Analyze and explain whether the Delaware restriction on the sale of Shine-It violates the Interstate Commerce Clause. Discuss why it is essential for businesses to understand the impact of the Interstate Commerce Clause and state police powers.

/in /by

Background Facts You Need To Know: Viral Clean (Clean) is incorporated and located in Maryland, but it engages in business in all Mid-Atlantic states. Clean uses its line of disinfectant and cleaning products, and it also sells its products to other companies via the internet.

Recently, the Delaware legislature enacted a law banning all sales and importation, until further notice, of Clean’s Shine-It surface cleaner in Delaware, The Delaware Attorney General’s Office investigated consumer complaints. It discovered that one of the ingredients in Shine-It is contaminated and causes a quick-growing mold to spread on surfaces to which it is applied. The mold can be toxic to humans and can cause damage to surfaces.

Clean wants to continue selling Shine-It in Delaware. If Clean can sell Shine-It in Delaware, it will increase its income and profits. Clean, therefore, intends to challenge the new law as unconstitutional, and it has consulted TLG for advice.

Winnie and Ralph ask you to prepare a summary report of relevant constitutional law for a meeting with them and Clean’s owners.

Instructions

Report You Need to Prepare: Prepare a report that addresses the following three questions:

  1. Analyze and explain whether the Delaware restriction on the sale of Shine-It violates the Interstate Commerce Clause.

Fully explain your conclusions based on constitutional law.

  1. Analyze whether the doctrine of “police powers” derived from the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution applies to the Delaware law.

Fully explain your conclusions based on constitutional law.

  1. Discuss why it is essential for businesses to understand the impact of the Interstate Commerce Clause and state police powers.

 

Identify any issues in the CFF that apply to your draft. How will you revise your draft to address this issue? Is the purpose of the memo clearly stated and consistently made throughout the document?

/in /by

Research Summary final draft

Before you begin to revise for submission of the Research Summary final draft, it’s good to think through what specific issues need to be addressed in your draft and consider all the topics discussed in the Collective Feedback File (CFF). To help you strategically plan your revision, consider and respond to the following:

  1. Identify any issues in the CFF that apply to your draft. How will you revise your draft to address this issue?
  2. Is the purpose of the memo clearly stated and consistently made throughout the document?
  3. Are all claims/statements made in the memo supported by research, and is that research properly cited?
  4. Are the connections clear between the research and the claims made? Is the research actually saying what the memo claims it says?
  5. Is the content and tone of your report tailored to the specific needs and expectations of the target audience?
  6. Is the document in proper memo format with all required headings?
  7. Have you edited your writing for concision and proper paragraph construction?
  8. Is the memo 3-5 pages of single-spaced paragraphs (or longer if you have included data visualizations)?

 

What lyrics do you find meaningful and why? Does it make you think of anyone that you personally know? Does this representation of immigration into the US seem accurate to you, why or why not?

/in /by

 

https://youtu.be/6_35a7sn6ds

After watching the video answer the questions

This discussion is dedicated to those that have worked hard to achieve their American Dream.

After watching the video selections, plase share your reactions.

Points to consider:

1- What lyrics do you find meaningful and why?

2- Does it make you think of anyone that you personally know?

3- Does this representation of immigration into the US seem accurate to you, why or why not?

4- Do you find Alexander Hamilton to be an inspiration?

5- Does awareness of the challenges faced by immigrants in the USA make you more empathetic to those who came to America to realize their dream/escape persecution/poverty?

 

After reading “Everybody’s Ethnic Enigma” respond to the following questions:

1.) Are you guilty of trying to figure out what someone’s race/ethnicity is and then asking them?

2.) Do you now feel that this is an appropriate question? Why or why not?

3.) Why do you think people want to know?

4.) What experience, if any, do you personally have with this phenomenon?

5.) Any advice?

 

What aspect of the issue you have identified intrigues your or do you deem most important? About what aspects of the issue do you want to know more?

/in /by

 Consider these brief definitions:

  1. Concussion concerns in football (America football)
  2. Mississippi water crisis
  3. Voting Rights in the United States

Topic: A subject in which we are interested.

Issue: A situation that has become the subject of discussion and possibly disagreement.

