How is Feminist theory—and/or the various theories on race and colonialism—similar to “Critical Theory”?
How is Feminist theory—and/or the various theories on race and colonialism—similar to “Critical Theory”? How might they work together?
How is Feminist theory—and/or the various theories on race and colonialism—similar to “Critical Theory”? How might they work together?
In your essay, address the following:
Why can some women athletes have some biological components, such as testosterone levels, normally associated with men?
Why are these women sometimes classified as intersex not as transgender?
Evaluate the arguments in the provided source (Page 1.1 source 2) claiming it is fair and those claiming it is unfair
Field Observation Study
In a paragraph, define a field observation study you would like to perform. Describe the topic you want to observe, the setting you would observe it in, who the subjects or participants might be, and what you think you might observe.
Discuss the power of peer pressure while addressing the following questions:
How is peer pressure different in college than in high school?
Was there more peer pressure or less peer pressure in high school?
Looking at the clothes you wear, the products you buy, the car you drive (or hope to drive someday), and the forms of entertainment you enjoy—how many of these are the result of truly independent choices versus the influence, at least to some degree, of peer pressure. my race is african american ethnicity- belizean.
Going to school to get a higher education was always and still is a big thing in my family.
New Developments in Theories of Gender and Sexuality
SELECT ONE OF THE ESSAY QUESTIONS
1. How do materialist feminists understand women’s place in society? Critically assess the limitation of their position in relation to either intersectionality or postcolonial theory.
2. Critically assess the significance for feminist thought of a shift from ‘working on women’ to ‘theorising gender’?
3. Drawing on an empirical example (this could be a current event, a cultural text, or a particular public figure or group) critically assess the concept of ‘intersectionality’.
4. Critically assess the concept of hegemonic masculinity. Discuss with reference to empirical examples (this could be a public figure, cultural text or social structure or social phenomenon).
5. Is it possible to create a world feminist movement? Identify the challenges of such a project and the position of postcolonial feminists towards the issue.
6. Critically discuss the claim that ‘sex is a biological category’.
7. Sexuality is a social construct. What are the theoretical and political implications of this claim?
8. What is ‘queer’? Is it anything other than being ‘against the normative’?
9. Drawing on one or more empirical examples, critically assess the role of the media in reproducing and/or subverting gendered norms.
10. Are we living in post-feminist times? Critically discuss this using empirical examples (from the media, personalities, events, trends, activist groups etc.).
Describe the theory that colonialism explains how the world’s nations became stratified.
Use details and examples from the text and outside sources, if you choose.
Discuss the power of peer pressure while addressing the following questions:
How is peer pressure different in college than in high school?
Was there more peer pressure or less peer pressure in high school?
Looking at the clothes you wear, the products you buy, the car you drive (or hope to drive someday), and the forms of entertainment you enjoy—how many of these are the result of truly independent choices versus the influence, at least to some degree, of peer pressure
Topic: Social Media
Does social media affect self-esteem?
Abstract
How does media affect self-esteem?
Abstract
Does social media create isolation?
You will need to spend some time discussing when and why Prevent was introduced and what its objectives are.You will certainly need to address the problems and issues that have arisen out of Prevent and also give voice to the opinions of individuals and groups that support it. As always, the weight of the evidence presented by the two ‘sides’ is key.In responding to this question, you will be engaging in contemporary debates about the process of ‘radicalization’. In so doing, there are a variety of sources open to you: State policies to counter radicalization, academic studies on radicalization, the testimonies of those that have been ‘radicalized’, the views of security experts, government and wider political reports on radicalization and the reports provided by
Human Rights group scounter-radicalization and NGOs, e.g. Quilliam, CAGE, Human Rights Watch, Liberty, Prevent Watch.
It is important to test the credibility of these sources and subject them to scrutiny. You also need to have some certainty about your own position on radicalisation.
Is it a readily identifiable process? If so, why? If not, why not? When did the discourse of radicalisation first emerge and why? You may well want to refer to specific examples and cases. Lots of possibilities here – including 7/7, London Bridge and/or Manchester Arena attacks.
When thinking about alternative strategies, you may have your own suggestions, but do read around the literature on this. Look at approaches to counter-radicalization adopted in other countries in Europe and beyond. You should also (re)engage with the Thought Piece for week 6, where it is argued that bolstering existing health, welfare and support services and advancing human rights would be a preferable alternative.
How effective has the UK Government’s Prevent strategy been in countering ‘radicalization’? Which alternative strategies might be adopted in Britain?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.