Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that it makes you lose all track of time. Why does it captivate you? What or who do you turn to when you want to learn more? (That is the prompt) This paper is for admission into college.
Read the article, General systems theory: Its past and potential. Pay particular attention to how von Bertalanffy’s general system theory originated and evolved and how the author of the article characterizes the terms, “systems,” “structures,” and “relations.”
Review pp. 514-515 of Bronfenbrenner (1977) to understand the definitions of each system within the ecological systems model.
Review Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model, located in this week’s learning resources. Focus on the meaning and interrelationships among the microsystem, exosystem, and macrosystem from a child’s perspective. Consider how these systems would be generalized to apply to an adult.
Using Bronfenbrenner’s model, identify two out of three systems (microsystem, exosystem, macrosystem) and their settings (school, work, family gatherings, neighborhood, country, etc.). Think about how demands and expectations in one setting might impact your ability to meet demands and expectations in another setting.
By Day 3
Post a response to the following:
Identify the two systems you chose and describe settings within each system that influence your life and behavior/activity. Then explain how demands and expectations in one setting could impact the ability to meet demands and expectations in another setting. Be specific.
1)After reading Cordova and Scott (2001), reflect on what you believe are crucial components of a satisfying, stable, and intimate couple relationship. Are they attitudes, beliefs, values, and/or behaviors? (Note that people’s beliefs and values do not necessarily correspond with their behaviors.) List several factors or dimensions you would deem important to collect information about when first sitting down with a couple presenting for services. How might those couple dimensions be assessed or measured?
Online Therapy and Your Practice
2) Therapy via video is rapidly becoming important for the field of Marriage and Family Therapy. Reflect on your web search for “online therapy” and “telementalhealth.”
In this discussion, respond to the following:
How this professional shift to online therapy might impact you professionally.
Critically discuss the challenges associated with ‘participation’ when conducting research with children and young people.
Main sources
The main sources of material for this assignment are:
Module Reader Chapter 1 ‘Images of childhood and their influence on research’ by Mary Kellett – cite as (Kellett, 2014) in your assignment
Module Reader Chapter 2 ‘What is research with children and young people’ by Sandy Fraser, Rosie Flewitt and Martyn Hammersley – cite as (Fraser, Flewitt and Hammersley, 2014) in your assignment
Module Reader Chapter 3 ‘Designing research for different purposes’ by Victoria Cooper – cite as (Cooper, 2014) in your assignment
Module Reader Chapter 4 ‘Doing qualitative research with children and young people’ by Sue Bucknall – cite as (Bucknall, 2014) in your assignment
Module Reader Chapter 5 ‘Ethics’ by Priscilla Alderson – cite as (Alderson, 2014) in your assignment
Block 1 Units 1–6
Fitzgerald, H., Stride, A. and Enright, E. (2020) ‘Messy methods: making sense of participatory research with young people in PE and sport’, European Physical Education Review, September 2020. doi:10.1177/1356336X20953462.
NOTE: Write a 350- to 525-word reflection on your chosen target behavior. Ensure you:
Describe the target behavior in observable and measurable terms.
Identify the methods that will be used to observe and acquire baseline data on this behavior.
Explain why you chose this behavior.
Do not select a condition which could be associated with a physical, medical or mental diagnosis.
• Compare and contrast the Stanford-Binet intellectual test, the Wechsler Scales, the Kaufman battery, and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities with regard to history, reliability, and validity.
• Based on the readings and other reliable supplemental resources, in your opinion describe which intellectual assessment tool is best and most ethical to administer to the LGBTQ population and explain the reasons.
• Students should address their choice in relation to not only reliability/validity but also cultural background as well as other strengths and weaknesses of the tests. Please remember to base all opinions on evidence.
Advocates of learning a single form of therapy in depth and conceptualizing and treating patients from one model have accused integrative approaches of creating therapists who are jacks of all trades and masters of none.
Discuss the pros and cons of in-depth training of one form of therapy versus a breadth-based training of multiple forms of therapy.
Your paper, would be to describe in detail how a college online course (such as this one) could be better created and or adapted to meet the needs of a variety of exceptional people. You may wish to center on persons with Mild intellectual disability, ASD, persons with ADHD or perhaps people with a combination of “atypical abilities”. There are huge numbers of people with learning disabilities, attentional problems and emotional disturbances, all happening at once. How might you design such a course?
Title: Drawing on material from Chapter 1 Critical, creative and credible and Chapter 2 Investigating memory: experimental and clinical investigations of remembering and forgetting, critically evaluate the contribution of experimentation to our understanding of how we retrieve memories.
Word limit: 1500 words (excluding references, the title and any appendices). Write the word count at the end of your essay.
As highlighted in the question, the key resources you will need to draw on for this essay are Chapters 1 and 2. While both chapters explore the experimental method, Chapter 2 is particularly relevant because it covers experimentation in the context of different types of memory and how memory works in relation to memory recall and recognition. For example, Section 3 of Chapter 2 reviews what types of memory-testing paradigms are used in lab-based experimental research, and Section 4 explores how evidence is used to develop and challenge two models of memory. You may find it useful to refer directly to some of the primary source material referred to in Chapter 2, or indeed other relevant papers/journal articles. Information about how to find relevant primary source material can be found in the Week 1 library activities referred to in the Study Guide.
While your essay should mainly draw on material from Chapter 2, you should also draw on material from Chapter 1. Section 2 of Chapter 1 is particularly relevant to the question as it focuses explicitly on experimentation. However, as the material in this section is not specific to memory or remembering, you will need to give some thought to how you can make this information directly relevant to the question as set. Perhaps focusing on the methodological issues highlighted in this section and exploring their broader implications would be helpful.
Chapters 1 and 2 include numerous references to (and discussions about) experiments, so they should provide you with plenty of material to address the TMA question as set. Keep in mind however that you only have 1500 words to work with, so you will not be able to cover every issue in the depth that it is covered in the textbook.
When writing this TMA, it is important that you integrate the chapters’ material in a coherent and logical manner, and in a way that explicitly addresses the set question. Simply summarising the chapters’ content is unlikely to gain high marks. Paying particular attention to the process words for this question should help you with this. In this case you are being asked to ‘critically evaluate’, which means you need to make a judgement about the contribution of the presented experimental evidence to our understanding of how we retrieve memories. Therefore, the arguments you make must be based on evidence and reasoning. This will require you to assess whether a given piece of experimental evidence actually supports the conclusions arrived at by the authors of the study you are describing. For example, are other interpretations of the evidence possible? Does the use of experimental methodology limit or shape the type of findings produced? Are there weaknesses in the design of the study which allow these alternative interpretations to creep in? A good area of consideration might be found in relation to ecological validity; a concept that is covered in depth across the qualification (including in DE100 and DE200). Do keep in mind, however, when you are writing your essay, that a ‘critical evaluation’ should give consideration to both the pros and the cons associated with the topic being explored; so try to ensure your essay does not simply aim to find faults with experimental methodology – rather make sure your essay considers the advantages and limitations in a balanced and well-evidenced manner.
1,Describe Psychology to someone who knows nothing about it with out using Jargin terms
2, Describe Psychology to someone of your peer.. on their level no apa needed
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.