Posts

What factors cause the demand for a quality ASP in schools and why? How do quality ASPs benefit and impact students’ lives?

Title: Examining Quality in After School Programs: The Primary Features, Good Model and the Overall Effects on Students’ Wellbeing

Introduction

Over the past decade, there has been an increased demand for quality Afterschool Program (ASP) due to many reasons (e.g., to decrease juvenile crime rate, the high cost of living required both parents to work, and to provide a safe space for children during after school hours) (Byrd & Zhang, 206, Wu & Van Egeren, 2010, and Youth.gov, 2019). In the state of California (CA), and especially in high-cost cities like San Francisco, most families require both parents to work and at least one of them has a full-time employment. Hence, ASP become paramount and not only for the academic reasons alone. The shift in our current culture driven by economic necessity dictates that a family of four residing in the Bay Area must earn less than $33,000 to qualify for state financial assistance. (USDA, 2019). Parents do their best to attempt to have balance in their personal and professional lives, and part of that balance is knowing that they have a trusted, supportive community that looks after their most prized possession, their child. According to the Afterschool Alliance (2019) data, 82% of CA parents say, “afterschool help them keep their jobs”. In 2019, Among CA’s K-12 students, about 1.6 million students are enrolled in afterschool, 2.4 million are waiting for an available program, and 1.2 million students are alone and unsupervised during after school hours (Afterschool Alliance, 2019).

With the increase of ASP, participants, educators, and communities have asked critical questions of what elements contribute to creating a quality ASP and what outcome do ASPs have on the participants (i.e., students and parents) and community, whether it is a positive or negative affect. Data are shown from Risk to Opportunity: Afterschool Programs Keep Kids Safe When Juvenile Crime Peaks, determined that 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. is the peak time for juvenile crime in California during school days, with 35% of juvenile crimes occurring during this time period. Many types of research (Wade (2015)., Bryrd & Zhang, (2006)., Bolt, Pierce, & Vandell, (2010)., and Mahoney, Parente, & Lord, 2007.) have proven that child and adolescent will experience a better life when positive adults’ guidance in learning to navigate life experiences are involved. Adolescents’ prefrontal cortex, the rational part of the brain is not fully developed yet; therefore, young children need adult guidance and support to navigate their lives through childhood before reaching adulthood. (Mahoney, Parente, & Lord, 2007). This research study will explore what features contribute to a quality ASP, analyze the effects of the program, and how it affects the participants and the community.

The majority of my educational career has been involved with youth work and out of school time. There are many important parts about ASP that people outside of the program are unaware of, such as . The logistics in ASP are a crucial part of the program, particularly when it is in the implementation phase. In order to have a greater understanding of what important characteristics play a vital role in quality ASP, I will dive into many research studies that examine the features and their effects on the participants. As I embark on my investigation, I pose the following overarching question: What factors cause the demand for a quality ASP in schools and why? How do quality ASPs benefit and impact students’ lives? More specifically, I ask, how does the socioeconomic play into the demand of ASP. The goal of this literature review is to understand the factors that cause the demand for quality ASP in schools and how quality ASPs impact the participating students lives.

 

 

Literature Review

Factors for Afterschool Program (ASP)

In San Francisco Bay Area, there are many great features about this region that makes people from near and far decide to inhabit here: the seasonal weather, accessible public transportation, a wide variety of activities for various age groups, and of course being the home and heart of Silicon Valley. All of it comes at a price of the high cost of living which demands most families to have two working parents and resulted in adults being unavailable to attend to their children (Byrd & Zhang, 2006). Therefore, parents seek to find quality programs for their children to attend during after school hours while parents are at work. Another important component that contributes to the demand of quality ASPs is the high juvenile crime rate during the 2pm – 6pm hours, with 35% of juvenile crimes occurring during this time period (Afterschool Alliance, 2019). With the high cost of living that demands both parents to work and the juvenile crime rate, it is imperative that children and adolescents have a safe environment that they can go to after school, have the appropriate adult guidance and support; then this is where quality ASPs come in (Wu & Van Egeren, 2010).

This research will also look into the other side which is the barriers that hinder families from participating in ASPs. Is it the cost and lack of a safe way for children to travel to and from afterschool programs for low-income families? These are reports from African-American families and Hispanic families who have reported that these are the reasons why they are unable to enroll their children in an afterschool program (Ford & O’Donnell, 2013). This leads back to parents view on ASP and how their perspective plays a crucial role in students’ involvement with ASPs. Parents perception of the programs and its benefits to their children will be a major influence on whether or not they want to enroll their children in the program.

Features of Quality ASPs

ASPs do not receive the recognition that it deserves for its work in education and child development. Others may only perceive ASPs as a safe place for children to attend when they have nowhere else to go during after school hours and there is no other relevance for the program. In reality, there are several features of ASPs that makes it a quality program for the community. Here are some of the important features: the staff, staff relationship with the students, diverse activities, and program’s flexibilities and their concurrent associations with child developmental outcomes (Bolt et al., 2010).

Staff in ASP plays a crucial part in the program. The staff brings the guidance, support, and nurturing aspects that children and adolescents crave and need, particularly when they do not receive it at home. When a staff is able to build trust and a positive relationship with the students, it allows staff to have a better understanding of the student and their needs, which leads to greater service for all. Staff training is also a crucial piece to having an effective ASPs especially for programs that have specific target goals such as improving students literacy skills (Hirsch, Mekinda, & Stawicki, 2010). It is also important to train staff who are inexperienced in the ASP field because of its different structure than a classroom setting. Program directors and coordinators should require all new staff to have a training/shadowing week (Wade, 2015).

Lastly, ASP staff wages also plays an important factor. In addition to not receiving the recognition that ASP staff deserves, the wages for the staff far less competitive than any other childcare jobs. This is partly caused by others, outside the field, viewing the job as equivalent to babysitting (Wade, 2015). Other features like diverse activities and program’s flexibility allows parents the option to either provide opportunities for their children to participate in enrichment classes or have them enroll in the school’s ASP (Bolt et al, 2010). Some parents opt not to have their child be involved in any ASP and that may be due to limited source of income (Byrd & Zhang, 2006). The review of all factors will allow us to understand what is the primary reason families partake in any ASPs or not. I will look into the local and the program’s policies and how it impact the ASPs as a whole and individually (Wu & Van Egeren, 2010).

The Impact on Student’s Wellbeing

ASP impact on the overall student’s well being has been mixed with both positive and negative outcomes. There are many aspects that ASP affect from social/emotional functioning,  positive outlook on physical health and nutrition (Beets, Beighlem, Huberty, Weaver, &  Webster, 2012), and academic achievement depending on the students the different level (Byrd & Zhang, 2006, Ford & O’Donnell, 2013, & Wade, 2015). Also, I will analyze how ASPs have various impacts on different types of adolescent like at-risk youth. At-risk youth group may have higher expectations set for them and the outcome will be focused more on their actions and it can rehabilitate the negative behaviors (Kremer, Maynard, Polanin, Sarteschi, & Vaughn, 2014). The goal is to gain knowledge on what features contribute to quality ASPs and finding more about the results of the effects it has on students’ success and wellbeing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resources

Afterschool Alliance (2019). Afterschool in California – New Data: From a Time of Risk to a Time of Opportunity. https://afterschoolalliance.org/policyStateFacts.cfm?state=CA

Beets, M. W.,  Beighle, A., Huberty, J., Weaver, Robert G., &  Webster, C. (April, 2012). A Conceptual Model for Training After‐School Program Staffers to Promote Physical Activity and Nutrition. The Journal of School Health, Vol.82(4), pp.186-95.

Bolt, D. M., Pierce, K. M., & Vandell, D. L. (2010). Specific Features of After-School Program

 

Quality: Associations with Children’s Functioning in Middle Childhood. Am J Community Psychol, 45:381-393. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9304-2.

Byrd, C. and Zhang, J. (October, 2006). Successful After-School Programs: The 21st Century Community Learning Centers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,  pp.3-6,12

Hirsch, B. J., Mekinda, M. A., & Stawicki, J. (2010). More Than Attendance: The Importance of After-School Program Quality. Am J Community Psychol, 45:447–452. https://doi-org.jpllnet.sfsu.edu/10.1007/s10464-010-9310-4

Kremer, K., Maynard, B., Polanin, J., Sarteschi, C., & Vaughn, M. (2015). Effect of After-School Programs With At-Risk Youth on Attendance and Externalizing Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol.44(3), pp.616-636.

Mahoney, J. L., Parente, M. E., & Lord, H. (2007). After-School Program Engagement: Links to Child Competence and Program Quality and Content. Elementary School Journal. Vol.107 (4), pp.385-404.

Ford, J. & O’Donnell, P. (2013). The Continuing Demand for 21st Century Community Learning Centers across America: More than four billion dollars of unmet need; Peterson, T., Fowler, S. and Dunham, T.F. (2013). “Creating the Recent Force Field: A Growing Infrastructure for Quality Afterschool and Summer Learning Opportunities.” Expanding Minds and Opportunities: Leveraging the Power of Afterschool and Summer Learning for Student Success. Washington, D.C.: Collaborative Communications Group.

U.S. Department of Agriculture – USDA. (n.d.) Retrieved on November 2019. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Eligibility. https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/recipient/eligibility  

Wade, C. E. (2015). The longitudinal effects of after-school program experiences, quantity, and regulatable features on children’s social–emotional development. Children and Youth Services Review. 48:70-79. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.007.

Wu, H. J.  and Van Egeren, L. A. (2010). Voluntary Participation and Parents’ Reasons for Enrollment in After-School Programs: Contributions of Race/Ethnicity, Program Quality, and Program Policies. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.42(4), pp.591-620.

 

Youth.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2019. Afterschool Programs. From https://youth.gov/youth- topics/afterschool-programs.

 

 

 

 

How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet?

