For this course, you are required to submit a 10-page critique and personal reflection on the textbook Why Evolution Is True. This draft is worth 3% of you grade. The final draft of this assignment is worth 23% of your grade and APA style is require
Your new client is familiar with the Food Pyramid, the previous graphic representation of the Dietary Guidelines, but unfamiliar with the current MyPlate tool. Describe the differences between the two tools, and why the switch was made.
Important: Double Space the Essay!
Recent polls found an amazing fact: 30 percent of Americans view public space as a more attractive place than their own homes. These people are no longer concerned with the size of their homes since they are more interested in interaction with the public rather than enjoyment of their private space.
Today, after suffering from the pandemic, we yearn for the opportunity to freely experience public space again despite negative experiences in the past. Now that we are finally “free”, will it be the same or will our current experiences change the way we interact with the outside?
Do you view public space as friendly or hostile? Consider whether your personal experiences and the fact that we are still suffering from the consequences of the pandemic might affect your or other people’s general attitudes.
Support your points with clear examples from personal experience and from Staples’s “Black Men and Public Space.”
Be warned that this is not a “discrimination” essay. It is more of an essay where you provide examples of human encounters with public space.
Directions:
Length of the final draft should be three and a half to four pages.
This does not include one page, single spaced Outline and Works Cited page.
First draft can be 1-2 pages long.
In your thesis, express clear opinion supported by one strong reason.
In your introduction, summarize Staples’s essay “Black Men and Public Space.”
Incorporate 2-3 quotations and 1-2 paraphrases from the essay.
No other sources are allowed!
Description of personal experience is allowed.
To start, follow these steps:
Use a pre-writing strategy of your choice: free-write, brainstorm, cluster, etc. (handwrite or type). You can send it as a screenshot (not mandatory).
Next, type a formal sentence outline; exclude introduction and conclusion.
Finally, type your first draft (upload it for peer revision). Your first draft can be shorter than the final draft. You must have an outline as the first page, but Works Cited page is not mandatory.
Arrange the submission in the following order:
First: outline
Second: first draft (any length)
Third: Works Cited (Optional)
Peer editors:
You will receive 2 drafts om Monday morning–please peer edit them within 2-3 days. Let me know if you do not receive anything ASAP.
Evaluate the following:
1. Does the essay respond to the question asked by the essay assignment?
2. Evaluate the author’s thesis. How can it be improved?
3. Evaluate body paragraphs. Are the topic sentences clear? Do we need to add more support? Are they well developed, coherent, and unified?
4. Evaluate the conclusion. Is it well developed? Was the thesis restated?
5. Any other suggestions to improve the paper?
4 Research methodology and selection of the case public consultations
The case study in section 5 covers various stages of legislative drafting process of the IDLR ranging from 2009 until 2018. The Finnish legislative drafting processes can be outlined in nine stages (Finlex 2019):
1. Initiative
2. Preliminary preparation
3. Regulatory drafting (official duties)
4. Consultation
5. Continued drafting
6. Review by the Government
7. Parliamentary review (including consultation in the parliamentary committees)
8. Enactment Act published in the Statute Book
9. Enforcement and monitoring
Answer specifically these questions:
1. Which stakeholder groups were involved?
2. Were the stakeholders for or against the suggestions?
3. What amendments did they request? E.g., did they request more/less effective tax avoidance legislation?
4. How did different stakeholder groups respond to the consultations? How did their background and interests appear in their views?
5. Whose comments were taken into account if the consultation influenced the corresponding rule?
Copy and paste the URL above and it will lay out how the paper should look and be.
It should have speaker notes and in-text citation.
It is only a short paper presentation that must have references and please do not highlight any portion of the presentation.
Introduction – Describe the case, information on the stakeholders, the bioethical issue, and the time frame of the incident.
Bioethical Analysis – Analyze the bioethical issue for the role end-of-life issues played in the case. Use proper terminology. Support your paper with secondary research.
