Write an essay addressing your integrated theory of leadership, drawing from your theology and your leadership theory understanding.

Theological Perspective in Leadership

This assignment will consist of a brief, 3-4 pages, double-spaced APA-style (title page, abstract, references count extra) paper in which you reflect upon your values and beliefs regarding the way you address:
your integrated theory of leadership, drawing from your theology and your leadership theory understanding.

How can we reconcile these two teachings based on a Lutheran understanding. Discuss the Roman Catholic view on work righteousness.

Faith Righteousness Vs. Work Righteousness:

A Lutheran Approach and the Roman Catholic Church Teaching: How can we reconcile these two teachings based on a Lutheran understanding

This paper should answer the question, how to reconcile, according to a Lutheran understanding, faith righteousness and good works. Also, it should discuss the Roman Catholic view on work righteousness. The paper should be 7 pages long, double space, and Chicago Manuel style with footnotes
Sources: Book of Concord, Christian Dogmatics, F. Pieper Volume II, Theology of the Lutheran Confession, Called to believe, teach, and confess by Steve Mueller

How does the text of Deuteronomy 17:14-20 relate to the narratives of Saul, David, and in particular, Solomon? Do you think that the author of I Kings has Deuteronomy 17 in mind as he writes the “Solomonic Narrative” of 1 Kings 1 – 11?

Content Essay: 1 Kings

The content essay assignment provides you with the opportunity to take a “deep dive” into the content of a particular interpretive issue within an Old Testament book. The ability to engage with the historical, literary, and theological elements of interpretation is an essential skill to develop in biblical studies. Developing these skills through research and writing is a time-tested means toward becoming a more competent reader and interpreter of Scripture. The content essay assignment probes challenging issues by answering the interpretive questions that rise from the text of Scripture.

INSTRUCTIONS
You will write a content on 1 Kings.
Content Essay: 1 Kings Assignment
In an essay, answer the following questions pertaining to 1 Kings 1 – 11:
1. How does the text of Deuteronomy 17:14-20 relate to the narratives of Saul, David, and in particular, Solomon? Do you think that the author of I Kings has Deuteronomy 17 in mind as he writes the “Solomonic Narrative” of 1 Kings 1 – 11?
2. Does the author of 1 Kings depict Solomon in a positive or negative manner? Is there any indication in the narratives prior to chapters ten and eleven that Solomon is already going astray (even in spite of his wisdom)? How is it that Solomon, endowed with the gift of wisdom, could go astray as he does?
The essay must be 1000 words and follow current Turabian format. Use three (3) academic sources (beyond course textbooks) must be cited. Preferred source material includes academic commentaries, journal articles, and academic monographs. Avoid popular sources, including non-peer reviewed websites and blogs.

Explain the different Views exist on the likely original meaning of the fourth servant song (Isaiah 52:13), and how early Christians used it to understand Jesus’ death.

Fourth servant song

Different Views exist on the likely original meaning of the fourth servant song (Isaiah 52:13), and how early Christians used it to understand Jesus’ death. Explore this topic by comparing three given texts.

What characteristics that marked the Reformation period (1517–1661) are still present in evangelical Christianity today, and which are no longer present?

Discussion: Characteristics of the Reformation Period that are still present today and those not present

post one thread of at least 550 word in response to the question below. You must support your assertions with 4 scholarly citations in Turabian format (notes-bibliography or author-date list). Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook(s), the Bible, etc.

• What characteristics that marked the Reformation period (1517–1661) are still present in evangelical Christianity today, and which are no longer present?

REad Chapter 10 of Mark A.Noll Turning Points Decisive Moments in the History of Christianity (3rd edition)

What informs Paul’s writing in this passage; does he draw on OT, relevant traditions/backgrounds, and why? How does he seek or influence his readers, any other conceptual connections that the audience could make, or is he making?

Apostle Paul’s Call and Conversion; Galatians 1:13-17

Kindly be sure to use academic at least three (3) peer-reviewed journal articles. So in your writing, brings these types of ideas into this paper; What informs Paul’s writing in this passage; does he draw on OT, relevant traditions/backgrounds, and why? How does he seek or influence his readers, any other conceptual connections that the audience could make, or is he making? What is the text saying concerning the thesis?

Describe how the conversation went, the reaction of your conversation partner both during and after the presentation of the argument, what you might have done differently, and how you feel after presentation about the strength of the argument.

Apologetics Field-Based Activity: Jesus and the Reliability of the New Testament Template

 

Instructions for this submission

The purpose of the activity is to provide you with an opportunity to construct a short argument for the reliability of the New Testament account of Jesus while anticipating possible objections to that argument and then sharing that argument “in the field.” In the sections provided below, you will insert your constructed argument and possible objections; you will enter the date, time, setting, and short description of the person with whom you share the argument; and a short reflection on the sharing experience.

