Posts

Critically analyze the impact of relationship marketing in developing a cohesive and effective strategy to create an effective service.

Assessment Information/Brief

To be used for all types of assessment and provided to students at the start of the module.

Information provided should be compatible with the detail contained in the approved module specification although may contain more information for clarity.

Module title Services and Relationship Marketing
Level 6
Assessment title Assignment 2: Case Study: Customer Loyalty and Relationship Marketing in Franchises
Weighting within module This assessment is worth 50% of the overall module mark.
Submission deadline date and time

How to submit

You should submit your assessment electronically via Turnitin on the module’ blackboard

Assessment task details and instructions

Targeting, acquiring, and retaining the “right” customers is at the core of many successful service firms. It is important that firms carefully choose desirable, loyal customers within the chosen segments and then take pains to build and maintain their loyalty through well-conceived relationship marketing strategies. The objective is to build relationships and to develop loyal customers (whether B2B or B2C) who continue to do a growing volume of business with the firm in the future.

From the above brief on service delivery, you are asked to:

Read the attached case- CRM at C. Fun Parks and produce a well-researched report supported by the relevant academic literature, models/frameworks. You are the CRM consultant, address the following:

1. Critically examine the existing literature on franchisor-franchisee relationships, its merits and demerits for each party to the relationship with application to the case and discuss ways in which franchisee satisfaction and loyalty can be improved. (50 marks).

 

2. Ultimately, the objective of the franchise is to improve customer satisfaction and loyalty of the final consumer. Taking into consideration the issues presented in the case, discuss and make recommendations regarding key strategies the franchise can employ to build long term relationships and improve customer bonds with the organization. (50 marks).

· You are required to produce a written report to include the following: Arial 12 font size, front sheet, abstract, contents page, introduction, main findings, conclusion, recommendations, and bibliography (Harvard format in line with School policy).

· You may include an appendix section if required.  Please print your word count at the end of your report.

· Refer to the guidance on report writing by visiting the University’s Study Skills general URL at www.edu.salford.ac.uk/studyskills. 2

Assessed intended learning outcomes

On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:

Knowledge and Understanding

1. Appraise the marketing process in services

2. Critically evaluate and analyze the relationship between marketing management and strategic management.

3. Critically evaluate and analyze the application of theories and concepts of services marketing in a range of different situations.

4. Critically analyze the impact of relationship marketing in developing a cohesive and effective strategy to create an effective service.

Practical, Professional or Subject Specific Skills

1. Demonstrate conceptual and critical thinking, analysis, synthesis and evaluation.

2. Exhibit relevant personal and interpersonal skills.

3. Have a wide knowledge and understanding of the broad range of areas of service marketing and management and the detailed relationships between these and their application

4. Practice consistently demonstrate a command of subject-specific skills as well as proficiency in generic skills and attributes

Transferable Skills and other Attributes

1. Acquire and develop a range of cognitive and intellectual skills relevant to the management of the service relationship in different organizational and work contexts and within different national settings

2. Locate, analyze and synthesize information from a range of published literature and electronic sources, with acknowledgement and referencing of sources

3. Capacity for independent and self-managed learning, as well as working in small groups, to clarify objectives, exchange ideas and knowledge, and evaluate data in terms of problems presented

4. Relate skills to future learning needs and employment requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and decision-making

Module Aims

1. To enable students to understand the nature of services within the business environment.

2. To develop a detailed understanding of the marketing process adopted by a range of public and private sector service organisations.

3. To develop an understanding of relationship marketing and how it contributes to the effectiveness of service organisations whether it be Business to Customer or Business to Business

4. To explore the current issues which impact (or have the potential to impact) on the practice of  marketing in Services

Word count/ duration (if applicable)

· Your assessment should be 2,500 words with +/- 10% tolerance. This is between (2,250 and 2,750).

· Front sheet, Abstract, Contents page, Figures, References/Bibliography and Appendices are not part of the word count.

· Students to decide for themselves the appropriate word length for each part of the task.

Penalties for exceeding word count/duration

Markers will cease considering content for the purpose of grading and feedback once the stated maximum length has been exceeded. Content beyond this point will not contribute to the determination of the awarded mark and will not be commented upon in feedback.

