. Is it possible to generalize these results, or are they specific to a particular paradigm or population? What further studies or experiments should be conducted to test the authors’ hypothesis or rule out an alternative explanation?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.