Posts

Choose one and give your rationale for why you chose this formula. Comment on how your fee strategy will be impacted by insurance companies and market trends in your geographic area.

Discussion Questions

Required components of the portfolio are outlined below and you can include anything additional you feel is useful. Put all components together in one pdf file with a cover page and upload in Blackboard. Use professional formatting, grammar, and punctuation.

I. Cover Page (APA format): 1 point

II. Behavior Change Theories (one page containing all 5): 15points

  • a. Health Belief Model
  • b. Stages of Change
  • c. Theory of Planned Behavior d. Social Cognitive Theory
  • e. Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

III. Terms and Definitions (one page containing all 12): 24 points

  • a. Ambivalence b. Bias
  • c. Change talk d. Core beliefs e. Empathy
  • f. Motivational interviewing g. Readiness
  • h. Relapse
  • i. Respect
  • j. Resistance
  • k. Self-efficacy
  • l. Sustain talk

IV. MI Techniques (no more than three pages total for these techniques combined): 20 points

  • a. Assessing Readiness
  • b. Dealing with Resistance
  • c. Engaging,Focusing,Evoking,andPlanning
  • d. Guiding Clients Who Believe Health Misinformation e. Handling Time Constraints
  • f. Mirroring
  • g. OARS (open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, summarizing)
  • h. Staying on Topic
  • i. Unpacking Meaning
  • j. Using Metaphors, Similes, and Analogies

V. Setting Fee Schedules & Rationale: 10 points

There are two simple formulas for setting fees. Choose one and give your rationale for why you chose this formula. Comment on how your fee strategy will be impacted by insurance companies and market trends in your geographic area. You don’t have to know specifics of what insurance companies pay and what counselors in your state charge, but rather comment on how these will impact your fee schedule.

Axelrod’s Formula for Setting Consulting Fees

How to charge to earn $100,000:

  • $100,000 / 200 days = $500 per day base rate
  • $500 per day base rate + $500 per day overload = $1000 per

day

  • $1000 + 25% add-on for profit = $1250 per day • Daily consulting rate = $1250 per day

Bleich’s “Three Times” Rule

To calculate the ballpark amount you will need to bill to meet operating expenses, triple your desired income to determine how much you need to bill annually. For example, to earn $50,000 a year, you need to bill $150,000 per year.

Describe in detail and with examples theory of consumer choice, asymmetric information, political economy, and behavioral economics. Describe the ultimatum game. What outcome from this game would conventional economic theory predict? Do experiments confirm this prediction? Explain.

Micro economics management

In one doc Answer the following questions and add link sources no plagiat:

1. Describe the aspects of the theory of consumer choice. Define a consumer’s indifference curve and explain the properties of this curve.

2. Describe in detail and with examples theory of consumer choice, asymmetric information, political economy, and behavioral economics. Describe the ultimatum game. What outcome from this game would conventional economic theory predict? Do experiments confirm this prediction? Explain.

3.Give several examples of environmental forces that might affect supervisors and require changes to an organization.

4. Read Case 15-A “Technology Drives Change” (pp. 426-427) and answer “Responding to the Case”.

5. Describe the pieces of legislation that have been most important in defining the rights of management and unions? Provide the highlights of each.

6. Read Case 16-B “Faragut Services Faces a Union Challenge” (p. 450) and answer “Responding to the Case”.

What are Forbes’s reasons for the housing bubble and how it related to the Federal Reserve Bank’s policies? What does a weak dollar mean and what issues may come of it? What one other concept or idea stood out to you in Chapter 1?

In Money We Trust? Documentary and Money Book Analysis

Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

Watch the 1-hour documentary, In Money We Trust?

Read Chapters 1 through 6 of Money: How the Destruction of the Dollar Threatens the Global Economy—And What We Can Do About It. ( Attached)

Steve Forbes is an expert on the global economy, monetary policy, and politics, and for this assignment, you will have the opportunity to dissect and analyze both his Money book and the In Money We Trust? documentary. Through a written analysis, you will explore the importance of a sound money system.