Polish Political Science Yearbook vol. 46 (2) (2017), pp. 105–117
DOI: 10.15804/ppsy2017207 PL ISSN 0208-7375
Karolina Wojtasik
University of Silesia (Poland)
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations
Use the Internet?
Abstract: The article gives general characterisation of the ways in which these
organizations use modern communication technologies. Currently, every major
terrorist organisation maintain robust media wings, which focus on producing
videos, publishing magazines and sharing them with the public via the Web. The
empirical system of reference is based on the activity of al-Qaeda, her franchise
AQAP (al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula) and ISIS (the so-called Islamic State).
While analysing the media of terrorist organisations, the Lasswell model was applied.
This formula is a standard research procedure used for investigating acts of
communication by answering the questions: who, says what, in which channel,
to whom, with what effect?. The author also present typology of videos produced
by jihadist organisations, characterised the most important and active media actions
of terrorist organisations and a typology of recipients of such messages.
The article presents a number of reasons why the Internet has become such an
important tool for terrorists
Keywords: ISIS; al-Qaeda; AQAP; terrorist propaganda; terrorist media, Cyber Terrorism
Introduction
The effectiveness of terrorist activity depends on its scale. More spectacular and severe
actions have a better chance to realise the political and strategic goals of terrorist
groups. It should be underlined that terrorists have always been dependent on the
media which showed, quoted and, so to speak, mediated in spreading fear. However,
for years terrorist organisations did not have any impact on the content and quality
of the broadcasted communiqués. Currently, terrorist groups have their own media
106 Karolina Wojtasik
wings, periodicals, editors and camera operators. The Internet and modern technology
has allowed terrorist groups to disseminate content which they can fully control.
VHS cassettes containing instructions on bomb assembly, recruitment propaganda
or recordings of leader speeches were already used for propaganda and instructional
purposes during the Soviet–Afghan War (1979 – 1989), long before the emergence
of the so-called Islamic State. However, these materials were prepared in Arabic or
languages used in Afghanistan (e.g. Pashto, Dari), thus were available only to a limited
group of people. Also, due to the lack of distribution possibilities provided by the
Internet, these publications were received only by the people directly involved in
combat. Nowadays, terrorist organisations reach fighters from the West who have
undergone radicalisation (children of Muslim immigrants or people with European
passports who converted to Islam), been inspired by the so-called lone wolves and
radicalise people who often do not know Arabic – thus there is a need to prepare
materials in English. Numerous publications available online promote radicalisation,
show methods of operation, provide practical guidelines and inspire action. Films
produced by terrorist organisations play a similar function. Radical online leaders
have become as dangerous as the mujahideen).
The aim of this article is to characterise some aspects of the use of the Internet in
the activities of terrorist organisations and to attempt to analyse this phenomenon. The
authors focus on creation and distribution of the publications of terrorist organisations
and present how these materials spread fear and introduce an atmosphere of anxiety.
A number of threads related to the presence of terrorists in the media and medial
image of terrorism was omitted because these topics are raised in publications from
the fields of security, media and social communication (Białek, 2005; Goban-Klas,
2009; Liedel, 2006) , whereas the media of terrorist organisations aren’t popular area
of research.
An in-depth study analysed various materials – publications of terrorist organisations
(magazines, films, music, posters, books) officially made available by organisations
such as al-Qaeda, AQAP1 (al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula) and ISIS (the so-called
1 Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) – Islamist militant organization, which is active
in Yemen and Saudi Arabia (but also inspires and gives guidance how to prepare a terrorist attack
to volunteers all over the world), considered the most active and dangerous of al-Qaeda’s branches.
AQAP is responsible for numerous attacks and acts of terror in Jemen and Saudi Arabia, as well as
for the attack on the offices of satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris in January 2015.
Islamic State (IS) – Salafi jihadist militant group, which proclaimed unrecognized quasi-state
on the occupied territories in Iraq and Syria. Organization or organization’s followers execute
terrorist attacks all over the world (also in EU and USA). Various governments and Muslim groups
rejecting its statehood that’s why abbreviation ISIS/ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (Sham)/
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet? 107
Islamic State). The above organisations were selected due to their high media activity
and professionalism in production. The aim of the study is a general characterisation
of ways in which these organisations use modern communication technologies.
The theoretical system of reference is based on social communication theories
and terminology related to communication science. The official media of terrorist
organisations are part of the mass media – means of mass communication which are
public communication channels characterised by having an institutional communicator,
collective transmission multiplexed by technical means and heterogeneous, and an
unstructured community of anonymous recipients (Pisarek, 2008, p. 121). However,
it should be noted that these media types are specific – the messages are produced by
terrorist organisations and are strongly marked by ideology and the propaganda of
the organisation. While analysing the media of terrorist organisations, a formula of
research procedure was applied used for investigating acts of communication called the
Lasswell model. It was chosen particularly because it includes the effects of an act of
communication (Pisarek, 2008, p. 109 – 110) which is very important from the point
of view of the subject matter in question. The Lasswell’s model of communication was
developed by American communication theorist and introduced in 1948 in article The
Structure and Function of Communication in Society. It is regarded one of the earliest
conceptual models used to explain human communication processes. According to
Harold D. Lasswell the best way to describe the act of communication is to answer
the following questions: who? says what? in which channel? to whom? with what
effect? In this model, the communication component who refers communicator, says
what refers to the type of message, in which channel refers to the medium, to whom
refers to audience and with what effect refers to effect of an act of communication.
This model has a lot of advantages: it is simple and easy, it suits for almost all types
of communication and takes into consideration the concept of effect, but also is
criticized: it’s linear model, it doesn’t mention feedback and noise.
Who is Talking?
Terrorist organisations are not random, chaotic groups of unstable sociopaths. Such
a stereotypical image, which is still prevelant in public opinion, is untrue and detrimental
from the point of view of preventive action. Terrorist groups usually have
Levant) is commonly used as it was the official name of the organization between 2013 – 2014.
There is also used an acronym DAESH created from the Arabic name of the organization. The
organization pledge allegiance to AQ and participated in its fight with Western forces in Iraq War
(2003 – 2011) but in 2013 broke alliance and started fight down AQ.
108 Karolina Wojtasik
a strategy of action, a goal and tactics adjusted to it – leaders of such groups calculate
costs and benefits, assess the risk and their decisions are often rational, well thought out
and fully informed (Bolechów, 2010, p. 23 – 46). A contemporary terrorist organisation
has to function as a well-managed company. It needs efficient system of command,
organisation of activities, a system of recruitment and training new members. It also
requires a spokesman, skilful specialists in the media, public relations, information
and propaganda. Also a well-organised logistics network as well as financing and
communication systems are necessary for such organisations to function efficiently,
especially when operating from the underground (Jaworski, 2006, p. 52 – 57).
According to the report Evolution of Jihadi Video (Intel Center, 2005), Palestinians
and Chechens were the first ones to film military actions and partisan fighting.
The leader of Chechen troops, Ibn al-Khattab (Thamir Saleh Abdullah) quickly
realised that although successful attacks on Russian outposts weaken the enemy, they
bring relatively small results. Due to an information blockade the Russian public
did not know that Russian soldiers suffered defeat and that the government did not
control the situation. Filming military activities also had another, equally important
purpose – raising the morale of other fighters. Video recordings presenting successful
missions and victories inspired and motivated militants to fight in very difficult and
unfavourable conditions. Thus groups under the command of Ibn al-Khattab recorded
everyday aspect of the unit: skirmishes with Russian soldiers, well-organised ambushes
and war councils.
In 2000, the group released a 40-minute film entitled Russian Hell No. 1. The aim
of this recording was to show that Chechen militants were successful, well trained
and ruthless towards captured enemies. The film is an amateur production shot by
random people who did not receive training on video-recording and probably had only
a simple VHS camera. A cameraman, whose hands constantly shook and who did not
have the frame under full control, poorly administered the zoom in/out feature. The
film consists of several fragments and presents partisan combat, successful ambushes
against Russian soldiers, destroying their equipment as well as killing and finishing
off captives. The sound is of poor quality, thus instead of sounds of combat viewers
can hear pieces of vocal music, the so-called nasheed, melodic, wistful songs about
the beauty of combat and dying in the name of God (Allah), sung a cappella.
The idea was quickly copied by al-Qaeda2 who a couple months later produced
a 2-hour film entitled The Destruction of the Destroyer USS Cole. It soon became the
ambition of every major terrorist group to document their achievements. Due to the
development of the Internet and technological advancement filming and making acts
2 Shortly before the 9/11 attack.
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet? 109
of terror public has never been so easy and cheap. In 2002 a journalist, Daniel Pearl,
was killed in Pakistan by terrorists, who forced him to give a statement in which
he condemn USA foreign policy. The statement and moment of death were filmed
and initiated the barbarian way of dealing with hostages. Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi,
the founder of jihadi organization, which later transformed itself into ISIS, used the
strategy of shocking by cruelty. In May 2004, a masked man (probably Zarqawi)
slashed the head of Nick Berg, an American citizen. The decapitation was filmed. The
organization has carried out about ten similar executions. Making movies showing
cruelty has become a steady terrorists’ strategy. This trend has continued for several
years, although a lot has changed since the first cassettes with speeches delivered by the
then leader of al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, or the film recorded in 2004 presenting
a masked man3 decapitating Nicholas (Nick) Berg were brought out into the open.
Amateur productions shot with a shaky hand, in random places, full of blurred shots
and weak sound have been replaced by films refined in every detail, shot in outdoor
locations, professionally edited video and audio, directed according to a script. Al-
Furqan Media, which produce films for ISIS, specialises in such productions.
The empirical system of reference of this article is the activity of ISIS and AQAP,
although these are not the only organisations which use media and the so-called new
media. An interesting example is the media wing of Lebanese Hezbollah, TV station
and portal al-Manar (the Beacon), which for years has propagated controversial views
and promoted behaviours threatening national security (calls for attacking Israel and
the USA, encouraging suicide attacks). Although the station also shows news from
other spheres of life, the actions of the Party of God are always presented in a positive
way. The portal offers a lot of downloadable material and mobile apps, also in English
and French. As demonstrated by the example above, the Internet is currently the most
popular ground used by terrorist organisations for publishing, communicating and
exchanging information.
Currently, teams of specialists from groups such as al-Hayat Media Center (associated
with ISIS), al-Malahem Media (associated with AQAP), as-Sahab and al-
Fajr Media Center (media wing of al-Qaeda) and al-Furqan Instytute (ISIS) prepare
professionally informative and propaganda-like campaigns, produce documentaries,
online magazines and directed executions4. They prepare various materials and publications.
3 Most likely it was Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.
4 All magazines and videos discussed in the article are in the author’s archive.
110 Karolina Wojtasik
What is Being Said?
A special term has been coined for the film productions created by fundamentalist
terrorist group – jihadi video production. In 2005, a typology of these types of films
was created (Intel Center, 2005, p. 6 – 7):
They include the following:
1. videos presenting an organisation, its goal and leaders (produced videos),
2. videos showing the operation of an organisation – skirmishes, attacks, fighting,
but also integration with civilian population, helping and supporting them
(operational videos),
3. videos showing hostages (hostage videos) – as confirmation of kidnapping,
informing viewers about the demands of a group or presenting an execution
of hostages,
4. videos showing statements (statement videos) related to alliances, changes in
the leadership, plans of an organisation, claiming responsibility for an attack,
declarations of committing more acts of terror,
5. videos which commemorate a dead, important leader/member of an organisation
(tribute videos),
6. videos showing elements of militant training (internal training videos); produced
either for an organisation’s own use or for promotional purposes,
7. videos with instructions/tips (instructional videos) which mainly present ways
of making improvised explosives5 or instructing how to handle a firearm
(dismantling, and cleaning a weapon, shooting positions).
Productions of terrorist organisations’ meia outlets are not only presented as videos.
Current online publications also include magazines, books, manuals, films and music.
A considerable part of these publications contain instructional and propaganda-like
materials for future fighters. Terrorist organisations extend the scale of operation
and recruit fighters from outside of the area of conflict, frequently from the broadly
understood West, also those who do not speak Middle Eastern languages. Thus more
and more materials on the Web are published in English (mainly), French, German
and Russian. These publications are prepared extra professionally because terrorist
groups, especially those with substantial funds, have teams of media specialists at their
disposal, often even separate divisions responsible for media communication.
The first issue of magazine entitled Inspire was published by AQAP in 2010.
Although it was not the first English-language jihadi magazine (Hegghammer,
5 IED – Improvised Explosive Device – a homemade explosive device intended to be used
in a terrorist attack or a diversion.
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet? 111
2010), its high quality, easy access and publicity accompanying every issue made it
regarded first well-known, easily accessible magazine published by terrorist. Between
2010 – 2016, 16 issues of the periodical have been published. AQAP, famous for very
well-functioning media base, published also Ṣadā al-Malāḥim (Echo of the Epics)
magazine and frequently uploads manifests and short videos on the Web. Inspire is
an instructional and propaganda magazine which features interviews with terrorist
group leaders, commanders, Muslim clerics, and contains stories of mujahids from
various parts of the world, also Europe, it documents the organisation’s achievements,
describes in detail acts of terror committed by the organisation, and presents reportages
from training camps. However, it mainly provides professional instructions on how
to make various kinds of explosives and other ways of killing a civilian population in
large numbers. The authors of the texts explicitly call for committing acts of terror
on the territories of EU and the USA.
The purpose of Inspire has been delineated in the first issue – to turn a Muslim
into a mujahid fighter6. The authors, aware that there are millions of Muslims all over
the World whose mother tongue (or official language of their country of residence) is
English, prepared grounds for exchanging information, a place people will address the
issues related to ummah7 and jihad8 which is an indispensable asset into the rebirth
of the Caliphate (Inspire, 2010, p. 2). The above assurances does not differ from
declarations included in publications promoting Islam. However, on one of the pages
of the fifth issue of the magazine information about the failed terrorist attack from
2009 by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab who boarded an American plane carrying an
improvised explosive device which ultimately did not explode. The would-be suicide
bomber was described as a hero and his action was praised. The authors asked the
readers to pray for this brave fighter and encouraged all Muslims who take issue
with the presence of the Crusaders (citizens of the broadly understood West) in the
Arabian Peninsula to attack embassies. Soldiers working for Western armies or “puppet
governments” in the Middle East are encouraged to commit acts of terror just like
Nidal Hasan did, using all available means, in the name and for the glory of Allah
(the one and only God) so that Islam would dominate the world (Inspire, 2010, p. 5).
6 Mujahid – someone who struggles for the sake of Islam, person engaged in jihad. Currently
this term is used when referring to religiously-inspired Muslim fighters who participate in guerilla
fights or fight against governments which they do not accept.
7 Ummah – the community of believers, all people following Islam.
8 Jihad – a term referring to all efforts made towards spreading and strengthening Islam:
mainly through internal struggle and spiritual development of the follower or converting infidels.
Radical terrorist groups define jihad as an armed struggle against infidels. In the media this term
is frequently but not accurately translated as „holy war”.
112 Karolina Wojtasik
The article includes threats against Americans who support governments responsible
for the deaths of Muslims. The anonymous author claims that an army of people
who do not care about their own lives will soon come to murder, spread fear and it
will be impossible to stop them (Inspire, 2010, p. 5). The above issue also features an
interview with the then leader of AQAP, articles about outlooks on life, a selection of
news from the world, sections related to caricatures of Muhammad and an appeal of
bloody revenge for those insults. Due to these types of articles Inspire does not only
promote Islam, but armed jihad as well. It is a source of information and inspiration
for potential lone wolves who can familiarize themselves with the methods of killing
civilian population in the section entitled Open Source Jihad, which gives direct
instructions how to prepare terrorist attack
Equally glaring but not as a frequently discussed example is the so-called Cosmopolitan
for female jihadists. Al-Shamikha magazine was issued by the media group al-Fajr
Media Center associated with al-Qaeda. The only available issue of this magazine (in
Arabic) appeared online and in print in 2011. A version in English has never been
published, although AQAP issued in that time, for example, the Inspire magazine in
English.
At first glance, Al-Shamikha looks like any other women’s magazine or, to be more
precise, a periodical addressed to stereotypical readers of women’s press. The magazine
is designed with a pastel colour scheme, the texts are ornamented with decorative
margins, fonts and many illustrations. The pink colour does not match the barrel of
a sub-machine gun on the cover and the title Meeting with a mujahid’s wife. Moreover,
in the table of contents (Al-Shamikha, 2011, p. 2) we can also find a position of the
following type: Marrying a jihadist, Sharia law that applies to you, A female martyr
and a supplement Your house is your kingdom with an advice section. Modern in
form and conservative in content, the periodical is not so much a guide addressed
to female readers as a certain kind of manifestation of the views of the organisation
which publishes it. Interviews, essays, pieces of advice included in – as stated in the
subtitle of the magazine – a magazine for Islamic female jihadists, clearly show the
kind of role a woman in a militant state should play. The cover story, Meeting with
a mujahid’s wife, is a long and moving interview with a widow of a fighter who died
in battle. The heroine of the interview in a diffused and emotional manner tells about
a dream which possesses her life. Umm Muhanad, as this is the name under which
the widow appears, emphasises from the moment when she learned that mujahideen
fight in Chechnya and Bosnia that she wanted to become a wife of one of them (Al-
Shamikha, 2011, p. 9 – 12). She speaks with great detail about the joy of being a life
companion to a fighter and about the importance of her role. She expresses the hope
that her children will share the fate of their father while she will support them in their
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet? 113
steps to becoming mujahideen and then shahids. When asked whether a woman is
an obstacle to a fighter or helps in fulfilling his mission, she answers that a wife who
is supportive and who shares her husband’s point of view is very important for a true
mujahid. The interview ends with a message to other women who also have lost their
husbands – mujahideen that they should remember that a great blessing has befallen
upon them.
It is uncertain whether the heroine of the interview exists or not, she is probably
some form of a model character. This is how the authors of the publication would like
to see women in the society under their rule. The topic of the advantages of marrying
a mujahid also appears in the article Marrying a jihadist. Such relationships, says
the author (female author?), is not only about life, but a joy which leads straight to
Paradise. Marriage with a fighter, concluded with the blessing of Allah, is a pleasure
of giving and a delight of obedience (Al-Shamikha, 2011, p. 18). Life of a model
dignified or majestic woman, as this is how the Arabic title of the magazine can be
translated, is not only limited to lofty glorious matters. In the section entitled Your
house is your kingdom the readers can find a number of tips related to lifestyle and of
carrying one’s appearance. The authors write that 90% of a woman’s beauty is her
skin, warning against the harmful influence of the sun which damages it irreversibly
(Al-Shamikha, 2011, p. 23 – 30) and concludes: out of concern for your beauty it
is best to stay at home. The following page includes a recipe for a honey mask and
a promise that the next issue will feature a recipe for a peel-off mask – in sha Allah.
However, the second issue was never released.
In Which Channel?
Informational and propaganda materials are mainly published online and, due to
social networking sites, spread quickly duplicated in millions of copies. Terrorist
organisations have official social network accounts on Facebook or Twitter, publish
propaganda and informational content, respond to questions on portals like ask.fm.
However, their strength does not lie in their official accounts but in the hundreds of
thousands of profiles of their supporters and sympathisers who exchange information,
publish visual materials, establish friendships with potential recruits, and communicate
with each other. They frequently use encrypted apps and apply the Internet to the
purposes of their organisations in a very professional manner. An eminent journalist
and a Middle East expert summarises the strength of ISIS media with the following
words: “Half of Jihad is Media” is one slogan posted on a jihadist website, which,
taken broadly, is wholly correct. The ideas, actions, and aims of fundamentalist Sunni
jihadists are broadcast daily through satellite television stations, YouTube, Twitter, and
114 Karolina Wojtasik
Facebook. As long as such powerful means of propagandizing exist, groups similar
to al-Qaeda will never go short of money or recruits (Cockburn, 2014, p. 168).
To Whom?
There is no propaganda message addressed to everyone. Similarly, the media messages
created by ISIS and other terrorist organisations differ depending on the target group.
Several target groups can be distinguished:
1. potential fighters; videos produced for them show fighting, brotherhood of
arms, modern equipment and man’s adventure. They are told about their
religious duty to participate in armed jihad.
2. sympathisers and activists; although they will not take part in fighting directly,
their social networking accounts and contact networks will serve as a speaking
tube for the propaganda. Due to thousands of radical followers of ISIS and
al-Qaeda, videos or music spreads throughout the Internet with lightning
speed.
3. potential sponsors and decision-makers; The success of terrorist organisations
depends, on the one hand, on the money of radical sympathisers from the
Arabian Peninsula and, on the other hand, regional powers which wage a proxy
war in Syria and Iraq.
4. local enemies of the organisations; ISIS shows brutality to spread fear among
Iraqis and Syrians, fuel hatred between Sunni and Shia Muslims, decrease morale
of the enemy’s armies, break the resistance of civilians, conquer new territories
(which will be ruled by terror) and look for support among the undecided.
5. radicals living in the West; the propaganda of ISIS, al-Qaeda and AQAP
skillfully reinforces their radical views, inspires to carry out acts of terror and
help those who organise them.
6. Western societies; in materials of terrorist organisations they are referred to
as infidels, Crusaders or Zionists. The aim of those publications is to spread
terror in Western societies, maintain the atmosphere of fear and uncertainty,
deepening radical attitudes and hostility.
It should be noted that media messages of terrorist organisations fit perfectly the
media’s demand for brutality and tragedy which sell much better than good news.
At a time when the public wants shock, horror and blood, ISIS media wings deliver
exactly the needed materials which are prepared professionally. They do not require
high financial expanses, editing or substantial processing and are ready to be included
in the evening prime time news. Thus terrorists can influence the way in which they
are presented in the media.
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet? 115
With What Effect?
In the 1980s, fighters arrived to join the holy war in Afghanistan (the Soviet–Afghan
War), in the 90’s to Bosnia and Chechnya and finally at the beginning of the 21st
Century to Iraq (2003), Somalia (2006) and Afghanistan (2001). Volunteers identifying
themselves with various forms of armed jihad who fight and die in conflicts
and wars for many decades are referred to using the acronym FTF (foreign terrorist
fighters). Currently, terrorist organisations such as the so-called Islamic State, al-
Qaeda or al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula reach out to fighters from the West who
undergo radicalisation by accessing publications in English.9 These include strictly
propaganda materials as well as manuals and guides which can be divided into two
categories – publications which are created for volunteers10 who are preparing to
come to the Middle East and publications for radicals who are spreading terror in
the infidels’ countries.
Out of 70,000 mujahids fighting for the so-called Islamic State, foreign volunteers
constitute 40% (Schmid, Tinnes, 2015, p. 7 – 8) and the majority of them are from the
Middle East11. Currently, it is estimated that around 30,000 fighters from more than
100 countries (Schmid, 2015, p.1) have joined the ranks of ISIS mujahids – around
6,000 comes from Europe. Although volunteers have also joined the al-Nusra Front,
80% of the newcomers fight under the aegis of the Caliphate. It should be stressed that,
although decisions to leave Europe and join a terrorist organisation is a result of various
circumstances and motives, social networking sites and recruitment propaganda
of terrorist organisations play an important role (self-reference) in this matter.
The publications of terrorist organisations are consulted by so-called lone wolves.
The 2015 San Bernardino terrorist attack was carried out on the December, 2 by
a Pakistani couple (an American male of Pakistani descent and a Pakistani female) who
had no criminal record and weren’t on the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) list.
During an office Christmas party for employees of centre for persons with disabilities,
which was attended by almost 100 people, Syed Rizwan Farook (b. 1987) with his wife
Tashfeen Malik (b. 1986) opened fire and killed 14 people, injured 21 and fled the
scene. They left behind an IED (constructed according to the instructions provided
in the al-Qaeda’s Inspire magazine no. 1/2010) hidden in a backpack which was
supposed to explode when the emergency personnel responding to the event would
arrive. The device failed to explode and was disarmed by a bomb squad. The couple
9 The magazines of these organisations are also available in French, German and Russian.
10 For example Hijra to the Islamic State (2015) [n.p.].
11 The largest numbers from Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Libya and Jemen.
116 Karolina Wojtasik
had no ties with any terrorist organisations, was not a part of any terrorist cell and
had become radicalised over the past several years prior to the attack (but before the
emergence of ISIS as a ‘state’).
Conclusions
Firstly, the Internet is a speaking tube for propaganda, a place for recruitment of
future fighters and, most importantly, a ground allowing rapid dissemination of
content and information which are important to terrorist organisations. Terrorist
groups have special departments managing media and communication strategy of
the organisation. They publish materials of very high quality, make efficient use of
modern technologies and social media.
Secondly, the activities of terrorist organisations, seemingly chaotic and random,
are in fact a thought-through method of operation. Terrorists’ methods, means and
strategy are constantly evolving toward higher efficiency and effectiveness.
Moreover, terrorism is an effective use of violence and fear, achieving political
goals by skilful manipulation of the use of force (real or potential) and the impression
evoked by it (Białek, 2005, 33).
Thirdly, he propaganda of terrorist organisations skilfully exerts influence on
minds and hearts of young radicals, fuels their hatred and provides them avenues for
action. It speaks their language, adjusts the level of the messages to the intellectual
capabilities of the receivers and chooses arguments very carefully. Furthermore, the
spectacularism of operation and low detectability causes Salafi organisations to inspire
lone wolves to carry out acts of terror. The Internet is an ideal ground for uploading
propaganda materials and instructions.
References:
Bolechów, B. (2010). Terroryzm: aktorzy, statyści, widownie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe
PWN.
Białek, T. (2005). Terroryzm: manipulacja strachem. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Studio EMKA.
Cockburn, P. (2014). Państwo Islamskie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Goban-Klas, T. (2009). Media i terroryści. Czy zastraszą nas na śmierć? Kraków: Wydawnictwo
Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Evolution of Jihadi Video (2005). Intel Center. Retrieved from https://intelcenter.com/EJV-PUBv1
– 0.pdf.
Hegghammer, T. (2010). “Un-Inspired”. Jihadica. Retrieved from: http://www.jihadica.com/
un-inspired/.
How and Why Do Terrorist Organizations Use the Internet? 117
Holtmann, P. (2012). „Virtual Jihad: A Real Danger”. In R. Lohlker, New Approaches to the Analysis
of Jihadism: Online and Offline (pp. 9 – 14). Goettingen: V&r Unipress.
Jaworski, M. (2006). „Ekonomia a terroryzm”. In K. Liedel (Ed.), Terrozyzm. Anatomia zjawiska
(pp. 21 – 66). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Scholar
“Letter from the editor” (2010). Inspire, 1p. 2. Retrieved from https://azelin.files.wordpress.
com/2010/06/aqap-inspire-magazine-volume-1-uncorrupted.pdf.
Liedel, K. (Ed.) (2006). Terrozyzm. Anatomia zjawiska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Scholar.
“Marrying a jihadist” (2011). Al-Shamikha, 1, p. 18. Retrieved from https://www.archive.org/
stream/AlshamikhaMagazine/AlshamikhaM#page/n17/mode/2up.
“Meeting with a mujahid’s wife” (2011). Al-Shamikha, 1, p. 9 – 12. Retrieved from https://www.
archive.org/stream/AlshamikhaMagazine/AlshamikhaM#page/n7/mode/2up.
Pisarek, W. (2008). Wstęp do nauki o komunikowaniu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie
i Profesjonalne.
Schmid, A.P., & Tinnes, J. (2015). “Foreign (Terrorist) Fighters with IS: A European Perspective”,
The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague, 6(8), pp. 1 – 69. DOI: http://
dx.doi.org/10.19165/2015.1.08.
Schmid, A.P. (2015). “Foreign (Terrorist) Fighter Estimates: Conceptual and Data Issues “, The
International Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague, 6(4), pp. 1 – 21, Retrieved from https://
www.icct.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ICCT-Schmid-Foreign-Terrorist-Fighter-Estimates-
Conceptual-and-Data-Issues-October20152.pdf.
“The Operation Of ‘Umar Al-Faruq Al-Nigiri In Response To The American Aggression On
Yemen” (2010). Inspire, 1, p. 5. Retrieved from https://azelin.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/
aqap-inspire-magazine-volume-1-uncorrupted.pdf.
“Your house is your kingdom” (2011). Al-Shamikha, 1, p. 23 – 30. Retrieved from https://www.
archive.org/stream/AlshamikhaMagazine/AlshamikhaM#page/n21/mode/2up.
Author
Dr Karolina Wojtasik
University of Silesia, Institute of Sociology. Contact details: ul. Bankowa 11, 40 – 007 Katowice,
Poland; e-mail: karolina.wojtasik@us.edu.pl.