 

  1. Construct a short argument for the reliability of the New Testament account of Jesus while anticipating possible objections.

 

  1. Type below the list, the type of argument for the reliability of the New Testament account of Jesus that you will be constructing (limit yourself to one of argument):

 

Jesus and the Eyewitnesses (Gould, p. 71-81; See also for topics in this section Sweis, p. 288-294)

The NT Claims to Be Eyewitness Testimony (Gould, p. 72-73)

It’s Early, REALLY Early (Gould, p. 73-74)

Dating the New Testament (Gould, p. 74-76)

Paul (Gould, p. 76-77)

Creeds (Gould, p. 77-78)

Marks of Authenticity (Gould, p. 78-80)

The Value of Eyewitnesses (Gould, p. 80-81)

The Preservation of the New Testament (Gould, p. 81-88)

The New Testament Manuscript Tradition (Gould, p. 82-84)

How Early? (Gould, p. 84)

Manuscript Variant (Gould, p. 84-86)

So What? (Gould, p. 86-88)

Did Jesus Exist? (Gould, p. 93-101)

Did Jesus Claim to Be God? (Gould, p. 101-103)

Was Jesus God? (Gould, 103-106; Sweis 239-270 may be helpful, depending on your approach)

  1. Lay out your argument as you plan to use it in the conversation you will be having.

 

 

  1. Anticipate two to three possible objections to your argument and how you would address those objections in a short conversation.

 

 

  1. Sharing your argument for the reliability of the New Testament account of Jesus.
  2. Identify the time and place in which you had the conversation.

 

  1. Identify the setting (coffeeshop, online, text, etc. It must, however, be a conversation and not a monologue):

 

  1. Identify your conversation partner (no names please): unbeliever, believer; uncertain; knowledge level, attitude of partner (antagonistic, interested, doubtful, devil’s advocate).

 

 

  1. Reflection (two-four paragraphs; a paragraph will have at least three complete sentences) in which you describe how the conversation went, the reaction of your conversation partner both during and after the presentation of the argument, what you might have done differently, and how you feel after presentation about the strength of the argument.

 

 

 

 

 

Differentiate Views exist on the likely original meaning of the fourth servant song (Isaiah 52:13), and how early Christians used it to understand Jesus’ death.

Isaiah 52:13

Different Views exist on the likely original meaning of the fourth servant song (Isaiah 52:13), and how early Christians used it to understand Jesus’ death. Explore this topic by comparing three given texts.

what lessons might believers learn today from the strengths and pitfalls too closely aligning the Church with culture and society?

The Church in the Middle Ages

Read Turning Points Chapters 5 and 6 by Noll. Read Exploring Christian Heritage pages 57-101 by Weaver & Roldan-Figueroa. Read uploaded Charts by Watson. Write a 400-word response for the following discussion question: (follow Turabian format)

Looking at European “Christendom” of the Middle Ages and considering the concept of “Christian America”, what lessons might believers learn today from the strengths and pitfalls too closely aligning the Church with culture and society?

What details did you discover that you had not noticed before? How do you think this exercise can help you to interpret the text better?

Discussion: Tools for Hermeneutics

The student will post two (2) threads of 400 words each and you must support your assertions with at three (3) scholarly citations from a minimum of two (2) sources in current Turabian format. Each reply must incorporate at least one (1) scholarly citation in current Turabian format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the Bible, textbooks, scholarly articles. From a conservative viewpoint

1. Using the 9 items to consider when reading sentences as listed in chapter 3 of Grasping God’s Word (i.e., repetition of words, contrasts, comparisons, lists, cause and effect, figures of speech, conjunctions, verbs, pronouns), list as many observations as you can find in Acts 1:8. You may list these by noting what category the item falls under (e.g., “contrasts”) and then offering an example of that item. For example, an observation would be to note that the sentence starts off with the conjunction “but,” which connects the sentence to the one above it in a contrasting matter. This item could be listed under both “conjunctions” and “contrasts.” We will follow the basic instructions for this assignment as given on page 64 of your text. Do not offer an interpretation or an application of the text. At this point I want you to list as many of the 9 items as you can find. How do you think this exercise helps you to understand the text better? What did you discover that you did not already notice about this passage?

2. Utilizing the 9 items a reader should observe in paragraphs (see chapter 4 of Grasping God’s Word), list as many of these items as you can observe in Philippians 2:1–4. Offer the items as a list (e.g., you could list the “emotional terms” of the passage including such words as “encouragement” or “comfort”). The goal here is to see how many of the 9 you can find in Philippians 2. We are not interested here in interpretation or application, just observations concerning the details of the paragraph with regards to the 9 items a reader should observe. What details did you discover that you had not noticed before? How do you think this exercise can help you to interpret the text better?