It is suggested you watch the documentary first to gain insight on some of the basic concepts. Next read the book and answer the questions in sequence. Answer each of the questions noted in each section below. Each section should be approximately one page in length with a total paper length of five to six pages. Be sure to analyze and write in your own words; do not just use quotes to make your points. Additionally, judge the importance of a sound money system and assess the value of Steve Forbes’s conclusion in using the gold standard.

Section 1: Chapter 1: How We Got Here

  • What are Forbes’s reasons for the housing bubble and how it related to the Federal Reserve Bank’s policies?
  • What does a weak dollar mean and what issues may come of it?
  • What one other concept or idea stood out to you in Chapter 1?

Section 2: Chapter 2: What Is Money

  • Why must money be stable?
  • What is Forbes’s prediction of Bitcoin?
  • This was noted at the end of the chapter: “Money measures wealth, but it does not create it.” What does this statement mean?

Section 3: Chapter 3: Money and Trade

  • What did Nixon do with the gold standard and what was the impact?
  • What is Forbes’s view of trade deficits? Are his viewpoints good or bad?
  • What one other concept or idea stood out to you in Chapter 3?

Section 4: Chapter 4: Money Versus Wealth; Chapter 5: Money and Morality

  • What happens when the supply of money is increased?
  • How can changes in monetary policy act as a system of communication?
  • How are money and trust tied together?
  • What one other concept or idea stood out to you in either Chapter 4 or 5?

Section 5: Chapter 6: The Gold Standard

  • What is the gold standard and how might it work in the US?
  • Why does Steve Forbes believe the gold standard should be brought back?
  • What is your overall conclusion of Steve Forbes’s view of money?

 

Why did this chapter (and topic) mentioned above, felt the most challenging to learn and understand? Explain. Reflect on your understanding of research methods before starting this course and at this point of the course; what has changed? What progress have you made?

Commentary/Personal Reflection Paper

50 points total

Due Date: April 21th by the end of the day.

Requirements for Commentary/Personal Reflection Paper submission:

  • Use normal 1” margins for the word document; double-space; 12-point font; Times New Roman.
  • Your personal reflection paper should be 2-4 pages long (anything less than two full pages will be docked points).

Questions you should answer through your reflection paper:

Given Chapter: Ethical Issues in Behavior Research and Topic: Physical and Mental Stress

1.Why did this chapter (and topic) mentioned above, felt the easiest to learn and understand? Explain why. (Please refer to the attachment before answering)

Given Chapter: The Measurements of Behavior and Topic: Scales of Measurement

2.Why did this chapter (and topic) mentioned above, felt the most challenging to learn and understand? Explain. (Please refer to the attachment before answering)

3.Reflect on your understanding of research methods before starting this course and at this point of the course; what has changed? What progress have you made?

4.If you could study anything in the world (does not have to be psychology related), what would you choose to research? and why? What seems exciting about it?

5. How do you see yourself, if at all, utilizing research methods or conducting research one day? Could be in any type of job, setting, etc.

How does the Fed control the money supply? Be sure to explain how they can expand or restrict the money supply. How does the banking system create money? List two to three pros and cons of the Federal Reserve Bank.

Federal Reserve Bank

Monetary policy is largely determined by the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) in the United States. For this discussion, let’s cordially debate the necessity of the Fed.

For your initial post address the following:

  • How does the Fed control the money supply? Be sure to explain how they can expand or restrict the money supply.
  • How does the banking system create money?
  • List two to three pros and cons of the Federal Reserve Bank.
  • What is your conclusion: is the Fed necessary? Support your opinion.

Response should be a minimum of 200 words. Assess the perspectives of several scholars. Support your response with at least one scholarly and/or credible resource. APA Format. Please cite all references.