In what ways does gender and/or race matter in global politics?

ESSAY GUIDANCE

Question:

  • In what ways does gender and/or race matter in global politics? Use example(s) to illustrate your answer.

Guidelines on essays

  • Keep to the word count
  • Be consistent in referencing
  • Include a bibliography/reference list
  • Proof read your work before you submit it – check for spelling mistakes and grammatical problems
  • You can use images/pictures as these do not affect the word count (apart from any ‘title’ that goes with the image)
  • Familiarize yourself with the marking criteria for Politics essays
  • Start you essay with the title – In what ways does gender and/or race matter in global politics? Use example(s) to illustrate your answer.
  • Introduce the object/issue/topic you will discuss.
  • Say what first drew you to this object/issue/topic and where you came across it. Also say what argument or main claims you want to make in the essay. Remember that an essay isn’t about your ‘opinion’, but is about putting forward claims or arguments which you make on the basis of your reading of the literature (books, articles etc).
  • Briefly contextualise the object/issue/topic – why did you choose it? What, initially, do you think it has to do with global politics? Some might be more obvious than others – but something has grabbed your attention enough to write about it for your essay.
  • Next explain how the essay will proceed/be structured
  • Say what framework or approach you are going to use to carry out your discussion. You might be using a specific theoretical approach – you might be delving more widely into the ‘gendering’ or ‘race-ing’ of the object/issue/topic. Be explicit. Don’t assume the reader knows the answers to these things.
  • Then have your discussion about the gender (race etc) of the object/issue/topic.
  • Have a conclusion – remind the reader why gender and/or race matters in the context of global politics in regard to the object/issue/topic you have discussed. Be explicit.

 

 

 

What did you find most problematic about the healthcare system issue?

Write a reflection paper based on what you learned about the Healthcare System Issue topic of your interest during your literature review. You can very well use your first paper, and change the perspective from author’s third person to first person. It is completely acceptable to just re-write your first paper, reflecting on your findings, adding your opinion, etc. You are not starting anything from scratch! If you did not do so on your first paper, do not forget to use the titles below

PLEASE REFER TO ID 2299485329

Describe the public health issue that you researched during your literature review. Use articles or pieces of information you found to justify and reference your statements. Try to answer the following questions:

What did you find most problematic about the healthcare system issue?
Is there a possible solution to the healthcare system issue? What recommendations can help solve the public health issue?
Should more people in your community care about the issue and why?
Overall how do you feel about what you have learned about the healthcare system

What is emotivism? Why does it make the apparent fact of moral disagreement so problematic?

Part One (25pts)

Answer one of the following two questions. The response should be clear, well-reasoned and developed, approximately 1-2 pages in length.

What is emotivism? Why does it make the apparent fact of moral disagreement so problematic? Discuss the pros and cons of viewing morality as emotivism does. Provide analysis and include appropriate citations.

If cultural relativism were really true, would social reformers (e.g., Martin Luther King or Gandhi, etc.) be justified in their disagreement with their culture “norms” and still be right, ethically speaking? Why or why not. Provide analysis and include appropriate citations.

Part Two (50pts)

Answer the following question. Response should be approximately 1-2 pages in length.

Compare and contrast utilitarianism and natural law theory in their analysis of a moral act. Include an analysis of the principle of double effect and apply both theories to a contemporary moral issue. Include appropriate citations and analysis.

Part Three (25pts)

Answer one of the following two questions. Again, responses should be clear, well-reasoned and developed, and approximately 1-2 pages in length.

What are the main similarities and differences between traditional ethical theories and virtue ethics? What are the most important questions in ethics as far as virtue ethics is concerned? Do you agree or disagree that those are the most important ethical questions? Analyze, explain, and cite.

Has your study of ethics in this course affected your ethical views in any significant respect? If so, in what significant respects have your views changed? What particular topics have we covered that have caused those changes in your views? Be specific and provide appropriate analysis and citations.

Why is the manner of your distribution important? What demographic data would be most appropriate to gather in the survey?

Develop questions for an employee survey to determine the views of department leadership and whether there is an inclusive workplace culture in PMC’s Lima plant, and make distribution recommendations on how the survey is sent and to who should receive it.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Apply models that drive employee satisfaction. ◦Develop questions to evaluate PMC’s department leadership.

◦Develop questions to assess PMS’s inclusive workplace culture.

◦Recommend how and to whom the survey is distributed.

  • Communicate human resource management needs, opportunities, and strategies effectively with multiple stakeholders. ◦Communicate in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for human resource professionals.

Instructions

As part of the Power Manufacturing Company’s HR team, you have been asked to create a survey for PMC’s Lima plant employees. There are 600 workers at this location. The goal of this survey is to determine the employees’ view of department leadership and whether there is an inclusive workplace culture.

Requirements

Create a 10-question employee survey and include the following in your analysis:

  • Develop questions to evaluate PMC’s department leadership. Create 5 questions and a scale. Support your rationale for why these questions and scaling would be effective for collecting and analyzing data to draw valid conclusions.
  • Develop questions to assess PMS’s inclusive workplace culture. Create 5 questions and a scale. Support your rationale for why these questions and scaling would be effective for collecting and analyzing data to draw valid conclusions.
  • Recommend how and to whom the survey is distributed. Why is the manner of your distribution important? What demographic data would be most appropriate to gather in the survey? How many employees would make a good representative for the survey findings?

