Posts

Analyze the audience, linking the topic to them in a way that will gain and hold attention and interest, and agreement.

/in /by

The purpose of this speech is to get the audience to do what you want them to do.

You should discuss an issue that is significant, contemporary, meaningful, and relevant to the audience.

Analyze the audience, linking the topic to them in a way that will gain and hold attention and interest, and agreement.

Length
This speech should be 6-9 minutes long. You will lose points if your speech is less than 6 minutes or is longer than 9 minutes and 15 seconds.

Sources
Use at least 3 outsides sources of information (6 for maximum credit) for this speech. Cite these sources orally in your speech.

Use written sources, credible Internet Sources, and personal interviews beyond your personal experience. Two of the three sources must be a current or appropriate book or article.

You must use at least three different types (examples, illustrations, statistics, testimony) of supporting materials.
Organization

The introduction should gain attention, orient the audience by stating the topic, offer a reason for listening, and preview the body of the speech.

The body must contain 2-5 main points using patterns of organization covered in the textbook or have prior approval by the instructor.

Each main point must be well supported by 2-5 1st-order sub-points designed to prove the main points (examples, illustrations, facts, quotations, etc.) Persuasive action speeches deal with questions of policy. Follow the Format for Preparation Outlines.

The conclusion of the persuasive action speech should focus the audience’s attention upon your topic, leave them in the proper mood (ready to do what you want them to do) and communicate a sense of finality (verbally or non-verbally indicate that you have finished talking).

Transitions between major sections of the persuasive-action speech (introduction, body, conclusion) and the main points should be carefully planned and used while delivering the speech.

Use transitions to move the audience’s attention from section to section and from main point to main point in the body of the speech.

What is your experience when new technological advances are introduced? How do you respond?

/in /by

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

What is your experience when new technological advances are introduced? How do you respond? Provide three examples and explain your answer.

How did people define and present themselves in society prior to each technological advancement?

/in /by

Imagine you are presenting at a technology conference. The organizers of the conference have asked all of the breakout session leaders to write articles for the conference website as a way to help promote the conference. You have decided your article will be about society prior to the technological advances you will discuss in your breakout session at the conference.

NOTE: Choose three technological advances to focus on for this assignment

NOTE: Write a 350- to 700-word article in which you discuss the following for each technological advancement:

What was society like prior to each technological advancement?

What were the benefits of not having each technological advancement?

What were the consequences or issues because each technological advancement was absent?

How did people define and present themselves in society prior to each technological advancement?

What was the state of social equity prior to each technological advancement?

Identify the successes of relatively new democracies in Africa, Asia, or Latin America and the ideas, leaders, and general societal conditions that have launched and sustained, or failed to sustain, them.

/in /by

Identify the successes of relatively new democracies in Africa, Asia, or Latin America and the ideas, leaders, and general societal conditions that have launched and sustained, or failed to sustain, them.

Be at least 3 pages in length,

Include a clear introduction that contains your research question, some background introductory information, and your thesis;

Contain several body paragraphs each with a clear topic sentence, supporting details and evidence from your research, and a transition sentence;
Include citations;

Have a clear conclusion that restates your thesis and summarizes your important points; and an MLA formatted works cited page.

Identify and explain the scope of three external dispute resolution schemes approved by ASIC for the financial services sector.

/in /by

Client Needs
Identify and explain the scope of three external dispute resolution schemes approved by ASIC for the financial services sector.

What are the main differences, from a purchaser’s point of view, of acquiring a property through private sale.

Explain how the mortgage franchisee system operates in Australia.

Explain why age is an important determinant in approving home loans.













How does replacing the tax exclusion for employer-provided health insurance with a tax credit.

/in /by

How does replacing the tax exclusion for employer-provided health insurance with a tax credit.

What interventions are effective in preventing falls in the elderly population in the hospital setting?

/in /by

What interventions are effective in preventing falls in the elderly population in the hospital setting?

Describe how using this team approach can improve client outcomes.

/in /by

Using the information you have learned from the web sites ( https://www.registerednursing.org/nclex/collaboration-
interdisciplinary-team/ ) and by watching the video, explain the benefit of using an inter-disciplinary team. Describe how using this team approach can improve client outcomes.

What was the resulting impact of the ruling? How did the citizens of your state benefit from it? Was this a good decision?

/in /by

This assignment is comprised of 2 parts, the first of which is due this week. Part II will be due in Week 7.

In Part I this week, choose a case from your state that involves civil rights or civil liberties that wound its way up to the United States Supreme Court.

If your state does not have a case that ended up in the United States Supreme Court, choose a civil rights case from another state that ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States.

Here is a brief description of civil rights and civil liberties: Civil rights refers to equal social opportunities under the law. It gives you these freedoms such as the right to vote, the right to public education, or a fair trial, among other things, regardless of your wealth or race.

Civil liberties mean freedom of religion, equal treatment and due process under the law, and the right to privacy.

You should be able to go online and look up your state and famous cases that ended up in the Supreme Court. For example, Brown v Board of Education (1951) started in Topeka, Kansas and ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States. Another example would be Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada (2020) that started in Nevada and ended up the United States Supreme Court.

Research your court case and write an outline of the case that you will be using to prepare a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. Be sure to verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment.

This week’s assignment should include (a) summary of the case; (b) a case outline; and a summary.

A. Summary of the Case

In one or two paragraphs, provide a general overview of the case that serves as a snapshot of what the case is about and how it ended up in your state high court. A summary is using your words to write a brief history of the case. Do not give your opinion or your interpretation but stick to the facts only.

B: Case Outline

Your court case outline should include:

Title: Name of the case

Facts of the case: Provide key facts involving the case.

History of the case: What legal action was taken based on what your state laws say about this case?

Legal questions: What were the legal issues the court had to decide?

Decision or holdings: Did the court decide for the plaintiff or the defendant? Explain the reason behind the decision?

Verdict and opinion (judgement): What were the concurring and dissenting opinions? How many judges decided for the defendant and how many justices decided against the defendant? What was the final verdict from the judge or the jury, if it was a jury trial?

C. Conclusion

What was the resulting impact of the ruling? How did the citizens of your state benefit from it? Was this a good decision?