Conclusion – Describe how the bioethical issue influenced the decisions of healthcare professional involved in the case. Use specific examples.
Write a Paper Answering the Following Questions. Please keep in mind that the paper is not to be a critique of either series, whether you thought it told the story from one or a lopsided position, or even if you think the accused committed the crime(s) or not. The paper is for you to explore and discuss the unethical actions/decision-making highlighted in the series.
This Extra Credit assignment can earn up to 10 points to your final course score. Your papers will be awarded points based on the quality of your critical thinking about the series and your ability to convey these thoughts and effectively relate them to components of the course material. Grammar and formatting will also count too.
Questions:
1. Discuss at least 3 generally held beliefs about our criminal justice system that the series addresses (eg. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty). What are these beliefs? And how does the series, be specific with scene(s) information, support or contradict these beliefs?
2. Discuss at least 3 examples of unethical actions/decision-making (but not illegal), and why it is unethical, committed by Law Enforcement in the series. Provide the episode number and a short description of the scene.
3. Discuss at least 3 examples of unethical actions/decision-making (but not illegal), and why it is unethical, committed by the Courts (Judge; Jurors; Defense; Prosecution) in the series. Provide the episode number and a short description of the scene.
4. Discuss at least 3 examples of illegal actions, and why it is illegal, committed by Law Enforcement and the Courts in the series. Provide the episode number and a short description of the scene.
5. Discuss the role the media played (positive or negative) in these cases? How did the media frame the cases? Provide episode numbers and short descriptions of scenes to illustrate your answer.
6. Discuss at least 3 examples of bias in the criminal justice system portrayed in the series. Why is it bias (on what grounds does it make it bias)? Provide the episode number and a short description of the scene.
7. Discuss the 1 action/decision that in your mind was the most unethical—even outlandish—taken in the cases described in the series. Why is this action/decision the one that you think is the most ‘out of line’ ethically? Provide the episode number and a short description of the scene.
-What sociological causes and explanations have been linked to this problem? Keep in mind the various theoretical perspectives.
-What social factors (structural, cultural, interactional, political, etc.) contribute to the existence of the problem?
-What do sociologists or other experts believe may be potential solutions to this problem?
7.1 Will plan, design, develop, and construct a non-profit, human service organization based on a specific social need you identified in your community. You will be expected to use foundation macro practice concepts and principles previously covered during the semester in the planning, development, and construction of the social service organization. You will use the 10-step model for developing/creating social service organizations covered in class. 2-3 pages
7.3 This reflection paper is designed to reflect your thinking process of what you described/wrote on the assignment (the interview questions/answers that were done with a community planner). Answer the following questions. Submit 2 pages reflection paper.
Text
The Practice of Macro Social Work, William G. Brueggmann, 4th ed.,
ISBN-13: 978-0-495-60228-6
How can you justify the need for the new organization? What will work?
What will not work?
How can you overcome this?
What would you do differently?
What would you do to implement improvements?
And last: what did you learn from writing the assignment, communicate with your instructor about how this experience and readings, helped shape your understanding of class-related material. Any personal experiences that connect with the subject matter.
Create an essay based on the hero’s story Joseph Campbell’s idea about a hero and the stages they go through. The movie chosen was Finding Nemo, and the doc given was the stages needed for the essay. Do not plagiarize other essays
Think of something that is currently classified as illegal in the United States. Now, consider what would happen if that was no longer illegal. What are the possible consequences? Be creative and don’t take the easy way out. For example, marijuana is not the best example here as many states are taking steps to legalize or decriminalize marijuana usage. Be sure you include research to support your posts. For example, what do other countries do? How does public policy differ? How might it impact institutions in society: law enforcement, prisons, education, communities, the environment, etc. Your paper should address how this change might impact individuals based on their race, class, and/or gender.
Parameters
Include at least two concepts from your textbook
Include at least two outside sources
500-800 words
Utilize APA format
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.