Feedback arrangements

You can expect to receive feedback

· Marks will be available on Blackboard. You will need to log into the full site to access the written feedback. The mark and feedback will be released at 16:00hours.

· Email: Dr Sean Chung s. uk or Dr  Michael Evans one-to-one feedback if you want tutorial support following results.

Support arrangements

You can obtain support for this assessment:

Formative Feedback:

NB: Students can discuss their assignment with Sean or Michael before the submission date. Should note that, we will be able to look at your draft in person and NOT via email.

· Support for this assignment is available during the weekly timetabled drop in sessions.

· Additionally, you can come to our respective offices during office hours.

· Further information is available under Assessment on Blackboard.

· Contact Michael Evans by email on mea.uk  or Sean Chung s.uk if guidance is needed to complete the assignment.

· A reply can be expected within 24 hours if you do not receive a reply please email again stating that the email is a second request for support

askUS

The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS.

Good Academic Conduct and Academic Misconduct

Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning/home/using-and-referencing-information

Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously.  You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning/home/using-and-referencing-information

Assessment Information

If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here.

Disability and learning support: https://www.salford.ac.uk/askus/our-services/disability-and-learner-support

Late submission: https://www.salford.ac.uk/askus/academic-support/student-handbook/your-studies/course-support/assessment-and-feedback

Personal Mitigating Circumstances

If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure https://www.salford.ac.uk/askus/academic-support/pmc

Personal Tutor/Student Progression Administrator

If you have any concerns about your studies, contact your Personal Tutor or your Student Progression Administrator.

 

 

Assessment Criteria

You should look at the assessment criteria to find out what we are specifically looking at during the assessment.

See attached assessment Criteria.

The guidance provided here is in addition to general assessment criteria guidelines for degrees contained in your level handbook. Your attention is also drawn to the School policies on plagiarism and referencing.

70% > Very good to excellent use of lecture material, presented to a very high standard, and incorporating both wider, directed reading and other published material. Additionally, very good evidence of original thought on and around the topic.  Definitions of the main subject areas provided with references. Clear indication of the importance of customer loyalty in driving profitability and business growth in service firms. Very sound analysis of the nature of the franchisor and franchisee relationship in services operation with appropriate examples and a very good understanding of the links between the academic literature and firm practice. Demonstration of very good understanding of loyalty building strategies and practices such as tiering to enhance business-to-business- relationships and business-to customer relationships in service franchises. Very good integration of contemporary marketing strategies to build closer relationships with relevant market segments. Clear introduction and justification of conclusions and recommendations drawn. Accurately referenced with a complete bibliography.

60 – 69% Good to very good use of lecture material, presented to a good standard, and incorporating both wider, directed reading and other published material. Additionally, good evidence of original thought on and around the topic.  Definitions of the main subject areas provided with references. Good indication of the importance of customer loyalty in driving profitability and business growth in service firms.   Good analysis of the nature of the franchisor and franchisee relationship in services operation with appropriate examples and a good understanding of the links between the academic literature and firm practice. Demonstration of good understanding of loyalty building strategies and practices such as tiering to enhance business-to-business- relationships and business-to customer relationships in service franchises. Good integration of contemporary marketing strategies to build closer relationships with relevant market segments. Good introduction and justifiable conclusions drawn. Good text referencing and bibliography.

50-59% Fair to good use of lecture material, presented to a fair standard, and incorporating both wider, directed reading and other published material. Additionally, some evidence of original thought on and around the topic.  Some definitions of the main subject areas provided with references. Fair indication of the importance of customer loyalty in driving profitability and business growth in service firms.  Fair analysis of the nature of the franchisor and franchisee relationship in services operation with appropriate examples and a fair understanding of the links between the academic literature and firm practice. Demonstration of fair understanding of loyalty building strategies and practices such as tiering to enhance business-to-business- relationships and business-to customer relationships in service franchises. Fair integration of contemporary marketing strategies to build closer relationships with relevant market segments. Fair introduction and justifiable conclusions drawn.  Satisfactory text referencing and bibliography.