What is Carroll saying about the nature of rhetorical analysis? How do the fundamentals of rhetorical analysis figure into your life, both as a student and as a citizen? Describe a pair of specific examples in which these concepts might play (or have played) a role in your participation in those areas.

ENC1102: Discussion: Understanding Context and Research Reflection

Questions for Analysis

What is Carroll saying about the nature of rhetorical analysis? How do the fundamentals of rhetorical analysis figure into your life, both as a student and as a citizen? Describe a pair of specific examples in which these concepts might play (or have played) a role in your participation in those areas.

Using at least one citation from Carroll’s essay, comment on the role of context in framing contemporary arguments. Is there enough contextual background on news stories, speeches, advertisements, and other areas of rhetoric in today’s digital information culture? How does the Washington Post’s proposed feature of the “Knowledge Map” (noted in this Shan Wang article

Links to an external site.) enrich the contemporary news environment?

Finally, in the second half of your essay, explain to your classmates the general features of your research argument. Using the taxonomies of reflection in the previous section as a guide, answer the following questions in your final four paragraphs:

  • What did you learn about your topic that you didn’t already know or that was surprising to you?
  • What is an area that you would like to improve upon as a writer moving forward, and which aspect of your research argument are you most proud of?
  • Finally, how do you see the subject of your research argument changing over the course of the next ten years? Where will it be in a decade’s time?

Where applicable, feel free to use hyperlinks to connect your essay to a resource or two in support of your answers.

Examine whether Dummy’s conviction for marijuana possession should be overturned, because he was not read Miranda warnings before making a deal. Evaluates whether Stupido’s confession should have been suppressed, because his lawyer was not allowed to see him. Explain the validity of Dripster’s death sentence for shooting and paralyzing Innocent violates the Eighth Amendment.

The Supreme Court Opinion Final Paper

Prior to beginning your written assignment, read the Excessive Bail

Links to an external site. article and review all previous weeks’ materials concerning the 4th Amendment, due process, the right to remain silent, the right to counsel, cruel and unusual punishment and capital punishment.

In the state of Denial, the Capital City Police have been watching gang activity between two local gangs, the Drips and the Scruds. The Scruds are mad at the Drips because they believe that the Drips have been encroaching on the Scruds’ territory and selling drugs in the Scruds’ neighborhood. Members of the gangs take the first letter of the gang’s affiliation for their “gang name.” For example, the leader of the Drips is assumed the name Dripster, while the leader of the Scrips took on the name Stupido. Officers Do-Right and Justice have been assigned to the case and have been following members of both gangs closely over the past several weeks.

Dripster (the leader of the Drips) has been driving around in a Black Chevrolet Blazer that is registered to his girlfriend. Do-Right and Justice have placed a tracking device on the vehicle so that they can follow the gang leader at a safe distance without him noticing them. Using the tracking device, they have followed him to a party being held at a house owned by the girlfriend of a fellow Drip, Dufus.

The officers decide to use a new device that they have obtained from the police department called the Bloodhound, which can sniff out certain smells from a distance. Using the Bloodhound, the officers have determined that inside the house are the following substances: marijuana, creatine (which is commonly used to cut cocaine), and lye (which can be used in making methamphetamine). Based upon the information they have obtained from the Bloodhound, they call a magistrate and obtain a search warrant for Dufus’ house.

After backup arrives, Officers Do-Right and Justice lead the way to the house, where they break through the front door of the house without first knocking and announcing their presence. Inside the house, they find Dripster sitting at the kitchen table in front of a scale and a white powdery substance, which is later determined to be to be cocaine. They also find Dufus in a back room surrounded by boxes of electronics and a pile of cash that they later determine to be $50,000. With Dufus are two low-level Drips, Dummy and Duncecap, who are armed with automatic assault rifles and loaded handguns.

