Posts

What is the eventual fate of the character and what is this trying to say about the war?Write an introduction that provides a little historical background about the Vietnam War.

You may choose to focus on a character, although NOT Tim O’Brien, as he is too large and found in too many stories. Norman Bowker, Mitchell Sanders, Rat Kiley, or Kiowa might make nice papers. Explore what the character represents through what he carries and what his function is in the story. What point does the fiction make about the war through this character? Does the character change? What is the eventual fate of the character and what is this trying to say about the war?Write an introduction that provides a little historical background about the Vietnam War. This will require a little bit of research, but not a lot. Just have some facts that will help provide a context for the points you want to make about the war.

When quoting your book, you should use the MLA style of documentation. The Online Writing Lab at Purdue is an excellent source for looking up how to do both short and long quote formats correctly.

Distinguish between effective and ineffective writing and apply the principles of good writing.

Write a short essay of 700 words about three (3) aspects of reading and three (3) aspects of writing which you find most difficult.
Distinguish between effective and ineffective writing and apply the
principles of good writing.
Ensure you include citations and a full reference list, including all sources, using the latest APA guidelines.

Write a research paper  about an informal settlement physical intervention with the aim to reduce disaster risk.

Write a research paper  about an informal settlement physical intervention with the aim to reduce disaster risk.

Compare Michelangelo’s “David”  with Rodin’s “Danaïde”. How does each sculptor establish the gender of his figure?

Compare Michelangelo’s “David”  with Rodin’s “Danaïde” (. How does each sculptor establish the gender of his figure? Does Rodin achieve more in terms of gender identity by leaving some of the original marble unfinished?

Explain the effect of Sugar and Phytohormone Signaling Pathways of top ten downregulated genes specially AT2G22990

Explain the effect of Sugar and Phytohormone Signaling Pathways

of top ten downregulated genes specially AT2G22990 (SCPL8/SNG1 gene) in a plant named Arabidopsis Thaliana

Is there a difference in children’s motivation for reading, when using online books instead of paper books

Is there a difference in children’s motivation for reading, when using online books instead of paper books

Analyze, interpret, and evaluate a variety of texts for the ethical and logical uses of evidence.

Demonstrate knowledge of individual and collaborative research processes.
Develop ideas and synthesize primary and secondary sources within focused academic arguments, including one or more research-based essays.
Analyze, interpret, and evaluate a variety of texts for the ethical and logical uses of evidence.
Write in a style that clearly communicates meaning, builds credibility, and inspires belief or action.
Apply the conventions of style manuals for specific academic disciplines (e.g., APA, CMS, MLA, etc.).

Did the Gadhafi’s regime disable the Libyan People from being able to establish a new society after his execution or was the key issue foreign intervention?

Did the Gadhafi’s regime disable the Libyan People from being able to establish a new society

after his execution or was the key issue foreign intervention?

Compare and contrast the views of Popper, Kuhn, and Lakatos on the issue of demarcation.

Compare and contrast the views of Popper, Kuhn, and Lakatos on the issue of demarcation. What is the demarcation problem, as Popper describes it, and what is Popper’s criterion for science? Why does he reject inductive confirmation as a mark of science? Why does he think his new criterion is better? What is Kuhn’s criterion for science, and what is his distinction between “normal” and “revolutionary” science? What is Kuhn’s criticism of Popper’s criterion? What is Lakatos’s criterion, and why does he reject both Popper and Kuhn? What features of Popper’s and Kuhn’s views does Lakatos preserve and why? What do you think is the proper criterion for science? Can there really be such a criterion? Explain.