40-49% Basic use of lecture material, presented to a reasonable standard, and incorporating both wider, directed reading and other published material. Some basic definitions of the main subject areas provided with references. Reasonable indication of the importance of customer loyalty in driving profitability and business growth in service firms.  Basic analysis of the nature of the franchisor and franchisee relationship in services operation with appropriate examples and a basic understanding of the links between the academic literature and firm practice. Demonstration of reasonable understanding of loyalty building strategies and practices such as tiering to enhance business-to-business- relationships and business-to customer relationships in service franchises. Reasonable integration of contemporary marketing strategies to build closer relationships with relevant market segments. Basic introduction and justifiable conclusions drawn. Adequate text referencing and bibliography.

30-39% An unsatisfactory piece of work which demonstrates lack of understanding of the concepts and models of customer loyalty and relations marketing. A weak understanding of the nature of the franchisor and franchisee relationship in services operation with little or no examples provided, or efforts made to make a link between the academic literature and firm practice. No valid definitions of the main subject areas provided with no references. Little or no indication of the importance of customer loyalty in driving profitability and business growth in service firms. A weak understanding of loyalty building strategies and practices such as tiering to enhance business-to-business- relationships and business-to customer relationships in service franchises. Limited or poor attempt of integrating contemporary marketing strategies to build closer relationships with relevant market segments. Poor introduction and weak justification of conclusions and recommendations drawn. Poor structure and bibliography format.

20-29% Poor work and failing to pay attention to detail. Inadequate and inaccurate knowledge displayed with a poor ability to interpret the task in hand. Limited effort and planning evident.

10-19% Virtually no relevant knowledge displayed. No apparent structure or meaningful discussion of the task at hand.

The pass mark for this module is 40%

You should consult your Blackboard Module site for detailed grade or mark descriptors.

In Year Retrieval Scheme

Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval. If you are eligible for this scheme, you will be contacted shortly after the feedback deadline.

Reassessment

If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you will need to resubmit on or before x August 2020. For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt.  Students should be aware that there is no late submission period at reassessment (this includes those students who have an accepted PMC request from a previous attempt).

· Be able to take the assignment following the next exam board.

· The re-take assignment will be the same as the main assignment brief.

· Submission period will be in August 2020 (Specific date to be confirmed by the examination office)

 

SRM: Assignment 2 – Case Study – CRM at C. Fun Parks

Background

  1. Fun Parks is a concept that was developed by Theodore Brook in 1985. The aim was to give people a short break, to take away their worries and give them a safe place to visit, where everything is provided for their comfort and entertainment, and also their family and/or friends, and all close to home!

From 1985 onwards Brook experienced a great demand for his service proposition.  In only a few years he was able to open more than thirty of these resorts in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and France.

The first resorts were company owned, managed and operated.  But soon Brook found that his resources were limited, and this hindered a rapid expansion; the launch of a franchising concept provided a solution.  At present, 85 per cent of the resorts are owned and managed by franchisees.  Twice a year there is a meeting between the franchisees and the franchise organisation.  During the last franchisee meeting, Brook was asked to develop and present a CRM plan.  The franchise organisation was, in the franchisees’ opinion, lacking a clear CRM vision and strategy, and invested in a rather ad hoc way in CRM systems.

The franchising concept

Characteristic of C. Fun Parks is the resort’s main building that houses the reception, a restaurant, a (tropical) swimming pool, a bar, a terrace, a game hall and a convenience store.  Apart from the central building, the resorts contain several bungalows, with accommodation available for four to sixteen people.

Guests can choose between several service packages.  The budget pack does not include bed sheets, towels, cleaning, welcome food and beverage package, etc., whereas the premium pack will provide these services.

Also, in the park several activities are organized for guests, ranging from horse riding, bingo and soccer games to nature walks.  Outside the park, there are ample opportunities for enjoying a short holiday.  The park provides guests with information so that they can enjoy and explore the local environment.

Franchisees have little decision-making freedom over the park.  The park’s general manager also must follow and pass a professional hospitality management programme and a special quality management system has to be implemented in his/her organization.  Furthermore, s/he will have to participate in the joint marketing programme.

Franchisee performance

About 70 per cent of the franchisees have been able to increase the customer satisfaction rates over the past five years.  However, the improvements in profitability and sales show a less satisfying trend over the past three years.

