Posts

Discuss briefly the suitability of the pumped material for the construction of the proposed recreation centre based on your results.

UBGMUQ-15-2 – Soil mechanics
Soil Mechanics Coursework Brief 2019-20
1
Soil Mechanics Coursework (CW) Brief 2019-20 Introduction

This brief provides a detailed breakdown of how to evidence the learning outcomes, guidance on how to present your presentation and the marking criteria. Please take care to read through the whole brief and address each task in your submission. Submission date   There is a 24-hour late period. If you modify your submitted work in this period it will be classed as a late submission. Submission format The submission is via Blackboard, which is accessible from the sidebar on the module Blackboard page. You must ALSO include a completed submission checklist as well as a self-reflection form as an appendix. A version of this is included at the end of this document. It is acceptable to complete the work for each section in a word processor and upload the work as a .doc, .docx or .pdf file. This submission will account for 25% of the soil mechanics final grade and the effort required is estimated around 5-7 hours or less.
UBGMUQ-15-2 – Soil mechanics
Soil Mechanics Coursework Brief 2019-20
2
General assessment guidance

The following guidance has been developed based on previous submissions. It provides advice on general good practice for the presentation of work in both an academic and professional settings and will be used in line with the marking scheme. 1. All equations are to be typed via word equation editor. 2. Equations, figures (including graphs) and tables require numbering and a descriptive caption e.g. “Figure 1: Graph of particle size distribution”. 3. Graphs should include a title, axes’ titles, units and where applicable a legend and annotations. 4. Symbols in all equations/expressions presented must be explained in detail in the main text. 5. All figures and tables must be referred to in the main text, and briefly discussed in the main text, e.g. “Referring to Figure 1 the particle size distribution is that of a uniformly graded soil”. Discussion should not be included in the caption. 6. All numerical results must include units (with the exception of dimensionless values, e.g., specific gravity 𝐺𝑠). 7. Accurate results and clear demonstration of independent thought and application of your understanding. 8. All sources must be cited and reference using the UWE Bristol Harvard Referencing Style. (http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/students/studysupport/studyskills/referencing/uweharvard.aspx)
Marking criteria

There is (1) section in the submission and is marked out of 100. Full marks are awarded for accuracy of results and where there is a clear demonstration of independent thought and application of your understanding, and for adherence to the general assessment guidance.
UBGMUQ-15-2 – Soil mechanics
Soil Mechanics Coursework Brief
Soil as a 3-Phase Material and Soil Classification (100 marks) Dredging is the scooping up of soils from the bottom of the waterways for land reclamation purposes or to keep rivers, canals, basins and channels clear of underwater obstruction. Dredging is also a critical element where marine piling needs to be set in place to enable quick commencement of steelwork and civil engineering construction projects. A dredging project has been proposed by a local council to dredge X(m) long section of a 12m wide canal up to a depth of 1.8m to reclaim land for the construction of a recreation centre. The material pumped out of the canal is described by data obtained from a sieving and compaction test as shown in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively. If the in-situ unit weight of the soil at the bottom of the canal is 22kN/m3 and the soil material is being pumped at a rate of 0.3m3 per minute. Take the specific gravity of the soil grains as 2.7 and X as the last three digits of your student ID (SID) number. Take X = 450m if last 3digits of your SID number is less than 300
Table 1: Data obtained from a sieving test Sieve no. Sieve size(mm) Mass Retained (g) 4 4.75 0 10 2.00 14.8 20 0.85 98 40 0.425 90.1 100 0.15 181.9 200 0.075 108.8 Pan – 6.1
Table 2: Raw data from a Standard Compaction Test (Proctor Test)
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 No. Mass of mould and wet soil 𝑀𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑+𝑀𝑤𝑒𝑡 (𝑔) Mass of wet soil sample and disc 𝑚𝑤𝑒𝑡+𝑚𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐 (𝑔) Mass of dry soil sample and disc 𝑚𝑑𝑟𝑦+𝑚𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐 (𝑔)
UBGMUQ-15-2 – Soil mechanics
Soil Mechanics Coursework Brief
4
1 2785
23.12
22.11 2 3059
25.69
24.25 3 3226
27.88
25.92 4 3283
22.19
20.65 5 3253
28.59
25.92 6 3199
24.75
22.41 Mass of mould 𝑀= 1135 𝑔 Volume of mould 𝑉 = 1000 𝑚𝑙 Soil specific gravity 𝐺𝑠 = 2.70
TASK
1. Plot the particle size distribution (PSD) curve using data from Table 1. [15 marks] 2. Determine the uniformity coefficient and coefficient of gradation. [10 marks]
3. Determine the textural composition of the soil (i.e., the amount of gravel, sand, etc.). [10 marks]
4. Plot the Compaction Curve using data from Table 2 and determine the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content. [20 marks]
5. Determine the volume of soil to be removed (dredged) [5 marks]
6. Determine the operational hours required to complete the dredging activity. [35 marks]
7. Discuss briefly the suitability of the pumped material for the construction of the proposed recreation centre based on your results. [5 marks]
UBGMUQ-15-2 – Soil mechanics
Soil Mechanics Coursework Brief

