Posts

Explain what the potential negative consequences could be if the problem is not addressed in this study

/in /by

Include in the notes section of the PowerPoint at least 200 words covering how you would explain the use and purpose of each item. For example, use who, what, when, where, and how to approach and explain each item as it applies to the peer-reviewed journals, the primary sources, and a secondary source.

Assignment: Part 2
Begin with “The problem to be addressed by this study is…” This statement should logically flow from the introduction and clearly identify the problem to be addressed by the study.

Succinctly discuss the problem and provide evidence of its existence.

Identify who is impacted by the problem (e.g., individuals, organizations, industries, or society),

Explain what is not known that should be known about it

Explain what the potential negative consequences could be if the problem is not addressed in this study

Remember to source the information and source assertions with citations of current, scholarly works from the literature

 

how do you think you would feel as a nurse working under these circumstances – would you be “for” or “against” this type of tracking?

/in /by

After you make your initial post you will be able to see the posts made by your peers; respond to a minimum of two (2) of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59pm. (I finished the initial post. I just need you to respond to two (2) of my fellow students’ posts)

(That’s what the Discussion was about)

What are the Ethical Boundaries of Tracking Employee Activities?

Read the case and answer the questions on p. 190, adding the details below:

Question 1, nothing added – just explain your answer.

Question 2, adding, how do you think you would feel as a nurse working under these circumstances – would you be “for” or “against” this type of tracking?

Considering the current pandemic, does this add a new twist to your perspective? As always, explain your answer.

what strategies can you employ to strengthen employees’ commitment to the corporate culture?

/in /by

Given that corporate culture can determine both personal success and satisfaction, what strategies can an employee use to survive and thrive with enhanced performance even if s/he is functioning in a misaligned environment.

Recognizing that creating and influencing a constructive culture is one of a manager’s most important jobs, as a manager, what strategies can you employ to strengthen employees’ commitment to the corporate culture?

 

What is Authority as the world sees it (Power, Force, Aggressiveness) What the Christian see Authority (Love, kindness, respect, patient, gentleness.

/in /by

How One Uses Pastoral Authority in Ministry

What is Authority as the world sees it (Power, Force, Aggressiveness) What the Christian see Authority (Love, kindness, respect, patient, gentleness; walking with others in their pain)

Describe distribution channels (direct, manufacturer to consumer, indirect, wholesalers/retailers, multichannel).

/in /by

Based upon what you learned from your research and strategy assessment, recommend a strategy the company could employ to increase profits and sales to the target market. Include two or three final slides that summarize and justify your strategy recommendation.

For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a video. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning of the presentation, and an additional slide for references at the end of the presentation.
Place:
Describe distribution channels (direct, manufacturer to consumer, indirect, wholesalers/retailers, multichannel).

Discuss possible channel conflicts.
Promotion:

What forms of advertising and promotion does the company use?

What forms of media does the company use? Describe the media mix.

Illustrate the messages the company currently uses.
Strategy Recommendation:

Evaluate tests and treatments (e.g., modern medicine and/or complementary and alternative medicine.

/in /by

Skin Condition Brochure

For this assignment, you will choose one of the topics from the list below. Based on your chosen topic, research the condition, and create a two-sided informational brochure that can be distributed to clientele, using this brochure template.

Include the following topics in your brochure:

Discuss the cause of the disorder or damage.

Describe the changes seen in the skin when the disorder or damage occurs.

Analyze the causes, risk factors, and prevention.

Evaluate tests and treatments (e.g., modern medicine and/or complementary and alternative medicine [CAM]).

Explain the environmental factors that can induce or exacerbate the assigned condition.

The content in your Skin Condition Brochure download must be summarized in your own words, not copied and pasted from your research sources. You may include hyperlinks to other information in your brochure. You may use up to three images per side to add visual interest and convey the information. Be sure to include citations and references in APA Style (Links to an external site.) for sourced information and images used.

Choose one of our brochure templates, and open it in an Office for the web program to make it yours (some brochures are for editing in Word for the web; others work in PowerPoint for the web).

 

Explain how you would evaluate the required items and the vendor information so that you would be sure to make a wise and informed system selection using multiple forms of research.

/in /by

Implementing Health Information Systems; SDLC

As Director of Health Information for a large health system, you have been tasked as a key leader in the selection and implementation of a new electronic health record (EHR) system for the organization.

The CEO and Board of Directors has asked that you address key issues related to the process of selecting and adopting an EHR system. Please follow the instructions below in completion of this assignment.

