Posts

Analyse the digital marketing and present the screenshots to justify the points made. While analysing the organisations digital media platforms if you come across to another useful element please use that screenshot as well.

/in /by

Spyder Active Sports Digital Marketing Audit

– Assignment brief and details are uploaded (includes page numbers from lecture notes)

– Assignment related lecture notes including points to use in the coursework are uploaded (use core concepts and terminology from these notes)

– Fill in the digital marketing audit template – uploaded

– Fill in the customer journey map template – uploaded

– Use the screenshots to analyse throughout the report (you can find the screenshots uploaded)—> This assignment needs justification through screenshots you don’t have to use all of them cause there are 26 but use the relevant ones as indicated in the lecture notes and assignment brief. Analyse the digital marketing and present the screenshots to justify the points made. While analysing the organisations digital media platforms if you come across to another useful element please use that screenshot as well

What are main issues that the client is presenting, and what additional information would you want to find out? What theoretical approach/es would you choose to follow with the client and critically evaluate your choice. How would you evaluate that the approach/es you follow works for the client?

/in /by

Assessed case study – Counseling

Think about your own personal reaction to the assessment. Imagine that you are a counselor who has been given this assessment and try to answer the questions below based on the weekly PowerPoints and reading you have done so far, in order to address the following questions:

Answer the following questions:

1. What are main issues that the client is presenting, and what additional information would you want to find out?

2. What theoretical approach/es would you choose to follow with the client and critically evaluate your choice.

3. How would you evaluate that the approach/es you follow works for the client?

Does the project itemize both requested funds and in-kind contributions? Do the total requested funds not exceed $300,000? Do the requested funds not exceed $100,000 per year? Is the budget understandable and accurate? Does the budget account for personnel and other direct costs? Is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) listed for each personnel in both budget narrative and budget table?

/in /by

XYZ Foundation Request for Proposals

Adapted from http://hvcaa.macrointernational.com/AppGuide.aspx (website currently unavailable)

What is the Mission of the XYZ Foundation (XYZ)?
XYZ’s mission is to improve the quality of life of individuals who have disabilities. XYZ funds projects that 1) operate on a local or regional scale and 2) are delivered by non-profit
organizations. Awarded funds may not be used for political lobbying or organizational fundraising efforts. Projects addressing low vision rehabilitation are especially welcome.

Am I eligible to apply for an XYZ grant?
XYZ awards grants to non-profit organizations working with individuals who have disabilities. The Project Director of the grant must work for the non-profit organization.

How much does XYZ award through its grants?
XYZ typically funds five projects per year. Requested funds are to be spent across a three-year period, beginning June 1, 2022 through May 31, 2025. XYZ will award up to $300,000 per each three-year project. While a project’s total budget may exceed $300,000 per three years, annual requested funds should not exceed $100,000. There will be no carry-over funds from one year to another. Grantees must report annually to XYZ on their progress toward goals and expenditures.

How will applications be reviewed and awarded?
Applications will be evaluated according to the following criteria (for 100 total points).
Applicants must use the following headings for the structure of their proposals:

1. Needs: Project Approach and Activities (30 points)
A statement of why your project is needed in your community. Describe in detail the unmet needs in your community and how your organization intends to address them in
a new or innovative way through the grant project. Describe your organization and why it is fit for the grant. Describe your Project Goal and Project Objectives.

Peer Review Criteria for Needs Section:
• What is the name of the organization requesting funds?
• Are the project goals and objectives stated clearly?

• What community or region does this proposal intend to serve?
• What are the unmet needs of the community or region and was this described in detail?
• How is the project new or innovative to the community or region?
• How will the project be sustained once funding ends?
• How does the proposal match up with the mission of the XYZ Foundation?
• Does the project exceed three years?
• Does the proposal include direct quotes from letters of support?

2. Personnel: Project Director and Collaborations (10 points)
A brief description of who will direct the project, including a resume of his/her skills and experience. Please list the names and contacts of community groups collaborating with you on the project. Provide a detailed description of the unique role and contributions of these collaborators on your project. The number of collaborations is not limited. Letters of support from your collaborators that specifically outline how you will work together are required.

Peer Review Criteria for Personnel Section:
• Who will direct the project?
• Is there a resume for the project director in Appendices?
• Who are the names and contacts of community collaborators for the project?
• What are the roles of the community collaborators?
• Are there letters of support from the community collaborators?

3. Management Plan (20 points)
A description of your key activities plus timeline of key activities. Assign personnel and deadlines to activities. Activities must be linked to Project Objectives. Project
activities must conclude by May 1, 2025, and a final evaluation report must be submitted to the XYZ Foundation by June 30, 2025.