What did they find? How are their findings significant? Do they align their findings with what they presented in the introduction?

PSY 2230E Adolescent Development ONLINE
Fall 2019
Article Summary Assignment
This assignment meets Course Learning Outcome 3 of 4: Given a prescribed format, students will read and summarize an adolescent development research article.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Requirements: Comprehension, Analysis, Evaluation
APA Standards Addressed:
-Identify principal methods and types of questions that emerge in specific content domains. (APA 1.2b)
-Demonstrate psychology information literacy (APA 2.2)
-Read and summarize general ideas and conclusions from psychological sources accurately. (APA 2.2a)
-Describe research methods used by psychologists including respective advantages and disadvantages. (APA 2.4a)
-Express ideas in written formats that reflect basic psychological concepts and principles. (APA 4.1a)
DO NOT worry about having to “do” what is listed above. By completing this assignment, you will be demonstrating skills in the areas above. This information box is provided simple as a reminder that your work on this assignment does serve a purpose.
Reading a research article can be very challenging for a variety of reasons, particularly as a student. These articles are written by experts for other experts rather than for novices or students. In psychology, our published research articles follow a standard format: abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion.
 The abstract is a very brief summary of the entire project, including the aims and results.
 The introduction sets the stage for the rest of the article and requires a great deal of higher level thinking to develop (analysis and evaluation of individual research articles and synthesis into the new idea or approach taken in the current article). In the introduction, the authors discuss research relevant to their current pursuit and present the prior research in a manner that develops a rationale for their study. This rationale guides everything else that follows. This section is VERY useful to students.
 The methods section describes every detail of the current study, from the participants to any materials used to any decisions about study design (e.g. longitudinal or cross-sectional). This section is most useful for other researchers looking to replicate or extend the findings of the current article.
 The results section contains a lot of statistics. Scientists use statistical manipulation of data to help determine the effects of what they are investigating. Psychology students learn about basic statistics as undergraduates, but research articles often employ statistical measures and processes with which students are unfamiliar. As such, this section is once again largely for other researchers.
 The discussion section presents an interpretation of the results. This section requires evaluation and synthesis as well because the current findings must be examined in light of previous findings and with respect to the rationale set out for the study. This section is also VERY useful to students.
Unfortunately, most students approach reading research articles as they would a textbook chapter, starting at the first page and attempting to read all the way through to the end. The problem with that approach is that students often get lost in the methods and results sections, losing sight of the connections between the introduction and discussion. Even experts don’t read articles this way. Personally, I start with the abstract, of course, but then I often go straight to the discussion to see what they are concluding, particularly if I am familiar with pervious work in the target area. If I am less familiar, I read the introduction before the discussion. Once I am clear on why they conducted the study and what they claim to have found, I go back and read the methods and results.
Fortunately, for this assignment, I’m going to ask you to read an article differently than you might think, and the process I am suggesting will be very useful to you as educators. I am literally giving you permission to skip
the results sections outright when you read research articles as professionals, and the methods sections will be areas that you skim after the fact if you need clarification about the participants, assessment measures, or any other details that can be found in the methods section (but only after you have read the abstract, introduction, and discussion).
The article that you have been assigned is Decreases in Psychological Well-Being Among American Adolescents After 2012 and Links to Screen Time During the Rise of Smartphone Technology (Twenge, Martin, & Campbell, 2018). This article is a multi-study article because it contains two experiments in one paper. So, there is a general introduction, but then each study has a brief introduction to explain the purpose of each study. Each study also has a discussion section, followed by a general discussion section at the end of the paper. The assignment prompt and grading specs reflect this format.
To read the article, you are going to do the following (and take notes for yourself throughout – trust me on this one):
1. Read the title carefully to try to make sense of what you are about to read.
2. Read the abstract VERY carefully (multiple times if you have to) so that you get the gist of what they were after before you try to read the larger sections of the article.
3. Read the introduction so that you can understand the relevant research and how the authors have used it to formulate their rationale for conducting the experiment(s) you will be reading about.
4. Read the introduction and discussion for Study 1.
5. Read the introduction and discussion for Study 2.
6. Read the general discussion to determine what they found and whether their findings were in line with their expectations. You should also be looking for how the authors cycle back to the main points in the introduction to see if they close the loop and discuss how their study fits in with the previous findings that they reviewed in the intro. One last thing to look for is a consideration of the limitations of the study and future directions.
In your summary, you must address the following:
1. What is the purpose of the article, including the specific purposes and rationales of each of the two studies that were conducted? If you need help here, try to determine what questions the authors were trying to answer with their research.
2. What did they find? How are their findings significant? Do they align their findings with what they presented in the introduction? Do they discuss next steps?
3. Reflect upon how/why this article is relevant to you as an educator of adolescents.
Your summary should be typed, double-spaced, and approximately 3-4 pages in length. Writing mechanics do count, so please be mindful of your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Please refer back to the article by citing appropriately (e.g. Twenge et al., 2018) when you do. If you are unsure of when to cite, err on the side of caution (a good rule of thumb is to cite anything that is not common knowledge). Do not use quotes – make sure everything is in your own words. Your work will be graded according to the grading specifications on the next page. You must meet all specs to pass this assignment. If you do not, you will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit for full credit.
Grading Specs General purpose is explained clearly and accurately. Rationale/purpose of each study is explained clearly and accurately. Findings are explained clearly and accurately. Reflection upon application of the article to educator practice is evident and sound. Student statements are supported by evidence from the article. Citations are present when necessary. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Comprehension has been demonstrated reasonably. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Analysis of the reasoning in the article has been demonstrated reasonably. Writing mechanics are sound and errors do not impede reader’s ability to easily comprehend the content.