Question: The specific focus of our curiosity, confusion, search for knowledge.

Even if you already have a sense of what your research question will be, go through the steps of the following exercise. It models the kind of critical thinking necessary to move thoughtfully from the abstract to the concrete. These steps also model the critical thinking process of pursuing your own interests as a researcher and writer.

The movement from topic to issue to question focuses thinking from the general to the specific. To illustrate the difference between these terms, let’s use an example (immigration):

Example:

Topic: Immigration. (very general; can clearly be broken down into sub topics)

Issue: Every year, thousands of immigrants arrive in the United States hoping to be allowed to stay in the country legally as refugees from dangerous circumstances. (describes a situation; adds key specific points: geographic location, reasons for immigration, and legal uncertainty upon arrival)

Question: What are the economical benefits of revising the process for immigrants to pursue legal residency as refugees? (seeks to understand the issue in more detail; interested in the experience of the people involved; interested in causes and/or effects)

Another Possible Question: Are the criteria for judging refugee status fair? (evaluates key ethical elements of the issue, but is a yes/no and subjective question would NOT be an effective research question)

DIRECTIONS: Choose three topics and issues and follow these steps, for each topic, as a way to focus your own interests and to chart a direction for research:

  1. Name your topic. Write no more than a sentence. Likely,  just a few words will do.
  2. Now identify the issue in which you are interested. Remember that your issue will be more specific than your topic. It will be one example of what your topic looks like “on the ground” or “in the real world.” Write no more than two or three sentences.
  3. Now write out some (at least 2) questions that come out of the issue you have identified.
    • What aspect of the issue you have identified intrigues your or do you deem most important?
    • About what aspects of the issue do you want to know more?
  4. Place an asterisk (*) beside the question that you would preferto use for your research question.

 

Explain the relationship between accidents and intoxicated pilots in the aviation industry the topic needs to integrate FAR’s and be relevant to the aviation industry.

/in /by

Relationship between accidents and intoxicated pilots in the aviation industry the topic needs to integrate FAR’s and be relevant to the aviation industry.

(so, no papers on people, historical events, etc. Focus more on an issue that interests you, safety issue, and so on)

APA Paper specifics READ CAREFULLY

Must follow APA guidelines.

If there are no in-text citations throughout the entire paper and/or no reference page it will result in automatic failure for the assignment

Title page + 5 FULL pages of content + Reference page

Abstract not required

At least 5 sources and 3 must be scholarly references such as journals, books, and similar sources other than websites. These 3 scholarly references may be online format 12 font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins

Do not write in first person (I, me, we, etc.), rather write your paper in third person (he, she,they, the researcher, etc.)

Summarize and paraphrase more than utilizing direct quotes. (In other words, avoid excessive direct quotations in your paper)

Limit to 1 block quote (block quote is a direct quote of more than 40 words)

Do not use Wikipedia as a source. Online blogs and forums are also not acceptable sources for a

collegiate paper

 

What are the economical benefits of revising the process for immigrants to pursue legal residency as refugees?

/in /by

Consider these brief definitions:

  1. Concussion concerns in football (America football)
  2. Mississippi water crisis
  3. Voting Rights in the United States

Topic: A subject in which we are interested.

Issue: A situation that has become the subject of discussion and possibly disagreement.

Question: The specific focus of our curiosity, confusion, search for knowledge.

Even if you already have a sense of what your research question will be, go through the steps of the following exercise. It models the kind of critical thinking necessary to move thoughtfully from the abstract to the concrete. These steps also model the critical thinking process of pursuing your own interests as a researcher and writer.

The movement from topic to issue to question focuses thinking from the general to the specific. To illustrate the difference between these terms, let’s use an example (immigration):

Example:

Topic: Immigration. (very general; can clearly be broken down into sub topics)

Issue: Every year, thousands of immigrants arrive in the United States hoping to be allowed to stay in the country legally as refugees from dangerous circumstances. (describes a situation; adds key specific points: geographic location, reasons for immigration, and legal uncertainty upon arrival)

Question: What are the economical benefits of revising the process for immigrants to pursue legal residency as refugees? (seeks to understand the issue in more detail; interested in the experience of the people involved; interested in causes and/or effects)

