Posts

How do each of the tools work? How are they different from each other? Why do you believe that these two tools are the best choice to stop network, DOS, and/or Windows attacks? Provide a rationale.

Cybercrime Tools

As a cybercrime professional you have many tools in your arsenal to stop network, DOS and/or Windows attacks.

Read the article, 21 Best Free Digital Forensic Investigation Tools, which briefly describes many of the tools.

Select two forensic investigator tools from the list below:

Autopsy.
Magnet Encrypted Disk Detector.
Wireshark.
Magnet RAM Capture.
Network Miner.
NMAP.
RAM Capturer.
FAW Forensics Acquisition of Websites (This is a tool to acquire Web pages for forensic investigation).
HashMyFiles.
CrowdResponse.
ExifTool.
SIFT.
Browser History Capturer and Browser History viewer by Foxton.
Sleuth Kit.
CAINE.
Volatility Framework.
Paladin Forensic Suite.
FTK Imager.
Bulk_Extractor.
LastActivityView.
FireEye RedLine.

Describe the tools you have selected:
How do each of the tools work?
How are they different from each other?
Why do you believe that these two tools are the best choice to stop network, DOS, and/or Windows attacks? Provide a rationale.
Describe an event or instance when one of these tools is the superior counter measure.

Describe how other scholars have gone about studying the same or similar research question. What worked well, what did not work well? Clearly identify and describe the concrete, specific ways in which the project contributes to theory.

Research Proposal

INSTRUCTIONS

• The paper must be 15 pages in length, which does not include the cover page or reference page.

• Students must describe their research question in one sentence. Students must describe dependent variable in one sentence. Both the research question and the dependent variable must be on page one of the proposal.

• Students must identify and briefly describe their research objectives

• Paper must offer brief lit review on previous work done to investigate the same or similar research question/RQ. This lit review must:

  • Describe how other scholars have gone about studying the same or similar research question. What worked well, what did not work well?
  • Clearly identify and describe the concrete, specific ways in which the project contributes to theory.

This component should include both a formal explanation and a substantive explanation. In other words, how do methodologists describe the type(s) of theory contribution(s) you make? And what “gap” in existing theory within your sub-field do you aim to fill?

  • Hypothesis(es) should be derived from lit review

• Paper must describe research design choices, including but not limited to:

  • Operationalization/measurement of major variables (Both DV and IVs)
  • List of possible observable implications (esp. for DV)
  • Possible data sources/cases
  • Description of techniques/methods used to carry out data collection and analysis
  • Discuss case selection, if applicable to project

• Using course readings and additional seminal works on research design and methods, paper must justify research design choices and convince readers their research design enables them to meet their research objectives

  • This will entail an explanation of how the nature of the data informed selection of appropriate methodology
  • Students must discuss the ways in which the research design is constructed to avoid common research design pitfalls
  • Students must identify the strengths and weaknesses of their research design
  • Students must offer concrete solutions for minimizing weaknesses

• After thoroughly explaining and justifying research design choices, doctoral students must describe how their work contributes toward the evaluation and/or building of public policies.
o Students should ground this explanation in the principles/methods for policy analysis studies and discussed in the course.

• Paper must include at least 20 references, in addition to the course readings, and must demonstrate integration of biblical principles.

• The paper must be written in proper Turabian format.

• Submit the assignment as a word document.

Summarize Kaba’s argument, evaluate her argument, and respond to her main point(s). Provide details, examples, and evidence to substantiate your points. Write in academic language and adopt a tone appropriate for scholarly discourse.

Yes We Mean Literally Abolish the Police

COMPOSE a summary and response to “Yes We Mean Literally Abolish the Police.”

1. Summarize Kaba’s argument, evaluate her argument, and respond to her main point(s).

2. Provide details, examples, and evidence to substantiate your points.

3. Write in academic language and adopt a tone appropriate for scholarly discourse.

4. Use transitions within paragraphs, between main points, and at the beginning and end of your essay.

Look for pathos in the speech. Identify using quotes from the speech. What are the specialized topoi to lead the audience into feeling? Look for ethos in the speech. Identify using quotes from the speech. How does the speaker create credibility?

Answer questions 1 & 2 from this article

https://speakola.com/political/jon-stewart-9-11-benefits-first-responders-2019

1.) Look for pathos in the speech. Identify using quotes from the speech.
•What are the specialized topoi to lead the audience into feeling?

2.) Look for ethos in the speech. Identify using quotes from the speech.
•How does the speaker create credibility?

Critically evaluate the challenges and opportunities for Tesco in securing supply chains in its international expansion strategy. Consider Tesco’s firm-specific advantages in managing its supply chains for competitive advantage.

International business strategy

This is the Task for thr Assignment:
Task 1 : Given the context of Tesco’s main activities, what are the main issues prevalent in influencing its future internationalisation agenda? In your response, consider the issues for both the firm and the grocery retail sector in which it operates.

Task 2 : After announcing its entry to the US market in 2006, Tesco failed to sustain its presence in the USA and retreated iin 2013. Critically evaluate the extent to which this was due to company firm-specific advantages and/or the lack of location advantages in the USA.

Task 3 : Identify: the geographic (country) targets; their historical sequence; and entry modes for Tesco’s international expansion to date. To what extent do these conform to established theory and thinking on patterns of international expansion?

Task 4 : Critically evaluate the challenges and opportunities for Tesco in securing supply chains in its international expansion strategy. Consider Tesco’s firm-specific advantages in managing its supply chains for competitive advantage.