Of course, the market has changed, but even if the franchisees take account of external events, they state they ‘need more’.  Occupancy rates have dropped to 85 per cent; this, although still acceptable, has been higher in the past.  Furthermore, guests often delay their choice of a short beak, leaving the decision as to whether to book a holiday until the last minute.  French guests are known for their impulsive behaviour; a substantial percentage does not reserve a bungalow and arrive at reception asking for a place to sleep.  During guests’ stay, the spending pattern has also shown a negative trend: they spend less during their stay in the restaurant, in the convenience store, on organized activities, on services, etc.  Not all the facilities are particularly profitable either.  Although it might not be desirable to hold each facility accountable, there is a need to exploit the tropical swimming pool, for instance, in a more economic way.

Does your paper have an overarching argument? Do your observations flow smoothly?Did you use in-text citations where appropriate, and were they formatted according to MLA style rules?

I will be providing the Bibliography and the paper outline, so please write the paper according to those documents. Also the grading criteria of the paper is as follows:

REQUIREMENTS
Your paper must be at least 2000 words.
Your paper must be accompanied by an MLA-style bibliography of at least 10 sources. Refer to the section below for more information about the bibliography.
All quotations, paraphrases, and factual citations must be accompanied by an MLA-style in-text citation.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Your bibliography must list at least 10 sources, two of which must be books and two of which must be scholarly articles. You will be graded on the quality of the sources consulted, and on the consistency and accuracy of your MLA formatting.

You will be evaluated on the following:
Evidence of research: Does your paper demonstrate a good knowledge of the topic? Do you describe events, products, and companies with specificity (e.g. dates, monetary values, Billboard chart positions)?
Organization: Does your paper have an overarching argument? Do your observations flow smoothly?
Clarity of expression: Are your ideas expressed in clear, direct prose? Is your writing largely free of grammatical errors and typos? Does your paper contain repetitive statements?
Citations: Did you use in-text citations where appropriate, and were they formatted according to MLA style rules?

Bibliography: Does your bibliography meet the requirements stated in the assignment guidelines, and is it formatted according to MLA style rules?

Critically examine a range of theoretical approaches to the evaluation of an organization’s strategic position.

Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
· Explore the risks and opportunities confronting strategic leaders in a changing world.

· Assess the challenges facing organisations in times of economic growth and recession.

· Critically examine a range of theoretical approaches to the evaluation of an organization’s strategic position.

Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes tested in this assignment:
· Research, diagnose and analyze a complex range of strategic problems.

· Critically evaluate strategic concepts and theory.

· Reflect on the experience of working as part of a team on a group project.

· Feedback /Marking criteria for this Assignment
Performance will be assessed using HBS Grading Criteria and Mark scheme.
Guidance for improvement will be given in writing on the Assessment Feedback Form or on the StudyNet Feedback Form within 4 weeks of submission.For each day or part day up to five days after the published deadline, coursework relating to modules submitted late will have the numeric grade reduced by 10 grade points until or unless the numeric grade reaches 40 for levels 4, 5 and 6 or 50 for level 7 (PG).  If a submission is more than 5 working days after the published deadline, a grade of zero will be awarded.

Where the numeric grade awarded for the assessment is less than 40 for level 4, 5 and 6, or 50 for level 7, no lateness penalty will be applied;

 

Detailed Brief for Individual/Group Assessment
Assignment Title: Individual Academic Reflective Report

 

Description of the assignment:

The sole aim of this assignment is to enable students to critically reflect on their academic experience of the module, including the evaluative, research and analytical skills gained throughout the module journey. It is also intended to enable the students to articulate their self-awareness, especially after working with colleagues in their assigned learning set during tutorials. Therefore, it is vital to follow the structure as laid out below to reflect on your experience of the module.

  1. Introduction:

· Briefly introduce your report to the reader – what is your report about?

· Discuss the specific issues that will be covered in the report

· Briefly discuss the company selected by your learning set: How and why the learning set settled for the selected company?

· Specify the models/frameworks that were used in analysing the issues in Assignment 1

· Discuss the rationale for writing the reflective report

  1. Description:

· Describe the aspects of the module that have significantly enhanced your knowledge and skills: Ensure you are specific and clear about the areas of the module you find most productive to your future career.

· Describe and justify how the module has developed your research, evaluative and analytical skills

· Describe the opportunities and challenges of writing an academic report with colleagues of differing backgrounds

· Describe how you applied the theories and theoretical concepts in your learning set to critically analyze the issues faced by your selected organization

  1. Feelings:

· Discuss your feelings about your selected company, including the strategic issues they faced and what they did to address them?

