Companies spend a lot of money to reach the people who would be most interested in their product or service. Segmentation is a process that allows marketers to identify their target market.
ALL WORK MUST BE ORIGINAL.
INSTRUCTIONS: 6 pages in APA format, 8 sources, peer reviewed sources no older than 6 years. Provide background information and discuss implications.
TOPIC: Discuss 5 important ways Art Therapy benefits school age children.
Explain the role of the Human Capital Model in an organization of your choice. Do you see the model as being important to an organization’s leadership? How does this relate to knowledge management? ( mid size vodka company/warehouse)
How do you demonstrate “deep smarts?”
See article below
How does one convince their supervisor, CEO, or business owner of the importance of human capital management in an organization
Assignment: Read the case in the midterm assignment folder “The Messy Business of Reinventing Happiness.” Your answer should be based on the case elements. If there are things the article doesn’t cover that are needed for your answer you are able to make assumptions of the nature of the work at Disney. Just make clear in your answer you are making such assumptions and what they are. Your document should clearly number each of three questions with the answer under that number.
Question 1 (50 points): After reading the case, do you feel the Walt Disney Company did a good job in preparing the workforce for the change? Use class concept on resistance to change in your assessment. What types of resistance to change do you think we will see in this situation? If Disney could do this process over what you would you suggest they do in order to better manage change and get employee buy in and appropriate digital mindsets for the change?
Question 2 (50 points): How might the addition of magic bands functionally change the jobs of workers at the Disney World theme park? What data might you suggest collecting in order to better understand how the change might impact theme park workers jobs? For the job changes, how might you consider humanistic HR elements in the process?
Question 3 (50 points): While the case description focused on the addition of magic bands for customers and how it directly impacts worker’s jobs, the change may also require or be helped by Digital HR changes as well. Considering the type of interventions we have discussed in this class, what digital HR interventions would help support the change to magic bands? To sustain its success over time? Discuss at least two digital HR interventions that might help the strategic initiative of Magic Bands. Tie those interventions to this particular situation. You may assume the Walt Disney Company is not currently using the interventions you suggest.
Read the “Darling – Health Care’s Benchmark Case,” located in Chapter 8 of the textbook. Write a 500-750 word essay that addresses the following:
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Case Study from text book: Legal and ethical issues for health professionals by George D Pozgar. Pages 488-490
In 1965, the landmark case Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital9 had a major impact on the liability of healthcare organizations. The court enunciated a “corporate negligence doctrine” under which hospitals have a duty to provide adequately trained medical and nursing staff. A hospital is responsible, in conjunction with its medical staff, for establishing policies and procedures for monitoring the quality of medicine practiced within the hospital.
Darling involved an 18-year-old college football player who was preparing for a career as a teacher and coach. The patient, a defensive halfback for his college football team, was injured during a play. He was rushed to the emergency department of a small, accredited community hospital where the only physician on emergency duty that day was Dr. Alexander, a general practitioner. Alexander had not treated a major leg fracture for three years.
The emergency department physician examined the patient and ordered an X-ray that revealed that the tibia and the fibula of the right leg had been fractured. The physician reduced the fracture and applied a plaster cast from a point 3 or 4 inches below the groin to the toes. Shortly after the cast had been applied, the patient began to complain continually of pain. The physician split the cast and continued to visit the patient frequently while the patient remained in the hospital. Not thinking that it was necessary, the physician did not call in a specialist for consultation.
After two weeks, the student was transferred to a larger hospital and placed under the care of an orthopedic surgeon. The specialist found a considerable amount of dead tissue in the fractured leg. During the next two months, the specialist removed increasing amounts of tissue in a futile attempt to save the leg, until it became necessary to amputate the leg 8 inches below the knee. The student’s father did not agree to a settlement and filed suit against the emergency department physician and the hospital. Although the physician later settled out of court for $40,000, the case continued against the hospital.
The documentary evidence relied on to establish the standard of care included the rules and regulations of the Illinois Department of Public Health under the Hospital Licensing Act; the standards for hospital accreditation, today known as the Joint Commission; and the bylaws, rules, and regulations of Charleston Hospital. These documents were admitted into evidence without objection. No specific evidence was offered that the hospital had failed to conform to the usual and customary practices of hospitals in the community.
The trial court instructed the jury to consider those documents, along with all other evidence, in determining the hospital’s liability. Under the circumstances in which the case reached the Illinois Supreme Court, it was held that the verdict against the hospital should be sustained if the evidence supported the verdict on any one or more of the 20 allegations of negligence. Allegations asserted that the hospital was negligent in (1) its failure to provide a sufficient number of trained nurses for bedside care of all patients at all times—in this case, nurses who were capable of recognizing the progressive gangrenous condition of the plaintiff’s right leg—and (2) failure of its nurses to bring the patient’s condition to the attention of the hospital administration and staff so that adequate consultation could be secured and the condition rectified.
Although these generalities provided the jury with no practical guidance for determining what constitutes reasonable care, they were considered relevant to helping the jury decide what was feasible and what the hospital knew or should have known concerning hospital responsibilities for the proper care of a patient. There was no expert testimony characterizing when the professional care rendered by the attending physician should have been reviewed, who should have reviewed it, or whether the case required consultation.
Evidence relating to the hospital’s failure to review Alexander’s work, to require consultation or examination by specialists, and to require proper nursing care was found to be sufficient to support a verdict for the patient. Judgment was eventually returned against the hospital in the amount of $100,000.
The Illinois Supreme Court held that the hospital could not limit its liability as a charitable corporation to the amount of its liability insurance.
[T]he doctrine of charitable immunity can no longer stand … a doctrine which limits the liability of charitable corporations to the amount of liability insurance that they see fit to carry permits them to determine whether or not they will be liable for their torts and the amount of that liability, if any.10
In effect, the hospital was liable as a corporate entity for the negligent acts of its employees and physicians. Among other things, the Darling case indicates the importance of instituting effective credentialing and continuing medical evaluation and review programs for all members of a professional staff.
Ethical and Legal Issues
How has cryptography, a mathematical tool, revolutionized modern science and what are its various applications across different fields?
In a 500-750 word reflection, address the following:
Refer to Social Work Disposition #9: Standard: Social Workers’ Ethical Responsibilities to Practice Settings when completing this assignment.
Compile the work that you submitted in Units III and V into a single document, and you will add the components listed below to complete your final research paper:
Make certain that you integrate your previous work (submitted in Units III and V) in a sensible and organized way in order for the final research paper to flow seamlessly from one section to another. You should use section headings as a way to keep your paper visually organized.
Based on how they fit into your particular research topic, make certain that the areas below are addressed.
How did the civil rights movement empower other groups to fight for their rights in the 1970s and 1980s? – respond in 150 words
Although the United States is among the wealthiest nations in the world, it is far from being the healthiest. Life expectancy and survival rates in the United States have improved dramatically over the past century, but Americans have shorter lifespans and experience more illness than people in other high-income countries. This assignment gives you an opportunity to put together what you have learned in this course, including, but not limited to:
Choose a contemporary public health issue (e.g., bioterrorism, gun violence, or natural disasters like hurricanes, tornadoes, and wildfires), its impact on public health, and strategies for mitigating and managing it once the issue occurs.
Following APA guidelines, create a PowerPoint presentation of 17-20 slides (plus title and reference slides) on the contemporary public health issue you have chosen and a human rights ethical dilemma. You will present this work to a team of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials tasked with developing global policies for addressing the impact of contemporary public health issues around the world.
Your presentation should assess:
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.