Are Today’s Business Heroes Challenging Our Ideas about Leadership? What do you think?

Leadership and organizational behavior (MBA)

Fall 2019-2020

Group Project 2 + Presentation (20%)

In an article namely: Are today’s business heroes challenging our ideas about leadership? Published in Harvard Business School website by James Heskett. Heskett has raised the issue of how the leadership style of the three very well-known leaders of high-tech companies: Bill Gates (The principal founder of Microsoft); Steve Jobs (Co-founder, Chairman, and CEO of Apple Inc.); and Jeff Bezos (Founder and CEO of Amazon) challenged our time-honored ideas about great leadership.

Please carefully read the article in the link bellow:

https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/are-todays-business-heroes-challenging-our-ideas-about-leadership

Purpose of the project:

The purpose of these assignments is to research, collect relevant materials from the available books, articles, news and then use it to analyze the critical aspects of the leadership example. Your team needs to: describe the leader’s vision, values, challenges and track record; provide an analysis of their leadership effectiveness and what made them a separate breed of leaders.

Groups required to prepare a written report in approximately 10 to 15 pages in length, excluding a bibliography, references and table of contents. Group are highly encouraged to integrate the learning concepts and course material within their report/presentation. It is advised to discuss each of those three leaders in three separate sections.

You should use Harvard Citation and Referencing Style in your report.  Please check the quick guide on how to use this referencing style at the end of this document.

Marks distribution:

Written Report: 15 Marks

PPTs Presentation: 5 Mark

Report Structure:

  • Cover page
  • Table of content
  • Introduction
  • A critical examination of Bill Gate leadership style
  • A critical examination of Steve Jobs leadership style
  • A critical examination of Jeff Bezos leadership style
  • Answer: Are Today’s Business Heroes Challenging Our Ideas about Leadership? What do you think?
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendices (if any)

After submitting the written report as a hard copy in class on the due date specified, all groups are required to present and lead a class discussion on what they presented regarding the leadership style of those three leaders. The team needs to develop and present an in-depth analysis and recommendations based on course concepts; and lead the class in a discussion of the case. The PPTs presentation is based on a team approach – each team will develop and deliver a 10-15 minute PPT presentation.