Peer Review Criteria for Management Plan Section:
• Are the project tasks clear and valid for the project?

• Are personnel assigned to tasks?
• Are deadlines indicated?
• Are there any goals/objectives that are not addressed by the management plan?
• Are there any personnel not assigned to tasks?

4. Project Evaluation (10 points)
A description of your project measurement processes. Describe how you will meet
the objectives listed in the Project Approach and Activities section of your
application. Describe how you will measure the effectiveness of the proposed
strategies, the effectiveness of your collaborations, and the sustainability of your
program once XYZ funds have ended. Describe how you will report the status of your
project to XYZ each year.

Peer Review Criteria for Project Evaluation Section:
• How will the project’s effectiveness and outcomes be measured?
• Are all goals/objectives linked to an evaluation measure?
• How is quality of life being measured?
• How and when will project status be reported to the XYZ Foundation?

5. Budget (20 points)
A detailed, line-item budget and justification of the funding amount requested. Budget expenses must be broken up by Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. You must provide details on
direct and indirect costs and in-kind contributions for this project. Applications that do not have an accurate, complete budget will not be funded.

Peer Review Criteria for Budget Section:
• Does the project itemize both requested funds and in-kind contributions?
• Do the total requested funds not exceed $300,000?
• Do the requested funds not exceed $100,000 per year?
• Is the budget understandable and accurate?
• Does the budget account for personnel and other direct costs?

• Is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) listed for each personnel in both budget narrative and budget table?
• Does the project list indirect costs?
• Does the budget list a percentage for the indirect rate (%)?
• Is the budget accurate
• Is the budget complete?

6. Appendices (10 points)
Include at minimum the following pieces of documentation: resume of the Project Director, at least three letters of support from various stakeholders (consumers, professionals, etc.) supporting your project, and at least one budget table. Include any supplementary documentation that adds to the value of your proposal.

Peer Review Criteria for Appendices Section:
• Is the Project Director’s resume included?
• Are at least three letters of support from collaborators included?
• Is there at least one accurate and complete budget table?
• Is an APA References list included?
• Is supplementary information included?
• Is each appendix cited within the grant narrative?

Does music positively correlate to sports endurance? If yes, are there specific types of music, and what are the degrees of correlation between the type of music listened to while participating in sports activity?

/in /by

Music, Sports, and Endurance

Does music positively correlate to sports endurance? If yes, are there specific types of music, and what are the degrees of correlation between the type of music listened to while participating in sports activity?

Write a reflection on how your philosophy of teaching in ELT has developed through the module.

/in /by

Language Teaching methodology

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

In 6 out of 12 weeks (from week 2-week 7), you will contribute a posting to the Discussion Board, 6 postings in total. These postings could include written posts, voice notes or videoed recordings. Suggestions for postings will be provided with each module. Postings should generally not exceed 300 words or 3 minutes for voice notes or video. Postings may include hyperlinks, images, and references to the literature, using the appropriate referencing conventions.

You will write a reflection (500 words +- 10%) on how your philosophy of teaching in ELT has developed through the module. You will also upload copies of the chosen three postings with the assignment as attachments.

What Are We Trying to Achieve? What Are the Significant External or Internal Challenges, Opportunities, and Issues? Does Our Mission Need to Be Revisited? Who are our customers? – Create a list of primary and supporting customers—volunteers, members, partners, funders, referral sources, employees, and others—both inside and outside the organization who must be satisfied.

/in /by

Manager Interview Paper

Use the company CDK for the company. Interview-based Paper on the five questions referenced in the Ducker (2015) book. A summary of those questions are attached. Interview questions are

1. What Is Our Mission? – Customer Service… – What Are We Trying to Achieve? – What Are the Significant External or Internal Challenges, Opportunities, and Issues? – Does Our Mission Need to Be Revisited?

2. Who are our customers? – Create a list of primary and supporting customers—volunteers, members, partners, funders, referral sources, employees, and others—both inside and outside the organization who must be satisfied. – What value do we provide each of these customers? – Should We Add or Delete Some Customers?

3. What does the customer(s) value? – What are our customers’ long-term aspirations, and what is our capacity and competency to deliver on those aspirations? – How well does your organization provide what each of your customers considers value? – What do our supporting customers consider value?

4. What are our results? – How Do We Define Results for Our Organization? – To What Extent Have We Achieved These Results? – How Well Are We Using Our Resources?

5. What is our plan? – What Have We Learned, and What Do We Recommend? – Where Should We Focus Our Efforts? – What, If Anything, Should We Do Differently? – What Is Our Plan to Achieve Results for the Organization?