Your Leadership and Culture Survey and analysis should demonstrate writing skills through the accurate communication of thoughts that support a central idea and use of correct grammar and mechanics as expected of a human resources professional.

Additional Requirements

  • References: Support your analysis with at least 3 academic, scholarly, or professional resources from the Capella University Library.
  • Format: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format.
  • Length: 6 pages, not including the references list.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Refer to the Leadership and Culture Survey Development scoring guide to ensure that you meet the grading criteria for this assessment before submission.

 

 

Is the selection of participants described and the sampling method identified?

Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues (2005) Vol 6, No 1
45
Abstract
A new framework for critiquing health-related research
is presented in this article. More commonly used existing
frameworks tend to have been formulated within the
quantitative research paradigm. While frameworks for
critiquing qualitative research exist, they are often
complex and more suited to the needs of students
engaged in advanced levels of study. The framework
presented in this article addresses both quantitative and
qualitative research within one list of questions. It is
argued that this assists the ‘novice’ student of nursing
and health-related research with learning about the two
approaches to research by giving consideration to aspects
of the research process that are common to both
approaches and also that differ between quantitative and
qualitative research.
Key words
Research critique; critique framework; heath research.
Introduction
When undertaking an undergraduate programme in
health related studies, as in many other academic
disciplines, students are required to demonstrate the
ability to read, understand and critique research reports.
Health research was at one time guided by the ‘medical
model’. However, though this model remains influential,
Polgar & Thomas (2000) suggest that there have been
changes in the role and status of other health
professionals that have brought different perspectives,
and require different approaches to research. A more
holistic approach now influences how health care is
conceptualized, and how research is conducted. The
methodology of social research has become an accepted
part of health research.
Green and Thorogood (2004) state that “health research
includes any study addressing understandings of
human health, health behaviour or health services,
whatever the disciplinary starting point” (p5). They
further suggest that health research may expand
knowledge of society and health, or address an existing
health care problem. Undergraduates of health related
studies therefore have to consider health research in its
broadest sense.
A common method of assessing understanding both of
the subject area and the research methodologies utilized
within that subject area is the presentation of a detailed
critique of a piece of published research. Our experience
in teaching students across a range of programmes in
Nursing, Health Sciences/Studies, Health Promotion
and Health Policy programmes has taught us how
difficult many of our students find this task. With the
help of funding from the Learning Development Unit we
undertook a project to develop, implement and evaluate
a research critique framework that students could use as
a guide.
This article analyses the content of frameworks that are
commonly used to critique quantitative research and
frameworks that are commonly used to critique
qualitative research and then presents a single
framework that addresses both research approaches.
This new framework is currently being used to assist
teaching and learning activities relating to the critical
appraisal of published research. As such, it is still in the
developmental stage and as teachers we continue to
reflect on the application of this framework to our
teaching. Feedback from students is essential to this
development and the article presents evaluations from
students who have been involved in learning activities
during the early developmental stage of the framework.
This evaluation is continuing and we would also welcome
comments from our colleagues.
The need for a research critique
framework
The need for able and competent health care
practitioners is self-evident. One way of ensuring
competence is through evidence based practice and
health professionals are expected to be intelligent
consumers of research, and this entails the ability to
read, understand and apply published research
(Murdaugh et al, 1981).A change of culture arose
Developing a framework for critiquing health research
BSc, PhD, RN, RNT, PGCHE, ILTM, Head of the Institute of Nursing and Midwifery,
School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University
BA, MPhil, RN, RGN, RNT, CertED, Senior Lecturer in Nursing, School of Health and
Social Sciences, Middlesex University
BA, MSc, PGDip, RN, DN, CertED (FE), Senior Lecturer in Health Studies, School of
Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University
Kay Caldwell,
Lynne Henshaw,
Gina Taylor,
following the move of colleges of nursing into the further
and higher education sector, resulting in an educational
culture where critical enquiry and evidence-based
practice is accorded greater priority (Benton, 1999). Most
students are introduced to research methods and critical
appraisal during their undergraduate education, or
preparation for professional practice. Yet McCaughan et
al (2002) report that qualified nurses reported problems
in interpreting and using research. MacAuley et al (1998)
highlighted how GPs who had been introduced to a
model of critical reading were shown to have applied a
more appropriate appraisal to studies than those who
relied on critical appraisal skills acquired previously.
Whilst literature in relation to the ability to critically
appraise research is abundant in relation to nursing and
to a lesser degree in medicine, there is an emerging body
of evidence in relation to other health care professionals.
Chalen et al (1996) identified several barriers to
research-mindedness in radiographers, including a lack
of knowledge of research methodologies. Domholdt et al
(1994) noted that this group had particular difficulty in
identifying concerns with construct validity.
Work in the field of health and health care is multidisciplinary
and involves a variety of approaches to
research. Further the range of such research is wide,
from concerns with the relationship between the health
needs of a population to aspects of the provision of health
services (Bowling, 2002). Government policy and
professional guidance insist that professional practice
should be based on evidence (Gomm & Davies, 2000).
While Pearson & Craig (2002) elaborate on the need for
nursing practice to be evidence-based, the need for
evidence-based health promotion has been highlighted
by Perkins, Simnett & Wright (1999), who also point out
that the achievement of the targets of ‘Our Healthier
Nation’ depend on the commissioning and
implementation of effective health promotion
programmes.
Given the primacy placed on the use of evidence in the
field of health and health care, it is important that
students are enabled to critique published research in
order to determine the usefulness of that research in
their chosen field of work. By ‘critique’ we mean the
ability to critically appraise published research by
identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the research
and forming judgements concerning its overall quality
and applicability.
Research in the fields of nursing, health studies, health
promotion and health policy can be of a quantitative or
qualitative nature: both research approaches provide
valuable information for the disciplines and often
complement each other. As such, students are required
to read and critically review quantitative and qualitative
studies. However, many of the available frameworks for
conducting a critical review are written within the
quantitative paradigm (e.g. Benton & Cormack, 2000;
Polgar & Thomas, 2000). There has been a tendency to
evaluate qualitative research against criteria appropriate
to quantitative research (Sandelowski, 1986). This can
result in students attempting to analyse qualitative
research within a quantitative framework and thus can
lead to unjustified criticism, for example, quantitative
frameworks for critique will direct students to raise
questions concerning reliability and validity, rather than
confirmability, dependability, credibility and
transferability. These activities, which may lead to
students appropriating the language of quantitative
research when critiquing qualitative research, can only
serve to perpetuate the view of qualitative research as a
‘soft science’ and detract from its value as a research
approach in its own right that aims to acquire
information that is different from that acquired by
quantitative research (Leininger, 1994).
There has been considerable debate concerning whether
quantitative and qualitative research can be assessed
using the same criteria (Mays & Pope, 2000). While
there are many criteria that will be common to both
research approaches such as the identification of an
appropriate question, the choice of an appropriate
research design, the conduct of a thorough and relevant
literature review, there are also discrete areas of
difference. For example, variables are not always given
operational definitions in qualitative research as
sometimes the aim of the research is to seek definitions
of the concepts from the viewpoint of the informants.
Various frameworks were reviewed and the common
features that relate to quantitative and qualitative
research were identified. In general guidelines tend to
reflect the philosophies of the respective approaches in
that guidelines for quantitative research tend to be in the
form of checklists, whereas guidelines for qualitative
research tend to be more discursive.
Frameworks for critiquing
quantitative research
The framework presented by Sajiwandani (1996)
provides a useful checklist covering points that are
appropriate for critiquing quantitative research relevant
to nursing and health care students and provides an
explanation and rationale for critique. Polgar & Thomas
(2000) also provide guidelines specific to the critical
evaluation of quantitative research papers. Benton &
Cormack (2000) offer criteria for critical evaluation of
research but do not state that their criteria are intended
for use with a particular research approach, however, the
criteria are written within the quantitative framework in
so far as they refer to hypothesis, operational definitions,
validity and reliability of any instruments or
questionnaires. Treece & Treece’s (1986) classic text
offers a comprehensive list of questions to aid critical
evaluation, but again it is written within the quantitative
paradigm.
The website of cybernurse
(http://www.cybernurse.org.uk/research/Reading_and
_Critiquing_Research.htm) offers a framework for the
46
Developing a framework for critiquing health research
Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues (2005) Vol 6, No 1
47
areas that should be considered when critiquing a
research report. There is no indication regarding which
research approach this framework can be used for, but in
terms of data analysis only statistical analysis is
mentioned, yet hypotheses are not mentioned. In
addition, there are many important omissions, for
example, research design, recommendations,
limitations.
While considering a range of frameworks focusing on
quantitative research the areas that appeared most
consistently were in relation to the research design;
hypothesis, operational definitions, population and
sampling, sampling methods, validity and reliability of
data collection, data analysis and generalizability.
However, there were a plethora of critique frameworks
that focused on very specific designs, rather than on
generic quantitative research, and these of necessity had
far more detailed guidelines for critique. The website of
the University of Wales
(www.uwcm.ac.uk/library/critical_appraisal/forms)
offers different frameworks for appraising systematic
reviews; randomised control trials; trials without
randomisation; cohort (longitudinal) studies; casecontrol
studies and cross-sectional studies. This in itself
pre-supposes a level of research design awareness that is
likely not to be evident in undergraduate students during
the early stages of their programmes of study.
While there appears to be some degree of consensus
concerning the areas that should be addressed when
critiquing quantitative research the situation is less clear
when it comes to qualitative research.
Frameworks for critiquing
qualitative research
Hammersley (1992), writing specifically concerning
ethnography, provides criteria for assessing
ethnographic studies. Questions are raised concerning
the extent to which new theory is produced, how far is the
theory developed and how novel are the claims made. He
also refers to the credibility and transferability of the
findings, as well as the influence of the researcher on the
findings. Mays & Pope (2000) refer to the increase in
interest in assessing the quality of qualitative research
and, drawing on the earlier work of Hammersley (1992),
identify two broad criteria: validity and relevance. These
authors acknowledge that these concepts can also be
used when assessing the quality of quantitative research,
but when used in relation to qualitative research they
need to be operationalized differently to reflect the
distinctive goals of qualitative research.
The website of the Public Health Resource Unit
(http://www.phru.nhs.uk/~casp/qualitat.htm) presents
a framework for critically appraising qualitative research
built around ten questions, with supporting detailed
guidelines. Areas that are specific to qualitative research
include the relationship between the researcher and the
participants and rigour in relation to data analysis.
Greenhalgh & Taylor (1997) provide an overview of the
nature of qualitative research and again suggest a
framework for critique based on nine questions with
supporting guidance. In terms of being specific to
qualitative research, the authors refer to the need to
acknowledge the researcher’s perspective, a detailed
description of methods used for data collection, quality
control measures in data analysis and the credibility of
the results and the transferability of the findings to other
settings. Forchuk & Roberts (1993) claim that there is a
paucity of guidelines for examining qualitative work and
provide a framework for this purpose, which is aimed at
undergraduate nurses and other health professionals.
The authors cover Leininger’s (1990) criteria for rigour,
but with minimal explanation. Overall the guidelines are
relevant and useful for qualitative studies, but the journal
may not be readily accessible to all health studies
students.
Highly specialized texts exist that offer advice, discussion
and debate, concerning the evaluation of qualitative
research (Leininger, 1994; Morse & Field, 1996; Kuzel &
Engel, 2001), and, inter alia, refer to issues like the
context of the research and the need for an audit trail.
Frameworks for critiquing both
quantitative and qualitative
research
Gomm, Needham & Bullman (2000) provide questions
to be asked concerning quantitative research, in terms of
three sections: Questions to ask about data collection
instruments; questions to ask about experiments;
questions to ask about surveys, case finding (or ‘clinical
epidemiological’) studies and case control studies. They
also provide questions to ask about qualitative research
in which attention is drawn to the setting of the research,
the researcher’s role in the research and the relationship
of the study to other research in the field.
Stevens, Schade, Chalk & Slevin (1993) provide a chapter
on evaluating research in a book aimed at health care
professionals. This is perhaps one of the most misleading
guides in terms of evaluating qualitative research. A
framework for research evaluation is provided and at the
beginning it is acknowledged that qualitative research is
not necessarily performed and presented in the same
format as quantitative research. It is further stated that,
in the light of this, reference will also be made to
qualitative research. Though reference is made to
qualitative studies, it is inadequate and sometimes
misleading, for example, in the methods section
reference is made to validity and reliability in measuring
instruments, but qualitative methods are ignored.
Further, in the results section qualitative findings are not
mentioned.
Nieswiadomy’s (1998) guidelines for critique appear to
follow the quantitative paradigm, however, she does
stress that not all studies require a hypothesis and that
“studies of a purely descriptive nature” (p342) may not
contain hypotheses, in which case research questions
may be used. Also, under the section headed ‘Research
Design’, Nieswiadomy states that quantitative designs
and qualitative designs are evaluated using different
criteria. However, limited advice is offered to guide
qualitative critique. Valente (2003) provides a
framework that mentions quantitative and qualitative
research in some sections, for example, method, but
refers solely to quantitative in others, for example,
analysis. Overall, the framework is heavily biased
towards quantitative research, and when both
approaches are discussed it is not clear which approach
is being addressed.
The website of the University of Wales College of Medicine
(www.uwcm.ac.uk/library/critical_appraisal/forms)
provides a series of guides on critical appraisal of
research studies, all taking the format of a table that
identifies a question and directs the reader to answer by
ticking ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘can’t tell’, but with no guidance as to
what should be considered when answering the question.
The questions are focused towards critically appraising
the research for the purpose of ascertaining its relevance
to practice, and assumes a high level of knowledge of
research methods in order to be able to answer the
questions, so would be difficult for undergraduates to use
effectively.
Parahoo (1997) takes account of both quantitative and
qualitative approaches to research and provides a list of
broad headings that encompass both approaches. The
guidelines are comprehensive in terms of quantitative
research, but less so for qualitative research. Each point
for critique initially addresses quantitative strategies and
is followed by a paragraph suggesting a different
approach for qualitative work. For example, Parahoo
states “in qualitative studies, researchers may not want
to be influenced by previous research. They should,
however, give a rationale and make reference to the
relevant literature” (p363). However, qualitative
research is addressed with less rigour than quantitative
research and the less discerning student may well
confuse the two approaches. The guidelines fail to clearly
set out the different criteria for each strategy, for
example reliability and validity are discussed, but
confirmability, dependability, credibility and
transferability are not referred to. However, attention is
also drawn to the need for rigour and an audit trail.
In a book written for nurses, LoBiondo-Wood & Haber
(1994) provide two separate chapters for quantitative
and qualitative critique. Dealing with the two strategies
in different chapters could be difficult for the novice
student who is still trying to internalize the difference
between the two approaches. However, both are dealt
with thoroughly and do provide useful guidelines for the
more advanced students. They make useful crossreferences
to other chapters in the book. Hek (1996)
highlights the importance of critical evaluation as a
means by which nurses can practice knowledgeably, and
stresses the importance of developing critical evaluation
skills, recommending a six-stage process. Quantitative
and qualitative research are both addressed within a
specific guide to the sections of the research that should