An electronic copy of both the written report and the PPTs should be sent to me via email on or before the due dates:

Grading Rubrics for Assessed Elements

Grading Rubric for Course Assignments
Scaled Score: 0/1 2 3 4
Criteria Weight Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard Exceeds Standard
Focus:

demonstration that the team understands the purpose of the assignment and key issues

10% No awareness Shows limited awareness of purpose. Shows awareness of purpose. Purpose is clear.
Format 5%  

Inadequate format

 

Average format

 

Above average format

 

Effective format

Organization: Paragraphs 5% Paragraphs lack clear ideas Some paragraphs have clear ideas, support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak. Most paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with some examples and have transitions. All paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with examples and have smooth transitions.
Depth /scope of content and structure 60% Content is not sound Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific. Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples and specific details.
integration of learned concepts to justify / support observations 15% No evidence of integration for the course concepts Shows limited integration for the course concepts Well-integrated for the course concepts Exceptionally well-integrated for the course concepts
Research/References (if assignment includes a research component) 15% The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to MLA style, nor listed correctly on the Works Cited page. Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in MLA style. Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to MLA style sheet. Sources are exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to MLA style sheet.

 

What are/do you think are the dimensions of organizational structure and how do these relate to the environment?

ORGANIZATION THEORY (MGMT A477)

Please answer ALL questions. You may refer to the textbook and related slides before composing your response to each question. Please restrict each answer within 200 words. You must provide examples to exemplify the quality of your responses. Please type your answers as clearly as possible. You must avoid spelling and grammatical errors. Your answers will be graded based on the originality and clarity of your composition. Lastly, please do not copy directly from textbook, internet or other resources.

ESSAY QUESTIONS (3 X 25 points = 75 points)

  • Modernists see clear boundary between the organization and its environment whereas Symbolic-interpretivists see a more fluid boundary between the organization and its environment.” Please analyze the above statement using appropriate organizational theories (such as structural contingency theory, resource dependence, population ecology, and institutional theory).
  • Taking McDonalds as an example, what are/do you think are the dimensions of organizational structure and how do these relate to the environment? Do you think McDonalds has mainly organic or mechanistic characteristics and are these appropriate? (Hint: This question connects Chapter 3 and 4).
  • From a post-modernist perspective, identify and briefly explain at least three issues that tall organizations encounter in comparison to flat organizations. (Hint: You need to think from management/employee/customer side to identify the issues).

 

How would you operationally define the subcategories for Type of Claim? For example, what counts as a fat type of claim?

Content Analysis Activity

Research Question: What types of health claims are most frequently used on the front of cereal boxes?

Unit of Analysis: claim

Categories for Type of Claim: For each specific brand, you should count the number of each type of health claim on the box and put the total number for each category in the coding sheet. The categories include fat-related, sugar-related, fiber-related, protein-related, and vitamin/mineral-related.

How to Code: One strategy you could use is to start at the top and work your way down the box, one claim at a time. So, find the first health-related claim on the box, determine which category it fits into, and put a one into the correct box. Keep adding in the appropriate categories until you’ve gone through all of the claims. Some claims may not fit into a category. If that’s the case, you just don’t code that claim (although keep it in mind to answer the questions that follow).

Coding Scheme:

Specific Brand (sample text) Type of Claim (unit of analysis) Number of Claims
Frosted Flakes
Fat
Sugar
Fiber
Protein
Vitamin/Mineral
Special K
Fat
Sugar
Fiber
Protein
Vitamin/Mineral
Kix
Fat
Sugar
Fiber
Protein
Vitamin/Mineral

 

Questions:

  1. How might you change the coding scheme? Would you add additional coding categories? Would you create more specific/different subcategories for the existing coding category (Type of Claim) than those that currently exist? Be sure to thoroughly and clear explain your answers as well as include arguments for the changes that you propose.

 

  1. How would you operationally define the subcategories for Type of Claim? For example, what counts as a fat type of claim? What counts as a sugar type of claim? Also, what counts as a claim more generally? Would you stick to only text or would both text and visuals be included in the definition of a claim? Be sure to thoroughly and clearly explain your answers as well as include arguments for the changes that you propose.

Explain the process of writing prescriptions, including strategies to minimize medication errors.

Think about two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your ethically and legally responsible decision-making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose any medication errors.
Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family.
Describe strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario you selected. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state.
Explain two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your decision making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose your error. Be sure to justify your explanation.
Explain the process of writing prescriptions, including strategies to minimize medication errors.
References
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/cfr/1300/1300_01.htm
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugreg/practioners/index.html

Critically evaluate strategies for the eradication of such biases, and for establishing recognition of differences and inclusion within the curriculum.