· Demonstrate how it has helped transform your thinking about Business Strategy generally.

· What new perspective(s) of Business Strategy have you captured during the module delivery? You can focus your discussion on any specific strategic theories/concepts/frameworks/models you have either learnt during the lectures and/or tutorials or within your learning set and show how they are applicable in practice? It is vital to ensure that, your arguments are specific and appropriately tailored to a key issue(s).

·Ensure you complement your discussions above with appropriate and specific examples

  1. Evaluation:

· Highlight the areas of the learning set discussions during the tutorials you considered invaluable/good, and the aspects that are inappropriate/bad. How did it affect your perception of working with others?

· What did you discover about yourself working with others? How do you intend to earnest the skills gained and/or address the weaknesses identified? How will they be useful/beneficial to your career in the future?

· Were there any cultural challenges within the learning set? How did you overcome these challenges? What lessons did you learn?

· How did the learning set communicate? Note: Think about: how meetings were held, email communication, specific social media interactions and tools used, etc.

· Ensure that you present appropriate justification for each argument.

  1.  Analysis:

· Analyse your perspective of the learning set discussions and the module. Discuss the sense you make of the situation.

· Articulate what lessons you have learnt and how that will improve and/or enhance your ability of working with others in the future?

· Specify how the knowledge gained from the learning set discussions has improved your understanding of strategic concepts/theories and your understanding of their applications in contemporary management practice.

  1. Conclusion:

Summarize your key points and indicate their implications on your future practice.

Note: your conclusion should come from the various sections discussed above.

Any specific instructions:

Reflective writing is personal, and therefore you are free to use first person (I, me, we) and emphasise the use of vocabulary, which relates to personal feelings and emotions. Be frank and specific in the way that you describe the research and analytical skills gained and use specific examples to illustrate how studying on this module have improved your level of application of these skills. The examples highlighted might relate to how you worked with colleagues in your learning set, and/or relevant real-life Business Strategy issues. You are also encouraged to consider how studying on this module might have developed your skills, knowledge and other attributes associated with enhancing your future career development. In summary, try to reflect on your overall experience of the module, your selected company and consider whether you have developed any new perspectives on Business Strategy and how this, together with changes in your skill set, might assist you in future.

· You are encouraged to include headings and subheadings to improve the clarity of your work

· You can include theories and/or concepts where appropriate, but must be directly linked with your arguments

· Ensure you include page numbers

· You are expected to use in-text referencing where appropriate and the use of Harvard Referencing style is essential (please check the Harvard Reference guide on Studynet if you need further information).

·         Word count limit must be adhered to with an allowance of +/- 10%

Mark scheme:

e.g. Weighting
Presentation and Structure 15
Harvard Referencing 5
Content and findings 25
Business Application 25
Analysis 30
Total 100
Student Support and Guidance

·         For further help, contact your module leader in their drop-in hours or by email.

·         Use the Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme to help improve your work.

·         Go to CASE workshops, use the CASE website and drop-in hours www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/go/CASE/

·         Academic English for Business support is available through daily drop-ins from the CASE office.  See the CASE workshop timetable on the CASE main website page for details.

·         Some tutors allow students to test their work using Turnitin.  Guidance on submission to Turnitin via StudyNet can be found by using the following link. http://www.studynet1.herts.ac.uk/ptl/common/asu.nsf/resource+library/TURNITIN+FOR+STUDENTS+2016+USER+GUIDE.pdf/$FILE/TURNITIN+FOR+STUDENTS+2016+USER+GUIDE.pdf

How long does it take to acclimatize to a hotter environment? What causes acclimatization?

New England Patriots are playing the Miami Dolphins in Miami., the weather in Miami has been very hot and the game is scheduled to be played on one of the hottest days of the season.

a. Will Miami have a fitness, physiological, or heat related advantage over New England? If so, what would be those advantages?
b. How long does it take to acclimatize to a hotter environment? What causes acclimatization?
c. What would be the effect of also having a very high relative humidity during the game?

Does the 2018 Directive have any direct or indirect effect that can be used against Sunshine Desserts?