be considered, but the complex integration of
quantitative and qualitative critique might be confusing
to the novice student. Some essential components, such
as setting, population and sample are omitted. Further,
the guide is presented in textual format and so some
detail can be lost.
Burns & Grove (2001) offer frameworks for both
quantitative and qualitative research in nursing,
acknowledging the need for differing approaches to the
critique of different types of studies. While their
framework for quantitative research includes the
standard topics like research objectives, questions or
hypotheses, the definition of variables, the identification
of independent and dependent variables, validity of
instruments, statistical procedures, when it comes to
qualitative research, other questions are raised. Burns
and Grove thus refer to ‘descriptive vividness’, looking
for clarity and factual accuracy of the researcher’s
account of the study. The context must be clear as data
are context-specific. Rigour in qualitative research
demands a clear account of the study elements, e.g. the
philosophy, the role of the researcher, the process.
Auditability and a decision trail are also required and any
theory derived from the study must reflect the data.
DePoy & Gitlin (1998) provide ‘guiding questions’ to
critically evaluate quantitative and qualitative research
studies. They present two adjacent lists, headed
‘experimental-type’ and ‘naturalist inquiry’, each with
very similar questions except for the entry for
quantitative research concerning validity and reliability,
where its qualitative counterpart refers to
trustworthiness.
Polit & Hungler (1999) offer separate guidelines for
quantitative research and for qualitative research. These
are thorough and complex and are presented in sections,
for example, guidelines for critiquing research problems,
research questions and hypotheses; guidelines for
critiquing research literature reviews, and so on. The
guidelines for quantitative research vary little from those
already reviewed. The guidelines for qualitative research
include reference to the research tradition within which
the study is carried out and highlight that the research
question and methodology should be consistent with the
research tradition. Again, an accurate description of the
research design is required, as is trustworthiness of the
data. Credibility, transferability, dependability and
confirmability are included in the guidelines. In terms of
data analysis, Polit and Hungler state that the themes
48
Developing a framework for critiquing health research
Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues (2005) Vol 6, No 1
49
should represent the narratives and there should be
evidence of accuracy of the researcher’s analysis and that
the context of the research should be clear. Polit and
Hungler’s framework for critiquing research is also
available on a web-site
(http://www.sonoma.edu/users/n/nolan/n400/critique
.htm). This is a comprehensive framework, but complex
and not easily accessible for novices.
Development of a new framework
Having reviewed a range of published research critique
frameworks, the first step was to identify the common
features (Table 1). Following this the strengths of
individual research critique frameworks were identified.
This enabled us to develop a framework that had areas
that were common to both quantitative and qualitative
approaches, and areas that were specific to each (Figure
1). To support the diagrammatic framework guidelines
are available and provide the teacher and the student
with an extended explanation of each item. Examples of
these guidelines are as follows:
Item in Research Critique
Framework Guideline
Is the literature review comprehensive and up-to-date? The literature review should reflect the current state of
knowledge relevant to the study and identify any gaps for
conflicts. It should include key or classic studies on the topic as
well as up to date literature. There should be a balance between
primary and secondary sources.
Quantitative:
Is the sample adequately described and reflective of
population?
Both the method of sampling and the size of the sample should
be stated so that the reader can judge whether the sample is
representative of the population and sufficiently large to
eliminate bias.
Qualitative:
Is the selection of participants described and the
sampling method identified?
Informants are selected for their relevant knowledge or
experience. Representativeness is not a criteria and purposive
sampling is often used. Sample size may be determined through
saturation.
Is the conclusion comprehensive? Conclusions must be supported by the findings. The researcher
should identify any limitations to the study. There may also be
recommendations for further research or, if appropriate,
implications for practice in the relevant field.
Quantitative Qualitative
Research design Philosophical background
Experimental hypothesis Research design
Operational definitions Concepts
Population Context
Sample Sample
Sampling Sampling
Validity/reliability of data collection Auditability of data collection
Data analysis Credibility/confirmability of data analysis
Generalizability Transferability
Table 1: Common features of research critique frameworks
50
Developing a framework for critiquing health research
Does the title reflect the content?
Are the authors credible?
Does the abstract summarize the key
components?
Is the rationale for undertaking the
research clearly outlined?
Is the literature review comprehensive
and up-to-date?
Is the aim of the research clearly stated?
Are all ethical issues identified and
addressed?
Is the methodology identified and justified?
Quantitative Qualitative
Is the study design clearly identified, and is the
rationale for choice of design evident?
Are the philosophical background and study
design identified and the rationale for
choice of design evident?
Is there an experimental hypothesis
clearly stated?
Are the key variables clearly defined?
Are the major concepts identified?
Is the population identified? Is the context of the study outlined?
Is the sample adequately described and reflective
of the population?
Is the selection of participants described
and the sampling method identified?
Is the method of data collection valid and reliable? Is the method of data collection auditable?
Is the method of data analysis valid and reliable? Is the method of data analysis credible and
confirmable?
Are the results presented in a way that is
appropriate and clear?
Is the discussion
Are the results generalizable? comprehensive Are the results transferable?
Is the conclusion comprehensive?
Figure 1: – Research critique framework
Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues (2005) Vol 6, No 1
51
Use of the framework
The framework is designed to be used both as a teaching
tool and as an aid to assessment. One of the motivating
factors for producing a framework was to provide clarity
and to ensure fairness for those students undertaking a
critical review of a research paper for assessment
purposes. During our experiences of helping students to
perform such critical review we had found that some
students had been unable to discriminate between those
questions that are appropriate to ask of quantitative
research and those that are relevant to qualitative
research. We hoped that by placing the questions that are
appropriate for the respective research approaches in
one single framework we would be able to facilitate the
clarification of some of the theoretical positions that
inform the respective research approaches and thus, in
turn, aid understanding of the need to pose different
questions. Thus, the framework can also be used in the
classroom for facilitating learning, and as a tool for group
activity.
Experience has demonstrated that it is the practice of
critically reviewing a research report that is valuable in
the learning process. Small group work provides the
student with opportunities for rewarding engagements
(Quinn, 1995), it allows students to work independently
and to discuss and clarify learning. In small groups
students have been provided with both quantitative and
qualitative research papers and have used the framework
and guidelines to produce their review. Feedback of the
review to the larger group allows further discussion and
development of knowledge and understanding.
The critique framework was used in teaching sessions
with two groups of under-graduate nursing and health
studies students and one small group of post-graduate
students. Nineteen students completed an evaluation
form. The numbers of students responding to particular
questions on a 0 – 5 scale are shown in Table 2. Students
were also asked two open questions:
• What did you like most about the framework?
• What did you like least about the framework?
What did you like most about the framework?
In response to the first question, the responses can be
grouped under two headings: ease of use and practical
application.
Ease of use
Students liked the presentation of the framework and
described it as straightforward, succinct and precise. The
fact that it fits on one page was pleasing to the students
and there were also comments relating to its simplicity
and brevity.
Practical application
Students found the framework easy to follow and
understand, describing it as very easy and very helpful.
They described the structure and the questions as good
and stated that the framework will help them to advance
their skills relating to the research process and methods.
It was also felt that the framework provides a useful
guide for critiquing research.
What did you like least about the framework?
Some comments suggested that the framework was too
short and could be more elaborate, but eight students
stated that there was nothing they disliked about it.
Discussion
We recognise that the comments presented here
represent the contributions of a small number of selfselecting
students and there is a need for a more
systematic approach to the evaluation of this framework.
This will be undertaken as the framework continues to be
used in classroom activities with students. However, the
current contributions from students do provide some
early indications of the potential value of the framework.
Overall, the students found the framework easy to use
and useful in terms of covering both quantitative and
qualitative research and helpful when carrying out a
critique of published research. Student responses to the
framework were largely positive, suggesting that it is a
0 1 2 3 4 5
How easy was the framework to use?
0 = not at all easy; 5 = very easy
2 5 5 7
How useful is it to have a framework covering both
quantitative and qualitative research?
0 = not at all useful; 5 = very useful
1 7 11
As a learning tool, to what extent did the framework help you
to appreciate the features that:
a) are common to all research?
0 = not at all; 5 = to a great extent
4 8 7
b) are specific to quantitative research? 3 13 3
c) are specific to qualitative research? 5 8 6
To what extent did the framework help you to carry out a
critique of a piece of research?
0 = not at all; 5 = to a great extent
2 8 9
Table 2: Evaluation of the Framework for Research Critique
useful tool in aiding learning about research and in
undertaking a research critique. The undergraduate
students who used the framework are required to
critique a piece of published research for their
assignment in their research methods module and it is
evident that they felt that the framework would help
them with this task.
Students responded favourably to the questions relating
to the features that are common to all research,
quantitative and qualitative research. However, in this
brief evaluation it was not possible to explore this
further, for example, by asking them why their responses
were positive or what in particular they found helpful.
This will form part of further evaluation as the
framework is used more widely.
Unlike some frameworks for research critique, this
framework gives equal weight to both quantitative and
qualitative research and uses the language of both
paradigms. In this way, students do not attempt to
critique qualitative research using a framework and
terms originally designed for quantitative research.
While students could be referred to two separate
frameworks, and students continue to be able to choose
to use separate frameworks, we believe that the
incorporation of the two approaches into one framework
serves to assist learning and reinforces the differences
between quantitative and qualitative research for the
‘novice’ student of research methods. Having acquired
understanding at an introductory level, advanced
frameworks are available for both research approaches
when, and if, students require greater depth at a more
advanced level of study.
Conclusion
Though the framework and guidelines were initially
designed for students working at both level two and level
three, it has also been found valuable with more
advanced students. Those undertaking masters level
study are frequently given the more complex task of
writing a critical literature review in preparation for a
research proposal or research report. Those students
who have not undertaken academic study for some time
find this daunting, and often request revision. The
framework has proved to be a useful tool in this activity.
For assessment at level two and three, students are
frequently required to critically review a paper of their
choice. Provision of the framework, with the assessment
guidelines, provides a direction for all students. The
inclusion of both strategies ensures that whatever the
choice of paper all students have guidelines with which to
work.
The framework, then, is of value in both teaching and
assessment at level two and three, and is also a
potentially useful teaching tool for masters level
students. It can be used as a teaching tool and displayed
on an overhead projector or on PowerPoint. It can also be
easily copied as a one page handout for students to work
with in the classroom or to take away for study. Further
use of the framework is required, but the intention is to
place it on WebCT, with the guidelines available as
‘clickable links’. As such, it will also serve as a revision
aid and will allow students to test their own knowledge,
clicking on those areas where they feel they need further
explanation. The next stage is to facilitate a more
systematic evaluation of this framework: we also
welcome comments from our colleagues.
References
Benton, D. C. (1999). Clinical effectiveness. In S. Hamer
and G. Collinson (Eds.) Achieving Evidence-Based
Practice. A. Handbook for Practitioners. Edinburgh:
Baillière Tindall.
Benton, D. C. & Cormack, D. F. S. (2000). Reviewing and
evaluating the literature. In D. F. S. Cormack (Ed.) The
research process in nursing (4th Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell
Sciences Ltd.
Bowling, A. (2002). Research methods in health.
Investigating health and health services (2nd Ed.).
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Burns, N. & Grove, S., K. (2001). The practice of nursing
research. Conduct, critique and utilization (4th Ed.).
Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Chalen, V., Kaminski, S. & Harris, P. (1996). Researchmindedness
in the radiography profession. Radiography,
2, 2, 139-51.
DePoy, E. & Gitlin, L. N. (1998). Introduction to
research. Understanding and applying multiple
strategies (2nd Ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
Domholdt, E., Flaherty, J. & Phillips, J. (1994). Critical
appraisal of literature by expert and inexperienced
physical therapy researchers. Physical Therapy, 74, 9,
853-60.
Forchuk, C. & Roberts, J. (1993). How to critique
qualitative research articles. Canadian Journal of
Nursing Research, 25, 4, 47-55.
Gomm, R. & Davies, C. (Eds.) (2000). Using evidence in
health and social care. London: Sage.
Green, J. & Thorogood, N. (2004). Qualitative methods
for health research. London: Sage.
Greenhalgh, T. & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper:
Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research).
British Medical Journal, 315, 740-743.
52
Developing a framework for critiquing health research
Journal of Health, Social and Environmental Issues (2005) Vol 6, No 1
53
Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with
ethnography? Methodological explorations. London:
Routledge.
Hek, G. (1996). Guidelines on conducting a critical
research evaluation. Nursing Standard, 11, 6, 40-43.
Kuzel, A. J. & Engel, J. D. (2001). Some pragmatic
thoughts about evaluating qualitative health research in
Morse, J. M., Swanson, J. M. & Kuzel, A. J. (Eds). The
nature of qualitative evidence. London: Sage.
Lo-Biondo-Wood, G. & Haber, J. (1994). Nursing
Research (3rd Ed.). London: Mosby.
MacAuley, D., McCrum, E. & Brown, C. (1998).
Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of
critical appraisal in general practice. British Medical
Journal, 316, 1134-1137.
Mays, N. & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in
qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50-
52.
McCaughan, D., Thompson, C., Cullum, N., Sheldon, T. &
Thompson, D. (2002) Acute care nurses’ perceptions of
barriers to using research information in clinicaldecision-
making. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39, 1,
46-60.
Morse, J. M. & Field, P. A. (1996). Nursing research. The
application of qualitative approaches (2nd Ed.).
Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd.
Murdaugh, C., Kramer, M. & Schmalenberg, C. (1981).
The teaching of nursing research. A survey report. Nurse
Educator, 28-35.
Nieswiadomy, R. M. (1998). Foundations of nursing
research (2nd Ed.). Connecticut: Appleton & Lange.
Parahoo, K. (1997). Nursing research. Principles,
process and issues. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Pearson, M. & Craig, J. V. (2002). Evidence-based
practice in nursing. In J. V. Craig and R. L. Smyth (Eds.)
Evidence-Based Practice Manual for Nurses. London:
Churchill Livingstone.
Perkins, E. R., Simnett, I. & Wright, L. (1999). Creative
tensions in evidence-based practice. In E. R. Perkins, I.
Simnett and L. Wright (Eds.) Evidence-based health
promotion. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Polgar, S. & Thomas, S. A. (2000). Introduction to
research in the Health Sciences (4th Ed.). London:
Churchill Livingstone.
Polit, D. F. & Hungler, B. P. (1999). Nursing research.
Principles and methods (6th Ed.). Philadelphia:
Lippincott.
Quinn, F. (1995). The principles and practice of nurse
education (3rd Ed.). London: Chapman.
Sajiwandani, J. (1996). Ensuring the trustworthiness of
quantitative research through critique. Nursing Times
Research, 1, 2, 135-141.
Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in
qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 3,
27-37.
Stevens, P., Schade, A., Chalk, B. & Slevin, O. (1993).
Understanding research. Edinburgh: Campion Press.
Treece, E. W. & Treece, J. W. Jr. (1986). Elements of
research in nursing (4th Ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
Valente, S. (2003). Critical analysis of research papers.
Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19, 3, 130-142.
http://www.uwcm.ac.uk/library/critical_appraisal/for
ms (Accessed January 16 2004).
http://www.cybernurse.org.uk/research/Reading_and_
Critiquing_Research.htm (Accessed January 16 2004).
http://www.phru.nhs.uk/~casp/qualitat.htm (Accessed
January 16 2004).
http://www.sonoma.edu/users/n/nolan/n400/critique.
htm (Accessed January 16 2004).
Kay Caldwell
Head of the Institute of Nursing and Midwifery
School of Health and Social Sciences
Middlesex University
Archway Campus
Furnival Building
10 Highgate Hill
London
N19 5LW
UK
Tel: +44 (0)208 411 6458
Email: k.caldwell@mdx.ac.uk
Lynne Henshaw
Senior Lecturer in Nursing
School of Health and Social Sciences
Middlesex University
Queensway
Enfield,
EN3 4SA
UK.
Tel: +44 (0)208 411 6474
Email: l.henshaw@mdx.ac.uk
Gina Taylor
Senior Lecturer in Health Studies
School of Health and Social Sciences
Middlesex University
Queensway
Enfield,
EN3 4SA
UK.
Tel: +44 (0)208 411 5383
Email: g.taylor@mdx.ac.uk
54
Developing a framework for critiquing health research

Does Prejudice and Discrimination Lead to the Development of Generalized Anxiety Disorder?