How does implementation of Advanced clinical practitioner role impact patient care and efficiency in Ambulatory Emergency Care.

Advanced clinical practitioner role

How does implementation of Advanced clinical practitioner role impact patient care and efficiency in Ambulatory Emergency Care.

What are some of the organization’s dominant values, norms, rituals, beliefs, language and ideology? How do these cultural elements listed in the previous question reveal the shared meanings and understandings that contextualize organizational life?

Organization’s culture

Select an organization and analyze its culture (using concepts from Chapter 16). The organization could be one where you have worked, or where you currently work. Or, it could be an organization that you are familiar with. You could do some research to familiarize yourself with an organization, if needed.

The objective of this assignment is to focus on this organization and describe its culture and the impact of its culture on its performance, its ability to change, and its promotion of a functional or dysfunctional work environment. After picking your organization, use the following questions as a springboard for analyzing its culture.

What are some of the organization’s dominant values, norms, rituals, beliefs, language and ideology?
How do these cultural elements listed in the previous question reveal the shared meanings and understandings that contextualize organizational life?
Where do these shared meanings come from? Charismatic founder? The organization’s origin or early history?
Are their competing subcultures within the organization?
Does the dominant culture impede or facilitate organizational change?
To what extent have recent or current leaders shaped the organization’s culture?
Why would a new employee in this organization fail if he or she did not understand the organization’s culture?

You are part of a team investigating patterns of aggressive behavior among wild chimpanzees in Tanzania. You notice that two members of your team, George and Helen are generating wildly varying types of data. George is observing many more instances of aggressive behaviors among the chimpanzees he is studying than among Helen’s population. Why might George and Helen be getting different results?

Scientific method

Name
The scientific method is a process for empirically testing potential answers to questions about natural phenomena in ways that may be repeated and verified. The answers that result from the testing are added to the body of knowledge we have about the natural universe. Scientific explanations are always subject to being revised and updated, based on further testing.

Typically, the scientific method consists of the following steps:

1. Observation: Make an observation about something in the natural world.

2. Question: Asking how the phenomenon came to be (why, what, how, etc?)

3. Hypothesis/Prediction: Propose a suggested answer to your question (must be testable) and make a prediction.

4. Experiment: Test the hypothesis by collecting data to corroborate or disprove it.

5. Conclusion: Draw a conclusion based on data collection. Rigorous and exhaustive testing and substantial data collection may eventually result in a theory being formulated.

The Scientific Method in everyday thinking The scientific method sounds abstract, but you don’t have to be a scientist to use it. People constantlyor use it in their everyday lives. Whether you are diagnosing a problem with your car, following a recipe, designing a business plan, you are likely using some form of the scientific method! 1. Think of a situation where you used trial and error to diagnose and solve a problem. In the space below, describe your problem and your process for solving it.

2. How do the steps you took to solve the problem correspond to steps in the scientific method?
Physical Anthropology and Science

 

Scientific Experiment #1. Sam is a bioarchaeologist studying health and disease lived in Peru 2000 years ago. She finds a skeletonoch With abundant t evidence of malnutrition and was incredibly unhealthy and disease-ridden. She concludes from this that the M patterns among the ancient Moche people who e population — ridden.
3. What is a key weakness of this experiment?

Scientific Experiement #2 You are part of a team investigating patterns of aggressive behavior among wild chimpanzees in Tanzania. You notice that two members of your team, George and Helen are generating wildly varying types of data. George is observing many more instances of aggressive behaviors among the chimpanzees he is studying than among Helen’s population.
4. Why might George and Helen be getting different results?

 

Apply the Scientific Method to Physical Anthropology Work in a small group. You will be given a ., er physical anthropology. Discuss and then I 5. Formulate a hypothesis that seeks to wriPap e answer to the following questions: Phenomenon you are investigating (a “provisional’ answer to the question above).
6. Describe the type or types of data you would collect to test this hypothesis.

7. What results of your data would support your hypothesis?

A common visualization of a scientific experiment involves a scientist in a white coat mixing chemicals or injecting lab rats. In reality, science takes place in a wide variety of settings. Scientific research in physical anthropology can involve numerous types of data collection, including fossils, DNA, primate behavior, CT scans, blood pressure readings, etc. While some physical anthropological research such as DNA analysis or bone measurement can be done in the lab, many types of data can only be collected in field settings.

Scientific experiments conducted in laboratory settings have many advantages. In the laboratory, variables in an experiment can be manipulated and conditions more precisely controlled. It is also much easier to repeat and replicate experiments in a lab setting than in the field.
In contrast, conditions in field research can be extremely variable and hard to control for. For example, wild primates may be too elusive for primatologists to observe. In paleoanthropology, fossils and human bones are difficult to locate, and skeletal remains are often poorly preserved. Human biology research on living people requires their cooperation and goodwill; populations also frequently move.

Of course, research on humans is also governed by strict ethical and legal standards.

Critically evaluate pedagogical approaches in relevant subjects/areas of learning, analyse theoretical perspectives which inform classroom practices.

Foundation assignment

Critically evaluate pedagogical approaches in relevant subjects/areas of learning, analyse theoretical perspectives which inform classroom practices.

Define and describe how self-insured companies determine risk adjustment? How do they distribute the risk? How is care for treatment reimbursed?

Self-insured companies

Define and describe how self-insured companies determine risk adjustment? How do they distribute the risk? How is care for treatment reimbursed?