The UK’s Employment Disputes Regulations implement the 2018 Directive, but it looks like the two don’t exactly align. I’ve also looked into the requirement in the Directive for public transport providers to issue certificates of delay. The UK doesn’t seem to have done anything to implement that bit of the directive as the Secretary of State for Transport believes “existing industry practice already conforms with the Directive”. Could one of you please draw up a memo addressing the following questions:
• Does the 2018 Directive have any direct or indirect effect that can be used against Sunshine Desserts?

• Can we use the 2018 Directive to force Western Rail to issue a certificate of delay?

• If the answer to either of the above is “no”, might we be able to bring a state liability action against the UK Government? Thanks, Ally. A lison McBeal MA, GDL, LPC Associate Solicitor, Beaverbrook and Sons
T: 020 776 64466 | E: a.mcbeal@beaverbrooks.co.uk 6 Phoenix Street, Nightsville, P12 KAY
Assistant: Ms Claire Otoms, T: 020 776 64683, E: c.otoms@beaverbrooks.co.uk
Subject: Employment Dispute Date: Monday, 3 February 2020 at 18:09:31 Greenwich Mean Time From: Reginald Perrin <reggie_perrin@gmail.com> To: Alison McBeal CC: Client Management; <EU Division (Trainees)>
Good evening, Ms McBeal,
Thank you for taking my case. I’m afraid I’m in something of a pickle.
I work for Sunshine Desserts. The company is owned and run by my boss, C.J.
Every day I walk from my house at 12 Coleridge Close to Sutton station, where I get the train to work. You know trains are like though – it doesn’t matter how early I leave I ALWAYS seem to arrive 11 minutes late!
Tuesday, 4 February 2020 at 9:45:45 AM Greenwich Mean Time
Page 2 of 2
C.J. has had enough. I got an email from him the other day saying “I didn’t get where I am today by tolerating lateness on the part of my employees” and he’s initiated disciplinary proceedings against me. I think he wants to sack me.
I did some Googling and I think this new EU Directive means C.J. isn’t allowed to sack me if my lateness isn’t my fault, but he says that’s not what the law says.
I also asked Leinster Rail for a certificate of delay, so that I could prove to C.J. that my lateness isn’t my fault, but they said they’re not obliged in law to give me one.
I just don’t know what to do. Can I rely on this Directive or not?
Yours sincerely,
Reggie.

Analyse the resources and key competences of the organization to identify a set of Strengths and Weaknesses and identify core competences (key factors that may give the company its competitive advantage).

Applied Corporate Strategy Assessment: Strategic Analysis Report

he module is assessed (100%) by an individual Strategic Report (maximum 3,000 words) involving an in-depth, strategic analysis of a large organization. The subject of the report will be decided by the module convenor but students will be able to choose from a list of several examples.

Instructions for assessment

This assignment is focused on the selected organization, its industry and business environment. By week 2 you will be given a list of organisations (cases) to choose from. Please choose one case (featuring an organization) for the purposes of this assignment.

Formative work in weekly seminars will guide students through analytical techniques and processes required to complete the task.

The Strategic Report should address the following:

2) Analyse the resources and key competences of the organization to identify a set of Strengths and Weaknesses and identify core competences (key factors that may give the company its competitive advantage). (30%)

3) Evaluate the given strategy (as per chosen case) using SAFe criteria. (30%)

A further 10% is available for clarity, structure, grammar, correct Harvard referencing and overall professional presentation showing clear report style.

Note that the emphasis is on application! This assignment is not about general (or critical) discussion of strategic models. You are asked to apply these models to the case chosen. Appropriately referenced data should be used in support of your arguments and discussion.

The report should not exceed 3,000 words + 10%.  Appendices are allowed outside this limit but NO MORE than 6 pages.

How will we support you with your assessment?

There will be weekly references to the assessment task in seminars and weekly activities in those seminars will be helpful in creating “scaffolding” for eventual submission.

The formative mini-casework in seminars will be of direct help in the application of relevant strategic tools. There will be regular Q&A sessions linked to the assessment report and in the final weeks of teaching there will be an opportunity to review and reflect upon work from previous cohorts.

How will your work be assessed?

Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking scheme indicated below.  Feedback will be given in the Turnitin/Grademark system with script comments plus overall points. When you access your marked work it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.

In this Strategic Report, high marks come from using strategic concepts and analysis from the module clearly applied to the organization. Harvard referencing, a professional report style plus appropriate diagrams/tables are also required. Outline marking expectations are as follows:

Q1: (30%) External analysis.