Psychology 13: Social Psychology

Paper 2: Literature Review (Instructions: Fall 2019)

Overview:

This paper is worth 10% of your total grade and will require you to write about 5 pages, double spaced, 12 point font, 1 inch margins for the top, bottom, right, and left margins.  This assignment was designed in order to allow you to delve a bit deeper into some facet of social psychology than we’re able to do in class. Learning how to do a literature review taps into and develops critical thinking skills in that you will learn how science progresses, integrate the science with things you already know or will know, and to extrapolate the concepts to new situations.  When we extrapolate, it means we can see applications of what we’ve learned, outside of the narrow situations in which the original information is presented.

In this paper you will write about one of four article choices accessible through the Pierce College website (online library database).  Instructions regarding how to access this database and find these four articles are provided on page 4 of these instructions.  Please browse through these articles and choose which one you find most interesting to you.  NOTE THAT YOU MUST CHOOSE ONE OF THE ARTICLES LISTED BELOW.  CHOOSING ANY OTHER ARTICLE WILL RESULT IN AN AUTOMATIC ZERO.  You will need to have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer to access these articles.  Most computers already have this installed.  If you do not, you can download it for free at… http://get.adobe.com/reader/

Possible Articles…

  1. Social Cognition and Perception… The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy; Feldman & Theiss; 1982; Journal of Educational Psychology
  2. Persuasion… Helpful or Hurtful?; Johnson & Downing; 1979; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Prejudice and Discrimination… Aromatic Discrimination; Baron; 1983; Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Attractiveness… Ugly Equals Bad; Dion; 1972; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Format Requirements:

Your literature review must have a cover sheet (this does not count as 1 of your 5 pages) with the name (you create your own title) of your literature review centered on the page in about 16-point font, and your name, institution, and date of submission in 12-point font, centered below the title.

Example: 

Does Prejudice and Discrimination Lead to the Development of Generalized Anxiety Disorder?

Chadwick J. Snow

Pierce College

  1. The first page of your review should begin right at the top margin.
  2. You will include proper referencing (APA) of the article you review at the very end of your paper. If

you’re not sure how to reference the paper, you can look at the reference list of the article you review  for correct formatting.

NOTE: You should only have ONE reference (the article you chose to review) AND note that the articles listed above are NOT properly referenced.  I want you to look up proper referencing on your own.

  1. NO QUOTING!!! You must be able to write this review in your own words.
  2. MAKE SURE THAT YOU PROVIDE SECTION HEADINGS FOR EVERY SINGLE COMPONENT

THROUGHOUT YOUR PAPER.

  1. Page 5 of these instructions explains the point breakdown for each part below.

 

 

Content Requirements: Part I

Summary:

  1. Begin the first page with a brief introduction which gives some background about the issue you’re reviewing. Why is it an interesting and/or important topic to study? (AT LEAST HALF OF A PAGE)
  2. You will summarize the research paper by:

 

  1. Stating what the authors’ purpose/hypothesis(es) of the study were. (2 to 4 sentences)

 

  1. Describing what they did in the study: the method (including participants / procedure / materials, etc…) they used to test their hypothesis(es). (AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS OF A PAGE)

 

  1. Describing the results of the study. I do not expect you to report statistics, only to give the gist of what the results showed. Was the hypothesis supported or not supported?  How or how not?  Explain thoroughly. (AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS OF A PAGE)

 

  1. Briefly discussing the implications of the results…what do they mean? Don’t just repeat the results; tell me what the researchers think their results mean. (AT LEAST HALF OF A PAGE)

 

 

NOTE: Keep in mind that I have read the study you’re reporting on.  So, I know it very well.  This means you must describe it well enough so that I know you fully comprehend the article you are reviewing.

 

 

 

Content Requirements: Part II

Analysis:

  1. An Unanswered Question(s) (1 to 2 sentences): Discuss at least one question you have about the issue you reviewed that was not answered by your reading of the study.

 

  1. Proposed Modification (AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS OF A PAGE): Propose a way the study can be modified that might help to answer your unanswered question(s).  Issues to address in the proposed modification:

 

  1. Would you use the same type of participants or different participants? For

example, if your study involved children, would you stick with children in your

proposed modification or would you switch to adults?  Why?

 

  1. What different testing materials would use and why would you use them?

 

  1. What is the value of doing this modification (i.e. what makes it special and

important)? Explain thoroughly.  This should be the longest section of your

Proposed Modification.

 

For example: if the study you reviewed was about how sexually abused girls

become fearful of romantic relationships later in life, might you redesign the

materials to determine if there is a specific form of sexual abuse that

increases the likelihood of being afraid of getting involved in romantic

relationships later in life?

 

 

 

 

  1. Application (AT LEAST HALF OF A PAGE): Finally, you’ll explain how what you learned

from the study you reviewed might transfer or apply to a different domain.

 

For example: if the study you reviewed was about how sexually abused girls

become fearful of romantic relationships later in life, how might verbally abused girls

react to social situations, such as parties or friendships; might they become more

introverted?

 

NOTE: The more different your application is from the original study (but still

preserving the underlying concept), the higher your grade for the application section

will be.

 

Your application MUST be different than your proposed modification.  REMEMBER, your modification is a variation of the study you read about.  Your application is creatively applying what you learned to a different (but related) domain of study.

 

Below are examples of what are NOT applications

 

  1. So, sexual abuse is a real problem in our society and can have a negative impact on those who get abused. (This is a conclusion).
  2. So, if sexually abused girls become fearful of romantic relationships later in life, then they might develop serious psychological disorders related to anxiety and depression from being alone all the time. (This is a consequence).
  3. We need to stop sexual abuse now! A massive effort needs to be launched to educate people regarding sex to help prevent sexual abuse from happening. (This is a prescription).
  4. Given that sexual abuse is a problem and needs to be stopped, we must also stop people from eating fatty foods to reduce obesity. (This is an unrelated topic).
  5. Clearly sexual abuse is a problem. The world is so full of problems that we need to eliminate this problem in order to free up time to solve other problems. (This is a piece of crap).
  6. Sexual abuse is a real problem. It’s a mess, just like the world.  Sexual abuse is truly a problem.  The world is such a disaster.  Sexual abuse is horrible. (This is hoping that Prof. Snow is tired from reading all these papers, will see that I have written many words down in this section, and won’t bother to actually read them).

 

 

NOTE:  Part I of your paper should be about 3 pages long and Part II should be at least 1.5 pages long.  DO NOT exceed 5.5 pages total.

 

 

Finally, do not forget your Reference Page.

 

 

If any of this is unclear, COME SEE ME AND ASK ME FOR CLARIFICATION.

 

AN EXAMPLE OF AN EXCELLENT PAPER 2 IS ON THE CLASS WEBSITE.

 

On your syllabus, note the due date of this paper and the consequences for turning it in late.

 

 

 

 

Instructions for Accessing the Four Possible Article Choices using Pierce’s Online Library Database

 

NOTE: Some students have had trouble accessing these articles using Internet Explorer.  You may want to use Google Chrome or some other web browser.

 

  1. Go to: www.piercecollege.edu.

 

  1. Click on “Library”.

 

  1. Click on “Databases A – Z”.

 

  1. Click on “P” and then scroll down and click on “PsycARTICLES”.

 

  1. Follow the login instructions for “Students”.

 

  1. In the search box, copy and paste EXACTLY the following from below (one article at a time of course)…

           

The Teacher and Student as Pygmalions: Joint Effects of Teacher and Student Expectations

 

Deindividuation and Valence of Cues: Effects on Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior

 

“Sweet smell of success”? The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations of job applicants

 

Physical Attractiveness and Evaluation of Children’s Transgressions

 

  1. Under the article title that comes up in the search click on “PDF Full Text”. (NOTE: if more than one result comes up, make sure you choose the one that lists the author mentioned on Page 1 of these instructions).

 

 

That’s it!

 

 

 

REMEMBER:  Do this for all four articles so that you can decide which one you would like to write about.

 

Come see me if you are having trouble with these instructions.

 

 

 

 

Grade Breakdown:

 

 

Name:                                                                        Grade:

 

Note:  YS = Your Score; TP = Total Possible

 

Criteria

 

Format (20 points)                                                  YS       TP

Within prescribed page range                                           4

Cover page                                                                           2

Typing format                                                                        2

Section headings                                                                5

Good editing                                                                         5

Proper referencing                                                              2

Section Total                                                                         20       

 

Article Summary (45 points)                                YS       TP      

Introduction                                                                           7

Purpose/Hypothesis(es)                                                     6

Method                                                                                   12

Results                                                                                  12

Discussion                                                                            8

Section Total                                                                         45       

 

Analysis (35 points)                                               YS       TP

An Unanswered Question                                                 5

Proposed Modification                                                        15

Application                                                                            15

Section Total                                                                         35

 

Total Points                                                                           100

 

 

NOTE:  I expect more time, effort, thought, and written work devoted to components worth more points than to components worth fewer points.

 

 

 

 

Whether the evidence justifies consideration by the court of the issue of reckless conduct?

Hackbart v. Cincinatti Bengals

FACTS:

  • Plaintiff was a professional football player and during a game was hit in the back of the head by the defendant after being blocked by plaintiff.
  • Defendant admitted hitting the plaintiff in the head was intentional
  • Plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence and reckless misconduct
  • Trial court ruled in favor of the defendant stating that football was beyond the realm of imposition of the law for tortious conduct and that the plaintiff assumed the risk inherent in the game.
  • Plaintiff appealed claiming the trial court erred in failing to apply tort principals to the action and evidence of plaintiff’s prior game conduct was improperly admitted at trial.

RULE:

  • Because the jurisdiction to hear or determine case exists in this case, it must be tried on its merits. According to Colorado Constitution, Art. II 6 “court of justice shall be open to every person, property or character; and right and justice should be administered without sale, denial, or delay.” Because of this the district court held that the trial court’s ruling that this case had to be dismissed because the injury was inflicted during a professional football game was error.
  • According to subsection (b) of Rule 404, “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Because the district court did not find the game of football to be on trial, but rather the trial involved a particular act in one game, then the acts of violence which occurred in other games and between other teams and players were without relevance.
  • Because the plaintiff was not shown to have been an unlawful aggressor in the immediate incident, his prior acts are not relevant.
  • Recklessness requires the intent to do the act, but without an intent to cause the particular harm. It is enough if the actor knows that there is a strong probability that harm will result.

ISSUE:

  • The question in this case is whether in a regular season professional football game an injury which is inflicted by one professional football player on an opposing player can give rise to liability in tort where the injury was inflicted by the intentional striking of a blow during the game.
  • Whether the trial court erred in ruling that as a matter of policy the principles of law governing the infliction of injuries should be entirely refused where the injury took place in the course of the game.
  • Whether it was error to receive in evidence numerous episodes of violence which were unrelated to the case at bar, that is, incidents of intentional infliction of injury which occurred in other games
  • Whether it was error for the trial court to receive in evidence unrelated acts on the part of the plaintiff
  • Whether the evidence justifies consideration by the court of the issue of reckless conduct?

ANALYSIS:

CONCLUSION:

The ruling court reversed the trial court’s judgment for defendant and remanded a new trial holding where no law prevented the application of tort concepts to football. They found that the plaintiff had the right to have his tort claims adjudicated and that the evidence of plaintiff’s prior football conduct was irrelevant to claims and improperly admitted.