When the officers rush into the room where Dufus, Dummy, and Duncecap are, Duncecap immediately throws up his hands and tells the officers, “I’ll tell you everything I know! Just don’t arrest me!” Dufus turns to his accomplices and says, “If either of you says a word, you are dead meat.” Duncecap immediately stops talking and claims he “doesn’t know anything about anything.”

As Do-Right is escorting Dripster to his cruiser after he has arrested him, a carload of Scruds drives by slowly. The Scruds’ leader, Stupido, leans out of his window and yells to Dripster, “I told you to keep your business off our turf!” Dripster, thinking Stupido is the reason that the cops raided the house, grabs Do-Right’s gun and opens fire towards Stupido’s car. Dripster misses Stupido and his car, but he shoots and injures a 12-year-old girl, Innocent, who is watching the arrests in her front yard across the street. Innocent survives but is paralyzed. At the same time, Stupido, realizing that Dripster is shooting at him, grabs his own weapon from the car and shoots at his arch-enemy but misses him.

Officers are able to safely transport Dripster, Dufus, Dummy, and Duncecap to the police station and have also arrested Stupido. They search Stupido’s car at the scene and find the gun he used to shoot at Dripster. Ballistics shows that the gun was used in a previous armed robbery of a party store. Stupido is charged with the robbery.

At the police station, Officer Justice, who is questioning Dummy without first reading Miranda warnings, tells Dummy that if he tells him everything he knows about the rivalry between the Drips and the Scruds and agrees to testify against the members of both gangs, the police will charge him with only possession of marijuana, a misdemeanor. Dummy takes the deal.

Stupido was interrogated at the police station regarding the armed robbery and told that he had been named as the robber by an eyewitness. He asked for his lawyer three times, but his lawyer, who arrived at the police station while Stupido was being interrogated, was twice denied entry to the interrogation. After three hours of interrogation, Stupido confesses to the armed robbery.

Dripster is convicted of attempted murder of Innocent and sentenced to death. He is also convicted of possession with intent to sell marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine. He is additionally convicted of possession of stolen property (the electronics) and unregistered firearms. Stupido is convicted of the armed robbery and attempting to murder Dripster. Dufus and Duncecap are also convicted of possession with intent to sell marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine; possession of stolen property (the electronics); and for unregistered firearms. Dummy is convicted of misdemeanor possession of marijuana.

The cases are all combined as People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido , et al. The following points have been appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. You are an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, and this case has come before the Court. The Chief Justice has assigned you to write a majority opinion resolving the case. In your paper,

  • Write an opinion (an analysis of the questions below that will serve as the reasoning and the ruling of the Supreme Court) that resolves the case based upon previous cases from the United States Supreme Court, other federal and state courts, and other scholarly sources.
  • Explain your opinion on each of the following points:
    • Evaluate whether all the evidence from the house should have been suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree, because the placing of a tracking device on the Blazer driven by Dripster without a warrant and without probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment.
    • Assess whether all the evidence from the house should have been suppressed because the use of the Bloodhound device without a warrant and without probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment.
    • Determine whether all evidence from the house should have been suppressed because the warrant issued by the magistrate was based upon information obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
    • Rule on whether all evidence from the house should have been suppressed because the police officers did not knock and announce; the warrant was not a no-knock warrant.
    • Conclude whether the gun used by Stupido should have been suppressed because the officers had no right to search his car at the scene.
    • Examine whether Dummy’s conviction for marijuana possession should be overturned, because he was not read Miranda warnings before making a deal.
    • Evaluates whether Stupido’s confession should have been suppressed, because his lawyer was not allowed to see him.
    • Explain the validity of Dripster’s death sentence for shooting and paralyzing Innocent violates the Eighth Amendment.

In light of this statement, discuss the challenges faced by local governments in the age of globalization. What benefits do you think globalisation has created for local governments?

Public Management (MGT 324)

Assignment 1        

Place of Submission: Students Grade Centre via blackboard.