Another Possible Question: Are the criteria for judging refugee status fair? (evaluates key ethical elements of the issue, but is a yes/no and subjective question would NOT be an effective research question)

DIRECTIONS: Choose three topics and issues and follow these steps, for each topic, as a way to focus your own interests and to chart a direction for research:

  1. Name your topic. Write no more than a sentence. Likely,  just a few words will do.
  2. Now identify the issue in which you are interested. Remember that your issue will be more specific than your topic. It will be one example of what your topic looks like “on the ground” or “in the real world.” Write no more than two or three sentences.
  3. Now write out some (at least 2) questions that come out of the issue you have identified.
    • What aspect of the issue you have identified intrigues your or do you deem most important?
    • About what aspects of the issue do you want to know more?
  4. Place an asterisk (*) beside the question that you would preferto use for your research question.

 

Write a paper that explains the arguments for and against the proposition Ethical=Right, Unethical=Wrong.

/in /by

Ethics vs right and wrong

As the pace of change in the world increases, there is discussion among people about whether long-held ideas of ethical/unethical and right/wrong still hold true. In this position paper, you will argue your agreement or disagreement with the proposition Ethical=Right, Unethical=Wrong.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Directions:

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that explains the arguments for and against the proposition Ethical=Right, Unethical=Wrong. Include the following in your paper:

  1. A discussion in support of the proposition.
  2. A discussion in opposition to the proposition.
  3. A research-based statement of and rationale for your d Organizational Stability

 

Is this empirical evidence to prove that stereotypes exist when it comes to prosecutors charging acquaintance rape? Because this claim is institutional in nature, what precautions or policy changes would you suggest reducing this stereotype? How would you enforce this policy?

/in /by

Empirical evidence

Is this empirical evidence to prove that stereotypes exist when it comes to prosecutors charging acquaintance rape? Because this claim is institutional in nature, what precautions or policy changes would you suggest reducing this stereotype? How would you enforce this policy?

No less than 200 words 

Write a 2 page (minimum) APA research paper on a LODD incident during a single family dwelling fire. Use any reputable source including NIOSH.

/in /by

LODD One and Two Family Dwelling Fires

Write a 2 page (minimum) APA research paper on a LODD incident during a single family dwelling fire. Use any reputable source including NIOSH. Include a timeline or summary of the incident, factors or conditions that contributed to the LODD, and the recommendations/lessons learned that resulted

 

Identify some of the key conversations surrounding the topic, based on your search. How does the primary text support, challenge, or digress from these other conversations? Who else was involved in the larger conversation about the text? What perspective did they add to it?

/in /by

Practicing Analyzing Content using Lateral Reading

Last week, we focused on identifying information in primary texts through a lateral reading process. You may want to return to the Week 4 module to review the video and reading on how lateral reading works and why we read this way. This week, you begin to analyze the content of a primary text, using a lateral reading practice, to determine how information circulates regarding a particular text or topic.

First, choose a primary text from the Learning Materials section of the Week 6 module. You will want to peruse each text to see which one interests you the most.

Next, read the source, creating a list of linked material within the source, or any topics you think you will want to find more information about. The more detailed your list, the easier it will be to return to those topics when you begin answering questions from the list below.

Last, begin to answer the questions below under “Analyzing Content.” These questions are taken directly from the Unit 2 Overview; not only will they look familiar for that reason, but they will also guide your process for writing about your primary source in your Unit 2 essay. Work through as many of the questions as you are able before class is over. Submit to this assignment before leaving today.

Analyzing content questions:

  • What connected/related texts seem to be most important to understanding the primary text and why?
  • Where do these connect/related texts fall on an information cycle? Does this seem like a topic that hasn’t been studied very much, given what you’re able to find? What might that suggest about the role or value of these connected/related texts in developing additional information about the topic of the text?
  • What additional context do the related texts offer to a reader? And how may that additional context shape what how a reader cares about or engages with the topic?
  • Identify some of the key conversations surrounding the topic, based on your search. How does the primary text support, challenge, or digress from these other conversations?
  • Who else was involved in the larger conversation about the text? What perspective did they add to it?
  • What content or ideas related to the text seem to circulate the most? What does this that tell you about public knowledge and perception of the topic?