What particular aspects of religion contribute to this relationship?

http://spp.sagepub.com/
Social Psychological and Personality Science
http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/06/18/1948550613492345
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/1948550613492345
Social Psychological and Personality Science published online 18 June 2013
Ryan S. Ritter, Jesse Lee Preston and Ivan Hernandez
Twitter
Happy Tweets: Christians Are Happier, More Socially Connected, and Less Analytical Than Atheists on
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Association for Research in Personality
European Association of Social Psychology
Society of Experimental and Social Psychology
Additional services and information for Social Psychological and Personality Science can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://spp.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://spp.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
What is This?
>> OnlineFirst Version of Record – Jun 18, 2013
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
Article
Happy Tweets: Christians Are Happier,
More Socially Connected, and Less
Analytical Than Atheists on Twitter
Ryan S. Ritter1, Jesse Lee Preston1, and Ivan Hernandez1
Abstract
We analyze data from nearly 2 million text messages (tweets) across over 16,000 users on Twitter to examine differences
between Christians and atheists in natural language. Analyses reveal that Christians use more positive emotion words and less
negative emotion words than atheists. Moreover, two independent paths predict differences in expressions of happiness:
frequency of words related to an intuitive (vs. analytic) thinking style and frequency of words related to social relationships. These
findings provide the first evidence that the relationship between religion and happiness is partially mediated by thinking style. This
research also provides support for previous laboratory studies and self-report data, suggesting that social connection partially
mediates the relationship between religiosity and happiness. Implications for theory and the future of social science using
computational methods to analyze social media are discussed.
Keywords
Twitter, religion, atheism, happiness, thinking style
Karl Marx (1843/1970) famously asserted that religion is ‘‘the
opium of the people.’’ Though he recognized that religion can
provide comfort in difficult circumstances, for Marx these
benefits were an illusion. The idea that religion hinders true
happiness is echoed by more recent arguments that the world
would be a better place without religion (e.g., Dawkins,
2006; Harris, 2008; Hitchens, 2007). But there is also evidence
for a positive correlation between religion and well-being
(Ferriss, 2002; Hackney & Sanders, 2003; Koenig & Larson,
2001; Poloma & Pendleton, 1990), observed across all four
major world religions (Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, and
Islam; Diener, Tay, & Myers, 2011).
In the present research, we use Twitter data to examine two
related research questions: (1) What is the relationship between
religion and happiness? and (2) what particular aspects of
religion contribute to this relationship?We investigate these questions
in a content analysis of Twittermessages (tweets)written by
religious and nonreligious individuals. This approach has several
important advantages. First, unlike traditional studies that assess
happiness through self-report (i.e., directly asking participants
how happy they are or to recall recent positive and negative
emotion; Diener, Suh, Lucas,& Smith, 1999), Twitter data allow
researchers to observe themood of users by the expression of happiness
(or unhappiness) in natural language. Twitter users are not
directed by survey questions or responding in a laboratory setting
that can trigger demand characteristics and distort accurate
responses. Instead, Twitter users are casually conversing on the
Internet with others on topics ranging from the mundane
(e.g., ‘‘I just saw a chicken cross the road’’) to life changing
(e.g., ‘‘I’m getting married!’’). Twitter can therefore provide a
window into users’ state of mind, in real time, as changes and
events are experienced. Furthermore,Twitter.comis currently the
ninth most popular website in the world, yielding millions of
tweets per day from an extremely large and diverse pool of users
(Alexa, 2012). Twitter thus provides a unique opportunity to
study psychological constructs on a large scale that is not possible
through traditional survey and laboratory methods (Lazer et al.,
2009). Finally, content analysis of Twitter allows us to examine
the linguistic markers of numerous different psychological variables
and their interrelationships simultaneously. In the present
research, we investigated two independent mechanisms that may
help explain the association between religion and happiness—
analytical thinking style and social connection—also observable
by differences in language use.
Thinking Style and Social Connection as Mediators
Whether religious people experience more or less happiness is
an important question in itself. But to truly understand how
religion and happiness are related we must also understand why
the two may be related. What features of religion could produce
1 University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
Corresponding Author:
Ryan S. Ritter, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 603 East Daniel
Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Email: ryan.s.ritter@gmail.com
Social Psychological and
Personality Science
00(0) 1-7
ª The Author(s) 2013
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1948550613492345
spps.sagepub.com
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
differences in happiness? We explored two independent
mechanisms that may mediate the relationship between
religion and happiness. First, believers and nonbelievers may
differ in preference for an intuitive versus analytical thinking
style (Gervais & Norenzayan, 2012; Shenhav, Rand, & Greene,
2011). Whereas intuitive thinking relies on gut feelings to make
decisions, an analytical thinking style emphasizes criticism and
skepticism to draw conclusions (Frederick, 2005). It is easy to see
howdifferences in thinking stylemay be associated with religious
belief. Faith is often characterized by strong emotional conviction
and valued by the very virtue of its uncritical nature. In contrast,
religious disbelief can be characterized by its skeptical approach
to belief. Many scholars suggest that the belief in God is a cognitive
default for humans (Barrett, 2000; Bloom, 2007), and thus
analytical thinking and skepticism may be necessary for one to
reject the dominant belief in God.More important here, however,
these differences in thinking stylemay contribute to differences in
happiness. At its extreme, analytic thinking can foster intense
rumination that can contribute to depression (Andrews & Thomson,
2009).Analytical thinkingmay also diminish the capacity for
optimism and positive self-illusions that typify good mental
health (Taylor & Brown, 1988). If religious people are indeed
happier than nonreligious people, differences in thinking style
may help explain why. But to our knowledge, no previous
research has tested this prediction. Here, we examined whether
nonreligious people exhibit more analytical thinking in their
tweets compared to religious people and whether this could
predict differences in happiness between the two groups.
We were also interested in the role of social relationships as
a mediator between religion and happiness. Several lines of
study have suggested that the quality of social relationships
contribute to overall happiness and well-being (Diener & Seligman,
2002; Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005; Myers, 2000).
Religion frequently provides a tight-knit moral community in
whom group members can trust and depend on for social
support (Graham & Haidt, 2010). In other words, religious
people benefit by being surrounded by an extended ‘‘family’’
with whom they can share in life’s joys and endure its trials.
Consistent with this idea, religious people report having stronger
social relationships than less religious people, and this
difference in social support predicts happiness (Diener et al.,
2011; Salsman, Brown, Brechting, & Carlson, 2005). Another
goal of the present research was to investigate whether this
effect could be observed in natural language on Twitter.
Method
We report how we determined our sample size, all data
exclusions (if any), all manipulations, and all measures in the
study (Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn, 2012).
Procedure
All data were collected using Python v2.7.3, a freely available
and open-source programming language. We gained access to
the Twitter Application Programming Interface using the
Twython package for Python (McGrath, 2012).1
Christian and atheist Twitter users were selected for analysis
by sampling from those who elected to follow the Twitter feeds
of five Christian public figures or five atheist public figures.
The five Christian public figures were Pope Benedict XVI
(@PopeBXVI), Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza), Joyce
Meyer (@JoyceMeyer), Joel Osteen (@JoelOsteen), and Rick
Warren (@RickWarren). The five atheist public figures were
Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins), Sam Harris (@Sam-
HarrisOrg), Christopher Hitchens (@ChrisHitchens), Monica
Salcedo (@Monicks), and Michael Shermer (@MichaelShermer).
The most recent tweet in the sample was from October
1, 2012.
For each of these 10 public figures, we first obtained a list of
their followers and shuffled them into random order. Followers
and their timelines (i.e., recent tweets) were then sampled from
this list at a rate of 150 per hr for a 24-hr period, resulting in
3,600 possible follower timelines per public figure. Only
publicly available follower timelines were accessed and up to
200 of each follower’s most recent tweets were collected. This
process resulted in timelines from a total of 12,849 Christian
followers and 13,367 atheist followers. However, many of
these followers had relatively few tweets in their timeline
and/or did not report English as their language. The final sample
thus included the 7,557 Christian followers (877,537
tweets) and 8,716 atheist followers (1,039,812 tweets) who
self-reported English as their language and had at least 20
tweets in their timeline. Thirteen followers who met all of these
criteria were following both a Christian and an atheist public
figure in our sample and were excluded from the final analysis.
Prior to analysis, each follower timeline was cleaned by
converting all words to lowercase and removing numbers,
hyperlinks, punctuation (except apostrophes), and any mention
of another Twitter user (e.g., @<username>).
The majority of users in our sample either did not self-report
their location (n ¼ 5,252) or reported a time zone in the United
States or Canada (Atlantic ¼ 464; Eastern ¼ 2,377; Central ¼
1,916; Mountain ¼ 472; Arizona ¼ 268; Pacific ¼ 1,238;
Hawaii ¼ 226; and Alaska ¼ 164). The rest of the users
reported locations more sparsely distributed across the world
(e.g., London ¼ 895; Quito ¼ 607; Amsterdam ¼ 263; Beijing
¼ 63; Mumbai ¼ 24; Jerusalem ¼ 14).
Measures
Christian and atheist follower timelines were analyzed using
Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC; Pennebaker,
Chung, Ireland, Gonzales, & Booth, 2007), a computerized text
analysis program. Given a piece of text, LIWC counts the
frequency of words or word stems present in a given language
category and outputs the percentage of words that appear in
each category. The LIWC dictionary includes subdictionaries
measuring objective linguistic categories (e.g., pronouns,
articles, and adverbs) as well as a variety of psychological processes
(e.g., affective, cognitive, and perceptual) and personal
2 Social Psychological and Personality Science 00(0)
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
processes (e.g., work, religion, and leisure). The LIWC dictionary
has been extensively developed and validated (for a
detailed description, see Pennebaker et al., 2007) and has been
successfully applied to the measurement of a wide variety of
constructs (for a review, see Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010).
For example, LIWC reliably detects the positive and negative
emotion words used when people are asked to write about
positive and negative life events (e.g., Kahn, Tobin, Massey,
& Anderson, 2007) and correlates with human judgments of
affective content (e.g., Pennebaker & Francis, 1996). In a
recent investigation on Twitter, researchers used LIWC to measure
within-person fluctuations in affect and found that people
tend to be happiest early in the mornings and on the weekends
(Golder & Macy, 2011).
Happiness. The presence of positive emotions and the absence
of negative emotions each have an independent influence on
happiness (Diener & Emmons, 1984). Here, we operationalized
happiness as the relative frequency of words in LIWC’s positive
emotion dictionary (e.g., ‘‘love,’’ ‘‘nice’’) to the frequency
of words in the negative emotion dictionary (e.g., ‘‘hurt,’’
‘‘nasty’’). In addition, we examined the independent effects
of positive and negative emotion, respectively.
Social Connection and Thinking Style. Social connection was measured
as the frequency of words in LIWC’s social processes
dictionary (e.g., ‘‘mate,’’ ‘‘friend’’) and analytic thinking was
measured using the dictionary of insight words (e.g., ‘‘think,’’
‘‘consider’’). These dictionaries were developed and validated
using the same procedures as the affective dictionaries
described above (Pennebaker et al., 2007) and have also been
used in previous research (e.g., Pennebaker & Francis, 1996).
Religion. We compared the frequency of words in LIWC’s
religion dictionary (e.g., ‘‘God,’’ ‘‘church’’) to validate our
assumptions about Christian and atheist followers’ own religious
beliefs. The religion dictionary was developed along with
the other LIWC subdictionaries.
To avoid any artificial inflation of association among these
variables, we removed a total of 43 words or word stems that
appeared in more than one of the five LIWC dictionaries of
interest (positive emotion, negative emotion, social processes,
insight, and religion). For example, in the unmodified LIWC
2007 dictionary, the stem ‘‘bless*’’ is included in both the positive
emotion and the religion categories, and the stem ‘‘prais*’’
is included in the social processes, positive emotion, and religion
categories. We therefore excluded these 43 words and
word stems, so that common phrases (e.g., ‘‘praise God,’’ ‘‘God
bless’’) did not artificially bias the results.2
Results
Sample Validation
Table 1 provides descriptive statistics and correlations among
all the variables of interest. Christian and atheist followers did
not differ in the percentage of all words captured by the LIWC
dictionary (grand mean ¼ 74.47, p ¼ .70), suggesting that
differences in linguistic content cannot be accounted for by
simple differences in English proficiency.
As expected, Christian followers tweeted words in LIWC’s
religion dictionary more frequently than atheist followers,
F(1, 16271) ¼ 328.51, p < .001; Cohen’s d ¼ .29, and talking
about religion was associated with less negative affect among
Christian followers (r¼.19, p < .001). Conversely, increased
chatter about religion among atheist followers was associated
with more negative (r ¼ .12, p < .001) and less positive affect
(r¼.09, p < .001). These results suggest that the selection of
Christian/atheist followers was indeed a valid measure of
belief/nonbelief.
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics and Zero-Order Correlations.
LIWC Category M SD Religion Social Processes Happiness Positive Emotion Negative Emotion
Christian followers
Religion 1.12 1.59 —
Social 9.36 3.17 0.18** —
Happiness 3.45 2.68 0.09** 0.22** —
PosEmo 5.53 2.31 0.01 0.34** 0.90** —
NegEmo 2.08 1.16 0.19** 0.16** 0.52** 0.10** —
Insight 1.54 0.78 0.03 0.27** 0.06** 0.05** 0.25**
Atheist followers
Religion 0.73 1.16 —
Social 8.08 2.91 0.14** —
Happiness 2.44 2.25 0.14** 0.11** —
PosEmo 4.77 1.93 0.09** 0.29** 0.86** —
NegEmo 2.33 1.15 0.12** 0.27** 0.51** 0.00 —
Insight 1.78 0.90 0.18** 0.27** 0.08** 0.04* 0.21**
Note. LIWC ¼ Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count; M ¼ mean; SD ¼ standard deviation.
Means are expressed as the percentage of total words within follower time lines. Happiness is operationalized as the difference in negative emotion from positive
emotion.
*p < .01. **p < .001.
Ritter et al. 3
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
Main Analyses
Because of our large sample, we adopted a significance criterion
of p < .01 for all analyses. We tested a multiple mediator
model using PROCESS with 10,000 bootstrapped samples
(Hayes, 2012), where religious belief (Christian follower ¼ 1,
atheist follower ¼ 0) was used to predict happiness with social
connection and thinking style included as mediators. We also
analyzed the data separately using positive emotion and
negative emotion as outcomes to investigate the independent
components of happiness.
First and foremost, the predicted relationship between
religion and happiness was supported. Relative to the atheist
followers, Christian followers expressed more happiness in
their tweets (total effect ¼ 1.01, standard error [SE] ¼ .04,
t ¼ 26.21, p < .001; Cohen’s d ¼ .41), reflected in the expression
of more positive emotion (total effect ¼ 0.76, SE ¼ .03,
t ¼ 22.88, p < .001; Cohen’s d ¼ .36) and less negative emotion
(total effect¼0.25, SE ¼ .02, t¼13.95, p < .001; Cohen’s
d ¼.22; see Table 1 for means). Second, as seen in Figure 1,
we found evidence that this relationship is partially mediated
by social connection. Christians talked more about social processes
than atheists (b ¼ 1.27, SE ¼ .05, t ¼ 26.73, p < .001;
Cohen’s d ¼ .42), which in turn was associated with more happiness
(b ¼ 0.17, SE ¼ .01, t ¼ 25.51, p < .001; bPositive Emotion
¼ 0.23, SE ¼ .01, t ¼ 42.56, p < .001; bNegative Emotion ¼ 0.06,
SE ¼ .003, t ¼ 21.44, p < .001). On average, 9.36% of words
used by Christian followers were related to social processes,
compared to 8.08% among atheist followers, consistent with
the hypothesis that religion promotes social support and social
connectivity (see Table 1). Indeed, social connection partially
mediated the effect of religious belief on happiness (indirect
effect ¼ 0.21, 99% confidence interval [CI] ¼ [0.17, 0.26];
indirect effectPositive Emotion ¼ 0.29, 99% CI ¼ [0.23, 0.34];
indirect effectNegative Emotion ¼ 0.08, 99% CI ¼ [0.06, 0.10]).
Next, we investigated differences in thinking style. Atheist
followers were more likely than Christian followers to use
‘‘insight’’ words (b ¼ 0.24, SE ¼ .01, t ¼ 17.92, p <
.001; Cohen’s d¼.28), consistent with predictions that atheists