Weight: 15 Marks

We expect you to answer each question as per instructions in the assignment. You will find it useful to keep the following points in mind. The assignment with be evaluated in terms of your planning, organization and the way you present your assignment. All the three section will carry equal weightage

Kindly read the instruction carefully and prepare your assignment accordingly.

  1. Planning: Read the assignments carefully, go through the Units on which they are based. Make some points regarding each question and then rearrange them in a logical order.
  2. Organisation: Be a little selective and analytical before drawing up a rough outline of your answer. Give adequate attention to the question’s introduction and conclusion.

Make sure that:

  1. a) The answer is logical and coherent
  2. b) It has clear connections between sentences and paragraphs
  3. c) The presentation is correct in your own expression and style.

3) Presentation: Once you are satisfied with your answer, you can write down the final version for submission. If you so desire, you may underline the points you wish to emphasize.

  “Globalization has changed the functioning of local governments”.

  1. In light of this statement, discuss the challenges faced by local governments in the age of globalization. (5 Marks)
  2. What benefits do you think globalisation has created for local governments? (5 Marks)
  3. With the help of examples, explain how local governments can raise their funds, meet future challenges and be able to convert their challenges into opportunities. (5 Marks)

Prepare some binding agents (transitions! synthesis! see below…) to bring everything together in the form of an actual draft of your research essay.

Week Three Assignment: Rough Draft of the Final Research Project

Overview

This is the assignment that is going to take you from a collection of write-ups on individual sources to an actual draft. It might be helpful to think of the writing you’ve done thus far in the class as a set of research-project construction materials. For example, the Project Introduction, end of Week One, represents a foundation for the final project. In Week Two, you’ll work on source write-ups: these are your building materials.

Now you are going to prepare some binding agents (transitions! synthesis! see below…) to bring everything together in the form of an actual draft of your research essay.

Be aware, though, that you are likely to find you also need more, or different, materials. It is at the drafting stage that we often notice significant gaps or unanswered questions in our research. We realize that more research is required—and possibly also refinement of the original research question.

This kind of looping back is not a sign of trouble. Rather, it is a natural part of the research writing process, which almost never follows a tidy straight line from idea formation to source gathering to drafting.

Two of our Week Three readings are of particular importance for the draft.:

The Synthesis lecture will help you begin thinking about how your ideas fit together, and how best to arrange them. The Transitions lecture will help you think about how to signal these relationships to readers.

For a reminder of what the finished product will look like, see the Final Research Project specifications document on this assignment. Note, though, that no concluding paragraph is required in the Week Three Rough Draft (we will work on conclusions next week).

 

How to develop your work into a rough draft

As the old saying goes, “there is more than one road to Rome.” Below, however, is an approach that you will likely find helpful for transforming your week-one introduction, week-two library report into the Week Three Rough Draft. If you are having trouble getting started or are short on time, try tackling the items below one at a time. Also, if the order of tasks below isn’t working for you, go ahead and jump around—whatever gets you started in transforming the pieces you’ve been developing to this point in the class into a draft that you can submit at the end of Week Three.

“Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs” –Henry Ford

 

☐ Join all of your project-related work into a single document: the Week One Introduction, and the Week Two Library Research Report.

☐ Carefully review any revision recommendations you’ve received on your earlier work. If substantive changes are needed (especially changes to the research question itself!), you will want to attend to those first. If you are confused about any feedback you’ve received from your instructor or classmates, get that confusion cleared up.

☐ Read/Re-read the assigned page on Synthesis and begin arranging your source write-ups. You began the process of synthesis in week-two when you analyzed sources in terms of how they spoke to your research question. Now return to these week-two source write-ups and examine them carefully. What are the different components of your inquiry that they help address? Which of the sources develop similar claims? Which represent areas of debate within your inquiry? What are some similar or different methodologies you see being employed to study issues related to your research question? What similar or different values or priorities seem to be motivating the research? Are there areas of strong consensus? Are there questions or sub-questions that your sources downplay or ignore?