 

Explain the diathesis-stress (aka vulnerability- stress) model of psychopathology. In your response, make sure to identify and define all the possible diatheses/vulnerabilities that can contribute to psychopathology (in general).

/in /by

Diathesis-Stress (aka vulnerability- stress) Model of Psychopathology

Explain the diathesis-stress (aka vulnerability- stress) model of psychopathology. In your response, make sure to identify and define all the possible diatheses/vulnerabilities that can contribute to psychopathology (in general). Then, pick one psychological disorder and describe the diathesis-stress model for that disorder. Show full knowledge and mature critical analysis of the readings you selected.All sources need to peer-reviewed and must be retrieved through PsycInfo index and/or through PubMed.Using a few quotes to show support for your ideas is acceptable. Excessive or inappropriate use of quotes is not acceptable.

Write an essay on why meditation apps are so popular. Include examples of popular meditation apps, and go into detail about the various benefits of meditation, specifically guided meditation, and some possible statistics of how popular they’ve become.

/in /by

Religion and Popular Culture: Why are Meditation Apps so Popular?

The essay will be an analysis of “why meditation apps are so popular”. Include examples of popular meditation apps, and go into detail about the various benefits of meditation, specifically guided meditation, and some possible statistics of how popular they’ve become. Include a well-developed thesis.

Minimum five sources, of which three must be peer-reviewed, academic sources, but can have more if the writer desires.

Discuss a case study of a business/industry which has tackled a similar issue. Explain what their problem was. Explain what their solution(s) was. State what you can take from this to create your own solution.

/in /by

Managed Learning

PART C: 4,500 word coursework (60% of the mark for the module) In the report, you are expected to cover the following points:

1. Background: discuss the problem or opportunity for change you have identified.
Patients in deprived area not attending GP appointments

2. Literature review: provide a review of academic theory which discusses potential solutions for your identified problem or opportunity and evaluate them. 1,300 words

3. Case study: Discuss a case study of a business/industry which has tackled a similar issue. 400 words
• Explain what their problem was.
• Explain what their solution(s) was.
• State what you can take from this to create your own solution.

Reducing missed appointments in general practice: evaluation of a quality improvement programme in East London – PubMed (nih.gov)

4. Evaluation: identify the most relevant solutions and critically evaluate their potential application based on the situation you identified in the background. Outline the process of evaluation (e.g. action research, feedback, or similar) 1,000 words

5. Recommendations: Give recommendations which are applicable to your context and perhaps the wider industry, if applicable. 400 words
• How could your solution benefit your company?
• How could they carry it out?
• How could the broader industry (i.e. other companies) benefit from your solution?

6. Skills Development Framework: 400 words
identify 4 skills you have developed throughout the module adopting a reflective process while giving concrete examples of the development. Include relevant sources.

  • Teamwork
  • Leadership
  • Problem solving
  • Planning and organisation

7. Reference list (excluded from the word count)

8. Appendices (excluded from the word count) You must critically research and apply in your coursework relevant academic theory and sources, course concepts and frameworks and industry material. Your work must be fully referenced using the Harvard system.

Paul v Constance [1977] 1 All ER 195 is a leading case relevant to which if the three certainties? Explain the facts, the legal issue at stake and the court’s decision. Critically evaluate the court’s decision in the context of certainty of intention

/in /by

EQUITY AND THE LAW OF TRUSTS

Assessment Task Detail and Instructions:

Word Limit: 2000 words excluding footnotes, bibliography and other items listed in

Reg 6.83 of the ARU Academic Regulations (Links to an external site.).

Written assignments must not exceed the specified maximum number of words. When a written assignment is marked, the excessive use of words beyond the word limit is reflected in the academic judgement of the piece of work which results in a lower mark being awarded for the piece of work (Regs. 6.81-6.82).

Answer 3 questions from the 6 listed below:

1) Paul v Constance [1977] 1 All ER 195 is a leading case relevant to which if the three certainties? Explain the facts, the legal issue at stake and the court’s decision. Critically evaluate the court’s decision in the context of certainty of intention

2) Emily wishes to make the following dispositions from a trust fund constituted from her estate:

Half of the money is to be used to build a new studio at her local gymnastics club.

A quarter is to be used to develop a new alphabet which she hopes will promote a song in everyone’s heart around the world.

The remaining quarter is to be used to look after her dog and to have a mass said for her at her local church.

Would the above gifts be valid as charitable purpose trusts? If not would they be valid as non-charitable purpose trusts? Provide reasons for your answers.

3) Keech v Sandford [1726] EWHC Ch J76 serves as precedent for the idea that fiduciary duties are strict. Explain the Court’s reasoning in light of subsequent case law.

Assess & critically analyse the accuracy of this statement with reference to any relevant law