use a more analytical thinking style (see Table 1 for
means). As seen in Figure 1, analytic thinking was then associated
with less happiness (b¼0.36, SE ¼ .02, t¼15.53, p <
.001; bPositive Emotion ¼ 0.11, SE ¼ .02, t ¼ 5.90, p < .001;
bNegative Emotion ¼ 0.25, SE ¼ .01, t ¼ 23.01, p < .001). Use of
insight words also partially mediated the association between
belief and happiness (indirect effect ¼ .09, 99% CI ¼ [.06,
.11]; indirect effectPositive Emotion ¼ 0.03, 99% CI ¼ [0.01,
0.05]; indirect effectNegative Emotion ¼ 0.06, 99% CI ¼
[0.07, 0.05]). Follow-up analyses revealed another meaningful
pattern of thinking style: Christians and atheists differed
in the kinds of insight words used, independent of mean-level
differences. Christian followers were more likely to use insight
words best characterized by certainty and emotion (e.g.,
‘‘know,’’ ‘‘feel’’), whereas atheist followers were more likely
to use insight words characterized by skepticism and analysis
(e.g., ‘‘thought,’’ ‘‘reason;’’ see Figure 2).3 This interpretation
was further supported with follow-up analyses of the LIWC
dictionaries measuring tentativeness (e.g., ‘‘maybe,’’ ‘‘perhaps’’)
and certainty (e.g., ‘‘always,’’ ‘‘never’’). The
percentage of words expressing tentativeness was lower among
Christian tweets (M ¼ 1.70, standard deviation [SD] ¼ .84)
than atheist tweets, M ¼ 2.02, SD ¼ .94; F(1, 16271) ¼
506.72, p < .001; Cohen’s d ¼ .36. On the flip side of this
effect, the percentage of words expressing certainty was higher
among Christian tweets (M ¼ 1.37, SD ¼ .71) than atheist
tweets, M ¼ 1.34, SD ¼ .75; F(1, 16271) ¼ 6.27, p ¼ .01;
Cohen’s d ¼ .04. These findings are consistent with previous
evidence that atheists have a more analytical thinking style,
whereas believers prefer an intuitive thinking style.
Discussion
In a linguistic analysis of nearly 2 million text messages
(tweets) across 16,273 users on Twitter, we found that
Christians express more happiness than atheists in everyday
language. This relation was partially mediated by linguistic
markers of social connection and thinking style. Christians
were more likely to mention social processes that suggest
stronger relationships and support networks. Simultaneously,
atheists were more likely to use ‘‘insight’’ words (e.g., ‘‘think,’’
‘‘reason’’) that in turn predicted decreased happiness, the first
evidence that thinking style partially mediates the relation
between religion and happiness.
Our results reveal important psychological differences
between believers and nonbelievers, and also suggest reasons
why believers may be happier than nonbelievers in general.
However, these findings should not be taken to mean that
religion is a prerequisite for happiness or that atheists are
doomed to be miserable. Religion itself may not provide the
key to happiness. Rather, religion can promote well-being
through other factors. Such insights can be used to improve
happiness in believers and nonbelievers alike. For example,
atheists may improve happiness by creating strong social
0 = Atheist Follower
1 = Chrisan Follower
Social Connecon
(Social)
Analyc Thinking
(Insight)
Happiness
(Posive Emoon)
(Negave Emoon)
1.27**
-0.24**
0.17**
0.72**
(0.44**)
(-0.28**)
(-0.11**)
(0.25**)
(0.23**)
(.06**)
-0.36**
Figure 1. Indirect effects of religious belief on happiness through
social connection and analytic thinking. Values above the paths represent
effects on happiness (positive emotion minus negative emotion);
values in parentheses below the paths represent effects on positive
emotion and negative emotion, respectively. LIWC dictionary names
are in parentheses. LIWC ¼ Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
**p < .001.
4 Social Psychological and Personality Science 00(0)
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
communities and support networks. Currently, atheists are
among the least trusted groups in American society (Gervais,
Shariff, & Norenzayan, 2011) and are bound to experience some
increased level of rumination and unhappiness due to the problem
of social exclusion. However, Atheism and secularism have
increased in recent years (WIN-Gallup International, 2012), and
the divergence in happiness between believers and nonbelievers
may decrease as Atheism becomes more normative. Indeed,
nonreligious people are equally happy as religious people in nonreligious
nations (i.e., where they fit in; Diener et al., 2011), and
increasing the perceived prevalence of atheism can decrease
anti-atheist prejudice (Gervais, 2011). In other words, increases
in happiness among nonbelievers should parallel increases in the
availability of secular social support resources and increased
feelings of being respected in society, both of which facilitate
increased happiness. Future research measuring Twitter activity
in specific regions or nations (e.g., using self-reported location
information along with geotagged information about the precise
latitude and longitude of tweets) is encouraged to examine
questions related to person–culture fit.
It is important to note that there may be other mediators
and variables that account for the relationship between religion
and happiness that are not captured by these particular
analyses. For example, religion may help provide a meaning
system to believers that resolves existential issues and helps
buffer against anxiety (Inzlicht, Tullett, & Good, 2011),
which is consistent with previous evidence that having purpose
or meaning in life also mediates the association between
religion and happiness (Diener et al., 2011). Here, proclivity
for analytic thinking could hurt or help well-being. Atheists
may come to some unpleasant conclusions on existential
issues through analytical thinking, but they may also derive
happiness and meaning from science as an elegant system
of explanation (Preston, 2011; Preston & Epley, 2009). Additionally,
because we measured associations among these variables
simultaneously, we must be very cautious in interpreting
causality. The associations reported may indeed be mutually
reinforcing and could have causal influences opposite the
directions modeled here. For example, having a strong social
support network and meaningful relationships may cause happiness,
but being happy also causes people to have better
social relationships (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005). Future
research could address these limitations of causal inference
by including time as a variable, or by complementing Twitter
analyses with traditional laboratory-based research methods
that afford more experimental control.
The present studies demonstrated powerful effects by
accessing millions of messages available on Twitter. This
Figure 2. Top 30 differences in usage for words within the LIWC insight dictionary. To create this visualization, we first calculated the
percentage usage of each word within the LIWC insight dictionary for both Christian and atheist followers. We next subtracted the atheist
follower percentage from the Christian follower percentage for each word. Finally, we selected the 30 most divergent words for visualization:
15 representing those used relatively more often by Christian followers and 15 representing those used relatively more often by atheist
followers. The sizes of the circles are scaled to represent overall word usage. The color of the circles and their position along the x-axis are
scaled to represent relative word usage among Christian and atheist followers. Values indicate the number of mentions per 100,000 words,
Christian Count–atheist Count. LIWC ¼ Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count
Ritter et al. 5
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
novel method allows meaningful patterns to emerge in the
specific words people choose to use in tweets, rather than
relying on more traditional self-report methods. Twitter has
considerable advantages as a source of data—its massive scale,
ease of access, high external validity, and fewer demand
characteristics. But of course, it is not without limitations. First,
Twitter users may still engage in some impression management
strategies. Sampling moments are not random and users can
decide exactly what they want to tweet about and when, meaning
people can selectively control the content they want others
to see. This concern is at least partially alleviated by the fact
that Twitter users have no way to know what kind of research
their data may be used for, if at all. There is thus little concern
about the expectations of an experimenter and the impressions
one might make on them.
It is also important to acknowledge that sampling from followers
of major public figures—particularly those on the far
extremes of religious belief and disbelief—may not represent
typical Christians or atheists, and these effects could reflect a
comparison of extremely conservative Christians to militant
atheists. We have also operationalized Christians and atheists
as those who chose to follow public figures well known for
their beliefs. But of course, people can follow these public
figures for reasons wholly unrelated to their religion. Despite
the imperfect nature of this sampling method, the large-scale
nature of Twitter data appears robust. Given that we randomly
sampled from literally millions of possible followers, it is
reasonable to expect a distribution that includes extreme
believers and nonbelievers as well as those with more moderate
or indifferent attitudes toward religion. Most importantly,
we are encouraged by the utility of Twitter data insofar as it
corroborates previous research that has used both laboratorybased
experimental studies (e.g., Shenhav et al., 2011) and
nationally representative samples (Diener et al., 2011). This
convergence suggests that the present findings are not limited
solely to Christian and atheist extremists and that Twitter can
be used to derive novel insights into a variety of phenomenon
of interest to social psychologists.
A final important limitation of the present research—but
one that is not unique to Twitter data—is the inherent limitation
of computerized text analysis. The analyses here relied on
simple word counts, and cannot account for complex features
of language such irony or sarcasm, and are insensitive to context
(e.g., Tweeting about positive things even when unhappy).
People may also negate their use of positive or negative affect
words (e.g., ‘‘not good’’ and ‘‘not bad’’) to convey a valence
opposite to what would be coded by a computer. To address
this possibility, we removed from user’s Twitter time lines all
instances of words in the positive and negative emotion
dictionaries that were preceded by ‘‘no’’ or ‘‘not’’ (see also,
Golder & Macy, 2011). Rerunning the analyses on these data
did not significantly alter the results. Thus, despite some
important limitations of Twitter data, we argue that the benefits
of using computational methods to access large-scale ‘‘realworld’’
data far outweigh the costs, especially when complemented
by more traditional research methods.
Conclusion
Overall, the present research demonstrates a positive relationship
between religion and happiness that can be observed in
subtle differences in language use. This research also sheds
light on some of the underlying reasons for this relationship,
that is, that religious people have stronger social connections
that can promote positive well-being and that atheists engage
in a more analytical thinking style that can diminish
well-being. More broadly, these results reveal the power of
Twitter data as an important research tool. Linguistic markers
of psychological phenomena reliably emerge even in casual
Internet conversations. Twitter data can provide valuable
insight into complex psychological processes and should be
considered a powerful tool for social scientists as people
increasingly live their lives online.
Authors’ Note
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect those of the John Templeton Foundation.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the
research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This publication
was made possible in part from grant support from the John Templeton
Foundation [grant number 29104], awarded to Jesse Preston.
Notes
1. Example Python code can be obtained from the first author upon
request.
2. Running the analyses using the unmodified Linguistic Inquiry and
Word Count (LIWC) 2007 dictionary yields the same pattern of
results. The biggest difference in using the unmodified dictionary
is that, among the Christian followers, religion and positive
emotion are positively correlated, r ¼ .17, p < .001.
3. An interactive visualization of within-dictionary differences for all
LIWC dictionaries of interest is available at the following website
(requires Java to view): http://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/pramlab/
SPPS_ForceGraph/
References
Alexa (2012). Twitter.com site info. Retrieved December 19, 2012,
from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com
Andrews, P. W., & Thomson, J. A. (2009). The bright side of being
blue: Depression as an adaptation for analyzing complex problems.
Psychological Review, 116, 620–654.
Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 29–34.
Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10,
147–151.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston, MA: HoughtonMifflin.
6 Social Psychological and Personality Science 00(0)
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013
Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive
and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
47, 1105–1117.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people.
Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective
well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin,
125, 276–302.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If
religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1278–1290.
Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of
Happiness Studies, 3, 199–215.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
Gervais, W. M. (2011). Finding the faithless: Perceived atheist
prevalence reduces anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 37, 543–556.
Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking
promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496.
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe
in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.
Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary
with work, sleep, and day length across diverse cultures. Science,
333, 1878–1881.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind
individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 14, 140–150.
Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental
health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion, 42, 43–55.
Harris, S. (2008). Letter to a Christian nation. New York, NY: Vintage.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for
observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process
modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/
public/process2012.pdf
Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not great: How religion poisons
everything. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M. (2011). The need to believe:
A neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process.
Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 192–212.
Kahn, J. H., Tobin, R. M., Massey, A. E., & Anderson, J. A. (2007).
Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and
Word Count. The American Journal of Psychology, 120,
263–286.
Koenig, H. G., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Religion and mental health:
Evidence for an association. International Review of Psychiatry,
13, 67–78.
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A.-L.,
Brewer, D., . . . Alstyne, M. V. (2009). Computational social
science. Science, 323, 721–723.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of
frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological
Bulletin, 131, 803–855.
Marx, K. (1843/1970). Critique of Hegel’s ‘‘philosophy of right.’’ In
J. O’Malley (Ed. & Trans.). London, UK: Cambridge University
Press (Original work published 1843, p. 131).
McGrath, R. (2012). Twython 2.5.4. Retrieved December 19, 2012,
from http://pypi.python.org/pypi/twython/
Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people.
American Psychologist, 55, 56–67.
Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth,
R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of
LIWC2007 [Software manual]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net. Retrieved
from www.liwc.net
Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and
language processes in disclosure. Cognition & Emotion, 10,
601–626.
Poloma, M. M., & Pendleton, B. F. (1990). Religious domains and
general well-being. Social Indicators Research, 22, 255–276.
Preston, J. L. (2011). Religion is the opiate of the masses (but science
is the methadone). Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 1, 231–233.
Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2009). Science and God: An automatic
opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 45, 238–241.
Salsman, J. M., Brown, T. L., Brechting, E. H., & Carlson, C. R.
(2005). The link between religion and spirituality and psychological
adjustment: The mediating role of optimism and social support.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 522–535.
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2011). Divine intuition:
Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution.
Retrieved October 14, 2012, fromhttp://ssrn.com/abstract¼2160588
or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological
meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis
methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social
psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological
Bulletin, 103, 193–210.
WIN-Gallup International. (2012). Global index of religiosity and
atheism. Retrieved from http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/
14/file/14.pdf
Author Biographies
Ryan S. Ritter received his BA from the University of Nevada, Reno,
and MA from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. He is
currently a PhD candidate in social psychology at the University of
Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Jesse Lee Preston received her PhD in social psychology from
Harvard University and is now an assistant professor at the University
of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Ivan Hernandez received his BS from the University of Florida and
MA from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. He is
currently a PhD candidate in social psychology at the University of
Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Ritter et al. 7
Downloaded from spp.sagepub.com at UNIV OF ILLINOIS URBANA on June 20, 2013