The idea here is to think about all of the different things you might say about your sources in relation to one another. Jot down some notes (you might want to do this directly on your document in a different colored font), and move paragraphs around so that related ideas appear together. In some instances you may want to merge two source write-ups into a single paragraph, or divide one write-up into two paragraphs.

☐ Are there gaps in the skeletal draft you’ve constructed that point to the need for more research? If so, now is the time! Re-visit the strategies you practiced in Week Two (using different databases, using one source to find others, etc.), and, as always, don’t hesitate to contact a librarian if you are in need of research assistance (refdesk@nu.edu).

☐ Read/Re-read the Week Three lecture on Transitions. Do you see how transitional phrasing can be used to express the kinds of relationships among ideas that you’ve been reflecting on? Take a look at the sample Final Research Project as well. Notice how the author uses transitions to show his readers relationships between the sources he found through his research. Note that he has synthesized his sources (he has identified relationships, contradictions, gaps, etc.) and that each paragraph begins with a sentence or two that make these relationships explicit for readers.

Again, synthesis—and the expression of synthesized ideas through carefully-crafted transitions—is the glue that holds the individual paragraph together and helps them cohere as a single research project. Try writing some transitions that express the relationships you’ve identified among your sources.

☐You attended to substantive revisions earlier in this process. Now is the time to attend to any more localized matters your instructor or peers commented on at an earlier stage, or that you’ve become aware of yourself upon reviewing your work. Take a look at the minimum requirements for the rough draft. Is your draft on track to meet these requirements? Revise as necessary. To get even more mileage out of this draft, check what you have against the Final Research Project specifications and the grading criteria. Strive to submit your best effort at this stage as a means of ensuring that the feedback you receive from peers and your instructor will be feedback that you can use (rather than a recitation of things you already know about and had intended to get to later).

☐Check your work against the list of “Presentation Norms in academic papers” that appears in the class lecture on Document Design:   https://info260.hcommons.org/document-design/

Example

The following annotated example calls attention to specific draft requirements:
https://info260.hcommons.org/annotated-sample-draft/

*Note that this example contains a chart. You may include visualizations, but they are not required in a paper.

 

A dam is being considered to reduce river flooding resulting from climate change. But if a dam is built, what height should it be? Increasing the dam’s height will reduce a flood’s probability and the damage when floods occur, but increase construction and maintenance costs. Which dam height minimizes the expected total annual cost?

Generate Analytica models for the following two questions and upload your models (*.ana)

Question 1

A dam is being considered to reduce river flooding resulting from climate change. But if a dam is built, what height should it be? Increasing the dam’s height will reduce a flood’s probability and the damage when floods occur, but increase construction and maintenance costs. Which dam height minimizes the expected total annual cost?

Note that the state uses an interest rate of 7% for flood protection projects, and all the dams should last 60 years.

Dam height Construction cost Annual Maintenance cost Annual Prob(flood>height) Damage if flood occurs
No dam $0 $0/year 0.40 $1,000,000
10 ft $400,000 $2,000/year 0.20 $900,000
20 ft $500,000 $4,000/year 0.10 $800,000
30 ft $600,000 $6,000/year 0.05 $700,000
40 ft $700,000 $8,000/year 0.01 $600,000
50 ft $800,000 $10,000/year 0.001 $500,000

Question 2

A community near the ocean is suffering from drinking water scarcity due to climate change. The community plans to build a water desalination system to transform seawater into fresh water. Once its useful life is over, the system will be sold at salvage value. Considering the following conditions, what is the rate of return?

  • Uniform annual benefit: $80,000 per year
  • Initial cost: triangularly distributed with a min of $500,000, a mode of $700,000, and a max of $1,000,000
  • Salvage value: normally distributed with a mean of $60,000 and a standard deviation of $9,000
  • Useful life: uniformly distributed over 10 to 15 years