Discuss the business environment and identify a number of Opportunities – Os and Threats – Ts (we expect 6 issues from business environment to be discussed in total each of which concluded as an O or a T). Please note that there is no need to address each factor (if for example there are no important legal or technological issues do not discuss these factors). Your task is to identify and discuss 6 most important issues in your opinion. Demonstrate how an issue is an Opportunity or a Threat.

Industry analysis (5 Forces) should be applied to assess industry attractiveness (each force should be discussed and assessed as High, Moderate or Low and industry attractiveness should be assessed having these forces in mind).

Make sure that you use appropriately referenced data (charts, figures, quotes etc) to support your arguments. Also, note that this is an external analysis so it is not about the firm but about issues in that industry (in context).

Q2: (30%) Internal analysis.

Identify and discuss organizations unique resources & distinctive capabilities (at least 6 Strengths and Weaknesses should be covered in total). Discuss resources (what a company has) and competences (activities) separately.

While addressing unique resources (physical – e.g. retail outlets, manufacturing facilities, products etc.; human – e.g. people and teams crucial for successful strategic development; intangible – e.g. brands, links to external stakeholders etc. and possibly financial) make sure that each is discussed separately and concluded as an S or a W.

While discussing distinctive competences construct Value Chain for the organisation and within list a number of specific and distinctive activities for your organization. Demonstrate how unique capabilities link to competitive advantage (each distinctive competence from Value Chain should be “pushed” through VRIO to identify Core Competences for the organization). Once you identify one (or two at most) core competence provide a discussion about these below Value Chain or VRIO (what is the activity and how does it contribute to firm’s competitive advantage). Note that all competences listed n value chain (and VRIO) should be company’s Strengths (Weaknesses could be discussed in a descriptive fashion separately). Again, use properly referenced data to support your arguments. This question is about the company (internal analysis).

Q3: (30%) Strategy Evaluation

Evaluate the given strategy – please see “Cases for the assignment” on moodle) using the three SAFe tests:

Construct TOWS populating Os, Ts, Ss and Ws fully (all Os and Ts obtained from Q1, all Ss and Ws obtained from Q2). Place the strategy you are evaluating in one of the inner sections and try to associate it to one or more internal and one or more external items while addressing Suitability (e.g. if you place a strategy in S-O quadrant identify appropriate S or Ss combined with O or Os while contemplating this strategy).

Construct Power/Interest matrix with a number of relevant stakeholders, then choose two stakeholder groups that will be affected with the strategy and for each discuss if the strategy you are evaluating is acceptable not and why.

While addressing Feasibility, comment on financial resources and skills required for implementation of the strategy being evaluated.

Note that it is a specific strategy that is evaluated!

PRESENTATION: (10%) We expect a professional report with clear report style (not an essay) e.g. frontsheet, contents, clear sections, tables & diagrams and relevant Harvard referencing. The word count should not be exceeded by more than 10%.

(In addition to marker feedback, a full marking rubric will be available within the Turnitin submission system for student consideration.)

Marking and feedback process

Between you handing in your work and then receiving your feedback and marks, there are a number of quality assurance processes that we go through to ensure that students receive marks which reflects their work. A brief summary is provided below:

  • Step 1 – The module and marking team meet to agree standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided.
  • Step 2 – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief.
  • Step 3 – A moderation meeting takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback.
  • Step 4 – Work at Levels 5 and 6 then goes to an external examiner who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair.
  • Step 5 – The Office process your mark & feedback & it is made available to you.

Describes how you would use the child’s occupational interests to both enhance development and enable attainment of occupational goals.

Bachelors and Masters Assessment Task 2 – Recorded PowerPoint

Task Instructions

Working individually, you are required to produce a recorded PowerPoint presentation:

You must consider the scenario provided involving a young child and his/her family. You must use this information to construct a recorded PowerPoint presentation that includes a video thumbnail of you. The presentation must be appropriate for broadcast to families of children.