1. Choose either the RFI and/or RFP for the systems selection process to base your work on. Select at least five (5) content elements of the RFI and/or RFP that you would need to include in order to assist in the selection process.

2. List 5 items that you would require in a vendor contract for an EHR. Explain how you would evaluate these items and the vendor information so that you would be sure to make a wise and informed system selection.

3. Conduct an internet search for “EHR contract negotiation” and determine important leadership skills for contract negotiations. Write 1–2 paragraphs describing what you have learned and how you would implement these necessary skills.

MAKE SURE::

● Determine at least five (5) content elements of the RFI and/or RFP that you would need to include in order to assist in the selection process.

● Create a list of five items that you would require in a vendor contract for an EHR.

● Explain how you would evaluate the required items and the vendor information so that you would be sure to make a wise and informed system selection using multiple forms of research.

● Determine important leadership skills for contract negotiations.
Describe how you would use these skills in an EHR contract negotiation using multiple examples and supporting details.

 

Does it employ a comprehensive search strategy and rigorous appraisal method? If this study includes research, nonresearch, and experiential evidence, it is an integrative review (see Appendix F). Yes

/in /by

1. Was there manipulation of an independent variable? Yes No

2. Was there a control group? Yes No

3. Were study participants randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups? Yes No
If Yes to questions 1, 2, and 3, this is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or experimental study. LEVEL I

If Yes to questions 1 and 2 and No to question 3 or Yes to question 1 and No to questions 2 and 3, this is quasi-experimental.
Question

Section I: Quantitative (continued)
1. Does it employ a comprehensive search strategy and rigorous appraisal method?
If this study includes research, nonresearch, and experiential evidence, it is an integrative review (see Appendix F). Yes

Use Appendix F
2. For systematic reviews and systematic reviews with meta-analysis:

Are the studies a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental, or quasi-experimental only?

Are the studies a combination of RCTs, quasi-experimental, and nonexperimental, or non- experimental only?

A systematic review employs a search strategy and a rigorous appraisal method, but does not generate an effect size.

A meta-analysis, or systematic review with meta-analysis, combines and analyzes results from studies to generate a new statistic: the effect size.

Appraisal of Quantitative Research Studies
Does the researcher identify what is known and not known about the problem and how the study will address any gaps in knowledge? Yes No

Was the purpose of the study clearly presented? Yes No

Was the literature review current (most sources within the past five years or a seminal study)? Yes No

Was sample size sufficient based on study design and rationale? Yes No

Were the characteristics and/or demographics similar in both the control and intervention groups? Yes No

Multiple databases searched and identified Yes No

Inclusion and exclusion criteria stated Yes No
Was there a flow diagram that included the number of studies eliminated at each level of review? Yes No

Were details of included studies presented (design, sample, methods, results, outcomes, strengths, and limitations)? Yes No

Were methods for appraising the strength of evidence (level and quality) described? Yes No

Were conclusions based on results? Yes No

Conclusions flowed logically from the interpretation and systematic review question Yes No

Did the systematic review include a section addressing limitations and how they were addressed? Yes No
Complete the Quality Rating for Quantitative Studies section

Quality Rating for Quantitative Studies
Circle the appropriate quality rating below:

A High quality: Consistent, generalizable results; sufficient sample size for the study design; adequate control; definitive conclusions; consistent recommendations based on comprehensive literature review that includes thorough reference to scientific evidence.

B Good quality: Reasonably consistent results; sufficient sample size for the study design; some control, and fairly definitive conclusions; reasonably consistent recommendations based on fairly comprehensive literature review that includes some reference to scientific evidence.

C Low quality or major flaws: Little evidence with inconsistent results; insufficient sample size for the study design; conclusions cannot be drawn.

 

 

 

Explain the Juvenille dependency process. How does it interact with Juvenile Justice court processes .

/in /by

The prompt is : Explain the Juvenille dependency process. How does it interact with Juvenile Justice court processes .

What is the quality of the public deliberation on the major public policy issues of the day?

/in /by

We have learned that the fundamental attributes of liberal representative democracy are popular sovereignty, political equality, and political liberty.

Each suggests a set of questions that will be raised throughout this book to encourage critical thinking about American political life.
About popular sovereignty, we should ask:

• Do citizens participate in politics?

• Can citizens be involved when they choose to be, and are political leaders responsive?

• Do institutions, such as political parties, elections, interest groups, and social movements, effectively transmit what citizens want to political leaders?

• What is the quality of the public deliberation on the major public policy issues of the day?