Item #1 – Equality of Educational Opportunity

Topic:  Discuss the issues surrounding the so-called “feminization of poverty,” and the impact of this process on equality of opportunity for education.

Format: approx. 2100 words

Sources: Number of sources: 10

Please ONLY use academic sources and also refer to course readings:

Gaskell, J. (1993). Feminism and Its Impact on Educational Scholarship in Canada. In L. Stewin & S.             McCann (Eds.), Contemporary educational issues: The Canadian mosaic (2nd ed.) (pp. 145–160).                Toronto: Copp Clark.  https://wcs.lms.athabascau.ca/file.php/241/readings/Gaskell_1993.pdf

Perry, G. (2003). “A concession to circumstances”: Nova Scotia’s “unlimited supply” of women teachers,               1870–1960. Historical studies in education, 15(2): 327–360.       http://historicalstudiesineducation.ca/index.php/edu_hse-rhe/article/view/458/620

Item #2 – Multiculturalism, Culture and Identity in the Classroom

Topic: “A commitment to equity means a commitment to social justice. This includes a commitment to removing established barriers and biases in school policies, programs, and practices so that the intended learning outcomes may be achieved by students of all societal groups, including those that have been traditionally disadvantaged.  (** Ontario Ministry of Education Curriculum Document 1993, cited in Varpalotai, p. 242)

1) Discuss the above statement in relation to traditionally disadvantaged groups within the education system and the “established barriers and biases” that exist for these groups.

2) Critically evaluate strategies for the eradication of such biases, and for establishing recognition of differences and inclusion within the curriculum.

** Varpalotai, A. (1995). Affirmative action for a just and equitable society. In R. Ghosh & D. Ray (Eds.),                 Social change and education in Canada (3d ed.) (pp. 240–253). Toronto: Harcourt Brace.

Format: approx. 2100 words

Sources: Number of sources: 10.

Please ONLY use academic sources and also refer to course readings:

 

Fleras, A., & Elliott, J. (2003). Unequal relations: An introduction to race and ethnic dynamics in Canada (4th ed.). Toronto: Prentice Hall https://wcs.lms.athabascau.ca/file.php/241/readings/Fleras_Ch10.pdf

 

* It can be argued that multiculturalism is more than a policy description.  It could be an ideology used to inform and guide Canadian society. Multiculturalism prescribes a set of ideas and ideals consistent with the principles of cultural pluralism and modeled after the liberal virtues of freedom, tolerance and respect for the individual.

What factors in the organization and community create or contribute to resistance?

Guiding Questions

Planning for Community and Organizational Change

This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Vila Health: Planning for Change assignment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise, an outlining tool, or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assignment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assignment. Do not turn in this document as your assignment submission.

Change Proposal

Draft a change proposal to justify your recommendation for improving the health of the community and establish the change as a priority for the next budget cycle.

Identify the benefits of proposed health care system changes and its implications for a community.

  • What are the direct benefits of your proposed changes?
  • How will improvements in overall health affect the community?
  • What evidence supports your claims?
  • What is the possibility that stakeholders jump to conclusions that are unfounded, given the nature and scope of the change? How would you avoid this risk?

Describe potential barriers to change in an organization or community.

  • Why do people resist change?
  • What factors in the organization and community create or contribute to resistance?
  • What evidence do you have to support your claims?

Develop strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict.

  • What are the drivers of change in organizations and communities?
  • What is your vision for change?
  • What are the expected outcomes and timeline?
  • How will you communicate with stakeholders and overcome resistance?
  • How will you resolve conflict among competing interests?

Develop a strategy for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate the proposed changes to an existing health care system.

  • Who are the key stakeholders in the organization?
  • What influence do they have on your proposal?
  • How will your proposed changes affect the organization?
  • What data and information will you provide to decision makers?

Develop a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system.

  • Be specific and thorough in identifying budgetary requirements.
  • Consider how you can present a compelling argument to the funding authority.

Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

  • Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.
  • Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

  • Integrate relevant and credible evidence from 3–5 peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications.
  • Is your supporting evidence clear and explicit?
    • How or why does particular evidence support a claim?
    • Will your reader see the connection?
  • Did you summarize, paraphrase, and quote your sources appropriately?

Submission Reminders

  • Have you identified the benefits of proposed health care system changes and the implications for the community? Have you provided supporting evidence?
  • Have you described potential barriers to change in the organization or community and provided supporting evidence?
  • Have you developed sound strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict?
  • Is your plan for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate proposed changes to the existing health care system complete?
  • Is your proposal well-supported by 3–5 sources of relevant and credible evidence?
  • Is your proposal properly formatted and 3–5 pages in length, not including the title page and references page?
  • Did you proofread your writing?