Time limit: 15 minutes (Minimum 6 slides but no maximum limit applies)

Weighting: 35%

  1. Preparation
  2. Consider the scenario described on the next page. Think about:
    • The features of the context for the client and his family
    • The child’s occupational interests
    • Typical developmental milestones for a child of this age
    • Typical occupations a child of this age would engage in (consider play, learning, self-care, sleep and rest, social occupations, as well as the occupations of the family that he would be drawn into).
    • The possible impact of the child’s condition on both his development and his engagement in occupation
    • How delays in one area of development might limit engagement in occupation, which in turn could impact on development in other areas
  3. Consider the nature of occupations that a child of this age would typically engage in, and how those occupations would facilitate all aspects of their development. In particular, consider the impact on fine motor developmental milestones
  4. Think about how you, as an occupational therapist, could use the child’s occupational interests to enhance development of his fine motor skills
  5. Understand how attainment of developmental milestones in fine motor development could contribute to the attainment of the occupational goals described in the scenario
  6. Become familiar with the recorded PowerPoint function as demonstrated in class

Task Description

You are required to consider the scenario provided involving a young child and his family. You must use this information to construct a narrated video PowerPoint presentation that:

  1. Demonstrates your understanding of the situation for the child and his family.
  2. Describes the relationship between developmental milestones and occupational performance, and
  3. Describes how you would use the child’s occupational interests to both enhance development and enable attainment of occupational goals.

Define and identify the tenants of ethical leadership-Identify and exercise ethical decision making in the context of leadership.

Need to provide a 4-page background information report about the 2001 Enron Scandal. Identify the problems and provide details about the underlying causes of the problem. Make sure to describe an outline of events. What ever some unethical issues? You will be required to filter, apply, and distill the concept presented in any of the chapter textbook (chapters 1-12), including course objectives and outcomes.

Reference page: You will submit 3 Ethical Leadership-related sources in addition to your textbook (“Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership: Casting light or Shadow”, Sixth Edition, Craig E. Johnson, 2018) for a total of 4 sources.

Course name: PRINCIPLES OF ETHICAL LEADERSHIP
Course objectives and outcomes:
• Define and identify the tenants of ethical leadership.
• Identify and exercise ethical decision making in the context of leadership.
• Assess the ethical climate of an organization.
• Characterize appropriate responses to ethical crises.

Discuss how effective cost management may have far-reaching impact, such as on organizational bond ratings.

Assume the role of a healthcare financial management consultant (choose a place or hospital or insurance in state of New Jersey) for a healthcare organization striving to manage its costs more efficiently. In a five-page paper, address the following:
Complete an introductory discussion related to the importance of effectively managing costs of healthcare organizations in the context of reducing cost of care while improving quality of care.
Discuss various methods healthcare organizations may use to allocate costs. Make recommendations to your client on the cost-allocation method(s) appropriate for its operations.
Discuss how the cost-allocation method and and cost-assembling method you have recommended may help the organization identify wastes in resources and manage costs more efficiently.
Discuss how effective cost management may have far-reaching impact, such as on organizational bond ratings.
Your paper must also include a title page, abstract, and references; these are not included in the five-page count. . Your paper should be written following current APA style guidelines. Use up to date references Journal USA sources.

Do authors highlight problems in introducing and developing different training approaches?

Literature Review
Literature review sources examples;
Relevant – Academic books, articles, journals, institutes, expert unbiased statements etc
Linked to your research project, undertake a wide literature review to identify;
Expert opinions – Proven facts – data – evidence
Qualitative and quantitative secondary information and data.

DO NOT SIMPLY REPORT WHAT AUTHORS SAY!
Analyse and critically compare (eg agreements / disagreements)
Form arguments and conclusions.
Analyse quantitative research (Form conclusions, do not simply state facts)
Project:- How can training and development positively impact on employee performance and productivity.

Hypothesis:- Continuous training and development contributes towards achieving organization aims and objectives.
You are researching into different forms of training and development approaches which contribute to achieving organization objectives.

DO NOT SIMPLY REPORT WHAT AUTHORS SAY!
Example approaches, you could;
Different authors views on different training approaches – agreements/disagreements
Is there evidence that certain training approaches work in certain circumstances.
Do authors promote deploying certain training and development approaches.
Can different training approaches in non business sectors be applied in business sectors?
Do authors highlight problems in introducing and developing different training approaches?
Are there errors in authors methods, perspectives and conclusions?
Are authors past perspectives no longer relevant.
Are sources valid/invalid? Biased/unbiased?
Are there gaps in authors research which questions validity of their views?