What statistical test should be used to analyze these data?

1.

   

A college student is interested whether there is a difference between male and female students in the amount of time spending working out each week. The student gathers information from a random sample of male and female students on her campus. Amount of time spend working out is normally distributed. The data appear below.

Males Females
7 5
5 9
9 8
10 3
6 10
2 5
4 9
  1. a) What statistical test should be used to analyze these data?
    b) Identify Ho and Ha for this study.
    c) Conduct the appropriate analysis.
    d) Should Ho be rejected? What should the researcher conclude?
    e) If significant compute the effect size and interpret this.
 

 

 

2.

A student is interested in whether students who study with others devote as much attention to their studies as do students who study alone. He believes those who study alone devote more attention to their studies. He randomly assigns participants to either group or individual study conditions and has them read and study the same passage of information for the same amount of time. Participants are then given the same 10-item test on the material. Their scores appear below. Scores on the test represent interval/ratio data and are normally distributed.

Group Alone
6 10
5 9
6 7
5 7
6 6
6 6
7 8
8 6
5 9

 

  1. a) What statistical test should be used to analyze these data?
    b) Identify H0 and Ha for this study.
    c) Conduct the appropriate analysis.
    d) Should H0 be rejected? What should the researcher conclude?
    e) If significant, compute the effect size and interpret this.
 

 

 

 

3.

A researcher believes exercise reduces anxiety in women. She identifies a group of women who had not exercised before but are now planning to begin exercising. She gives them a 50-item anxiety inventory before they begin exercising and administers it again after 6 months of exercising. The anxiety inventory is measured on an interval scale and higher numbers indicate higher anxiety. In addition, scores on the inventory are normally distributed. The scores appear below.

Before After
46 44
41 40
42 39
47 46
43 42
45 43
  1. a) What statistical test should be used to analyze these data?
    b) Identify Ho and Ha for this study.
    c) Conduct the appropriate analysis.
    d) Should Ho be rejected? What should the researcher conclude?
    e) If significant, compute the effect size and interpret this.
 

 

 

4.

A researcher is interested in comparing the self-esteem of students who volunteer for community service versus those who do not. The researcher assumes that those who complete community service will have higher self-esteem scores. Self-esteem scores tend to be skewed (not normally distributed). The self-esteem scores appear below. Higher scores indicate higher self-esteem levels.

No Community
Service
Community Service
33 41
41 48
54 61
13 72
22 83
26 55
  1. a) What statistical test should be used to analyze these data?
    b) Identify H0 and Ha for this study.
    c) Conduct the appropriate analysis.
    d) Should H0 be rejected? What should the researcher conclude?
 

 

 

 

5.

You noticed in a training class that it appears that more men tend to sit near the door and more women opposite the door. In order to determine whether this difference is significant, you collect data on the seating preferences for the students in your class. The data appears below:

  Males Females
Near the Door 25 14
Opposite
the Door
12 20
  1. a) What is the statistical test that should be used to analyze these data?
    b) Identify Ho and Ha for this study.
    c) Conduct the appropriate analysis.
    d) Should Ho be rejected? What should the researcher conclude?

 

hat type of strain or challenges does storing all of this data for processing pose to the organization. What are some of the solutions?

Mid Semester Paper Instructions:

Within 5-7 pages, please give your thoughts on the “Clinical Information & Health Information Exchange: Two Technologies Come Together at the Moment of Need” article.  Regardless of your position, please use research and data to support your thoughts on the topic.  Please incorporate different research topics and information we have covered in class to date. Conclude with what your suggestion for how these technologies will play out over the years to come. Please support your research, data, and decisions. Consider things such as where the industry is today, security, interoperability issues, and lack of standards.  The following questions must be answered in your paper:

  1. What type of strain or challenges does storing all of this data for processing pose to the organization. What are some of the solutions?
  2. We’ve talked about the explosion of HIS pertaining to healthcare. How has the HITECH Act and The Accountable Care Act contributed to this explosion?
  3. What are the potential positive impacts of clinical analytics on value based healthcare delivery?
  4. What are the barriers to successful implementation of the Health Information Exchange? How do we overcome them?
  5. What challenges does interoperability of systems pose on information sharing?
  6. In your own words, tell me about the outlook of these two technologies over the next three to five years.